Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 1

Climate change has become a pressing and complex issue today. The question arises whether we should refrain from taking further preventative measures and resign ourselves to this devastating circumstance. In my view, I strongly disagree with the notion that we should accept climate change as inevitable and instead argue for proactive methods to prevent its adverse consequences due to their long-term effects.

On one hand, adaptation is often seen as a contemporary solution to climate change. For instance, in many flood-prone coastal regions, the construction of flood defenses has taken place to combat rising sea levels caused by global warming. Similarly, new building codes have been implemented to ensure that homes can withstand more extreme weather events. While these measures have mitigated environmental damage to some extent, it is important to recognise that they provide only short-term solutions. They fail to address the underlying causes of climate change, such as deforestation and non-renewable energy exploitation, which continue to exert irreversible consequences to ecology and human life.

On the other hand, prevention should be the primary focus on account of its far-reaching impacts. One typical preventive measure is public campaigns playing a crucial role in reshaping community awareness and attitudes toward global warming. By educating younger generations about climate change and the importance of protecting the Earth from an early age, we can foster an eco-friendly lifestyle that includes energy conservation and waste reduction. Therefore, this proactive approach ensures that global warming is addressed not only in the present but also in the long term.

Additionally, advancements in climate technologies, such as the development of renewable energy sources, contribute to sustainable climate control by significantly reducing carbon footprints resulting from human activities.

In conclusion, while adaptation measures like flood defenses and building codes serve as short-term solutions, they do not address the root causes of climate change. Meanwhile, prevention, through public education and technological advancements, holds greater potential for long-lasting influences. Therefore, I firmly support prioritising preventive methods over accepting and living with the environmental problem.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 2

Climate change represents a major threat to life on Earth, but some people argue that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion since such a practice might lead to irreversible consequences which could be avoided if efforts are put into protecting the environment and minimizing human footprint on the Earth’s climate.

Firstly, trying to live with climate change is a false belief which might result in disastrous implications. To give just one example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with continuing rises in sea levels due to climate change. Millions of people would be displaced by flooding, particularly in countries that do not have the means to safeguard low-lying areas. These people would lose their homes and their jobs, and eventually be forced to migrate to nearby cities or perhaps to other countries. The potential for human suffering and financial loss would be huge, which would be compounded by the outbreaks of disease and famine, as well as increased homelessness and poverty.

Secondly, the idea of slowing climate change is feasible through the implementation of various measures carried out by governments and individuals. Governments could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming, which might include imposing “green taxes” on drivers, airline companies and other polluters and investing in renewable energy production from solar, wind or waterpower. As individuals, people should also try to limit their contribution to climate change, by becoming more energy efficient, by flying less, and by using bicycles and public transport. Furthermore, the public can affect the actions of governments by voting for politicians who propose to tackle climate change, rather than for those who would prefer to ignore it.

In conclusion, it is clear to me that we must address the problem of climate change since finding ways to live with it might lead to irreversible consequences. Rather than enduring, individuals and governments can join hands to slacken the speed of climate change by imposing green policies and saving resources.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 3

Perhaps the greatest threat to the world is not regional conflicts, terrorism, or political instability, but climate change and environmental degradation. If we do not address this greatest danger properly and in time, we will be responsible for our own extinction, and I do not believe that we should find ways to live with it by doing nothing about it.

To commence with, the rising global temperature, Arctic ice melting, deforestation, air pollution and depletion of the ozone layer are all connected and would lead to a single event - the destruction of the world. We have already harmed the environment to a great extent, and the time has come for all nations to work together to reduce the environmental damage caused by our actions and greed. The sudden floods in the USA, intense storms in Asia, and unpredictable droughts in Africa are all resulting from climate change, and this change is occurring more rapidly than ever before. If we let this continue, the future would be even more perilous. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, consequences of climate change include the increased intensity of storms including tropical cyclones, increased risks of drought, wetter Asian monsoons, and, possibly, more intense mid-latitude storms.

