Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 1

People have different views about how to ameliorate health, education, and trade for the poorer nations. Many argue that the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. I somewhat agree that action is necessary to help these poorer countries in such areas; however, I think that the main role in improving these areas still belongs to these poorer countries.

The first reason why I think the governments of wealthier countries should help the needier countries is for humanity. First, nowadays the world is increasingly reaching progress and civilization, so humanity is no longer confined within a country or territory but in the world. Therefore, helping poorer countries to get improvements in health, education, and trade is one of the great humanitarian actions. Moreover, this helps to shorten the gap between rich and poor as well as increase solidarity among countries, contributing to maintaining international peace and security.

Another reason is aiding the more indigent nations to improve health, education and trade will help developed countries define their positions and power of voice internationally. The USA, for example, has supported African countries in resisting Ebola or Zika epidemic, which helps this country define its big role all over the world. Moreover, supporting other poorer countries to develop such areas helps wealthier nations take advantage of advertising their achievements in health, education, and trade, which helps them get many economic benefits from investment in such areas.

However, I also think that poorer nations should find solutions to achieve ameliorations in health, education, and trade. Firstly, finding ways to get improvements in such areas will help these countries give away the dependence on the economy and politics of wealthy countries. Secondly, finding the solution to improvements in health, education, and trade will not only encourage citizens’ creation in utilizing domestic resources to develop their countries but also help these countries define their ability and reaffirm their positions in comparison with other countries.

In conclusion, I somewhat agree that the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for assisting the poorer nations out of their difficult conditions in such areas for humanity, their positions, and the power of voice worldwide. However, I also believe that these poorer countries should find solutions to achieve improvements in health, education, and trade.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 2

The advancement of third-world countries is feasible by appropriate underpinning. The first and foremost way is to procure aid from the administration of first-world countries. However, this will swiftly settle several proceedings, eventually, I am in complete unison with such a viewpoint. My preference is justified further in the ensuing paragraphs with logical examples.

To begin with, wealthy countries have a moral obligation to help underprivileged people, which is one of the reasons. Developed countries help people only when neighboring countries are suffering from health, education, and trade issues. For example, you can contribute by building a school in a non-developed nation. One can also have the opportunity to send doctors and nurses to support their health standards. This allows administrations to secure stricter trade agreements to support the economies of developing countries. The world will become a better place when wealthy nations fulfill their promises and make fair contributions.

Moreover, the vast majority of third-world countries in this day and age have historically prepared at the expense of developing countries. This is another reason why developed nations need to support developing nations. For instance, popular European countries once illegally searched for gold and diamond deposits in Africa. As a result of this, it would only be correct to support the educational needs of these countries by awarding scholarships to the right students. In addition to this, funding may be provided to help improve healthcare systems and seminars are held to educate business owners in developing nations.

In conclusion, developing medical, educational, and business infrastructure is the only way to help poorer countries improve. Additionally, the guiding hand of wealthy nations can assist them in achieving their objective. It will not only speed up the process of progress but also it will help them to discover their route to survive.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 3

In today’s society, certain underdeveloped nations are struggling to promote the fundamental rights of residents, such as access to health care and education. Supporting the improvements in living standards in developed countries benefits society in many ways. My preference is explained in the following paragraph with appropriate examples.

To begin with, in the age of globalization, a country’s happiness can offer the global economy. Therefore, rich countries should help developing countries benefit. Firstly, rich countries should try to improve conditions in the world's public schools and hospitals. The construction of schools and hospitals will ensure the provision of essential needs for all. For example, schools and hospitals are in bad shape in all the third-world areas. Secondly, governments of rich countries can help improve education systems in developing countries. Developed nations often have well–equipped health care and education facilities employing highly qualified specialists. They can send teachers and doctors for training.

As an alternative, every government must look out for its citizens. However, it might be exceedingly challenging for governments to quickly improve living circumstances without any outside help. For instance, nations can obtain loans. In addition, the administration should also use more funds on the development of the infrastructure rather than spending it more on the equipment for army offers, museums, and other sources and should focus more on uplifting the nation.

In conclusion, I think that everyone should support one another. Additionally, allocating money to help may not have a substantial negative impact on the economy of a developed country while significantly enhancing lives in a different nation.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 4

Some experts suggest that the wealthy nations of the world help the impoverished countries in trade and commerce, health as well as in education. I am in complete unison with the viewpoint. My preference is justified further with reasons and examples.

The foremost argument to explain my opinion is, that the underdeveloped nations can be uplifted if the rich countries do some amount of business with them. The poor countries can improve their economies by selling raw materials to rich countries and by buying industrialized goods in return. india‘s economy was in the bracket of underdeveloped nations, it progressed by conducting expensive trade of wheat, potato, tea, spices, and other goods which has eventually made her one of the most promising developing nations. Additionally, the affluent countries can support the needed nations with education. They can donate computers, and books, help in building schools, train teachers and thus support for a long-term cause.

