Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 1

There are arguments that individuals should be refrained from doing new things and must stick to traditional methods. However, some people are convinced that individuals need to venture into some noble experiences in life. In my opinion, I would argue that alterations in some activities and practices are essential to achieving progress and success.

Primarily, it can never be denied that some people may become comfortable with the routine practices in life, in which they are more accustomed. Clearly, people will not need to learn new things as they are already more cognizant about the activities that they habitually perform. For instance, in this modern era, the seniority group will find it confusing to read newspapers on an electronic tablet due to the fact that they are not aware of its new features and the proper operation of the gadget. For these reasons, geriatric individuals do not need to learn the settings and the high technology applications as it will take them a long period of time to adapt this product of technology.

However, it can be argued that people’s lives will become more adventurous if they opt to new trends and experiences. As can be expected, progress and success in life are often achieved when a person tries to explore new ideas and practices, which might be beneficial for the improvement of his or her life. To illustrate, a businessman, who have experienced failures in his or her business, will resort to new strategies in order to make the business more firms and highly profitable. This can be done by abandoning the old-fashioned styles and techniques while accepting the modern ways, which could make the people’s lives more favourable. The new idea, a new way of life and changes to the old way of life often bring new opportunities to people and getting adapted to the changes is the primary means of survival and advancement.

In conclusion, there is a heated argument about whether people must remain to the conservative ways of life or resort to modern trends. However, I personally believe that the ideology of success can be reached if people embrace the new-fangled ways of living in the society.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 2

People's attitudes toward change are evolving in response to the needs of modern life. In the past, most people preferred to live their lives in the same way, while only a handful embraced change. However, nowadays, the number of people in the former category has decreased, especially among the younger generation, who actively seek change and expect it to bring enjoyment and improvement.

Firstly, the younger generation today often prioritizes change in various aspects of life. They embrace it, believing it will make their lives more meaningful. Secondly, change creates new opportunities that allow individuals to grow and move forward. For instance, a new job might present challenges that push someone to adapt, acquire new knowledge, or enhance their skills. Thirdly, change can break the monotony of a routine that has become boring and predictable. Finally, as well as making life more enjoyable and interesting, new experiences can positively impact physical and mental health, helping individuals become more experienced and valuable.

On the other hand, older generations often avoid change in many cases because they do not want to adopt a materialistic lifestyle. They believe in dedicating full attention to one thing and following traditional ways of living. By avoiding major changes, they stay within their comfort zones, missing many opportunities that change could bring. They prefer maintaining their daily habits and feel satisfied with their current circumstances. For some, routines provide structure and a sense of security, while others may lack the confidence to face new challenges. They believe that staying secure and preserving the status quo is the safest way to live.

In conclusion, both perspectives have their merits. However, I am convinced that change is unavoidable and essential for those who want to keep pace with the fast-moving modern world. Even if some people maintain stability by following routines, the world continues to evolve, making adaptation necessary.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 3

Many people prefer their daily routine while others always look for change as they believe the change would bring more benefits. In my opinion, I would agree with the latter point of view.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why some people want to stick to their routine. Firstly, they are passionate about what they do every day. For example, street artists in Vietnam love creating colourful artworks in public without any desire for change despite little earnings. Secondly, some people have merely adopted a fear of uncertainty that prevents them from changing their ways of life. If they changed their current jobs, there would be no guarantee that other jobs would bring the same level of satisfaction as the previous one, which explains why they embrace the routine over change.

On the other hand, I would side with those who think that change is better. People would have new exciting experiences. For example, instead of staying at home and watching TV, some people would go on a motorbike trip or do mountain climbing to enjoy the open air. Furthermore, making changes in one’s life is believed to enhance his/her talents. When a person focuses only on what he is doing daily, he would never know his true potential. A song composer would never discover his aptitude for singing if he did not dare to get on stage.

In conclusion, I believe changing one’s lifestyle continuously has a positive impact on his/her life.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 4

There is a certain section of the human diaspora who prefer sticking to one chore or the way of life they are accustomed to, however, another school of thought thinks about transformation and changes to the mode and way of life they are living as. I am inclined towards the latter standpoint.