The last thing humans should do is to turn a blind eye to this imminent problem and learn to live with it, of course, unless we want the termination of the human race! There is a lot to do, and we should start implementing regional cooperation right now. Every individual should contribute by emitting fewer fumes and planting as many trees as possible while the use of fossil fuel should be globally prohibited. Industrial countries have more responsibilities as they contribute more to environmental degradation and an international panel should be formed by giving it supreme power to make any legislation to curb environmental damage.

To conclude, for our existence on Mother Earth, we should take immediate actions at individual, regional and international levels to check climate change. Otherwise, we will fail to save our planet and future generations.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 4

Climate change is one of the most pressing issues of our time, and there is a growing consensus among scientists and policymakers that urgent action is needed to prevent its worst effects. In light of this, the idea that we should simply learn to live with climate change is misguided and dangerous. While it may be true that some level of adaptation will be necessary as temperatures continue to rise and weather patterns become more extreme, this should not be seen as a substitute for efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

One reason why the "live with it" approach is problematic is that it fails to account for the immense costs that climate change is likely to impose on society. According to the United Nations, climate change could cost the world economy as much as $360 billion per year by 2030, and up to $1.2 trillion per year by 2060. This includes both the direct costs of climate impacts, such as damage to infrastructure and property, as well as indirect costs such as lost productivity, health impacts, and displacement of people.

Furthermore, the idea of simply living with climate change ignores the fact that it is likely to disproportionately affect the most vulnerable members of society. For example, low-income communities and people living in coastal areas or areas prone to drought or extreme weather events are likely to bear the brunt of climate impacts. This is already being seen in many parts of the world, where communities are experiencing more frequent and severe heatwaves, floods, and storms.

In addition, taking a "live with it" approach could also undermine efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and prevent further warming. If people believe that it is futile to try and stop climate change, they may be less likely to support measures such as transitioning to renewable energy or reducing consumption.

To conclude, climate change and its dire consequences are real. We need to take every measure possible to revert to the damage caused to the mother planet and take initiatives to prevent climate change for our own survival. This is why "learning to live with it" is misguided and a dangerous approach which will only accelerate our destruction and extinction.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 5

As climate change increasingly becomes an urgent global issue, some argue that our focus should shift from thwarting its progress to learning to coexist with it. However, this perspective is not without its merits and drawbacks, particularly in the context of Vietnam.

Proponents of the view that we need to live with climate change often highlight the inevitability of the phenomenon. For instance, given Vietnam's elongated coastline, rising sea levels have already manifested in the form of recurrent floods in urban areas like Ho Chi Minh City. Traditional measures to combat this, such as building barriers, are deemed unsustainable in the long run. Moreover, the nation's agriculture, largely based in the Mekong Delta, is susceptible to increasing salinity due to these rising sea levels. It's argued that strategies should be designed to adapt crops, rather than futilely combating an inexorable force. Nevertheless, a counterargument arises when considering the potential for human ingenuity. In the past, Vietnamese farmers have been known to develop innovative farming techniques in response to challenges, signifying that perhaps preemptive action against climate change might not be as hopeless as believed.

However, I believe that solely adapting to climate change is a perilous approach. Whilst mitigation measures might not offer immediate relief, their long-term implications for the environment and socio-economic structures are invaluable. Taking Vietnam as a case in point, its burgeoning tourism industry, which thrives on natural attractions such as Ha Long Bay and Phong Nha Caves, stands at risk if we merely accept the wrath of climate change. Were these treasures to be compromised, not only would the nation's economy suffer, but an irreplaceable part of its cultural identity would be lost forever. In the face of such potential devastation, striving to prevent, rather than simply endure, is the more sagacious choice.

In conclusion, while the immediate realities of climate change in places like Vietnam might prompt some to advocate for acclimatization over prevention, I firmly opine that efforts to halt this global crisis should remain paramount. By doing so, we not only safeguard our present but also bequeath a sustainable legacy to future generations.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 6

Climate change represents a major threat to life on Earth, but some people argue that we need to accept it rather than try to stop it. I completely disagree with this opinion, because I believe that we still have time to tackle this issue and reduce the human impact on the Earth's climate.

