Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference in income earnings between the rich and poor. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference - mẫu 1

The disparity in income earnings between the rich and the poor has been a topic of significant debate. Many state that reducing the income gap is the most effective way to ensure a happy society. I agree with this perspective, as narrowing income inequality can lead to improved access to essential services and a more equitable distribution of opportunities.

Firstly, reducing income disparity can foster social cohesion. When the gap between rich and poor is wide, it leads to social stratification, resentment and tension within society. On the other hand, a more balanced income distribution can promote a sense of unity and mutual respect among citizens. For instance, Scandinavian countries, which are known for relatively low levels of inequality, consistently rank high on the World Happiness Report. This suggests that a more equal society can contribute to overall happiness and well-being.

Secondly, the reduction in the income gap can improve access to essential services such as healthcare, education, and housing. When wealth is in the hands of a few people, the majority may struggle to afford necessities. By redistributing income more equitably, governments ensure that all citizens have access to these fundamental services. This, in turn, can lead to healthier, better educated, and more productive populations. For example, public healthcare systems in countries with lower income inequality, such as Germany, provide comprehensive coverage to all citizens, thereby enhancing their quality of life.

In conclusion, reducing the income gap between the rich and the poor is indeed a crucial step towards ensuring a happier society. It promotes social cohesion, improves access to essential services, and provides equitable opportunities for all. By addressing income inequality, governments can create a more just and harmonious society, ultimately leading to greater collective happiness and well-being.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference - mẫu 2

Income disparity is a critical issue resonating across the globe. Many people deem that reducing the earnings difference between the wealthiest and most impoverished is the precondition for building a happy society, and I firmly agree with this notion.

To commence with, happiness seems profoundly influenced by the wealth reference in a society. If most members of society have a similar economic condition, they have better bonds and better understanding. For instance, US states where income disparity is lower have less violence and conflicts while confusion and friction are higher in states where income and social disparity is huge.

Moreover, income disparity undermines the fairness of the equal opportunity mechanism resulting in despair. In other words, income inequality makes it notoriously difficult to promote equality of opportunity. In fact, few privileged people can enter the workforce markedly better prepared than their counterparts. On the other hand, individuals with few assets find it much harder to access the first small steps towards larger opportunities, like a bank loan for starting a new business or paying for advanced education. However, this is not the case of mere envy that causes an unhappy society. It is an objection to income disparity based on the impacts of a few being better off compared to others.

All things considered, it seems reasonable to conclude that income levels should be balanced and fair so as to produce a contented society. Therefore, politicians ought to devise policies to promote a fair distribution of wealth in order to reduce the income gap between the richest and poorest.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference - mẫu 3

The concept of income equality has long been debated as a means to achieve societal happiness. While some argue that minimising the gap between the earnings of the richest and poorest individuals is essential for a harmonious society, I respectfully disagree. In this essay, I will present arguments against this view, highlighting the importance of individual effort, meritocracy, and economic incentives in fostering social progress and overall well-being.

A society that rewards individual effort and provides incentives for success encourages innovation, entrepreneurship, and productivity. When there are significant differences in earnings, individuals are motivated to strive for higher levels of achievement, contributing to economic growth and societal development. For example, in countries with higher income disparities, such as the United States, individuals have the opportunity to accumulate wealth through their hard work and ingenuity, which fuels economic progress and creates job opportunities for others. This dynamic environment not only drives innovation but also fosters a sense of personal fulfilment and satisfaction derived from one’s accomplishments.

A moderate-income gap can serve as an incentive for social mobility, motivating individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds to strive for better opportunities and improve their standard of living. By recognizing and rewarding merit, societies can encourage individuals to acquire the necessary skills and education to uplift themselves and their families. For instance, in countries where there are higher income disparities, such as Singapore, individuals from lower-income backgrounds have access to various government initiatives, scholarships, and grants that enable them to excel academically and pursue higher-paying careers. This not only promotes social mobility but also provides a pathway for the disadvantaged to improve their circumstances and break the cycle of poverty.

In conclusion, emphasizing income equality as the sole measure of societal well-being overlooks the important role of individual motivation, innovation, and social mobility in driving progress. By fostering an environment that rewards individual effort and provides opportunities for advancement, societies can cultivate a sense of purpose, achievement, and overall satisfaction. Therefore, a moderate-income gap, coupled with equal access to opportunities, can contribute to a thriving and fulfilled society.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference - mẫu 4

Happiness is the most desirable part of life. Some people argue that equal income level among rich and poor people will help to create a joyful society due to the fact that this will bring a sense of equality, less competition for luxurious things and social harmony. In this essay, I will contend supporting arguments to this view and provide examples to elaborate its strong need in society.

There is no doubt that the level of earning impact upon the status of society and its happiness. Firstly, income would bring poor people to equal lifestyle of society, and this will create a sense of equality among them. For example, in most of the Asian countries, most of the rich people do not like to invite and talk to the persons who are living in slum condition owing to the fact that they think that this will lower their status. However, if they have the same income and lifestyle then nobody likes to think about others’ background status. Secondly, there will be less competition to buy new luxurious items. For instance, this is a scientific phenomenon that a human likes to buy things by imitating others in society. Equal earnings mean very similar lifestyle and mentality to save money. Hence, they would not have any curiosity and social pressure to buy expensive items. Lastly, all such conditions lead towards social harmony where people give value to family, friends and society than to run around money and higher lifestyle.