Changes sometimes could feel slightly overwhelming and an onerous deal to think of for some people. They might consider stabilizing themselves to the boundaries of their comfort zone and might not want to drift to another spectrum or an entirely distinct array. There could be several causes to take into consideration their opinion about this. Conventionally shelled strata might not find it appealing to leave the nest they have fabricated for such a long time and could find it enchanting to stick to their caricatured dynamics. A threat or uncertainty to the economic influx might be another reason to think of. Hopping from one professional domain to another one might not sound safe to some people though they might have a flair for the other domains as well. The threshold of daily survival could be a restrictive chord for them, which prevents them from daring to change, the good or bad decision comes later, but it could be apprehensive to them to go for a new lease.

Coming to the facet of believers of dynamism, there are a noteworthy number of mindsets that think that change is inextricably linked with the reality of the world as nothing is for permanence, to which I correspond too, as well. In a multi-dynamic world that is so volatile and transformational, sticking to one string of routines might not be lucrative in the longer run. From a work-front perspective, it could be very fruitful if one skims through various options culminating in the realization of their knack for an ordeal they would spot in the journey, which they might not even have thought of had they not looked around for their proficiency in the journey of analyzing various spectra of job roles. From the viewpoint of children too, for that matter, it has been reconnoitred that a group of kids who are involved more in recreational activities, prove to be more concentrated, focused and sharper in their life ahead.

All in all, it could be therefore argued that change is not a matter of option, it indeed is a requirement, and if we see it in the vision of introspection, change and modification is an inevitable part of life, and so is the case in every nook of it.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 5

Masses are evolving as per the need of the hour. In the past, a majority of people seemed contented with their ordinary, mundane lives. They didn’t have any issue doing the same task again and again. On the contrary, there were only a few who wanted consistent change. However, in the present era, the tables have turned, and the former category’s proportion has declined substantially. Regardless of age, it has become quite arduous for people to sit at a place to relive the same day again and again. In my opinion, I believe alterations are essential.

Primarily, it cannot be overlooked that some people create their own comfort zones with routine practices, which they get accustomed to. Clearly, people don’t find the need to learn new things as they are fine by being cognizant with the activities they perform habitually. For example, in this digital age, senior citizens will find it difficult to read the latest affairs on an electronic device as they are not familiar with features and how to operate such gadgets seamlessly.

However, it can be argued that people can integrate more adventure into their lives by opting for new experiences and trends. And it is obvious that success and progress can be accomplished when somebody tries exploring newer ideas that could be advantageous for the improvement of life. For instance, suppose there is a businessman who suffered major losses in his professional life. Now, he can resort to new technologies and strategies to build the business from the ground and earn more profit. This can be achieved by abandoning obsolete styles while being keen on accepting modern ways.

In conclusion, there is always a heated argument in regard to whether people should stay conservative in the methods of living a life or resort to modernized ways. However, I believe that the idea of success can be achieved by embracing new techniques and living standards.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 6

The act of pursuing a singular way of life for the better part of one’s life is an endeavour undertaken by many. Such practices were more widespread among our previous generations when the collective knowledge and experience of the human race were marginal. Presently, owing to the availability of countless alternatives, people tend to reform nearly every aspect of their lives regularly. Personally, I prefer the idea of committing to a particular manner of living with adjustments as and when it is needed. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I will delve deeper into the topic and elaborate on both sides of the discussion.

It is a well-known fact that devoting oneself to a particular lifestyle requires the utmost level of discipline. Only a handful of people can remain faithful to a certain direction in life before their minds seek change. However, once individuals have mastered the ability to exercise self-control and follow a set path, they are bound to be rewarded in certain ways. Such a person can sustain themselves with minimal resources and are considered free from the vicious cycle of consumerism.

On the contrary, it is also true that change is the hallmark of progress, and people who avoid it are bound to be left behind. As we move further into the 21st century, humanity is blessed with technological advancements that once belonged in the realms of science fiction. The degree of convenience that human innovation has facilitated is commendable. Today, the number of choices available to consumers is baffling, to say the least. Thus, it is natural for people to take advantage of such facilities and enhance their standards of living to the best of their abilities.

Finally, I would like to conclude by saying that everyone is entitled to their personal preferences, and the selection of a particular way of living is an outcome of individual bias. Nevertheless, it is better to commit to certain habits as the desire for change is never-ending.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 7

In today’s world, change is ubiquitous. While some individuals prefer to stick to their daily routines and avoid change, others embrace it with open arms, seeing it as an opportunity to grow and develop. This essay will discuss both these views and provide my opinion.

