Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems

Đề bài: Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extent do you agree?

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems - mẫu 1

It is argued that money should be spent on developing roads and motorways rather than on public transport systems. Personally, I think both road and public transport systems have vital roles to play in modern society, and therefore should be equally invested in.

On the one hand, better road quality increases the level of safety and reduces traffic congestion. In many cities and provinces in Vietnam for example, the number of road accidents is ever-increasing because there are a lot of holes on the road’s surface. This is clear evidence that the government should spend money improving the quality of road systems in order to ensure the safety of people. Additionally, building wider roads and more motorways in big cities like Ha Chi Minh, where traffic congestion is still a major problem, will help to increase road capacity. It means that there will be more space for a larger number of vehicles, hence reducing pressure on the city’s main roads as well as congestion.

On the other hand, better public transport systems are beneficial for the environment and people who do not have a private vehicle. In fact, some modes of public transport like subways produce less pollutants than cars and other private vehicles. Therefore, spending money providing people with access to public transport will improve air quality and reduce pollution. Furthermore, for those who do not have a private vehicle, such as motorbike or car, buses and subways are a great choice if they have to travel every day.

In conclusion, for the reasons above, I believe money should be well-spent on not only road but also public transport systems.

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems - mẫu 2

There are those who opine that it is more crucial if the government allocates financial resources to the construction of roadways instead of transport systems for railways and the tram network. Personally, I am totally against this idea because comprehensive public transport systems can bring convenience to more people and help protect the environment.

The primary reason supporting my stance is that well-built and maintained public transport systems make commuters’ lives easier. Employees do not have to go to work by car, especially those who work in the city centre, where finding a parking space is time-consuming and at the same time, it is costly to park; instead, they can take a nap and finish some work on the train or bus. Apart from that, people can avoid traffic jams during peak hours because bus lanes are already available, and trains always run smoothly as scheduled.

Another point I consider relevant is that financing public transport can contribute more to environmental protection. Automobiles are powered by fossil fuels, emitting large quantities of toxic gases to pollute the air. If people actively choose public transport due to its great convenience and high efficiency they can enjoy, they will be less likely to drive cars. Such green travel will considerably alleviate air pollution, making a city more livable.

In conclusion, I strongly disagree that it is more reasonable to invest money in building roads and freeways rather than public transport facilities. Funding public transport systems can, for one thing, make individuals’ everyday life more convenient, and, for another, conserve the environment. Therefore, it is suggested that the authorities prioritise developing public transport systems.

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems - mẫu 3

Investment in transportation is a major concern for many individuals. There is a notion that the authorities should allocate more funds for the construction of roads and motorways rather than the development of public transportation. This essay totally agrees with the mentioned idea for several reasons.

To begin with, transport infrastructure should be prioritized because the operation of conveyances, including public vehicles, relies heavily on the quality of roads and motorways. The development of roadway systems is indeed an essential prerequisite for the coordination of numerous forms of transport from motorbikes, cars, and trucks to buses. South Korea is an outstanding example. This country, where the vast majority of citizens are pedestrians and public transport commuters, has always put great emphasis on building and maintaining a reliable system of roads.

Furthermore, the advancement of roads and motorways is significantly crucial since this is an effective measure to tackle accidents and congestions. Promoting the quality of roadways helps ensure travel smoothness and safety while expanding thoroughfares enables vehicles to move more easily and be better controlled even during peak hours. The costs of negligence in constructing high-quality roads include increased mortality from car accidents and disrupted delivery of passengers and goods, for instance, and consequently, lead to serious economic losses. Therefore, this ought to be one of the first and foremost focuses of investment.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that allotting money to roads and motorways is of greater importance than distributing budgets to public transport due to the fundamental role of roadways in the whole conveying system as well as the demand to deal with various traffic problems.

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems - mẫu 4

It is argued that more funds should be allocated to roads and motorways rather than to public transport systems. I am in complete disagreement with this opinion.

On the one hand, I can understand why spending money on road networks gains the support of many people. Their view is that better road quality would increase the levels of safety and ease traffic congestion. Firstly, the better quality of motorways means a considerable decline in road mortality and injury rates. This is justifiable since the roads in some countries are fraught with holes and obstacles, plaguing people with danger and insecurity. In this sense, the amelioration of poor road infrastructures would ensure the safety of travellers. Secondly, expanding roads and building more motorways are believed to curb traffic jams. Traffic congestion is a major concern in big cities where massive numbers of vehicles travel on the road during hours of peak demand. This vexed problem could be tackled as wider roads provide maximum travel time in free-flowing traffic.

