Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers

Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers. Some disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers

Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers - mẫu 1

These days, there is some discussion about whether pop stars should be paid better than classical musicians. Although both views are reasonable, I think it is fair that pop singers earn more money than classical musicians.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why classical musicians should earn better salaries than pop stars. Firstly, because classical music is generally listened to by society's more influential and wealthy classes, classical music composers are put under a lot of pressure. Some spend their entire lives learning to master a particular musical instrument or style of music. In addition, classical music tends to be performed live on stage, and therefore musicians need to give a perfect performance every time, which could be very stressful. Pop stars, however, usually only sing along with music that is played from a recording or can retake a recording when in the studio.

On the other hand, most pop stars need to spend countless hours in the studio every year in order to record new music, followed by many weeks and months touring the world performing and promoting their music to their fans. Although this may sound like an amazing lifestyle to some, many pop stars become exhausted and burnout early in their career or turn to drugs and alcohol in order to cope with the stress. Furthermore, pop stars are generally also expected to act as role models for the youth. This responsibility requires them to monitor their actions and behaviour in order to set positive examples for young people to follow, which can also add to their stress. Lastly, most pop stars have short-lived careers as pop music continues to evolve and new stars replace the old.

In conclusion, while both pop stars and classical musicians both have certain stresses in their careers, I believe that pop stars are more worthy of a higher income because of their duty to be role models, and the uncertainty of their career span.

Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers - mẫu 2

Whether pop stars should earn more money than classical music performers is a topic that has generated considerable debate. Some argue that the fame and commercial success of pop stars justify their higher earnings, while others believe that the skill and dedication required for classical music merit greater financial rewards. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my own viewpoint.

Supporters of higher earnings for pop musicians argue that these stars have significant commercial potential. Pop artists can generate more revenue for record labels than classical musicians due to their wide appeal and marketability. For instance, stars like Taylor Swift and Ed Sheeran have amassed fortunes from their record-breaking performances and vast fan bases. This profitability justifies the higher financial rewards for pop stars.

Conversely, enthusiasts of classical music assert that classical musicians should earn more due to the substantial effort required to master their craft. Classical music demands years of rigorous training and dedication. Moreover, classical musicians contribute significantly to cultural heritage, performing complex pieces that require exceptional skill. For example, a professional violinist must invest countless hours perfecting their technique, often without the same level of financial return as pop stars.

In my opinion, while both perspectives have merit, I believe that the earnings of artists should be determined by the market dynamics. Pop stars’ ability to draw large audiences and generate substantial revenue cannot be overlooked. However, it is also important to support classical musicians who play a crucial role in preserving cultural traditions. Balancing both aspects could ensure a fair distribution of earnings.

In conclusion, although classical musicians deserve recognition for their dedication and cultural contributions, the significant commercial impact of pop stars justifies their higher earnings. Ultimately, the balance between preserving tradition and embracing commercial success is key.

Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers - mẫu 3

The pop-versus-classical debate is one that many music fans are no stranger to. For some, pop stars deserve more financial rewards than their classically trained counterparts do, but others disagree. Before my personal opinion could be delivered, it would be essential to analyze both perspectives in question.

To back the view that pop musicians should earn more, their supporters cite these stars' commercial potential. In layman's terms, pop artists could secure vast amounts of money for the labels than classical performers could. Because of their carefully constructed image and the easy-listening nature of their genre, pop stars captivate their admirers and turn audience figures into profit. Taylor Swift and Ed Sheeran, who are among the most recognizable names in the musical industry, have been able to amass fortunes thanks to their record-shattering performances. With this knowledge, it should not be surprising to see why pop stars deserve to be recognized for their profitability more than musicians from other genres, and not just classical performers, do.