On the flip side, some others counterclaim that the poor countries are themselves responsible for their progress and issues. They must manage the economy and make appropriate efforts to improve the health and education sectors by taking loans from the world bank or the rich countries.

To culminate the discussion, it is commented that indeed the wealthy nations must help the poorer ones. The leaders of the industrialized nations play a decisive role in essential areas and help to make the world a better place. Where all have food, good health, and some income to remain happy.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 5

Undoubtedly governments of developed nations should share the responsibility of helping less fortunate nations. Different measures exist, ranging from market access to direct financial payments or even medical assistance. This essay will explain why certain measures are inherently better than other methods.

Firstly, the most adequate way to assist the lesser developed countries is not through health or education ‘hand-outs’. This method is flawed and only offers temporary relief from long-term challenges; also, this assistance can be cut at any moment, leaving the country stranded.

For example, economic help from the UK to disadvantaged regions in Africa has gradually been reduced since the onset of the financial crisis. Although some parts of the continent may be better educated or in better health, the benefit was short lived, thus leaving the countries of Africa to look for other donors.

Commerce is without doubt the most essential type of assistance that can be given. If the less developed country has the opportunity to develop trade, then it will build strong capabilities to serve it for the long term. These strengths can develop the local economy and are more reliable than education or health.

For example, while trading with the richer country, the government can search for other foreign markets to trade with. This would offer more stability and diversification for the nation.

To conclude, assistance is definitely necessary for the poorer regions; however, ‘hand-outs’ are short-term solutions. The optimum solution is to offer market access so the region can produce products and generate the regular income.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 6

Health, education and trade are the keys to the sustainable development of the developing countries. However, there has been heated debate about whether the governments of developed nations ought to place responsibility for aiding the poorer countries in these sectors. I firmly believe rich nations should step forward to help underdeveloped nations to be lifted out of the poverty trap.

To commence with, healthcare is without a doubt something we are entitled to; it is our basic right to have access to healthcare. For hundreds of thousands of people, however, it is simply not a right, but a luxury. Societies devastated by civil wars and grinding poverty do not have access to healthcare; even the most primary medical supplies are out of reach for those vulnerable people. In countries like Yemen, health aid can go a long way towards ameliorating poverty and helping underprivileged people in their time of need.

Similarly, education is an essential right that we all believe we are also entitled to. Education can play a paramount role in an individual’s personal development and society as a whole. It paves the way for job prospects and can help those disadvantaged people in severe poverty. Not only does education alleviate an individual’s condition, but also improve their community. Therefore, rich nations should launch programmes that teach specific skills set that poor people can use to find work. Likewise, aid for trade creates a window of opportunity for developing countries, particularly for the least developed countries. Many poorer nations encounter trade-related infrastructural obstacles which constrain their potentiality to engage in global trade. However, trade and commerce is likely to stimulate economic growth and can eradicate poverty eventually.

In fine, the best way to help poorer countries is to improve the holy trinity of health, education and trade. Therefore, richer countries should embark on aid projects in these areas so as to ward off poverty.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 7

It goes without saying that health, education and commerce take the centre stage in the sustainable development of the Third World countries. People, however, are deeply divided on the issue of whether developed countries ought to shoulder more responsibility for aiding the developing countries in those sectors. In this case, I firmly disagree with the opinion expressed, and I will explain why.

First and foremost, recipient countries do not have the primary institutional capacity to carry out aid projects supported by rich nations. Therefore, they cannot manage the development programmes because of the lack of robust institutions and for corruptions. A case in point is Nigeria. The country still cannot ward poverty off despite receiving a substantial amount of foreign aid for the last three decades. So offering aids is not a viable solution.

Secondly, overseas assistance, in most cases, fuels corruption and entrenches authoritarian regimes consequently. The development aids are channelled into politicizing economies rather than aid projects, like a hospital, school and economic zone for example. Ultimately, the money spent to suppress political opponents, like sub-Saharan Africa for instance. In addition to this, trade proposals face vehement opposition from the powerful vested interests.

Last but not least, foreign aid promotes a culture of dependency. Donor countries try to play an unwanted role in shaping the politics and economy of the host country. Consequently, it reduces the quality of governance. A good example here is ‘Zimbabwe’. The country has a long history of aid dependency. The major risk here is that the rich country has the political leverage, which in turn shapes the policy of the recipient country that serves the donor country ultimately.

