The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure

Đề bài: The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 1

The restoration of old buildings in cities often demands significant government expenditure. While preserving historical structures is essential, it is worth considering the benefits of allocating these resources to construct new houses and roads instead. This essay will argue that investing in new infrastructure can result in a more significant positive impact on society, compared to directing spending toward projects involving old buildings.

Firstly, spending money on building new houses can help alleviate the growing housing shortages faced by many cities. As urban populations continue to rise, the demand for affordable and accessible housing increases. By prioritizing new housing developments, governments can ensure that more citizens have access to decent living conditions, which in turn improves their quality of life. One example can be seen in the city of Vienna, Austria. Known for its well-established social housing program, the local government has invested in the construction of affordable and high-quality housing units for its citizens. As a result of these efforts, Vienna consistently ranks among the top cities in the world in terms of quality of life.

Secondly, allocating funds to construct new roads and improve existing transportation networks can have significant benefits for cities. Improved roads can reduce traffic congestion, decrease travel times, and enhance road safety. Moreover, well-planned transportation networks can boost public transit options, encouraging people to use more environmentally friendly modes of transportation. For example, instead of spending millions of dollars on restoring old structures, New York City decided to invest in upgrading and expanding the public transportation system, specifically the subway. As a result, New York City's residents and visitors experienced reduced travel times, less congestion during peak hours, and more convenient transportation options.

In conclusion, I believe that it is essential to recognize the advantages of investing in new housing and infrastructure projects. Instead of focusing on the restoration of old buildings, governments can significantly improve the lives of their citizens and foster the long-term development of cities by addressing housing shortages and improving transportation networks.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 2

Different governments around the world are spending a massive amount of money to restore century-old buildings in the metropolis (main city). Some people believe that the money should be spent on free housing programs and constructing new roads, instead, and I partly agree with it.

Restoring old buildings, especially those historic buildings, is essential in any government as they are part of the history of a country. In addition, they serve as reminders of a country's culture and tradition, and of how ancestors fought for their right to be independent from their colonizers. Also, those buildings help the country's tourism industry as they attract travelers from different parts of the world. For example, the Colosseum in Italy and the Great Wall of China, among others, help boost (improve) the annual revenue of tourism in those countries. Thus, investing a huge amount of money in restoring those types of buildings is not problematic.

However, I believe governments should be selective (choosy) in spending their money on the restoration of old buildings. They have to choose those old buildings with historical and cultural significance, otherwise, those buildings that are of no value must be demolished, especially if they pose risks to the general public. The government of any country, then, allocates (distributes some financial resources for a particular purpose) some money to build better roads and houses for people who cannot afford to buy or rent a house. In this way, the financial resources of any government will be maximized (make the best use of) and used in a more meaningful way.

To conclude, spending money on the restoration of old buildings with historical and cultural value is as important as building more roads and providing free houses to underprivileged citizens. Any government must make sure to address these two for the betterment of the country and its people.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 3

In recent years, the restoration of historic buildings in many cities has been a subject of ongoing debate. While some argue that the substantial government expenditure involved in such projects could be more beneficially utilized in the construction of new houses and roads, I disagree with this notion for the following reasons.

On the one hand, proponents of allocating government funds to the construction of new houses and roads argue that these projects are essential for addressing contemporary societal needs. Building new houses addresses the pressing issue of housing shortages, particularly in rapidly expanding urban areas, contributing to improved living standards and community well-being. Additionally, investing in the construction of roads and infrastructure plays a key role in promoting efficient transportation of goods and people. The development of modern road networks, exemplified by the expressways in countries like Japan or the United States, underscores the significance of infrastructure in supporting economic activities and ensuring the seamless flow of commerce.