There are various measures that governments and individuals could take to prevent, or at least mitigate, climate change. Governments could introduce laws to limit the carbon dioxide emissions that lead to global warming. They could impose “green taxes” on drivers, airline companies and other polluters, and they could invest in renewable energy production from solar, wind or waterpower.

As individuals, we should also try to limit our contribution to climate change, by becoming more energy efficient, by flying less, and by using bicycles and public transport. Furthermore, the public can affect the actions of governments by voting for politicians who propose to tackle climate change, rather than for those who would prefer to ignore it.

If instead of taking the above measures we simply try to live with climate change, I believe that the consequences will be disastrous. To give just one example, I am not optimistic that we would be able to cope with even a small rise in sea levels. Millions of people would be displaced by flooding, particularly in countries that do not have the means to safeguard low-lying areas. These people would lose their homes and their jobs, and they would be forced to migrate to nearby cities or perhaps to other countries. The potential for human suffering would be huge, and it is likely that we would see outbreaks of disease and famine, as well as increased homelessness and poverty.

In conclusion, it is clear to me that we must address the problem of climate change, and I disagree with those who argue that we can find ways to live with it.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 7

Some suggest that we adapt to climate change rather than try to prevent it. I take issue with this assertion for two main reasons, which will be explained below.

To begin with, adapting to climate change is a short-term solution. This is because the Earth’s climate is largely unpredictable and still poorly understood despite the advances in climate prediction technologies. Thus, adaptation measures that seem effective for today’s climate may fail to address the long-term effects of climate change. For instance, city planners can relocate cities further inland in response to rising sea levels, but these cities may eventually suffer from low precipitation and water shortage due to a sudden change in cloud formation. In this sense, adaptation proves a short-sighted measure to a phenomenon yet to be fully understood.

Furthermore, preventing climate change would be a more sensible course of action. This is because while adaptation deals with the effects of climate change to some degree, preventative measures tend to target the root causes of climate change. One prime example of a prevention strategy would be switching to renewable energy in order to curb human carbon output – a primary contributor to global warming. This measure serves humankind longer than adaptation measures like large-scale installation of air-conditioning in cities to bring down temperature levels.

In conclusion, I am adamantly opposed to the idea of adapting to climate change not only because it is a half measure but also because its alternative – prevention – is far more practical from a long-term future perspective.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 8

Climate change has been the most challenging problem that has ever faced humankind. Nevertheless, from some people’s perspective, the best solution to sustain the life of people through the drastic changes in climate is to adapt to reduce the damage that it causes, rather than prevent it. From my personal standpoint, I find this statement partially justifiable due to the reasons that are going to be detailed demonstrated in this writing.

On the one hand, without both the authorities' and the public’s full preparation for climate change, its impacts can be quite detrimental. There is no doubt that the intensity of climate change events is escalating. A clear example to illustrate this point is hurricane Maria which struck Puerto Rico. Due to the complicated relationship between the US and Puerto Rico, the island’s constructions specializing in the defense against storms and floods have not received much careful treatment. After the destructive hurricane Maria, most of Puerto Rico’s building structure has been severely affected and its citizens are living without electricity and daily supply. Therefore, governments, local communities, and organizations concerning environmental protection must cooperate to upgrade facilities, as well as inform and educate people about the skills and knowledge required to survive the frequency of extreme weather events.

On the other hand, climate change prevention holds increasing importance to the future of our generation. It is unavoidable truth that humans cause climate change. Owing to human deforestation for agriculture or residency, and burning fossil fuels for energy, numerous natural habitats have vanished. This leads to global warming and rising sea levels, which are the key factors in the increasing appearance of natural disasters. If the climate crisis is not adequately addressed, more severe issues, such as food shortage, lack of accommodation, and housing will be imminent. Thus, not only the governments must invent laws that regulate the level of carbon emissions of factories and vehicles, but companies must also invent the proper method to make production more environmentally friendly. Most importantly, the public must acknowledge the impacts of climate change in order for them to adjust their living standards in favor of the environment.