To draw conclusion, foreign assistance often puts a curse on the recipient countries. Therefore, aids in selective sectors by the rich countries are not going to change the future of poorer nations unless those poor nations themselves try to improve their fate.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 8

Enhancing healthcare, education, and trade is indispensable for the progress of developing nations; nevertheless, it is the duty of political leaders in developed countries to assume responsibility for supporting impoverished nations in these domains. Despite international cooperation is crucial, I completely disagree with the notion because the primary obligation rests with the governments of economically disadvantaged countries.

Firstly, it is the duty of national governments to prioritize the well-being and progress of their citizens. To brief, they possess the authority to enact policies, allocate resources, and establish frameworks that promote economic growth, education, and healthcare, empowering central administration to take ownership of their development agenda and tailor strategies to their unique needs and priorities. Additionally, fostering good governance, transparency, and accountability within poorer nations is crucial for effective development. By building strong institutions and addressing corruption and mismanagement, governments can create an environment conducive to sustainable development and attract both domestic and foreign investment.

Furthermore, affluent nations can fulfill a supportive role by extending financial assistance, sharing technical expertise, and implementing capacity-building programs, thereby bolstering the capabilities of economically disadvantaged nations to tackle challenges within these sectors. Moreover, international cooperation can promote fair trade practices and create an enabling environment for economic growth in deprived countries. The elimination of trade barriers, the provision of preferential market entry, and the facilitation of skill development and technology transfer can play a pivotal role in promoting economic progress in underprivileged nations. By fostering mutually advantageous alliances, affluent and reliant nations can cultivate collaborative endeavors that facilitate sustainable development and the alleviation of poverty.

In conclusion, I firmly concur that local governments should assume the primary responsibility for promoting sustainable progress in impoverished countries, with wealthier nations providing crucial financial support and trade opportunities to foster growth.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 9

Many underdeveloped countries nowadays face serious problems trying to provide their citizens with decent education and health facilities, as well as in other areas like trade. However, I disagree that developed nations ought to support these countries and think they should try to stand on their own feet instead.

It is usually possible for poor countries to raise enough money to overcome their predicaments since the source of their shortcomings is usually deep corruption and domestic mismanagement, which have resulted in their funds being embezzled by dishonest officials and their affairs in areas like education, health and trade run by unqualified authorities. If they are in need of support in such areas, they should first make an effort to eradicate the abovementioned issues before asking for aid from the outside world.

Furthermore, the money that the governments of developed countries have belongs to their citizens because it originates from their taxes, customs duties, and national resources. It should therefore be spent on providing better facilities like health centres and universities, and improving business environments for their own citizens, not for people living elsewhere in the world.

Some may argue that the decline in living conditions in developing countries could result in the migration of their citizens to developed countries in search of a better life, which involves serious financial and cultural concerns for rich nations. However, public investment in improving border control and defense structures can render these concerns insignificant.

In conclusion, I think developed countries should not aid poor countries, as their funds should be invested in the betterment of life for their own citizens. Undeveloped nations can often overcome their shortcomings in commerce, health and education on their own through eliminating corrupt officials and improving their management practices.

Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However - mẫu 10

Today's world has been divided into developing and industrialised countries, the main difference between them is the amount of money that governments apply in important sectors such as education, health and commerce. Most of the poorer nations are buried in debts as a result of their unbalanced finances which are reflected in a failed health care, an unstructured education system and a weak international trade. This vicious cycle will continue indefinitely unless wealthier nations show interest in minimizing the worldwide economic differences, as well as taking more responsibility for assisting less fortunate countries.

Most of the African countries live in sub-human conditions because of the extreme poverty, upheaval, hunger, disease, unemployment, lack of education and both inexperienced and corrupt administrations. The devastating consequences of the AIDS epidemic in those countries could improve if the infected population were to receive free drugs to control the disease, have access to health professionals and get information on how to prevent its spread. But this can only be achieved through international help programs in which leaders of the world's richest countries donate medicine and also send doctors and nurses to treat and educate those in need.

Moreover, most of the poor countries rely on selling agricultural products and raw materials to rich nations and buying industrialized products from them, resulting in a huge financial deficit. Consequently, they borrow a significant amount of money from the World Bank to try to improve their broken economies, but sometimes the money disappears with no significant changes, and they cannot even pay the bank interest. Regarding this issue, last year, G8, which is comprised of leaders of the eight richest nations, decided to forgive billions of dollars worth of debt owed by the world's poorest nations. In addition, they developed adequate loan programs to financially assist those countries.

In conclusion, leaders of the industrialised countries play an indispensable role in assisting developing nations in dealing with essential areas such as health, education and trade. Also, their aid is the key to breaking the vicious cycle, which results in poverty and death.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think parents should read or tell stories to children. Others think parents needn't do that as children can read books or watch TV, or movies by themselves. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Some people think that uniform at school is unnecessary and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people say that international sporting events contribute greatly to peace and stability in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---