Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others, however, believe that it is the only way to save these attractions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed

Đề bài: Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others, however, believe that it is the only way to save these attractions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 1

Some people feel that cultural traditions are ruined when people use them to make money from tourists. Others claim that using these traditions as money-making ventures is the only way to save them. In my opinion, both views are true to a certain extent.

To begin with, many traditional customs are modified for commercialization, and end up losing their originality and value. For example, Vietnamese traditional dances such as the lion dance, which were traditionally performed only by martial artists during special occasions, are now often poorly performed by amateurs at tourist sites across the country. Such changes not only give foreign visitors a false impression but can also make the dance less meaningful to the local people. Also, many traditionally sacred sites are heavily damaged by the irresponsible behaviors of tourists. For instance, a well-known Youtuber named Logan Paul recently visited Japan and filmed himself dumping a bag of coins into a sacred well, where people often drop coins for luck, and did permanent damage to one of Japan’s most famous iconic traditions.

On the other hand, there are several reasons why monetizing from cultural traditions is the only way to protect them. First, the revenue could be used for the preservation of such traditions. For example, many people in Bat Trang village in Vietnam make their living from selling traditional ceramic products, and thus are able to continue one of the oldest traditions in Vietnam. Second, by putting cultural traditions on public display, the government could heighten people’s awareness of preserving these traditions. For instance, the Vietnamese government has built several museums around the country that solely exhibit examples of ethnic minority cultures in an attempt to protect cultural values without affecting the lives of these ethnic people, yet successfully gathering lots of public attention and support.

In conclusion, using cultural traditions as money-making attractions has both positive and negative impacts on the preservation of such traditions.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 2

Some individuals argue that commercializing cultural traditions for profit tarnishes their authenticity and cultural significance, while others assert that monetizing these traditions is essential for their survival. I believe that both viewpoints hold merit to a certain degree.

To commence, there is a concern that the pursuit of profit can lead to the distortion and loss of cultural traditions. Frequently, when traditions are adapted to cater to tourists, they may undergo changes that compromise their originality and cultural value. For instance, traditional dances like the Vietnamese lion dance, which were historically performed exclusively by skilled martial artists during special occasions, are now often poorly executed by amateurs at tourist sites, eroding their authenticity and meaning. Additionally, some sacred sites suffer damage due to irresponsible tourist behaviors, endangering their cultural significance. For instance, the actions of a well-known YouTuber named Logan Paul, who desecrated a sacred well in Japan, have permanently harmed one of the country's iconic traditions.

Conversely, there are compelling reasons why capitalizing on cultural traditions is seen as the only way to safeguard them. Firstly, the revenue generated from such activities can be channeled back into the preservation of these traditions. For example, many residents of Bat Trang village in Vietnam make a livelihood by producing and selling traditional ceramic products, enabling them to carry on one of Vietnam's oldest traditions. Secondly, by showcasing cultural traditions in public venues and exhibitions, governments can raise awareness and garner support for their preservation. The Vietnamese government, for instance, has established museums across the country dedicated to exhibiting examples of ethnic minority cultures, successfully garnering public attention and support while respecting the lives of these ethnic communities.

In conclusion, utilizing cultural traditions as profit-generating attractions has both positive and negative repercussions for their preservation.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 3

Capitalizing on local cultural customs in order to appeal to tourists has always been a heated topic as many protest the effects this development might have on their cultural heritage. Personally, I disagree with the practice as I do not think they can honestly preserve the culture and heritage of local groups, albeit some exceptions to minority culture should be made.

As a point of consideration, when tourists invest in local cultural traditions, these traditions become a production that must be put on in order to please these tourists, leading to the loss of authenticity over time. Tourism places unnecessary stress on local customs, for they must appeal to tourists for their ideas about the culture and fulfill this expectation. Through a gradual process of change, there might not be any semblance of the old tradition left. For instance, many tourist destinations in East Asia have had to transform their food and services to fit Western taste, and as such, lose the authenticity that pulled people towards them in the first place. 

On the other hand, exceptions can nonetheless be made when it comes to displaced natives living on reservations. These people have been forced off their lands in the past, and often forced to adapt to colonizers, and their cultures often have been repressed in the past to the extent that it may be nearly extinct. In these situations, these once sacred and important cultural rituals can only be kept alive by the interest of tourists. This is why many minority people actively welcome visitors to explore their culture and customs as a way to preserve them. 

On the whole, I argue that tourism has had a negative effect on local cultures since the local cultures have had to change to something they are not; nonetheless, I believe that some exceptions should be made to minority cultures that need to be explored in order to be preserved. 

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 4

That traditional cultures are now commercialized for tourism and are vandalized in the process has been a concern for many. Alternative voices, in avocation for economic pursuit, claim commercial application to be the sole channel that preserves long-standing practices. The following essay aims to analyze both perspectives and from it giving support for the latter view.