On the one hand, some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoid change. They find comfort in familiarity and believe that change can lead to uncertainty and instability. These individuals often have a routine and are content with the predictability of their lives. Moreover, they may fear the unknown and be reluctant to take risks or try new things. In some cases, people may be satisfied with their current situation and see no need for change.

On the other hand, others believe that change is always a good thing. They see it as an opportunity for growth and development. These individuals understand that life is unpredictable, and change is inevitable. Moreover, they recognize that change can provide new experiences, perspectives, and opportunities. People who embrace change are often willing to take risks and try new things. They may be curious and open-minded, willing to explore new ideas and opportunities.

In my opinion, change can be both positive and negative, depending on the circumstances. While it is true that change can bring about new experiences and opportunities, it can also be overwhelming and unsettling. I believe that it is essential to find a balance between stability and change. Having a routine and sticking to it can provide a sense of security and stability, but being open to change can lead to growth and development.

In conclusion, whether to embrace change or stick to a routine is a personal choice. While some people prefer to avoid change and stick to what they know, others see it as an opportunity for growth and development. I believe that it is essential to find a balance between the two, as both stability and change have their advantages and disadvantages. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide what works best for them.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 8

Change has played a significant role in every person's life. While some choose not to welcome such changes, others choose to accept them and move forward. But I believe that changes are inevitable aspects of life, so it's necessary to accept them and move on.

While discussing the positive aspects of change, one needs to mention the instant simplification of life experienced by individuals in the current day and age. Due to the advancement of technology, cashless transactions have been normalized, accessibility to maps has made traveling much easier and faster, and electric vehicles have suppressed the elevation of pollution. Today, people are experiencing a much evolved and hasslefree life due to a series of prominent reforms. Not to mention, there has been a significant upliftment in our social life due to such evolutions in society.

Regardless of the benefits, some people focus on the drawbacks of such social and technical refactorings and cling to their old beliefs and patterns. Sure, some challenges accompany changes and hamper our natural flow of life. To illustrate, if a person who is used to working at night is suddenly asked to work early in the morning, and someone who is a morning person is urged to work late at night, their productivity and zest will be completely hampered. Some could also argue that the cons of technical innovations are higher than the pros. For example, technological evolution has given rise to advanced hacking systems, internet fraud, digital security breaches, and privacy threats. Social advancement is slowly eroding our cultural heritage along with it.

To conclude, in my opinion, change has its fair share of benefits and shortcomings, where its positives outweigh its negatives. People should embrace them gradually while proceeding with innovation and mindfully avoiding its harm.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 9

Over the past few decades, change, be it social, scientific, or technological, has been a key factor in the lives of every individual. Some people refrain from revamping their lives and try to anchor their old patterns and beliefs, whereas others decide to embrace them. Nevertheless, I feel like alterations are inescapable facts of life, thus it is imperative to adapt to them and proceed forward.

Speaking of the welcoming social reforms that most individuals have well accepted, one cannot simply ignore that today's society imparts equal rights to everyone irrespective of their caste, creed, or gender. Not to mention lifestyle modifications through technological advancements have made our lives easy, seamless, and accessible. A few instances of such technical evolution are online banking which has unloaded the burden of physical financing, advanced GPS tracking systems like maps that have made traveling effortlessly easy, and electronic vehicles along with solar power, which have helped our earth to get healthier. Even in disastrous situations like the COVID-19 pandemic, people went through a lot of refreshing transitions in their life schema like remote working culture, hygienic habits, and digitized education, to name a few.

On the other hand, realignment, in any form, requires a lot of adjustments and acclimatizations. Hence, certain folks refrain from such progress and prefer to follow their old patterns of life since they disfavor such mutations due to their negative impacts. Without a doubt, innovations have their fair share of alarming drawbacks. For instance, online bank transactions have increased the level of fraud and hacking, data security is at high risk, and electronic devices are the primary cause of digital eye strain and addiction syndrome. Moreover, our cultural heritage and legacy are on the brink of extinction due to several social reforms.

To summarise, it is evident that the benefits of change are greater than its harms and the problems can be overcome by the use of these changes in moderation and proper balance. Hence, my opinion is to accept the change with open arms while being aware of its shortcomings to avoid them. 

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 10

Change is the law of nature, and adaptation to those changes is necessary. Few people tend to follow their routine life avoiding any change; however, others prefer to live a versatile life. I prefer to have a life with variations. This essay shall delve into both prospects of people’s lives.