On the other hand, classical music artists should, at least according to their enthusiasts, be the more financially - favored party, owing to the multifaceted effort required to produce one. To embrace their training is taxing on the classical players, not least because they cover the cost of their instruments by themselves. An entry level clarinet, for example, may set its owner back upwards of 500 dollars, which is by no means an insignificant sum, and then a clarinet for professional performances costs several times that amount. Furthermore, classical musicians practically spend their whole careers perfecting their craft, while keeping up performances to make their living, actions that undoubtedly take physical and mental tolls on the artist. This stands in stark contrast to pop stars, who, even past their prime, can still maintain a stream of income thanks to royalty. It could, therefore, be understood that some would prefer classical performers to earn as much if not more than, pop stars.

In my opinion, while either view could be reasonably comprehended, the status quo should be left to the market to decide. Little effort by authorities should be asked to rectify any grievance that may arise, lest such attempt appears ham - handed and indiscriminate.

Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers - mẫu 4

How much joy we receive from a performer is entirely dependent on our personal taste. The more individuals follow a particular performer the more popular that artist will become, therefore it’s only right that pop stars, who sell more music than classical artists should be paid more.

Few can deny the beauty of classical music, for centuries it has lifted our bodies, minds, and souls to near angelic levels, as the composition of these great works of art were made by geniuses. Today we can hear these masterpieces virtually for free, as they’ve been performed and recorded scores of times. Unfortunately, this means that the value of their work is greatly diminished, especially as there are relatively few new works coming out these days. Furthermore, orchestras have many members, which reduces the amount paid to each maestro, so making a living in this way is quite challenging.

In comparison, pop musicians today require relatively few people in their entourage, in fact, many stars have solo careers, which minimizes the dilution of the payouts. More importantly though, is the fact that young people always gravitate to pop music or similar, as that is what their peers listen to and what is promoted most thoroughly by record labels. Pop performers have millions of fans, all buying up every hit release on Spotify, Apple Tunes, or even on vinyl, as well as merchandise and concerts. The royalties from all this add up quickly, allowing these stars to live a life of luxury after just a few years of popularity.

As incredibly talented classical artists are, they just do not compare to today’s hit makers, as the youth are by far the most likely to buy music as it becomes available. Add to this the power of marketing to the pop industry and our amazing classical performers have no chance.

Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers - mẫu 5

Some individuals opine that celebrities performing pop music should be paid higher salary in comparison to those majoring in classical music, while others are not in consummate accord with the aforementioned idea. This essay would delve into discussing the two perspectives as well as stating my support for the former one.

It is reasonable for classical music performers to earn more money due to their huge effort in mastering instruments and traditional values that they preserve. Chief among these is that those who pursue traditional music has spent a plethora of time and attempt to be adept at using instruments and the specific style of each category of classical music. Obviously, traditional music requires not only thorough understanding of its nature but also the talent as well as constant practice to deliver the best piece of music enjoyed by the public. Concerning the second viewpoint, classical music plays a paramount importance in preserving traditional values of a country. It is true that the more money artists performing classical music can earn, the more possible that they would not change jobs. As a result, there are chances that future generations can still enjoy one of some masterpieces in music field.

Nevertheless, I strongly believe that more financial means should be paid for pop celebrities due to their short-term contribution and great attempt in maintaining positive images. With regard to the former, the majority of pop stars have to face the challenge of a short-lived career since the entertainment industry is constantly changing. Consequently, for around one or two decades of contribution, most of those well-known artists would be replaced by other more talent and dynamic ones. Another point is that performers of pop music always trying to set good examples especially when presenting in public. Since they aware of their significant impact on people, particularly teenagers, great effort in creating and maintaining favourable figure has been made by these individuals. Therefore, it is logical that stars performing pop music should earn more money.

In conclusion, although artists of classical music have to make great attempt in mastering their skills and retaining traditional value, I suppose that pop performners should be paid with higher salary due to their contribution in a short period of time and their responsibility maintain positive images.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem, while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Intelligence is the most important quality for a leader. Do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field, as long as they are playing well. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• Some people think that it is a good idea for all employees to wear uniforms at work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people believe that employers should not be concerned about the way their employees dress, but they should be concerned about the quality at work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---