Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts

Đề bài: Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 1

The arts are both a window into a culture's history and an expression of the unique personalities of the citizens of a country. While I agree that the government shouldn't waste money on the arts, I also think that doing so would be a mistake.

It is widely believed that investing in the arts is inappropriate for national progress and citizen welfare. Many people propose that the available funds should be used to improve infrastructure such as healthcare facilities, transportation networks, educational opportunities, and other similar institutions which will help in better transportation to previously unavailable areas and more medical attention for those who are sick. Better educational opportunities for kids should be the main focus. Many governments, in the eyes of these individuals, simply cannot afford to support the art as it is a luxury.

On the other hand, the arts are just as important as other areas where investment is needed. The arts have been shown to reduce crime, increase social cohesion, and increase civic participation, all of which point to the economic benefits of investing in their growth and maintenance. Visitors from all over the world flock to museums and art galleries, boosting the economy, while artists expose the biases of our society through their creations. Similarly, engaging in artistic pursuits like painting, music, acting, dancing, and so on can help relieve stress and teach people new skills. Likewise, these kinds of actions give the world a good impression of a country. Many museums and theaters would close permanently without government funding for the arts. The true development of a nation depends as much on the arts as it does on science.

In conclusion, the arts benefit both individuals and society. Thus, government arts funding is not wasteful. 

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 2

Some people argue that a nation has more important issues to deal with before it can devote resources to the arts. It seems reasonable to me, however, to set aside some of the budgets for the purpose of preserving and fostering the arts, as I believe they are an integral part of any culture.

Of course, those opposed to funding for the arts have their reasons for doing so. First of all, the majority of artistic endeavours are costly and lack obvious results that are directly related to a country's income. For instance, the Kebangkitan Pahlawan monument in Malang city, which has absorbed almost 1 billion rupiahs, does not draw a lot of attention. In addition, art is not essential to the continuation of human life. The existence of humans will not end simply because they lack aesthetic taste.

Nonetheless, I continue to believe the government should provide funding for the arts. There is a strong possibility that a country's arts scene will become a significant economic driver as the arts become increasingly integral to the nation's identity. In addition, art makes life worthwhile. Art, like food, is a supplement to the human soul. Its uniqueness has a magnificent power to aid buildings, roads, parks, and everything. Consider how empty a room would be if there were no paintings or decorations on the walls. Art enriches people's lives by allowing them to make use of their experiences and develop their own uniquely beautiful imaginations.

In conclusion, it is essential for a government to invest in the arts because doing so would either improve the tourism industry or provide better artistic facilities, both of which would help in an overall improvement in the quality of life.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 3

There are some people who believe that funding the arts is a waste of money that could be better used to address other, more urgent societal problems. I agree that there are probably a lot of issues that can't be fixed unless we allocate a lot more money to the problem.

I agree with the idea that the government should spend money on increasingly serious problems rather than the arts. This is due to the fact that the majority of talented people in today's society are focused on their careers and looking for better ways to earn money. To put it another way, modern media considers the arts to be pointless; instead, it would be more beneficial to direct resources toward finding solutions to the major problems that impede the economic development of so many countries. Because a healthy population results in an increase in the size of the labour force, which in turn contributes to a high level of budget, healthcare is deserving of more financial support than the arts.

Another factor to take into account is that art is not a necessary component of a well-rounded education and therefore should not be given more weight than other topics. Because of this, it won't be possible to assist young people in finding jobs in the future. As an illustration, considering that the arts aren't as crucial as other subjects, parents typically encourage their children to concentrate on math and science while they are in school rather than the arts.

To summarise, the primary concerns for every nation should be addressing important issues such as healthcare reform and educational inequality. These should be the primary factors.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 4

It is believed that spending money on arts is not very useful and that it should be directed elsewhere. I completely disagree with this and feel that arts are worth every penny that is spent on them.