In conclusion, owing to the emergency and the destructiveness of climate change, it is relatively urgent that governments and local authorities must upgrade their facilities to ensure their stability if any natural disasters occur. Nevertheless, methods that involve preventing climate change are seriously required so that the continuity of these extreme climate change events would drop.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 9

The debate around climate change has led some to argue that instead of solely focusing on preventing it, we should also find ways to adapt to its inevitable impacts. While I acknowledge the importance of both approaches, I believe that the best strategy is to combine prevention with adaptation.

To begin with, either prevention or adaptation only can not solve the problem of climate change completely. On the one hand, focusing only on prevention may not be entirely effective, as climate change is, to some extent, unavoidable. Despite global efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition to renewable energy, the effects of climate change - such as rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and shifts in ecosystems - are already occurring. This suggests that even with the most rigorous preventative measures, some degree of climate change is inevitable. Thus, solely relying on prevention is not a comprehensive solution. On the other hand, focusing exclusively on adaptation is also not a viable strategy. The rapid pace of climate change outstrips the speed at which human development can counteract its effects. While technological advancements and adaptation strategies, like building resilient infrastructure and developing sustainable agricultural practices, are crucial, they may not be sufficient to keep pace with the escalating impacts of climate change. Relying solely on adaptation could lead to a scenario where we are constantly reacting to crises rather than proactively addressing the root causes.

A more effective approach to tackling climate change lies in the integration of both prevention and adaptation strategies. Preventative measures work to slow down the progression of climate change, while adaptive strategies ensure that we are prepared for the changes that do occur. This dual approach allows us to tackle the problem from multiple angles, reducing the risk of catastrophic outcomes and enhancing our capacity to thrive in a changing world. Ultimately, integrating prevention and adaptation is not just a pragmatic response, but a necessary one to ensure the long-term sustainability of our planet and the well-being of future generations.

In conclusion, while both prevention and adaptation are important, a combined approach is essential for effectively addressing climate change. By integrating these strategies, we can achieve a more sustainable and resilient future.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 10

Climate change has started threatening our very existence on this planet. The soaring temperatures have already caused the extinction of many species. Some people feel that it is difficult or impossible to stop climate change. In their opinion, we need to find ways to live with it. I disagree with this view because climate change can be prevented to a great extent. And when it can be prevented, we do not have to find ways to live with it.

The argument that instead of preventing climate change we need to explore alternative ways to live with it shows our unwillingness to change our irresponsible ways. We need to accept the fact that climate change didn't happen on its own. It was triggered by our actions. Since the days of industrialization, we have been consuming natural resources without thinking about the consequences of our actions. When we burn fossil fuels, we produce many gases that increase global warming. The last decade saw a dramatic increase in the number of vehicles on the road. All of them emit dangerous carbon dioxide. Refrigerators and air conditioners are now found in almost all homes. They also produce greenhouse gases. Unfortunately, what we do to reduce the heat inside our homes and offices increases global warming. This is a vicious cycle, and we must get out of it.

The best way to reduce climate change is to use our resources responsibly. We need to invest in alternative energy sources like solar and wind. In addition, the government should encourage people to use public transport systems. Imposing 'green taxes' on private vehicles and airlines could be a step in the right direction. Everyone needs to make a conscious effort to reduce their carbon footprint by consuming less energy. Both the government and the media need to create awareness about the growing threat caused by rising temperatures and changing climate.

To conclude, there are several ways to prevent climate change and hence the argument that we need to find ways to cope with it does not hold water. It merely shows our unwillingness to reduce our carbon footprint.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 11

Significant climate changes have been observed in many parts of the world. Some people believe that figuring out a way to adapt to the changing climate rather than preventing it from happening is the best solution to this problem. In my opinion, I agree with this statement to some extent. I think people should try to mitigate the negative effects caused by climate change so that they can live with it. Meanwhile, they should also take some measures to prevent it from getting worse.

It is undeniable that it is necessary for people to find a way to live with the changing climate because it has already happened. We cannot actually prevent something that has already happened. All people must face the truth that the changing climate has brought us a variety of negative impacts. For example, the temperature is increasing, and the sea level is rising. Finding a way to mitigate the demerits of these phenomena is, therefore, critical to human beings. Only in this way will the development of human society not be inhibited by the effects of climate change.