On the prior side, consequences like culture mispresentation from having to cater to exterior preferences is evidently a justifiable fear. Under economic influences, deep-rooted practices could be morphed towards more entertaining versions of themselves, regardless of what is truly meaningful to the natives or how foul such deviations might be perceived. In reality, Hollywood’s interpretation of prevalent Eastern ways of life has constantly received backlash for its priority of glamourous visuals over true depictions, thus enforcing stereotype imposed by visiting foreigners upon a whole community across generations and becoming the basis for opposition.

Yet aside such risk, many practices would have become extinct had there not been any assistance of public exposure through commerce. It is needless to say that regardless of any culture’s distinguished trait, their stance against modern customs’ dominance has proven unsustainable. As such, commercial demands, and along with them, the financial rewards of exhibiting unique historical undertakings, undoubtedly play significant roles in encouraging them being passed down to later generations rather than withering away. Simply speaking, money upkeeps the tradition.

In conclusion, efforts to save corroding cultures via commercial applications spark debate of its true efficacy. While supporting it may sustain the way of life against modernization, over-reliance on it could be detrimental to the subject of focus.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 5

The preservation of cultural traditions is a matter of great importance and has sparked a debate regarding whether the monetization of them leads to their destruction or serves as the only way to safeguard these valuable aspects of heritage. This essay will examine both perspectives and argue in favour of the opinion that cultural traditions may be jeopardized when they are exploited for commercial gain.

On the one hand, proponents of using cultural traditions as money-making attractions argue that this approach provides a viable means to preserve and safeguard these customs in an increasingly globalized and commercialized world. Economic benefits generated from cultural tourism can contribute to the conservation and restoration of cultural sites and artefacts, ensuring their longevity for future generations. For example, entrance fees to historical monuments can fund restoration projects and maintenance, preventing the decay and degradation of these cultural treasures. Moreover, financial support from tourism revenue may enable local communities to invest in educational initiatives and cultural programmes, fostering a sense of pride and awareness about their heritage.

On the other hand, many individuals strongly believe that commercially utilizing cultural traditions puts these cherished practices and customs at risk of losing their authenticity and significance. When cultural elements are commodified for the sake of tourism or entertainment, there is a tendency to modify or sensationalize them to appeal to a broader audience. As a result, the essence and deeper meanings of these traditions may become diluted or distorted, eroding their authenticity and cultural value. For instance, traditional rituals and ceremonies performed as mere spectacles for tourists may lose their spiritual significance, leading to a loss of respect for these once-sacred practices. Moreover, the true traditional aspects of an area may be diluted and contaminated with the presence of tourists from many different areas of the world as they all bring their own traditions and cultural aspects with them.

In my opinion, the commercialisation of traditions indeed puts them in danger. So rather than exploiting cultural traditions solely for monetary gain, ensuring their preservation and value should get more priority.

In conclusion, the debate over using cultural traditions as money-making attractions raises valid concerns about the potential erosion of their authenticity. I believe that authorities should make sure that the traditions and cultures of a nation do not diminish for the sake of foreign remittance.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 6

No one can deny that a trip to a remote destination away from one’s everyday life and culture is an exciting experience for the traveler, but its negative impact on the local culture and traditions cannot be ignored.

In many places, cultural traditions are destroyed because they are being commercialized for profits. For example, the moment a tourist sets foot in a place of attraction, he is always first welcomed by a crowd of peddlers or a line of shops selling souvenirs and handicrafts that are often fake and overpriced. What is more, in the peak tourist seasons, there are just so many visitors that even the remotest island turns into a noisy market. Those who are expecting a quiet cultural journey may finally end up seeing the same hustle and bustle in a modern city.

There are, however, arguments for setting up a money – making attractions in a tourist area. We cannot afford to renovate historical buildings if they are not visited at a price. If traditional skills and lifestyles were not presented to visitors in an impressive way, they might soon be forgotten. For many parts of the world, tourism has become a major source of income and helps to save the local culture from dying out.

We should find the right balance between tourism development and cultural protection, and I believe the government has a very important role to play here. In my own country, for example, many tourist cities have made effective development plans to successfully attract large numbers of visitors while still preserving their distinct cultural traditions.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 7

Some believe it is detrimental for cultural traditions if they are turned into a cash machine for tourism, while others think the opposite. This essay will look at both of these viewpoints to clarify the importance of cultural commercialization in retaining traditions and then will suggest protective measures in limiting the downside.

It is negative in some ways for local cultural traditions when they are used to develop tourism. First, the attraction of cultural uniqueness is immeasurable when it magnets thousands, and even millions of people the world over to come and experience new ways of life. The visitors will bring with them their own cultures and needs which should be accommodated. This will somehow lead to excessive cultural integration which may undermine or disrupt the local tradition. Second, the economic development allows local people to change their jobs and improve their living conditions, so the local may build concrete houses to replace cottages and make souvenirs instead of doing farm work. The traditional lifestyle and culture attached to the old village and farming may, therefore, diminish.

However, highlighting cultural traditions is also necessary in keeping them alive. Indeed, when a feature of tradition is identified as appealing, introducing it to tourists is a good way to emphasize its value and arouse the awareness of cultural protection in the local people. For example, when Hue court music, the Vietnamese royal music, is performed for tourists on boats on Huong river, people will start to fear that one day the music may disappear and thus take actions to conserve it. Moreover, more records will be kept about such tradition through publications of all kinds ranging from tour information on leaflets or travel blogs, to videos of real cultural experiences of tourists, and cultural or tourism books. These are safe houses to prevent these traditions from losing in part or disappearing altogether.