First of all, arts are considered a national interest. In some countries, arts have significant importance and government establishes and maintains organizations that preserve arts. For example, Canada, USA, UK, Australia have art museums all over the country that exhibit ancient arts. People who are interested can visit the museums free of cost. The cost of maintenance is undertaken by the government. Moreover, this increases the level of interest among the people. Thus, the government puts an inconsiderable amount of effort to preserve the arts in the form of museums, craft exhibitions, etcetera.

Secondly, arts are considered to be a great form of entertainment by several people in the country. For instance, movies, exhibitions, crafts are derived from arts. Movies are considered very lucrative and there is a film industry for every language. Like, Hollywood is for English, Tollywood is for Telugu, Bollywood for Hindi. Exhibitions and crafts display several creations like paintings, clay buildings, paper arts, and glass paintings.

Encouragement for arts from government improves the livelihood of thousands of people who base their career on arts. This proves beneficial both to people who work on arts and others who enjoy arts.

To conclude, since arts play an important role in the lives of people, it is very important for the government to make sure that arts are financed properly in a variety of forms like museums, exhibitions, documentary films, craft expos, and so on.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 5

Arts reflect the heritage of a country and depict the creativity of an individual. While many believe that financing in arts is a wastage of money, I am of the opposite view as I believe that financing in arts is a good idea for the government.

Many people think that diverting funds towards the arts hampers the well-being of citizens and the development of the nation. For example, available monetary resources, according to them, could be put to use in building more hospitals, roads, schools and developing other infrastructures. This means increasing care of the sick and improved transportation to previously inaccessible areas. For children, it caters for better education facilities. These people believe that art is a luxury, and many governments cannot afford this extravagance.

However, while investments in such areas are vital, spending on arts is equally important. Allocating money to the development and sustenance of the arts helps boost the economy, and arts are important to alleviate crime from society and positively entertain and engage people. Art galleries can attract tourists from all over the world, generating revenue in return while artists can reveal discrimination of society through their works. It is also the case that viewing and practising arts, such as painting, music, acting, dancing and so on, are good sources of venting out stress while educating people at the same time. Such activities also portray a positive picture of a nation to the world. If governments fail to support arts fiscally, many art galleries and theatres would not be able to survive. Arts is as important as science for the true progress of a nation.
In pithy, it is clear to me that spending on arts is beneficial both for an individual and society. Therefore, funding arts by the government is not squandering money.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 6

There is an ongoing debate regarding the allocation of government funds to the arts, with some individuals asserting that such expenditures constitute a waste of resources, suggesting that the funds could be more effectively utilised elsewhere. While I acknowledge the need for prudent financial management, I firmly believe that investment in the arts yields numerous societal benefits that justify the allocation of government funds.

Government funding for the arts is essential and should not be dismissed as wasteful expenditure. Investment in the arts fosters cultural enrichment, preserves heritage, and enhances national identity. The arts contribute to the social fabric of a nation, fostering creativity, critical thinking, and personal expression. The annual Edinburgh Festival in Scotland is a prime illustration of the positive impact of government-funded arts initiatives. This event attracts millions of visitors and showcases a wide range of performances, exhibitions, and cultural events, contributing significantly to the local economy while celebrating Scotland’s rich cultural heritage. Furthermore, the arts industry generates employment opportunities and drives economic growth through tourism and cultural events. For instance, renowned art galleries, museums, and theatres attract visitors from around the world, stimulating local economies and creating jobs.

Finally, arts play a crucial role in promoting social cohesion and inclusivity. They provide a platform for marginalized voices and promote dialogue on important social issues. By supporting diverse artistic expressions, governments can foster understanding, empathy, and tolerance among citizens. For instance, the “Black Lives Matter” movement gained significant momentum through various forms of artistic expression, including music, visual art, and performance. These creative endeavours not only provided a platform for activists to raise their voices but also helped educate the public about systemic racism and inequality

In conclusion, dismissing spending on the arts as waste would overlook the significant benefits they provide to society. Investment in the arts promotes cultural enrichment, stimulates economic growth, and fosters social cohesion. Therefore, I firmly disagree with the notion that government spending on the arts is a misuse of resources, and I back the continued support and investment in this vital sector.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 7

The allocation of government funds is often debated, and one area that often comes under scrutiny is arts funding. Some argue that the government is squandering money by investing in the arts and that these funds would be better utilised in other areas. In this essay, I will argue in agreement with this perspective, highlighting the need to prioritise essential sectors such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure over the arts.

