Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting

Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the World Cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country. Discuss both these views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting

Đề bài: Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting events like the World Cup, and that the money would be better spent on other things. However, others think that hosting large sporting events has a clear, positive impact on a country. Discuss both these views and give your opinion

Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting - mẫu 1

There is fierce competition between nations to host major international sports events like the World Cup or Olympics as it is a unique opportunity to boost the national reputation of the host nation. In spite of its undeniable benefits, I believe that the costs are too great and therefore governments should prioritise other key issues to better benefit their citizens.

On the one hand, becoming a host nation for global events such as the World Cup or the Olympics brings a number of economic and infrastructural benefits. During these events, there is an influx of tourists from all over the world who need places to stay, restaurants to eat in and traditional products to purchase. The efforts made to cater to these tourists will remain long after they have gone. The cost of renovating a hotel might pay for itself during the event and then begin turning a large profit in later years. The other main area of development is related to the rapid expansion of quality infrastructure. Nations will be forced to invest in new sports facilities like swimming pools and stadiums as well as make renovations to pre-existing infrastructure like roads and airports. For example, China used the Beijing Olympics as an opportunity to modernise old buildings and roads.

On the other hand, these competitions use up tremendous resources from the host nation for a temporary competition. To ensure the success of these prestigious events, governments must waste a large percentage of the nation’s budget in the years leading up to the competition, oftentimes in the billions of dollars. The newly constructed facilities usually fall into disuse after each tournament. A salient example of this is Brazil as many of the swimming pools and sports facilities that were used in the 2014 Olympics are currently abandoned and becoming decrepit. Meanwhile, there are other pressing issues that have been festering including the need for new schools for underprivileged students and quality healthcare for the elderly population. If the government had prioritised these issues the country would be in a better position and its citizens would have a higher standard of living.

To summarize, due to the exorbitant costs, I am of the belief that the government should not allocate such a large percentage of its financial resources to hosting global events with negligible long-term impact. Instead, these events should be hosted in the same countries year after year so that the new infrastructure pays for itself over time.

Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting - mẫu 2

Today’s global sports events seem to increasingly capture the attention of countries that aspire to take charge of them. Concerning this trend, while some individuals maintain it would positively contribute to the development of a country, others assert that the investments in these events would be squandered eventually. Personally, I agree with the former viewpoint and will address both opinions in the following essay.

On the one hand, there are several rationales behind the belief that investing in major sporting events is wasteful. Firstly, the enormous financial resources demanded in constructing sports, accommodation and transportation facilities to serve the needs of athletes and visitors will likely be exchanged for very few economic gains. In fact, it has taken decades for several cities like Montreal or Los Angeles to pay off all the debts incurred in preparing and organizing the Olympics in the past. Secondly, some infrastructures are prone to abandonment after the end of a sports tournament or event. To illustrate, most of the stadiums erected in Brazil during the 2014 FIFA World Cup have fallen into disuse because they were particularly tailored for the tournament matches only.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that hosting international sports events could create positive impacts on a country. This is because as a host, a nation can appeal to a great number of visitors who desire to thoroughly and directly enjoy the sensational atmosphere of world-class matches. This, in turn, can substantially boost the sales of accommodation and transportation services, contributing to the growth of the national tourism sector. Furthermore, renowned sporting events often showcase elite athletes with inspiring skills and sportsmanship, which can potentially promote more engagement in physical activities among the masses. This motivation is undoubtedly valuable, considering the sedentary lifestyle that is led by many people these days due to the huge workloads or excessive immersion in online social media.

To recapitulate briefly, despite the statement that the organization of major sporting events would have numerous bad effects, it is my firm conviction that it would confer significant benefits as mentioned above for the host country.

Some people think that it is a waste of money for countries to host big sporting - mẫu 3

In contemporary society, the allocation of colossal funds for hosting prominent sporting events, such as the World Cup, has become a pressing issue. The debate over whether these investments are extravagant and should be redirected towards more urgent needs or if they offer substantial advantages is controversial. This essay will shed light on both viewpoints and present my perspective.

On the one hand, many proponents assert that hosting major sporting contests provides undeniable economic and cultural merits, contributing significantly to the host country's prosperity and global standing. Firstly, these investments lead to a significant boost in tourism and revenue, attracting a global audience and resulting in increased tourism, hotel bookings, and local business income. In addition, not only can these events yield cultural and diplomatic benefits, but they also promote national pride and unity as citizens rally behind their athletes. Moreover, cultural exchange can be further facilitated, which, in turn, enables home nations to showcase their culture, history, and traditions to a worldwide audience.

On the other hand, opponents of the aforementioned view claim that the drawbacks of this act should not be overlooked. To illustrate, hosting major athletic events constitutes a considerable expenditure of resources because this movement causes financial problems for the host countries. The budget needed for these events is quite substantial, covering refurbishment of stadiums, transportation infrastructure, and accommodation facilities. Consequently, these exorbitant costs frequently divert massive public funds away from vital sectors, including healthcare and education. For instance, the 2021 Southeast Asian Games in Vietnam necessitated impressive infrastructure outlays, thereby redirecting resources from other essential projects. In light of these considerations, these assets could have been more wisely distributed to tackle immediate domestic concerns.

In conclusion, despite the associated financial challenges, the substantial advantages of hosting large-scale sporting competitions outweigh the disadvantages. Therefore, nations should carefully consider participation to harness the prominent benefits these events bring.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In recent years, tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit. However, some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• More and more people want to buy famous brands of clothes, cars and other items. What are the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

• As a part of education, students should spend a period of time studying and living in a different country to learn its language and culture. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• A few languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?

• A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems can this cause? How might these problems be reduced?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---