While investing in new facilities is undeniably essential for urban development, I firmly believe that the restoration of old buildings also holds immense importance and thus deserves enormous state funding. Firstly, preserving these structures could not only foster a sense of cultural identity but also attract tourists, contributing to the local economy. For instance, the restoration of landmarks such as the Colosseum in Rome or the Taj Mahal in India has not only preserved historical heritage but also become a major source of revenue through tourism. Secondly, the restoration of old buildings can be a catalyst for urban revitalization. When historic districts are revitalized, more businesses will likely be established in these areas, which helps create more jobs and stimulate local economic growth.

In summary, while there is certainly a need to invest in new houses and roads, I disagree with the idea that redirecting government funds from restoration of old buildings towards these projects would yield greater benefits for society.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 4

Nowadays, the pressing need to provide shelter for the community is a mainstream issue being addressed by the government. However, the capital invested into construction renovation is huge compared with the cost of original housing development. I couldn’t have agreed more that this amount should rather be used for modern expansion alongside transportation routes. Analyzing the need for urbanization and the effect of construction retrofitting will justify it.

Firstly, more than half of the society’s population lacks a home in developing countries thereby encouraging human habitation in slums, where they have always been exposed to environmental disasters such as floods, outbreaks of diseases, and insecurities. For instance, urban cities across the world have been experiencing congestion due to overcrowding. Hence, erecting lodges in areas that are yet to be developed will be more advantageous to society.

Secondly, of course the approach of retrofitting as an alternative to building construction may be cheaper, particularly in the case of smaller projects. Yet, the risk attached to the processes involved could incur more costs. For example, the demolition of structural elements of the existing buildings, if not handled by experts could lead to vehement loss and even death, contrary to the budget. Thus, restructuring of housing should best be considered as the last result of expanding housing.

In a nutshell, the government’s record of a large amount for developing readymade houses as against contemporary homes and access roads, calls for the need to consider the option of investment with respect to project size and expertise.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 5

Government funding for the repair of historic structures is sometimes rather high in urban areas. Some contend, however, that it would be more advantageous to utilize this money to build new roads and residences. I think this point of view is justifiable, however it is still important to renovate the ancient buildings.

The reason is that the preservation of historic structures brings some undeniable advantages. One of them is that this would facilitate preserving a city's cultural heritage. Because these old buildings capture the architectural and historical significance of a certain era, they act as a link to the past. Repairing them therefore enables us to protect our cultural identity and provide the next generation with a tangible link to their history. Restoring the unique ancient structures can also attract tourists, which will develop the local tourism industry and in turn strengthen the local economy. These benefits can be clearly seen in cities such as Tokyo and Seoul, where the local governments allocate money to maintaining their ancient castles and palaces. By doing so, they have preserved their distinctive historical identities and drawn foreign visitors to these cities to explore their exotic cultures.

However, there are also beneficial effects to spending money on new homes and roads. First, governments can solve the housing crisis and give their residents better living conditions by building more homes. In many cities across the world, sufficient housing has long been considered necessary for society's advancement and people's well-being. Singapore is a salient example of a city where affordable housing has been emphasized so that its citizens can enjoy a higher quality of life and thereby, they willingly work hard to contribute to their city's development. In a similar vein, the construction of new roads may improve the transportation network, spurring economic expansion and enhancing connection both inside and between cities. To exemplify, a better road system would allow the transportation of products between businesses and clients to be faster, thus accelerating economic growth.

In conclusion, while the restoration of old buildings plays a significant role in preserving cultural heritage and boosting tourism, investing in new houses and roads addresses pressing societal needs and facilitates economic development. Therefore, to ensure both historical preservation and modern progress, finding a balance between the two approaches is essential rather than supporting just one.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 6

Preserving ancient buildings, the world overtakes huge sums of money, therefore, some argue that this fund can be utilized to build new shelters and maintain roads. This essay totally disagrees with this viewpoint because these historical buildings play a key role in preserving the culture and promoting tourism.

Firstly, restoring old buildings is a great means to preserve a nation’s cultural heritage. Every nation has some historical monuments that reflect the culture and history of that country. Therefore, keeping these buildings alive for posterity is a preferable school of thought rather than neglecting these masterpieces and spending them on other areas. For example, the UK government each year expends millions of pounds on the restoration of ancient buildings in the country.