While it is impossible for us to prevent the climate change that has already happened, it does not mean that we can allow the situation to get worse. People still need to find out the reason for climate change and try to come up with a practical solution to prevent it from getting worse. If we only focus on how to adapt the changes but ignore the problem itself, the change of climate will become more significant. The more significantly the climate has changed, the more difficult it is for us to deal with it. We have to adopt some measures to prevent it from being unmitigable. Otherwise, the world may suffer from catastrophic consequences.

To conclude, we have to admit the fact that climate change has already happened therefore we must find a way to adapt to these changes. However, a series of prevention measures still need to be figured out to avoid the predictable worse situation in the future.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 12

Many people suggest that we should adapt to and live with climate change rather than try to prevent it. I strongly disagree with this viewpoint because it is a short-sighted idea and ignores the urgent need to address the root causes and mitigate the severe consequences of global warming. In my opinion, it is essential that we prioritize efforts to prevent climate change rather than resign ourselves to its consequences.

One compelling reason to prioritize prevention is the potential scale of the impacts of climate change. Rising global temperatures, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events pose significant risks to ecosystems, human health, and the global economy. By taking proactive measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, we can mitigate these risks and work towards a more sustainable and resilient future.

Furthermore, preventing climate change aligns with the principles of sustainability and environmental stewardship. We have a responsibility to protect the planet and its resources for future generations. Embracing a mindset of living with climate change without addressing its underlying causes would be short-sighted and detrimental to the long-term well-being of both people and the planet. A notable example of the importance of preventing climate change is the Paris Agreement. This global accord aims to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius and pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels. The agreement recognizes the urgent need for collective action to reduce emissions and transition to low-carbon economies. By working together to prevent climate change, countries can foster international cooperation and make significant strides towards a sustainable future.

In conclusion, the idea of living with climate change instead of preventing it is misguided. We must prioritize prevention by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, transitioning to renewable energy sources, and adopting sustainable practices. By doing so, we can mitigate the risks and ensure a healthier and more sustainable future for generations to come.

Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to - mẫu 13

Perhaps the best danger to the planet is not the nuclear bombs, but the regional conflicts, terrorism, and an epidemic of people or governmental instability, however also the climate change and ecological degradation. If we do not handle this best risk properly, we will be liable for our very own temptations, and I do not feel that we ought to allow it to occur by doing nothing about that.

The unexpected flooding in the United States, a severe storm in Asian nations, inconsistent droughts in African American nations are entirely resulting in climate change, and this shift is happening rapidly than previously. If we allow this to continue, the future could be much riskier. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, effects of climate fluctuations include the higher intensity of storms such as tropical cyclones, raised risks of drought and also, a neighbouring Asian monsoon, and also, perhaps, more extreme mid-latitude storms. Based on a 2001 report, global warming could lead to sea levels to grow around 4 ft by 2100, and several nations such as some South Asian nations would suffer considerably from this.

The final thing that humans must do in order to develop a blind eye on this impending issue and learn how to live with this, needless to say, when we do not need to have the conclusion of this human race. There is a great deal to do, and also, we ought to begin executing regional collaboration at the moment. Every person should donate by emitting fumes and planting as many trees as you can while the usage of fossil fuel ought to be internationally banned. Industrial nations have more duties since they contribute more to ecological degradation, and a global panel ought to be shaped with providing it with a supreme ability to earn any laws to kerb the ecological damages.

In conclusion, for our life at the mother, Earthwe must take prompt action both in-person and global level to inspect the climate shift. Otherwise, we will fail to conserve our world.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Many people think that it is better to get advice from older people rather than young ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people say that nowadays children have too much freedom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• The best way to understand other cultures is to work for a multinational organisation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Young people are often influenced in their behaviors by others in the same age group. Some argue that peer pressure is important while others feel it has distinct disadvantages. Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages?

• Many parents today organise extra classes for their children after school and at the weekends. Do you feel that this is a worthwhile thing to do, or do you feel children have enough education at school?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---