Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should

Đề bài: Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by new ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress?

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 1

Most nations around the world have at least some, or possibly many, old buildings such as temples, churches and houses in their cities, villages and surrounding areas which have historical significance. In my opinion, it is very important to maintain these, but this does not mean progress should stop.

Preserving certain old buildings is important for several reasons. Firstly, these structures provide an insight into the history of our countries, showing us how people many centuries ago lived their lives. Without them, we could only learn by books, and it would undoubtedly be sad if this were the only way to see them. Many of these buildings are also very beautiful. Take for example the many religious buildings such as churches and temples that we see around the world. Not only this, but on a more practical level, many of these buildings provide important income to a country as many tourists visit them in great numbers.

However, this certainly does not mean that modernization should be discouraged. I believe that old buildings can be protected in tandem with progress. For example, in many circumstances we see old historic buildings being renovated whilst maintaining their original character and being used for modern purposes. Also, in no way does history hinder progress, and in fact it is the opposite. By studying and learning about our history, we understand more about the world we live in, and this helps us to build a better future.

To conclude, I believe that it is very important to protect and preserve old buildings as we can learn about our history as can others from other countries. Such knowledge can also help us to understand how to modernise our countries in the best way.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 2

It is a fact that some governments are preserving many historical buildings these days. A group of people believe that protecting these old buildings is considered as a waste of money, as they should be demolished and replaced with new buildings. I personally believe that maintaining an old building is essential, since the building has a lot of historical value, and it would be unique to see cities that combined the modern and historical buildings together.

It is believed that protecting some historical buildings is important since they have historical values. Many of the buildings had become the witnesses of some special or tragic moments of a particular country, therefore it should be preserved. One of the examples would be the Fatahilah Museum in Central Jakarta, Indonesia. It is an old building that was erected during the Dutch colonial era in the 18th century and formerly used as a prison to punish the rebellion. Now, it is maintained by the Government as a museum to commemorate the people who had sacrificed their life for the independence of Indonesia.

Some cities are still protecting their historical buildings, though new high-rise buildings are showing up in the surrounding area. The historical buildings are maintained by the state government, and they are standing along with the new skyscrapers. Many people believe that the combination of these old and modern buildings have made the city become fascinating and attractive. As a result, they become one of the tourist destination places. Some of the cities that have preserved them would be Beijing, London and Paris, and more than thousands of people have visited these metropolis cities.

In conclusion, retaining the historical buildings is definitely an important thing, because they have become eyewitnesses of some important events. And it is a fact that the combination of old and modern buildings brings a lot of benefits for the city and the country as well.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 3

People believe that in this world, nothing is constant but change. Hence, in every detail of our lives, even on the simple aspect of infrastructures and housing, we expect change. Nowadays, the increasing number of the population has drastic need to destroy old houses and rebuild new ones that are more suitable for them. Some believe that this change is inevitable and essential, while some argue that historical houses should be preserved to protect history. In this essay, I will enumerate the importance of preserving old houses or buildings and will then give my opinion on the matter.

First and foremost, preserving historical infrastructures is thought to be essential because it mirrors our ancestry and culture. Maintaining it will depict how we give importance to our heritage. For instance, the Ifugaos on the Mountain Province still live in their old Nipa huts and refuse to adapt to the modern style of houses. They argue that doing so will be a simple way to prove their love for their own culture.

Moreover, maintaining old buildings will preserve the culture's identity. For instance, in some places in Malolos Bulacan, government officials encourage the people to preserve traditional Spanish style houses within the area. They point out that the place is well-known because of these houses and destroying it might become harmful to our culture and would also affect tourism.

In summary, there is no doubt that protecting old houses and buildings is indeed important. However, I believe that a little change will not be harmful. We should take into consideration the changes that occur in the environment and somehow learn how to adapt while preserving the trace of our history.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 4

From our school days, we are taught about each and every piece of our history, the people who were a part of this history are no longer with us, the only thing left are the buildings from that era. Some have the opinion that we should demolish these constructions to make new ones. The solution for this debate will be elaborated further in the ensuing paragraphs.

First and foremost, we should reconcile that we have a long history, freedom, and many privileges because of our ancestors. The only tangible memory we have with us are these buildings. It would be dull-witted to destroy these properties in order to create something which might not have a huge importance in our life. These new constructions will not fill us with courage or any other important feelings. 

On the contrary, it should not be disregarded that all the buildings have some limitations, the base of these buildings is likely to fall off in a particular time frame. It is very dangerous to keep them, as sooner or later they will be a threat to the life around them. Some parts of the structure might fall off, resulting in some damage to the surroundings. The amount of money and manpower required to maintain these old properties is much more than the new structure.

To conclude, it is evident that albeit, the expenses are more with the old establishments, the sentiments we have with these constructions should be given more importance and, thus we must not demolish them.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 5

It is a fact that many constructions are protected by the authorities in order to safeguard the history of that place. Nevertheless, some perceive that these properties should be replaced with upgraded establishments. The significance of these buildings and the solution to this dilemma will be explained in further writeups.