Secondly, funding historical monuments for maintenance promotes tourism, especially in the Orient world. Many people from the western world flock to these countries to visit these masterpieces because of their aesthetic appeal. As tourism is one of the booming industries these days, it can aid the developing nations in boosting their economies by keeping old monuments in good shape. For example, millions of people flock to India to see Taj Mehal, which strengthens our nation’s economy. That is one of the main reasons our government allot vast amounts of money to preserve all the old buildings.

In conclusion, spending on preserving ancient buildings should be prioritised rather than diverting the allotted fund to restore old buildings to build new roads and houses because these historical buildings play a vital role to preserve culture and boost the tourism industry.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 7

Government spending is a highly controversial issue because people naturally have different priorities and beliefs. Some of them think that the money spent on the restoration of old buildings is wasteful, but this essay will argue against that notion, suggesting instead that these are essential pieces of a nation’s heritage.

To begin with, it is understandable that people might feel this way because there are numerous ways that a national budget might be spent, and old buildings are probably not high on most people’s lists. However, not everything that is important is obvious and often people do not realise the value of something until it is gone. Around Asia, for example, many countries underwent the same sort of industrial development in just two or three decades that Europe went through over a period of several centuries. As a result, these countries lost most of their ancient buildings, and these cannot be recovered. Many governments fund the construction of replicas, but these obviously lack the authenticity of truly ancient buildings.

Letting these buildings fall into ruin shows a staggering lack of civic pride. Cities and countries must unite to fund the maintenance of important shared spaces, including these historic sites. Without these places, cities begin to look unremarkable, and it is hard to tell one place from another. Whilst it is important to devote spending to new projects, governments must not overlook the heritage aspect that defined their city or country over a long period of time, and which continues to mark it in the modern era.

In conclusion, old buildings may seem like a waste of money because they can be expensive to maintain, but they are important in various ways, and so governments should set aside funding to ensure their upkeep. 

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 8

The preservation of historic buildings in major cities places a significant burden on government budgets. However, despite this substantial drain on state funds, it is highly important that these old structures are maintained for future generations.

Old buildings give a city character. In other words, they tell the story of a city’s history and how it has changed over time. Cities like Prague, for instance, are massively popular tourist destinations because people can see magnificent buildings from centuries ago rather than be surrounded entirely by modern structures that are functional but have no soul.

A related idea is that old buildings can be a source of revenue rather than a great expense. As mentioned above, tourists flock to Prague to experience the atmosphere created by being surrounding by centuries of history, while very few people travel to some other cities in Europe that were rebuilt at the end of World War Two and feature drab square concrete buildings.

Nevertheless, a government’s finances are limited, and the construction of new buildings and transport infrastructure is essential. Therefore, perhaps only buildings with substantial historic or architectural value should be preserved and just being old does not necessarily make something important.

Generally speaking, paying for the upkeep of old buildings should be a priority for governments due to their cultural and potential economic value. Cities are places where people live, and life is better when we are surrounded by impressive monuments from the past that can inspire us for the future. 

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 9

There is ongoing debate about whether government expenditure should be primarily focused on the restoration of old buildings in major cities or directed towards new housing and road development. While I agree that significant funds are required for the restoration of historical structures, I also believe that investment in new housing and road development is essential for urban growth and improved quality of life. Therefore, it is important to strike a balance between these two aspects in order to achieve sustainable development.

One argument in favor of investing in new housing and road development centers around the increasing demand for affordable and modern accommodation as well as efficient transportation systems. As urbanization continues and cities expand, it is crucial to provide adequate housing for the growing population. In addition, well-structured road networks are essential for easy commuting and improved connectivity, which can contribute to economic growth and opportunities in various sectors.