People prefer a comfortable life and do not want to have changes, which may disturb their routine life. In other words, they do not want to take the risk and keep their life going as it is. This, however, impacts people’s growth potential and will limit their learning. Also, this approach will make people less adaptable to any unforeseen situation in life. This, in general, makes sluggish people impact on their health as well and makes them weak comparatively.

On the other hand, some people prefer to have a variety in life. These types of people are energetic and cannot follow the same routine of their life always. This is the inherent behaviour that enables them to take more risks. These people have a higher probability of growth and learning because of their risk-taking capability. Their adaptability to any type of natural change is also excellent. These types of people are always on edge, which makes them healthy and strong.

To conclude, today’s era is very dynamic, where situations are changing more rapidly, and one shall be ready to accept those changes. I am a person who loves to have changes in life at a regular interval. This keeps me in attention at all times.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 11

The needs of the environment are influencing mass changes. Back then, the majority of people chose to live their entire lives doing the same things, with very few people choosing otherwise. Currently, there are fewer members of the former group. Everyone wants to see change, but especially young people, who anticipate positive and enjoyable changes.

First of all, only the younger generation now fully embraces change in the majority of situations. They welcome change and believe it will add significance to their lives. Second, when things change, we are presented with fresh chances to advance. For example, starting a new work may provide obstacles that force an individual to change, learn new things, or broaden their skill set. Thirdly, a shift may signify a break from the past and an outdated schedule that has grown monotonous and cliche. Lastly, having new experiences can improve our physical and emotional well-being in addition to adding excitement and interest to our lives. We discover that experiences can make us more valuable and experienced.

Conversely, individuals of the older generation frequently resist change out of a desire to avoid becoming materialistic. They contend that we ought to focus exclusively on one issue and the traditional way of life. They mostly stay away from significant changes and stay safe, missing out on a lot of opportunities that the changes could have presented. They would rather stick to their routine and avoid stepping outside of their comfort zone. Their situation seems satisfactory to them. They might not enjoy surprises or lack the confidence to take on new challenges, or they might believe that structure comes from routine. They thought that the best course of action was to remain safe and to remain in the current situation.

Briefly stated, each side appears to have advantages of its own. I did, however, also convince them that in order to keep up with the fast-paced nature of modern life, change is both inevitable and essential. The world continues to spin and change, even though some people manage to maintain a semblance of stability through routine.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 12

The debate on whether people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change encompasses diverse viewpoints, revealing its advantages and drawbacks. This essay critically assesses these perspectives.

There are myriad arguments in favour of my stance. Recent research not only outlines the significance of studies as well as people, but also points out the importance of education and coping with vicissitudes. Besides, it provides a brief overview of expanding cultural understanding, followed by enhancing global perspectives. Examples of this can be seen all over the world, especially in affluent nations. Further, the implications of technological advancements on these views are significant, justifying widespread support for the idea that people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change.

However, there are some arguments against the aforementioned view. Besides, its impact is far-reaching indeed as its influence extends to various facets of society, shaping not only individual experiences but also impacting on the academic research landscape. Therefore, it is apparent why many are against the notion that people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change.

In conclusion, while the viewpoint that people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change presents a complex array of advantages and disadvantages, my analysis leads me to firmly support the notion that its benefits substantially outweigh the drawbacks.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 13

The perspective on embracing change varies among individuals, with some preferring a steady life, whereas others advocate for the benefits of change. Both views have compelling arguments, yet I firmly believe that a balanced approach, incorporating elements of both views, can lead to a fulfilling and enriched life.

On one hand, supporters of maintaining a consistent lifestyle, free of change, often cite security and stability as their primary reasons. To brief, a stable life can provide a sense of predictability, reducing anxiety and stress levels, further establishing deep-rooted relationships, a secure financial foundation, and cultivating a sense of belonging within their community. Individuals who choose to stay in their hometowns and continue their family traditions, for instance, develop close ties with their neighbors and experience a strong sense of belonging.

On the other hand, proponents of change argue that it stimulates personal growth and fosters adaptability. Accepting change allows individuals to step out of their comfort zones and explore new experiences, leading to personal development and broadening horizons. For example, recent technological advancements have revolutionized industries, improving efficiency, productivity, and creating new sectors and job opportunities. Embracing change is essential for unlocking these benefits.

In my opinion, it is crucial to strike a balance between embracing change and maintaining certain aspects of consistency. Individuals can reap the benefits of growth and progress without sacrificing stability provided that they incorporate new experiences and perspectives into established routines. Illustrating this, businesses that welcome innovation while maintaining core principles and values can adapt to evolving market demands, stay ahead of the competition, and achieve long-term success.

