Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world’s resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 1

Air travel has become highly popular, and this can easily be understood by looking at the number of incoming and outgoing flights at a busy airport. Since air travel saves a great deal of time, most business people today choose it over other modes of transportation. Travelling by air has many advantages, as well as disadvantages. In my opinion, essential air travel should not be restricted, but when air travel becomes a means of luxury, it should be limited.

Firstly, no other mode of transport can take a business person as quickly as air travel can. People, especially affluent business executives, use this mode of travel to reach their destinations quickly. Additionally, for long-distance travel, such as traveling to a distant country, air transportation is a necessity. For instance, traveling from India to the USA is quite impossible by road, sea, or any other vehicle, and in these cases, people have no alternative but to use air travel.

However, nowadays it has become fashionable for people to use air travel even for very short distances. Air transportation systems consume a large portion of the world's fuel reserves and contribute to environmental pollution. Therefore, restrictions should be applied in such cases. For example, if a destination is only 2-4 hours away by road, the idea of traveling by air is pointless and highly extravagant. Governments should impose strict regulations so that aviation companies can differentiate between a genuine business executive and a tourist, allowing business people to use air travel while encouraging tourists to take alternative routes.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 2

The impact of air travel on the environment has been a topic of continuous debate in recent years, following the concern that more and more people refer to it as a convenient means of travel. I feel that restrictions should be imposed on air travel.

The first undeniable factor is that aircraft accounts for a large proportion of air pollution. Planes, either idling or taxiing, contribute a large part to local emissions annually. There are some suggestions that air travel is one of the most suitable modes of transport for long-distance trips. This idea is, however, fallacious. Trains, for instance, can also serve as an optimal alternative, consuming less energy and causing less contamination. So, it is highly recommended that the government imposes restrictions on intra-country travel.

Along with air pollution, aircraft can cause noise pollution. Although it is impossible to precisely measure the actual impact of noise on people’s everyday lives, its ability to increase anxiety and disturbance levels has been confirmed. Especially for those living in the neighbourhood of an airport and around the flight paths, noise problems created by aircraft are a headache.

However, the air is indeed the only fastest means of transport to fly across countries. So, it should be operated in such a way that its strengths can be taken maximum advantage of. For instance, by replacing old engines with cleaner ones, people can mitigate the negative effects caused by flying.

In light of the facts discussed above, substantial consideration should be given to the pollution caused by aircraft. Air travel should be preferred only when there are no other means of transport available.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 3

With the growth in aviation, the majority of people are more likely to travel abroad to spend their leisure time on special occasions. One of the most tangible influences of this phenomenon is the exponential increase of thousands of airlines which provide low-cost carriers, and it is argued as the trigger of environmental catastrophes on a global scale such as air pollution and lack of fossil fuel. As a result, critics claim that air travel should be controlled to preserve the natural ecology. While it is believed that air travel provides more benefits in terms of time consuming and reasonable prices, people also have to consider the negative side of this transportation.

Supporters of the aircraft deliberate that airplanes are by far the fastest mode of transport which connects all parts of the world by hours. Before the invention of aviation, people used ships to travel for trading and travelling in other countries, but it took more than a month to reach a destination. In the 20th century, when airplanes have been invented, many counties choose this means of transport to export food such as vegetables and fruits to places where they are not in season or cannot be grown. For pragmatic instance, New Zealand exports fresh milk and apples to developing countries, Africa and India, using airplanes only around 12 hours. Consequently, some food could be exported faster and would not deteriorate in the worldwide distribution.

In addition, the availability of cheap air travel allows many holidaymakers to visit abroad for vacations over the last decades. According to a survey published in the Times magazine the proportion of travellers who prefer travelling other countries increases to around 70% in 2014, and it goes hand in hand with an increase of annual income of low-cost airlines which is more than 35% compared to previous year. Air travel leads people to get novelty of other challenged vacations.

On the other hand, the detrimental effects of this development are the impact on the environment. Firstly, a study records that there are more than hundreds of international and domestic flights which require more than a thousand liters of fuel every day. As time passes by, the natural environment is absorbed to produce more fuel while there is prevention to limit this activity. In the linear relationship of this condition, burning fossil fuel in terms of oil will add significantly to this problem as just one flight releases large amounts of carbon dioxide and other gases into the environment and damages the ozone layers. It can be concluded that the development of aviation contributes to climate change as the global problem.