However, I would argue that spending on public transport is a better investment for a few reasons. Compared to vehicles, high-capacity public transit modes can accommodate a larger number of passengers at a time. This could be exemplified by integrated and expansive public transport networks in Australia. Recent estimates indicate that each train on Sydney’s railways removes approximately 1000 cars from its roads. Therefore, a modal shift from private to public transport would tremendously alleviate urban congestion which has been considered as one of the productivity bottlenecks in developed economies. Moreover, efficient public transport systems are a contributor to a cleaner environment. By removing cars from streets, public transit plays a pivotal role in the abatement of carbon emissions. Not only does this reduce air pollution, but it also mitigates the effects of climate change as a whole.

Based on the above-mentioned arguments, I acquiesce to the view that money should be invested in public transport systems rather than road networks.

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems - mẫu 5

Traffic is an ongoing problem in modern society, and there have been heated discussions on whether to invest more in road infrastructure or upgrading mass transit such as trains and buses. From my perspective, it is more optimal to spend taxes on building wider or newer roads or bridges.

The biggest current problem in cities is none other than the congestion of traffic. As solving this problem by reducing the population or limiting the use of private vehicles is nigh impossible, the ideal solution is to change the city's infrastructure. It has been proven in various research and articles that numerous cities managed to circumvent any traffic related issue simply by widening the intersection, creating new roads or constructing new bridges. Another example can be seen in the city of Hanoi, a beautiful city which was marred by constant traffic jams and rush hours. However, in recent years, new intersection bridges and wider routes being built at a fast pace have lessened the issues plaguing the city. Renovating infrastructure has usually been the optimal method for solving traffic problems.

Comparatively, putting public taxes into mass transit has been shown to be ill-choiced due to more expensive investments and less successful results. Despite focusing on public transport, the frequency of rush hours and traffic congestion remains static, with no drastic change likely to be seen. The problem stems from the size of the mass transit used daily, and hypothetically, if people rely more on them, the need for more buses and trains will increase. As a result, too many buses occupying one road can be a nightmarish scenario one might expect in the future. Coupling with more public money invested, then a city or a country is probably going to face an economic recession stemming from traffic.

In conclusion, the answer to whether public money should be put into road infrastructure or systemic innovation to public transport is simple. Renovating and creating new roads and bridges are cheaper, easier and more optimal to solve traffic problems. Hopefully, the government can earnestly spend people's hard-earned money on that rather than making excuses about human population or failure of technology.

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems - mẫu 6

There is a contention that financial resources should be directed towards the enhancement of roads and motorways rather than towards public transportation systems. From my perspective, both road infrastructure and public transport systems hold significant importance in contemporary society and hence warrant equal investment.

On one hand, enhancing road quality enhances safety levels and alleviates traffic congestion. In numerous cities and provinces across Vietnam, for instance, the frequency of road accidents is on the rise due to numerous potholes on the road surface. This serves as compelling evidence that the government ought to allocate funds towards enhancing road quality to ensure the safety of its citizens. Moreover, constructing wider roads and additional motorways in major cities like Ho Chi Minh City, where traffic congestion remains a significant issue, will augment road capacity. This implies that there will be more room for a greater number of vehicles, thereby easing pressure on the city's primary roads and reducing congestion.

On the flip side, improved public transportation systems are advantageous for both the environment and individuals lacking private vehicles. Indeed, certain modes of public transport such as subways emit fewer pollutants than cars and other private vehicles. Therefore, investing in providing people with access to public transport will enhance air quality and mitigate pollution. Furthermore, for those without private vehicles such as motorcycles or cars, buses and subways serve as excellent options for daily travel.

In summary, based on the aforementioned reasons, I opine that funds should be judiciously allocated not only towards roads but also towards public transportation systems.

Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems - mẫu 7

It is believed by some that more funds should be expended on roads and motorways as opposed to public transport. I completely agree with the given viewpoint as I believe that the economy of a country relies massively on the seamless condition of its roadways.

Firstly, in order for many industries to run smoothly, it is required for them to transport a substantial quantity of goods every day to different cities. The Indian economy, for example, relies heavily on agriculture, and a huge number of fruits and vegetables are transported through roadways on a daily basis. This whole system can crumble if the roads are not well maintained, which in turn will impact not only the livelihood of many but also lead to inflation as people will not get eatables easily.

Secondly, it is significant to improve roads and motorways as it promotes smooth commuting not only through public transport but also for those who travel using personal vehicles. Consequently, the productivity of a nation increases because a huge number of people travel to work every day. It might also result in fewer accidents on roads which may lead to contentment among people. For instance, many road accidents occur because of the fact that motorways are not smooth and have potholes or are congested.

To conclude, I believe that it is more crucial to improve roads and motorways as compared to public transport if both the efficiency of the workforce and the economy of a nation are considered.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Nowadays a large amount of advertising is aimed at children. Some people think this can have negative effects on children and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?

• Many people find it hard to balance their work with other parts of their lives. What are the reasons for this? How can this problem be overcome?

• Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---