In conclusion, despite the advantages claimed by not welcoming change, opponents emphasize personal growth and progress; nevertheless, by adopting a rich blend of both these approaches, one can accept change without compromising stability and security while sustaining principles and values.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 14

The topic of change and its acceptance in life sparks great interest, with two contrasting viewpoints. Some prefer a stable, routine life, avoiding change, while others see change as beneficial. I firmly believe that embracing continuous evolution in response to circumstances is positive.

On the one hand, there are those who prefer stability and routine in their lives. They argue that consistency provides security and predictability, leading to peace of mind and contentment. This group believes that adhering to the same tasks and avoiding significant changes can facilitate the mastery of skills and expertise in a particular field. For instance, consider a person who has followed a fixed daily schedule for years, waking up at the same time, following a set routine, and going to bed at a specific hour. This individual may contend that such a lifestyle has allowed them to excel in their profession by dedicating focused, uninterrupted time to their work. The stability in their routine provides a sense of control and mastery over their daily tasks, contributing to a profound sense of accomplishment and fulfillment.

On the other hand, proponents of the belief that change is an essential and inevitable part of life argue that it is a catalyst for personal growth. They assert that embracing change opens doors to new opportunities, diverse experiences, and continuous learning, all of which contribute to both personal and professional development. Advocates of this perspective emphasize that change stimulates creativity, adaptability, and resilience. For example, an individual who transitions from a long-standing career to entrepreneurship, initially confronts challenges in the unfamiliar territory. However, by fully embracing this change, he gains new perspectives, develops essential entrepreneurial skills, and cultivates resilience, ultimately fostering substantial personal and professional growth.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that change is inherently beneficial as it promotes growth, learning, and progress for individuals and society. Embracing change challenges people to adapt, fostering continuous learning and preventing stagnation.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 15

Change is inevitable. Anything happening around us and someone doing the same thing with a different method or medium is called change. We all observe that with respect to time, everything changes; in fact, nature itself changes with time. In this essay, I will explain why most people want to run on the same track and why some people prefer novelty. Before concluding this topic, I will describe my view.

Millions of people avoid adopting change because of fear. It is a nasty truth that everyone wants smooth operations in life, doing the same things that they did in the past, but that is not possible. Researchers and scientists aim for a more comfortable and easier life for human beings, and that is only possible if human beings adopt new technology, which means accepting the change and acquiring knowledge; for example, In the banking system, if the government had not spent money on digital technology, which is working around the clock, still the bankers should have been using notebooks and pens.

On the contrary, many people argue that change brings problems and disturbs the system. It generally seems that older adults don’t want to let go of old habits. They fear stepping out of the window and adopting novelty, which might lead them to embrace new opportunities. Moreover, they believe that Routine provides a sense of control and reduces the anxiety that can accompany change.

Change is inevitable and adds spice to life; if there is no change, life becomes monotonous. Change is generally for the betterment and leads to development.

In conclusion, people should understand the situation to adapt to change; at the beginning, it seems difficult, but at a later stage, it is fruitful.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 16

Changes in our lives are inevitable. Some people believe change is a good start, while others prefer things to remain the same. This essay discusses the positive outcomes of changes and the drawbacks of avoiding them in favor of staying the same.

Continuance of change is the fate of every life in the universe. A person who is exposed to change learns a wide range of knowledge. It helps them survive any hardship. The ability to adapt to myriad situations and social development were the fruit of changes. Taking the risk of changing makes us more independent and introduces us to the thrill of life. Changing opens up new opportunities in our lives.

However, it’s vain to keep things from changing. The beauty of life is in its changes. People hate changes when they come out of their safe zone. They want to keep things the same because of the comforts that they had earlier. The fear of change starts from losing the things that they love most, like friends and family. So, the outcomings of a change make people reluctant.

In conclusion, Changes won’t follow a paradigm. One who adapts themselves to not worry about the outcomings would learn and explore the beauty of life. Those who fear taking the risk of losing will be prone to changes.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 17

While many people are justifiably resistant to the idea of change, others embrace it as a driving force for growth. In my opinion, change is not inherently progress and should not be pursued in all situations.