In conclusion, the development of air travel in recent years has its own merits and demerits for the environment. In the glance, air travel benefits people to commute between different regions sooner whereas people are blame for environmental influences which are more important issues so that the restriction should be implemented to reduce damages. From my perspective, using air travel for travelling should be controlled, and green taxes should be increased to control low-cost airline companies as a novel solution.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 4

It is irrefutable that air travel causes pollution and uses a lot of fuel, but I disagree that air travel should be restricted. I believe that restricting air travel would solve some problems but would lead to many other problems.

At a time when people all over the world worry about the decreasing level of fossil fuels and global warming, it is right to take action to save the planet Earth. However, to simply discourage flights is not the answer. International tourism has become the backbone of many economies of the world. Many countries are earning from tourism. Many people are employed in this industry. Many businesses, like hotels and leisure centres, are dependent on tourists. So, if we discourage international tourism, it would create new and even worse problems. Many businesses would go broke, and many people would be without jobs.

Air flight also enables intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of cheap air fares makes it possible for people the world over to travel regularly, regardless of the purpose of the trip. Therefore, people have the opportunities to learn from different cultures and have a better understanding of countries they used to be unfamiliar with. This, in turn, enhances cultural communications between countries.

It is true that air travel consumes oil, but other modes of transportation are also causing pollution and using fuel. Discouraging private cars and encouraging people to use public transport could help save the environmental resources in a big way. Therefore, it would be a very unpractical decision to restrict air travel at the cost of people's mobility, or worse, at the cost of the development of the economy. Technology could also be used to produce more environmentally friendly and fuel-efficient engines.

Summing up, instead of restricting air travel, we should develop a more efficient engine that produces more energy output with less fuel and fewer major air pollutants. We should also focus on limiting private vehicles and encouraging public transport.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 5

As a major contributor to carbon emissions, the aviation industry is an appropriate target for environmental legislation. Restricting the number of flights taken each year would reduce not only pollution but the demand for carbon-based fuels. We must be careful though to ensure that any restrictions do not make air travel unaffordable.

A common proposal to restrict air travel is to impose a levy on ticket prices. Higher prices would discourage people from flying; individuals would look for alternative forms of transport or cancel their trips. The money raised could then be used to fund environmental projects. The drawback to this proposal is that it might prevent poorer people from travelling.

Research has shown that most air travel is the result of a small number of travellers making very frequent journeys. Any restrictions that are imposed should take this into account. A flat levy on ticket prices would disproportionately penalise relatively infrequent travellers, so a fairer solution would be to allow travellers to make two tax-free trips a year. Any subsequent flights could be subject to taxes aimed at discouraging air travel.

Advances in technology may make restrictions on air travel unnecessary. In the past ten years the aviation industry has made progress in making planes more fuel efficient. Government subsidies could help continue this trend until aircraft are hybrid vehicles, similar to many of today's road vehicles.

In conclusion, restrictions on air travel are part of the solution to the problem of limited resources and carbon emissions. However, any changes that are made should be fair and accompanied by increased investment in energy technology.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 6

There is a growing belief that restricting air travel is the best solution to preventing the air pollution it contributes to. To begin with, airplanes produce an enormous amount of carbon dioxide, which, according to Greenpeace, is about 13,000 tonnes every year. This leads to even more increases in the temperatures leading to increased global warming.

Air transportation uses a huge amount of the world’s fuel reserve. Air travel should be reduced if it becomes a luxury more than a necessity. If there is an alternative to travelling by road, then there is no need to travel by air, it becomes unnecessary and extravagant.

Planes, either idling or taxiing, contribute annually to the local emission rates. Some people might argue that planes are the only mode of transport for long distances. This is not true as trains are an equally good alternative and consume less energy. They are also much more reasonably priced. Some trains have been said to be even more luxurious than the first-class airplane seats.

Along with the obvious air pollution, airplanes also contribute to noise pollution. Several studies have proven that noise has the ability to increase anxiety levels. People living around the neighborhood of an airport have complained about noise problems as well as headaches caused due to airplanes.

The government should look into this and make sure air travel doesn’t become an unnecessary luxury. Before aviation existed, people used ships to travel long distances. If it isn’t necessary to travel fast like maybe in the case of a businessman, people should consider options. Tourists should be encouraged to look into alternatives to travel instead.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 7

With the growing aviation sector, the majority of the people today prefer to travel abroad through this means. Today air travel has many more uses than just transporting people from point A to B. Many countries. Use this means of transport to export foods like vegetables and fruits to other countries where these might not be grown or aren’t in season.

If there is a delay in transporting food items, they might deteriorate and not taste as they are supposed to. Thus, air travel is considered to be the most efficient.

The availability of cheap flights has encouraged more people to travel abroad to new countries and locations to experience culture and traditions firsthand, in less time than if traveling by train or road. Air travel is the most comfortable and fastest means of transport. They have many facilities which ensure comfort among the passengers when they travel long distances.

