Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time

Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time should be promoted to a higher position. What is your view on this? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time

Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time - mẫu 1

The prosperity of a company has been associated with the long dedication of employees. While many people are demanding that the only staff who have worked in a company for a long time should be offered to a higher promotion, I partly agree with this method.

On the one hand, I agree that giving a good chance of promotion for people who have devoted their life to a company for ages is a positive measure to consolidate the development of a company. Firstly, workers having the length of service in a company accumulate precious experience in working, ensuring the run of the company smoothly. Secondly, individuals who have a long history of working will get extended relationships among their partners and colleagues, helping their company get remarkable profits in finding new markets as well as keep a company growing stably. Besides, through the process of stable working on the spot for a long time, they will know the advantages and disadvantages of a company to find a way to solve the problems happening unexpectedly.

On the other hand, I also believe that granting somebody who has worked many years promotion will influence others. First and foremost, newcomers who have good skills and necessary knowledge for jobs in a company will have no chances to compete against those working for ages in gaining a higher position, leading to inequality. Secondly, promoting someone who has worked for a long time will make them rely on others and be lazy in the study and improve their knowledge, becoming a weak measure for the development of a company.

In summary, I can clearly come to the conclusion that although bringing opportunities for people working many years in a company get a higher place is a good measure in keeping a company alive, but this solution has its negative impacts.

Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time - mẫu 2

One of the reasons why companies choose to promote some employee is seniority. While the length of service is undoubtedly an important factor, my belief is it should certainly not be the only criterion for deciding who should be promoted. Rather it would be best for companies to have a more varied policy in this area. There are without question sound arguments for promoting employees who have been working for a company for a number of years.

The first of these is that these more experienced employees would be able to adapt themselves to be in a higher position. As they would understand the culture and policies of the company better, they should be given priority to be in higher positions in a company. Again, on a practical level, if they were not promoted, they might well leave the company to find a higher position and earn a larger salary. This could have serious consequences for the company, which might lose a significant amount of business to its competitors.

Despite these factors, there is a strong argument in favour of also promoting staff because of their performance. This can be seen by how some multinational companies use annual performance and development reviews when deciding on promotion. Under this system, a supervisor can set targets for an employee and if those targets are met, then the staff can be promoted, even if they are relatively junior. The benefit of this approach is that it encourages staff to work harder and rewards merit and not just slow service.

In conclusion, there is no doubt a case for implementing a policy of promoting long serving members of staff, but I believe that it is also wise to take account of the performance of more junior members of staff.

Some people think that only staff who have worked in a company for a long time - mẫu 3

We all know that work is the food of life. There is no doubt that the experienced staff is far better qualified to a promotion than the fresh employee. It is taken for granted that the long-service employee has several potentials which help him to get a promotion contrary to the new employee. Thus, many companies reward the employees who have been with them for a long. In my opinion, this is indeed a good idea for the motivation of the employee and for the improvement of the company.

One of the reasons why the only experienced employee should get a promotion is that s/he knows many things about his/her job. For example, he can tackle any issue related to the scope of his work and can implement good solutions to such problems. Undoubtedly, such employee deserves the promotion due to his broad knowledge and experience. Another important issue is the employee loyalty towards the company and that should be rewarded.

Another reason is that the experienced employee can communicate elegantly with people from different backgrounds. To illustrate, he is able to deal with everyone perfectly and this, without a doubt, is because of his long experience in his work. Consequently, he is the only one who can get the promotion.

In conclusion, it cannot be denied that the experienced employee is the only one who deserves the promotion. As stated above, the experienced employee not only knows the tactics of his work but also can perfectly deal with people. Hence, he must be promoted.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinions on this?

• Some people think that success is the best measure of intelligence, while others think that intelligence can be measured in other ways. What is your opinion on this?

• In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by international fast foods. This is having a negative effect on both families and societies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by fast food. This has a negative impact on families, individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• During the 20th century, contact between different parts of the world has developed rapidly thanks to air travel and telecommunication. To what extent do you agree that societies benefit from the increased contact and closer relationships with foreigners brought by international tourism and business?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---