To commence with, many buildings serve the purpose of emotional memories to a vast population. There are many constructions that are heirlooms; they make future generations attached to their ancestors. In today's era, a number of people are getting attracted to western culture so much that they are getting drifted from their own religion. The heritage will remind us of the sacrifice and struggles that our elders have gone through for us to live a privileged life.

On the flip side, some buildings in any part of the world have conflicts that massacre the common people. A solution to this misery can only be constructing anything else after demolishing the existing structure. For instance, we are witnesses to the recent events of a dispute that sparked between groups of people due to a structure. It enraged a huge populace, not only causing damage to the national property but also hurting many emotions. Finally, to tackle this a new structure was built; according to some suggestions, if this construction had started years ago then, this damage would never have been caused.

To conclude, it can be taken into account that new construction would be a logical step that we should take in order to curb some anticipated alarming situations.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 6

With the advancement of everything, the space for constructing new buildings is lacking, henceforth some are of the opinion that the buildings protected by the government can be superseded by the new properties; they perceive that history should not come in the way of progression. The stance of the general populace is expressed in the upcoming paragraphs.

To begin with, we should understand that the structure constructed in the past represents many heroic deeds or any sort of inspiration. For instance, the remains of Tanaji Malusare, one of the greatest warriors, are still preserved. These inspire the people of today’s era to fight for their community selflessly. 

On the contrary, instead of keeping these old buildings, some suggest that new formations that can elevate the importance of that particular place can be a better alternative. A beautiful new formation should be constructed in order to upgrade, this way more people will visit. This substitute will serve the purpose of the buildings constructed in the past, as they will be able to give the essence of all the important details that our ancestors wanted us to remember. Hence, the requirement will be fulfilled.

To sum up, it should be taken into account that the new constructions will magnify the purpose and solve the problem of the old buildings. It must be understood that the reformations of any historic monuments are always not negative. The authorities should make some efforts to unite both the purpose and construct a new building so that the upcoming generations will always remember.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 7

The issue of whether old buildings should be demolished and replaced has long been a controversial issue. While some believe that it is important due to their historical value, others believe they should not stand in the way of development, which is resembled by the building of new infrastructures. In order to support one view over the other, it is crucial to answer two questions, which this essay will discuss: they are the extent of importance for maintaining old buildings and whether one should value history over progress.

Firstly, I believe that it is very important to maintain old buildings because they have historical and cultural significance and economic value. The old buildings may have an important function in history, and some are even the nations’ pride. For instance, the Great Wall of China signifies the history of slaves’ perseverance, building the great wall of defence despite severe weather conditions, under the tyrannical rule of the Emperor and it also shows the concerns over safety during that historical period. Not only so, the Great Wall of China is also the place that every tourist will visit when they come to Beijing; thus, it can be said that the Great Wall has economic value as those tourists will subsequently spend money there. Furthermore, the Great Wall of China instils a sense of pride in the hearts of Chinese people, as it resembles their long-lasting history. Hence, maintenance of old buildings is of utmost importance.

However, opponents may argue differently: Although new buildings may not have historical and cultural significance, they do have their purpose, both economically and developmentally. By replacing old buildings, there will be more space for housing, which is especially important due to the current problem of overcrowding. In doing so, it can guarantee basic living standards. There will also be more space for buildings used for educational purposes, as education is important for the nations’ growth.

Another argument that opponents put forth is that history should not deter progress. They believe that a nation shouldn’t live in the past; instead, they should actively seek out the future. Whilst I believe this argument is sound, it is important to note that history doesn’t necessarily hinder progress but would even prevent mistakes from happening again. An example will be the Nazi camps; they serve as a reminder to the nation about the dangers of discrimination and injustice.

To conclude, based on the two questions, I strongly believe that old buildings should not be replaced, not only due to their significance to the nation, but also due to the fact that it doesn’t hinder progress.

Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nations history. Some people think they should - mẫu 8

There is a contentious debate regarding whether old buildings should be demolished or preserved. Some argue for the demolition of old buildings to make way for new ones, citing the need for housing and office spaces. However, many buildings are protected by laws as they are considered part of the nation’s history. In this essay, I will discuss both perspectives and offer my own opinion on the matter.

On the one hand, modernization is increasingly seen as a catalyst for economic growth. Industrial advancement requires additional space for expanding factories and offices to meet the growing demands of urban populations. Moreover, many old buildings in city centers not only occupy space that could be used for modern facilities but also pose risks of collapse. The population is increasing, yet real estate remains limited.

On the other hand, old buildings hold significant cultural and historical value. They serve as evidence of history, having witnessed various remarkable historical events. For example, the Hanoi railway station has stood for over 122 years and has witnessed many fierce battles during the two Indochina Wars against the French and Americans. Today, it is considered one of the oldest buildings in Hanoi, serving as a timeless example of 19th-century architecture. Furthermore, ancient buildings can generate significant economic value by attracting tourists and enhancing related industries such as food and beverage, souvenirs, and transportation.

In conclusion, I advocate for the preservation of old buildings due to the substantial benefits they bring to our lives. Furthermore, history acts as both a barrier to progress and a significant driver of economic growth.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns as it increases crime and violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Genetic engineering is an important issue in society today. Some people think that it will improve people’s lives in many ways. Others feel that it may be a threat to life on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others, however, believe that it is the only way to save these attractions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless or unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---