Those who argue in favor of change point out that when a person changes, they are likely to grow in a positive direction. This is evident as a person grows through stages of childhood and adolescence and becomes more mature and intelligent. The same fact applies when a person is an adult as reconsidering one’s biases, opinions, and habits can lead to healthy, upward personal development. One further instance of this relates to relationships. A person who has experience with multiple relationships will likely have developed their emotional intelligence and ability to be a healthy partner to someone else.

However, change is not necessarily related to personal growth. This fact is best illustrated through the everyday examples. A person who changes jobs is not guaranteed to learn more in a new position or company and may even come to regret moving on. It is more likely that someone who remains at a single job will be able to progress at that company into a variety or roles and grow. This is also the case when it comes to travel or moving to a new home. Individuals who travel learn more about the world but may neglect their own personal growth as a consequence. By staying in one city or country, a person can better understand themselves and their neighbors and make deeper and longer-lasting personal progress.

In conclusion, despite the fact that change can be a catalyst for healthy personal growth, it should not be regarded as intrinsically positive. Individuals should seek to grow as people but not always alter the material circumstances around them.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 18

Some individuals favour a stable and predictable lifestyle, whereas others believe that change is inherently beneficial. Both viewpoints have their merits, but I believe that a balanced approach that embraces change while valuing stability is essential for personal development and societal advancement.

Those who favour maintaining the status quo and avoiding change argue that stability provides security and comfort. They believe that routine allows for improved planning and reduces the risks and uncertainties associated with change. By adhering to routines and routine activities, individuals can establish a sense of control and comfort in their lives. Additionally, avoiding change can be viewed as a method to maintain continuity and preserve traditions.

On the other hand, proponents of change argue that it is a necessary catalyst for individual development, innovation, and societal advancement. They believe that change introduces new opportunities, challenges, and perspectives, which fosters adaptability and resiliency. Individuals can investigate their potential, learn from new experiences, and escape the monotony of routine by embracing change. Moreover, change is frequently required to address societal issues, drive technological and scientific advancements, and meet changing needs and aspirations.

I believe it is essential to strike a balance between stability and change. While familiarity and routine can provide a sense of security, completely avoiding change can result in stagnation and missed opportunities for development. Embracing change, on the other hand, enables personal growth, innovation, and assimilation to a world that is constantly evolving. Individuals can discover new passions, challenge themselves, and contribute to the advancement of society by embracing change.

A balanced approach involves being receptive to change and cognizant of the lessons and values garnered from stability. It is essential to evaluate the potential benefits and hazards of change and to make well-informed decisions based on one's personal situation and goals. In addition to embracing change, one should be willing to learn, adapt, and take calculated risks.

In conclusion, while some individuals prefer stability and routine and others appreciate change, it is essential to adopt a balanced approach that values both. Stability provides a sense of stability, whereas change fosters personal development and social advancement. Individuals can navigate life's transitions, adapt to new circumstances, and contribute to a dynamic and evolving society by embracing change while appreciating stability.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 19

Without a doubt, the last 15 years have witnessed more changes in people's behaviour than in the preceding 30 years. A significant number of people opine that it is good to live life by following the same pattern and avoiding change. However, others believe that change is a part of life and also a positive aspect that enriches the horizons of individuals. The essay will discuss both the strong arguments in the upcoming paragraphs, along with my opinion.

Indeed, avoiding changes in life has numerous upsides. One of the most significant positives is that people follow their own passions and desires which they are interested in. To put it another way, they might become successful and well-being individuals if they do not take others' pieces of advice and keep to themselves. For instance, famous scientists and researchers, such as Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein, discovered various laws and theories by avoiding unnecessary modifications not only in their projects and research but also in themselves. Thus, change is a negative aspect of life.

On the other hand, some people strongly believe that change is always good because it is directly related to improvement. In other words, most people learn from their experience, but intelligent ones learn from others' experience, which helps them improve in every aspect of life, such as behaviour, communication, and education. According to a survey conducted by the Times of India, 70% of people learn and grow up after experiencing a bad phase in their lives, and they also modify and prepare themselves to deal with every worst situation.

To conclude, it seems to me that changes in life are crucial for becoming a better version of themselves.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 20

It is true that people perceive change in different ways. Some members of the community believe that change is always for the better, while others think otherwise.

Those who are in favor of change may argue that it poses a possibility for a particular person to improve him- or herself, both mentally and socially. From the mental perspective, changes relating to traveling and receiving education help one broaden one's mind and learn something new. As for the social perspective - it is empathy for others that he or she may acquire after suffering changes in his or her private life, because it is known that those who experienced various changes in relationships with their family or acquaintances may then better understand other people's feelings. This way, change improves not only a person’s mental, but also social and private aspects.

