The money spent by governments on space programmers would be better spent on vital public services

The money spent by governments on space programmers would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

The money spent by governments on space programmers would be better spent on vital public services

Đề bài: The money spent by governments on space programmers would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The money spent by governments on space programmers would be better spent on vital public services - mẫu 1

The allocation of government funds has sparked significant controversy in society. Some argue that the government should invest money in space exploration programs rather than vital public services such as education and healthcare. However, I disagree with this perspective for several reasons, and I will expound on them in the subsequent paragraphs.

Firstly, investing in astronomy entails a substantial cost, requiring a significant amount of money, time, and effort. It is expensive to train scientists and other staff for space missions, especially when utilizing advanced technological equipment. Many countries cannot meet these requirements, and attempting to do so might lead to the need for securing a loan or facing failure. Therefore, the government should carefully consider its budget size and capabilities before deciding whether it is viable to allocate funds to space programs.

Secondly, public services such as education and healthcare play a crucial role in the growth of a country’s economy. Nurturing skilled and knowledgeable individuals through a qualified learning environment contributes to a skilled workforce, thereby strengthening the economy. Japan’s investment in education serves as an illustration, as it has helped the country become one of the most successful economic nations in a decade. Additionally, a robust medical system ensures the health of workers, enhancing their productivity and significantly contributing to economic growth. Scandinavian countries, with their heavy investment in healthcare, have reduced the rate of illness among workers, further strengthening their country’s economy.

In conclusion, the argument that government funds should be directed towards space programs is misguided. Instead, the government should prioritize investing in community services such as the medical system and the academic landscape due to their tangible benefits for the growth of the country’s economy.

The money spent by governments on space programmers would be better spent on vital public services - mẫu 2

It is sometimes argued that governments in some nations are wasting a lot of money on space programs to explore the universe rather than using those funds to provide public services. This view completely piques my interest. In this essay, I will provide my view and support it with reasons and justification.

To begin, there are a number of good reasons not to fund public services. First, we don't have a lot of money to spend. So, if we spend money on public services, we'll just make better use of what we already have instead of finding new sources. Second, Earth's population is growing over time, and if we don't find a new world where we can get the food we need, there will be a famine. It takes time to train employees who provide services like teaching, medical care, police work, and so on. In addition, public servants use a wide range of resources while carrying out work that benefits society.

In contrast, I believe that space missions should continue to receive funding from governments rather than essential public services. As a result, we need to find other planets and search for essential resources without which we cannot exist. For example, oxygen for breathing, water for drinking, petroleum for energy, and food for eating. Additionally, if we discover a suitable environment for survival, we can relocate a portion of our population there and become a multi-planet species. We also know that there are a lot of galaxies and planets in them, so at least one of the planets must have another intelligent species like humans on it. Last but not least, there are a lot of planets in space, and one of them could be another source of energy.

In conclusion, I believe that space projects that will benefit all of us should continue to be funded by the country's authorities.

The money spent by governments on space programmers would be better spent on vital public services - mẫu 3

I believe that governments must spend more on space research than on public services like schools and hospitals. It should be a top international priority, in my opinion. In addition to reducing global warming, this change may also lower energy resource prices. I will explain the details in this essay.

First, burning gasoline and its derivatives damages the atmosphere's ozone layer by emitting a significant amount of greenhouse gases. Since more than 90% of the planet's energy sources are nonrenewable, global warming is accelerating. To put it another way, pollution will get worse if governments (provide) don't act quickly. Scientific reports indicate that the average global temperature is almost ten times higher now than it was in the 1980s. This is harmful not only to humans but also to the atmosphere as a whole. Pollution caused by burning fuel is directly linked to this alarming climate change.

Second, because of the extensive extraction of petroleum deposits, the prices of nonrenewable fuels have been rising. As a result, petroleum must be replaced with more cost-effective energy sources. As a result, these deposits will eventually tend to disappear, increasing the price of gasoline significantly. The European Union is accelerating advancements in solar and wind energy generation as a means of resolving this issue. For instance, the majority of Norway's energy comes from renewable sources like hydro, biomass, wind, and solar. In addition, the fact that the electricity service in Norway is by far the most affordable in the world demonstrates the economic benefits of utilizing unrestricted natural resources. The world needs a new source of energy for which the space explorations are required.

In conclusion, developing public resources like schools and hospitals will improve the lifestyle but will not help in the long run. Spending money on space exploration might provide us with something that will help the world to prevail.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to take care of their own health and diet. Others, however, believe that governments should make sure that their citizens have a healthy diet. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Many people believe that learning a foreign language is a very difficult task. What are the most difficult things about learning a foreign language? What is the best way to overcome them?

• People in the limelight have a responsibility to set an example for others by their good behavior. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Many people prefer to use public transportation while others say that personal cars are the best mode of transportation. Excessive use of private cars is considered to be the main reason for the traffic jams in many cities and that’s why the use of public transportation is encouraged. In your opinion, what are the pros and cons of using public transport?

• Children who start reading earlier in life perform better later on in their school studies. How important are early reading skills in a child’s academic performance? What other preschool factors influence a child’s later academic achievements?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---