On the other hand, preserving old buildings carries significant cultural and historical value. These structures provide a glimpse into a city's past, reflecting its architectural heritage and unique identity. By restoring and maintaining historical buildings, cities can attract tourists, boost cultural tourism, and generate revenue. Moreover, preserving the historical charm of neighborhoods can enhance residents' sense of pride and attachment to their community.
In conclusion, while substantial government expenditure is necessary for the restoration of old buildings in major cities, investment in new housing and road development should also be prioritized. Striking a balance between these two aspects is crucial for accommodating the growing population, improving urban infrastructure, and preserving cultural heritage. By combining these efforts, cities can achieve sustainable development, enhance residents' quality of life, and foster economic growth.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 10

Restoring and maintaining dated buildings in major cities often takes considerable governmental funding. Some people oppose this and favour using tax money to construct more houses and road infrastructure. I generally agree with this idea because a society ought to provide its citizens with the basic need of housing, yet in cases of historic and iconic buildings, exceptions should be granted.

In big cities, tax money should be allocated to provide adequate housing and construct more roads to accommodate the increasing population. More and more people from economically deprived regions have been migrating to metropolitan areas in search of work. This has caused the population density in certain cities to rise remarkably, bringing in its wake negative outcomes such as traffic congestion and crowded living quarters. Using tax money to build more houses, therefore, provides people with affordable shelters that low-income people could purchase. In addition, constructing more roads means smoother traffic which enables the economy to grow effectively.

On the other hand, there are buildings that are worth restoring because of their historical or symbolic significance. These buildings are the source of inspiration for arts and sometimes income for the local people, and they are of great interest to historians, archaeologists and architects for their academic values. Structures within the Imperial City of Hue are the prime example of such buildings. The Imperial City of Hue has been the subject of countless works of art and literature, and as a tourist attraction, it has also been beneficial to local business. Academically, it offers a glimpse into how life was in ancient Vietnam.

In conclusion, I agree that constructing more houses and roads is important and should generally be prioritized over maintaining old buildings with the exception of historically significant constructions. I believe this should be the approach for most cities.

The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure - mẫu 11

Across the world, enormous funds have been devoted by governments to renovate plenty of ancient buildings in metropolises to protect the cultural and historical heritages. After serious consideration, I deem that the investments from the governments should more particularly emphasize on expanding the area of residential buildings and perfecting transport facilities to satisfy the developments of conurbations and the needs of people.

Enormous capital injected by governments towards dwelling houses and public transport services should be the inevitable consequence of urbanization. Due to emergence of various platforms and employment opportunities in metropolises, people flood into the urban areas to realize their self-value and obtain more materially abundant life, however, this imposes huge burdens onexisting lodgings and transportation system. From this point, it is the obligation of governments to expand residential areas that people expect of and provide more convenient and faster public transportation to alleviate the deteriorating traffic condition.

In addition, governments' investing in new lodgings and improving the current transportation system can embody the actual demands from people and is favorable for tackling a series of issues evoked by high housing price, housing shortage and traffic congestion. Therefore, I believe addressing housing shortage and controlling high house prices by means of governments investing in the real estate sector is exactly the way out for solving the biggest problem people are confronted with. Secondly, improving the current transportation condition is the effective way to enhance happiness index and life satisfaction index.

It is undeniable that it is also reasonable to some extent that governments invest in renovating ancient buildings. It can be conducive to inheriting cultures and safeguarding the local customs and traditions better. Nevertheless, the funds invested by governments should be used to tackle practical issues people are confronted with better so as to provide more suitable living conditions and make people enjoy the convenience brought about by improving the public transportation.

On balance, after taking into account the above perspectives, the government should put more money in improving the living conditions, adjusting the high housing price and providing more perfect and advanced transportation facilities while adopting reasonable measures to protect the ancient buildings in conurbations.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people feel that the private lives of celebrities should not be openly shared by the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree

• Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that space programmes should continue no matter what the cost. Discuss both sides and give your opinion

• The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree?

• Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think it is essential for us to learn history. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• It is important that we maintain and protect the beautiful buildings of the past, even if it is expensive for countries to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---