In contrast, those who avoid changes point out the difficulties to readapt to them that many people experience. For instance, some large companies, Finnair for example, practice giving professional psychological and medicine support to those employees who were sacked due to the companies' structural changes. Apparently, such policies infer that a spate of people may suffer from the difficulty of getting accustomed to the changes and find their new way in life. In addition, it can be pointed out that changes regarding private affairs do not always make a person better. For many people such changes simply cause a nervous breakdown, and, again, may jeopardize their health, since the psychological aspect of a person is tightly connected to his or her general well-being.

In conclusion, my view of the problem is that change is an indispensable part of our lives, so people should accept this fact and try to learn how to tackle it rather than avoid it, which is impossible.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 21

Some people prefer to live within the status quo, while others believe that it is always good to make changes. I agree with the latter viewpoint because, in the long run, people will certainly gain more from the changes they made than they lose.

People who resist change may be too afraid of the risks involved. Take, for example, those who choose to stay in a low-paying job they hate. They may fear that if they resign, they may be unable to find a new one. However, I do not think maintaining the status quo can help them avoid risks. Sooner or later, they will lose their low-level jobs to automation. In fact, as the billionaire entrepreneur Peter Thiel said, "in a world that's changing so quickly, the biggest risk you can take is not taking any risk."

Others, on the other hand, argue that change is always a good thing because it is the only way to succeed in the long run. If super successful people and organizations are examined, it will be found that they all have one thing in common: They keep trying new things. They are willing to experiment and fail a lot in order to innovate. This may have downsides in the short term but allows them to remain relevant and competitive over longer periods of time. I agree with this argument because if a person is stagnant for the sake of short-term comfort, they will be guaranteed to fail in the longer term.

In conclusion, although a shift in direction comes with risks, in the long run people will benefit from the shift they made. Therefore, change is always a good thing when thinking long term.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 22

Over the last half century, the pace of change in the life of human beings has increased beyond our wildest expectations. This has been driven by technological and scientific breakthroughs that are changing the whole way we view the world on an almost daily basis. This means that change is not always a personal option, but an inescapable fact of life, and we need to constantly adapt to keep pace with it.

Those people who believe they have achieved some security by doing the same, familiar things are living in denial. Even when people believe they are resisting change themselves, they cannot stop the world around them from changing. Sooner or later, they will find that the familiar jobs no longer exist, or that the 'safe' patterns of behaviour are no longer appropriate.

However, reaching the conclusion that change is inevitable is not the same as assuming that 'change is always for the better'. Unfortunately, it is not always the case that new things are promoted because they have good impacts for the majority of people. A lot of innovations are made with the aim of making money for a few. This is because it is the rich and powerful people in our society who are able to impose changes (such as in working conditions or property developments) that are in their own interests.

In conclusion, I would say that change can be stimulating and energising for individuals when they pursue it themselves, but that all change, including that which is imposed on people, does not necessarily have good outcomes.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 23

Change has always been a matter profoundly debated; many are quite open and liberal about accepting and integrating it into their lives, while some are averse and, in fact, hostile to even the slightest of hints about altering anything in their routines. I feel that both have their views well-supported with plausible reasons.

Change has been the fundamental law of nature, as many suggest. The ability to adapt successfully to the fast-transforming surroundings and environments guarantees survival. The ones who can adapt to shifts do not only weather the harshest of times but also get to enjoy the exploits of success attained thereafter. This can be easily exemplified from historical events, where civilizations that failed to respond appropriately to the fast-altering world order ceased to exist, while those who adapted themselves ruled supreme.

Moreover, doing things differently is considered to be a way to innovate: it has an element of adventure that allows encountering and overcoming uncertainties. For this school of thought, humans are subject to change in the same way as the days and nights, and seasons. Altering methods of working and leading life can afford freshness, excitement and consequently, improvements, and evade boredom.

Having said that, the other lobby is more comfortable with working in the same settings. They dread even the slightest deviations in their methods, for that might force them to expend efforts once again to attain similar success, and also expose them to failure.  This attitude is more visible among the ageing population who are reluctant to even engaging with the new technology.