Firstly, in many developing countries, there are pressing needs in areas like education that require significant financial resources. Schools often struggle with outdated facilities, inadequate resources, and overcrowded classrooms. By diverting funds from the arts to education, governments can address these urgent issues and provide students with a better learning environment. For instance, additional funding could be used to improve infrastructure, hire more teachers, and enhance educational programmes, ensuring that future generations have the necessary skills and knowledge to thrive in a competitive world.

Furthermore, healthcare is another critical sector that deserves greater attention and investment. Many healthcare systems face challenges such as long waiting times, understaffing, and limited access to essential treatments. By reallocating funds from the arts to healthcare, governments can improve the quality and accessibility of healthcare services for all citizens. Lastly, infrastructure development is vital for economic growth and the overall well-being of society. Neglected roads, bridges, and public transportation systems can hinder productivity, impede trade, and jeopardize public safety. By investing in infrastructure projects, governments can stimulate economic activity, create jobs, and enhance the overall efficiency of transportation networks. Allocating funds to such projects would have a tangible and lasting impact on the lives of citizens, improving their daily commutes, reducing congestion, and promoting sustainable development.

In conclusion, while the arts hold cultural and aesthetic value, it is essential to prioritise limited government funds toward sectors that directly address the fundamental needs of society. By redirecting resources from the arts to areas such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure, governments can make a more significant impact on the well-being and prosperity of their citizens.

Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts - mẫu 8

Many contend that government funding for the arts is better allocated to sectors such as healthcare, education, or infrastructure, deeming arts investment as impractical. I argue against this notion, advocating that funding the arts is essential for cultural, economic, and societal benefits, thus meriting its place in government budgets.

First, the arts enrich cultural heritage and national identity, pivotal in an increasingly globalized world. For example, Aboriginal art in Australia not only offers aesthetic pleasure but also plays a crucial role in preserving cultural narratives and traditions. Curtailing such funding risks diminishing a nation's cultural legacy and diversity.

Economically, the arts sector is a significant contributor, creating jobs, attracting tourism, and generating revenue. Studies have shown that every dollar invested in the arts yields substantial returns, revitalizing local economies and contributing to economic diversity. This is evident in cities like Liverpool, which transformed into a cultural hub, enhancing its economic landscape significantly.

Socially, the arts promote mental health and foster social cohesion. Integrating arts in education has proven to boost academic performance and enhance critical thinking skills. Moreover, arts provide a platform for diverse societal dialogue, facilitating mutual understanding and cohesion, particularly valuable in times of social unrest.

Although essential services require robust funding, dismissing arts financing is short-sighted. A balanced budget that nurtures the arts alongside essential services fosters a well-rounded societal development. Ignoring the arts could lead to a cultural and societal impoverishment that undermines long-term national prosperity.

In conclusion, viewing arts funding as a governmental waste is an oversimplification. The arts are not merely a luxury but are integral to the nation's cultural, economic, and social framework. Properly funded, the arts can yield substantial benefits across various aspects of societal development.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution is not to use technology to live a simple life. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think sending criminals to prison is not an effective way to deal with them. Education and training are better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Fewer and fewer people today write by hand using a pen, pencil or brush. What are the reasons? Is this a positive or a negative development?

• Throughout history, people have dreamed of living in a perfect society, but they have not agreed on what an ideal society would be like. What do you think is the most important element of a perfect society in the modern world? How can people work towards achieving an ideal society?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---