However, this is inevitable to avoid that only better earning does not bring happiness. There is also a need to change the thinking of people to pay equal respect and dignity to every culture, belief and human existence. For instance, terrorist and corrupt people of society, who have the chance to have good earning, family, friends and high status in the society, do not value to social bonds and harmony. The only need is to change and divert their mentality rather than just considering income level to bring happiness to society and nation. Not only does this, for most people, earning does not impact on their happiness other than good healthy family, habitat and high attitude. Nevertheless, a happier society could eliminate these factors to a high extent and bring greater value to life, family and society.

To recapitulate, there is no doubt that good and equal income impacts more on happy society than any other factors. The only need is to consider all such conditions to at least enable every member of society to upgrade their status to equality and social harmony.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference - mẫu 5

Class distinctions are an intrinsic element of human relations but many today worry over the drastically widening gap between rich and poor. In my opinion, in order to have a happy society there must be a more equal distribution of income.

The main reason that these economic reforms would make society happier is by diffusing personal frustrations. The less wealthy often feel resentful and insecure about their place in life. This has a number of symptoms ranging from relatively benign unhappiness to deep depression, and takes a collective toll on individuals, families and societies. In the most extreme examples, mass shootings in the United States are invariably undertaken by poor, white males who feel left behind economically. The net impact of lifting people out of poverty would be a boon to everyday families as well as society at large.

Furthermore, if people no longer had to stress and work themselves to the bone to make ends meet, new outlets to contribute more to society would open up. They could volunteer for a charity, if they have an altruistic bent, take up an art, spend more time being a dedicated family member, or even set aside time to try to innovate in their vocation. Small-scale parallels for this exist already in the form of scholarships given to underprivileged students who are then able to get degrees and contribute across a variety of disciplines to making society happier in general.

In conclusion, there is little doubt that in the 21st century income inequality has reached a level that causes extreme unrest among the general population and distributing capital more evenly would remedy this. Countries ought to look closely at recent proposals for a universal basic income.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference - mẫu 6

Economic inequality is so obvious in our world. Some believe that it is better to limit the salaries of the rich, thereby making residents happier. I do not agree with this view as it could have serious consequences for the nation.

To inaugurate with, to improve the standard of living of the economically disadvantaged, the first and foremost step is to ensure free access to education for everyone, regardless of their background. Consequently, they will be able to get a well-paid job. For example, another possible method is to set a minimum wage for each job. In this way, slowly and gradually the disadvantaged will witness their lives prosper and feel fulfilled.

However, if the government introduces a plan to cap the wages of rich people, it could have serious consequences. This is because they may feel dissatisfied, and as a result the worker may migrate to developed countries where he can earn decent money without any restrictions. For example, recently many rich Indian businessmen migrated to various foreign countries where they could get tax benefits like Malta. Because of this, some unintended consequences may affect the financial health of society while attempting to maintain an optimal standard of living for everyone.

To conclude, according to some, in order to minimize economic imbalance in any country, limiting the income of the rich would be a feasible solution. In my opinion, I firmly repeat that this is unlikely to bring any positive result, since it causes discontent among the rich. It is highly recommended that the authority find alternative solutions to this problem.

Many believe that the best way to ensure a happier society is to reduce the difference - mẫu 7

Firstly, one should understand happiness is not a tangible thing to measure because most people define it in different ways. If the case of money is taken into consideration, there is no specific limit of earnings that makes a person happy. To be precise, the rich desire more money to make themselves happier. Similarly, the poor want more money to explore new horizons in their life, for example, a car or their own house. Yet happiness would not stay longer with them as they aim for new desires.

Finding the best way to find happiness in society is really a hectic job. It should be understood that a happy society should meet all the basic needs and is to be updated with the developmental processes as per the technological and scientific advancements. For example, in a society in which smartphones and computers are popular, irrespective of economic status, one can hardly distinguish the happiness level between the rich and the poor.

On the other hand, balancing the earnings of the richest and the poorest is one attempt to make society happy. However, it seems to be hardly practical as one cannot easily re-order a social system, which shaped itself over a thousand years.

To conclude, though the idea of narrowing the gap between the earnings of the richest and the poorest seems to be a good idea to embrace happiness, it hardly happens. Instead, other factors such as satisfying the basic needs of society and updating them with technology seem to be more productive.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Culture is turning similar around the world. What are the reasons? What are the positive and negative aspects?

• It is important for people to take risks, both in their professional lives and their personal lives. Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people say patriotism causes problems and is negative overall. Others feel that it is beneficial for society at large. Do the advantages of patriotism outweigh its disadvantages?

• Tests and examinations are a central feature of school systems in many countries. Do you think the educational benefits of testing outweigh any disadvantages?

• In the past, when students did a university degree, they tended to study in their own country. Nowadays, they have the opportunity to study abroad. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this development?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---