Moreover, in modern times and advancements in technology, proper training is conducted. And preventive measures are taken to minimize the damage done to the environment. Fuel consumption reduction and safety of the airplane and passengers are taught. The newer mechanisms in airplanes are invented keeping the state of the environment in mind.

Airplanes offer many discounts on tickets at various times of the year. This means, along with saving time, it has also become a good money saver for long distances.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 8

It is irrefutable that the aviation industry has posed a direct threat to our environment, as it consumes too much fuel and emits an insurmountable amount of air pollutants. However, I disagree that air travel should be restricted, because this would solve some problems yet lead to even more serious ones.

International tourism has become the backbone of many countries in the world. Many countries are earning substantially from this smoke-free industry and the local people are highly dependent on hospitality services like hotels, restaurants and recreational centers. Discouraging air travel may lead to the breakdown of tourism, thus leaving an unbearable loss in a nation’s economy. In addition, air travel acts as a catalyst for intercultural exchanges between countries. The advent of cheap airfare makes it possible for people to travel the world and broaden their minds about the countries that used to be unknown. This, if restricted, could be compared to closing borders and blocking cultural communication.

Air travel is indeed using up oil and causing serious environmental problems, but so are other modes of transport. Therefore, I strongly believe that simply discouraging flights is not the solution to the problem. It is a better idea to narrow down private transport and encourage people to switch over to public ones, including airplanes, to protect Mother nature in the long run.

In conclusion, I reaffirm my conviction that setting limits on air travel is not a judicious decision as its potential merits are likely to be overshadowed by the downsides. Reducing the use of private vehicles, however, is of greater significance.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 9

A few individuals opine that to curb increased air pollution and excessive fuel usage air travel should be limited. I completely disagree with this statement because firstly, it is a more comfortable and fast means of transport and secondly, strict guidelines are followed.

There is no denying this conviction that air travel is the most comfortable and fast means of transport. Air travel offers a wide range of facilities, which are comfortable for people when they need to travel large distances. Moreover, this helps people to reach their destinations at a fast pace, due to which a lot of time is saved. Limited connectivity of airplanes will increase problems for passengers and will add a burden on them. Air travel has helped the world to connect in the best possible way. A recent survey in France depicted that the people prefer air travel as major means of transport in comparison to other means of transport because of comfort and less travel time.

Moreover, in this modern era, due to the advancements in technology, a lot of preventive measures and strict guidelines are followed to minimize the damage done to the environment. Proper training is conducted for pilots to enable them to not only reduce fuel consumption but also maintain the safety of the aircraft. Furthermore, new technologies that are used in aircraft are invented keeping the environment in mind. As a result, a lot of these technologies have contributed to reducing pollution levels. For example, the recent invention of a new type of emitter has drastically reduced pollution done by aircraft.

To summarize, air travel should not be restricted as it is a convenient mode of transport, and the aircraft industry is continuously taking preventive measures to reduce environmental damage.

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will - mẫu 10

With the accelerating pace of lifestyle, traveling by air has become a favorable option for people to move from one place to another. However, some people blame the exhaustion of some natural resources and air pollution on this kind of transportation. This essay aims to outline evidence that supports the opposing position.

Apparently, there is little doubt about the constructive benefits that humankind derives from air travel. Firstly, traveling by plane would be more affordable and time-saving, when it comes to long-haul distance trips. It means that in some cases, traveling by other transportation may cost people a higher expenditure of time as well as money. From another perspective, the possibility remains that other means would consume a greater number of natural resources and release more pollutants into the environment. Therefore, it probably merits one’s attention that whenever humanity still relies on natural resources, the emergence of environmental degradation is inevitable regardless of any transportation that is in vogue.

Moreover, the advent of modern technology has promised a distant future that could make air travel more environmentally friendly. For instance, alternative resources may release air travel from the reliance on natural reserves, which is a contributing factor to the imminent demise of some resources. Besides, technological advances in the aircraft industry have brought profound impacts that lead to savings in fuel. It is, therefore, reasonable to look forward to more contemporary inventions that would allow people to make optimal use of air travel as well as prevent destructive outcomes of this means.

By way of conclusion, I would reaffirm the position that air travel contributes an integral role in modern lifestyles. Therefore, there are compelling reasons to direct spending toward making air travel more eco-friendly rather than imposing constraints on this mode of transportation.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?

• Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.

• One long-distance flight consumes fuel which a car uses in several years’ time, but they cause the same amount of pollution. So, some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights, such as tourist travel, rather than limit the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---