To recap, it can be said that both views are justified. Change despite being an essential element that has brought around numerous improvements, staying put in similar settings is sometimes important.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 24

Many individuals like to solely devote their lives doing similar activities and shunning variations so that they can minimize risks and master particular skills. Yet, others prefer to take on new challenges in life. In this case, however, I argue in favour of the latter view for some specific reasons.

It is believed that remaining the same helps people in some respects concerning effort loss. The proponents of this view argue that they do not want to embark on a new adventure at the cost of stability. In simple words, new situations can pose risks to them, and they are reluctant to adapt to such obstacles in their lives. Moreover, repeatedly doing the same tasks helps them master their skills. However, this prevents them from exploring their hidden talents or developing new competencies.

I, however, readily concur that the benefits of taking chances and accepting new challenges can beat its trivial disadvantages. First and foremost, stepping out of their comfort zone facilitates people through direct and demonstrative skills to break boundaries, on a personal and professional front. In other words, change helps people attain mastery in managing emotions, mind and challenges of life. For example, executives with complete confidence and willingness to take on new challenges are quite likely to move swiftly up the corporate ladder. Secondly, people who embrace diversity will most likely be filled with more happiness than their counterparts.

To conclude, although avoiding changes seems to be a secure and stable preference, I sincerely believe that not only does this phenomenon greatly hinder progress towards success but also dampens people’s enthusiasm. Embracing novelties has always been rewarding despite some hurdles and uncertainties.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 25

There are two schools of thought when it comes to the subject of change and taking challenges in life. Some people advocate for a life of stability and predictability, while others view change as an essential element of personal growth and development. In this essay, I will examine both perspectives and argue that a balance in stability and acceptance of change is the best way of leading a fulfilling life while also reaching one’s potential.

On the one hand, those who prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change argue that it leads to a stable and risk-free existence. This can be particularly appealing for individuals who value a certain level of predictability and order in their lives. By avoiding change, they can maintain a sense of control and security, which can contribute to their overall well-being. Additionally, they may be able to establish a routine that works for them and provides a sense of comfort and familiarity.

On the other hand, proponents of change argue that it is a necessary aspect of personal growth and development. Without change, individuals may become stagnant and complacent, preventing them from reaching their full potential. Change can bring new experiences, challenges, and opportunities that can expand one’s worldview and broaden their horizons. Moreover, it can lead to personal and professional development, as individuals learn to adapt to new situations and develop new skills.

In my opinion, both perspectives have their merits. While it is important to establish stability and predictability in one’s life, avoiding change altogether may lead to missed opportunities and hinder personal growth. However, change for the sake of change may not always be beneficial either. Therefore, I believe that a balance must be struck between the two. Individuals should be open to new experiences and opportunities, while also recognizing the value of stability and routine in their lives.

In conclusion, while some people prefer a life of stability and predictability, others view change as an essential aspect of personal growth and development. Both perspectives have their merits, and I believe that a balance must be achieved to ensure a fulfilling and satisfying life.

Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however - mẫu 26

People differ in their attitude towards taking risks, with some people seemingly born to be risky and others rather risk averse. This essay will look into the advantages and disadvantages of an adventurous attitude and conclude that taking some risks is a positive thing.

First of all, it should be noted that taking risks is necessary for success. History is full of such examples in all fields, from science to war and from sport to literature. Those who simply continue tradition and never try anything new are doomed to repeat the past and typically content themselves with mediocrity. However, when people try new things, they may risk failure, but they also bring about the possibility of tremendous success. Looking at literature, for example, we can see great writers like James Joyce and William Burroughs, who completely redefined what a novel could be by breaking all the rules. They could easily have wasted their time and become mired in failure, but their risks paid off and they are today considered giants in their field.

Of course, that is not to suggest that taking a risk always results in success. Naturally, for every great success there are countless failures. To continue the idea of literature, one can only begin to imagine the number of writers who attempted to do something entirely new but failed because they were misunderstood. Taking risks in everyday life can be an even bigger problem because the consequences can be more severe. Young men often hurt themselves in foolish stunts because they took a risk to impress their peers. In such cases, it would clearly have been better not to take that risk at all.

In conclusion, whether it is better to take risks or not depends entirely upon the risk. In some scenarios, it is best to take a chance and see what happens because the potential outcome could be immensely rewarding, but in many cases, it is rather pointless. Still, overall, it is better to take some risks than avoid them altogether.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think parents should read or tell stories to children. Others think parents needn't do that as children can read books or watch TV, or movies by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---