In conclusion, it is the economic development of the tourist spots that may harm the local culture rather than the emphasis on cultural traditions in attracting visitors. However, when introducing local culture to travelers, people need to keep a certain separation of the tourist site from the local community to avoid too much cultural integration and constantly organize cultural conservation programs to protect their origin and uniqueness.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 8

Some say cultural traditions are destroyed when used as money-making attractions for tourists. Others say this is the only way to save such traditions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In recent years travelling has increased rapidly. Some groups of people believe that promoting tourism way reduces traditional culture. However, the selling token is such a way to save traditions. In my perspective, I will discuss both views in the upcoming paragraph.

On the one hand, promotion can bring many benefits to people and the government. The first and foremost view is that when travellers visit any historical nation, there are generated business opportunities for local and government. Tourism is the best key to any economy. It boosts people’s lifestyles. For example, tourists buy local art to learn about the culture if they visit a local place.

On the other hand, money-making is disadvantageous for culture. If profit is the main purpose, then the primary goal and culture will be changed over time. In other words, if workers and traditional artists create a product only to attract visitors and gain money, then it will be affected. Secondly, this method also negatively impacts visitors, particularly foreign visitors, who never recommend that place or product after an incredible experience.

To sum up and offer my position, I support the former view because tourism is the best way to promote culture, and it is economically beneficial. However, it is weakened by the wrong way it is done.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 9

Many people today are against using cultural tradition as a source of income to target tourists. In contrast, others agree that it is a good idea as that will preserve the tradition that can be passed on to the next generation. Some advocate free cultural traditions for tourists, which is justified. I am one of them, and in this essay, I will try to explain why I think concerns about free cultural tradition have great merit.

First of all, cultural traditions have been around from time immemorial, it is the culture laid by the ancestors, and they are happy to showcase their tradition to foreigners. For instance, the new yam cultural festival, where farmers will bring in their harvest and the farmer that harvested the most giant yam will be honoured by other farmers. This honour is done by local musicians, where metals and wood are used as musical instruments. Also, the fishing festival held towards the end of every year attracts tourists from different parts of the globe to watch the festival free of charge.

Secondly, not every tourist can afford to pay the cultural tradition fees, after spending more on travelling expenses, coupled with hotel accommodation and feeding expenses, if they are charged for cultural tradition, it will discourage them from coming hence the tourist rates of the visit will drastically be dropped.

Technology is increasing, new gadgets are being produced, and one can watch any event from the comfort of his home. Hence cultural tradition should be made accessible, enticing tourists to always want a real view of the tradition rather than watching online.

To conclude, instead of paying cultural fees by tourists, farm products and local cuisines should be made available for tourists to buy and take back home, which will, in turn, boost the economy as well as encourage the indigene to hold their culture in high esteem and preserved it for the future generation.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 10

Opinions differ as to whether tourism fosters or undermines cultures and customs. While to a certain extent tourism brings traditions to a wider audience, I would argue that it does more harm than good.

Mass tourism, with huge investments diverted into development, advertising and propagation, has made indigenous customs, several of which were formerly alien and unpopular, known to people around the world. Once a small local festival that were formerly restricted to only tribal peoples, the Cong Chieng carnival in the middle part of Vietnam has greatly emerged to become a tourist trap, with influxes of Vietnamese and foreigners flocking to the place every year. Nevertheless, I believe such popularity is just superficial. A custom known by a lot of people does not necessarily mean a well-preserved one.

All too often, tourism brings in its wake cultural assimilation. It is not rare to see tribal people, adults and children alike, get rid of their traditional attires for modern, Westernised ones worn by tourists. Many hotels, resorts and spas have also been erected every year, encroaching on the areas where there once were villages, altars and ritual meetings. Additionally, the disgusting hands of tourism moguls have reached out to even the remotest areas, tempting local people into working for them with promises of higher wage rates and a better life. As a consequence, the number of ethnic people has greatly shrunk in recent years, with many ethnic minorities being declared non-existent.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that profit-oriented tourism, despite the fact that it may bring customs to more people, is a cultural catastrophe.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 11

It is true that many people argue that cultural traditions will only survive if they are commercially packaged for the tourist market. While this may be the case, I agree with the opposing view that such packaging inevitably leads to the death of those traditions.

On the one hand, globalisation is resulting in socio-economic changes which are destroying traditional ways of life. It is not always possible to preserve cultural traditions in the face of these changes. The changes affect traditional cultures in many ways. For example, folk songs and other genres of music such as American blues reflect a way of life which is disappearing, based on agricultural work in the fields. Without the organisation of music concerts aimed at tourists, this artistic musical heritage will almost certainly be lost, and there will be nobody to perform the traditional music and dances associated with it.

On the other hand, I agree with those who believe that the commercialisation of traditional cultures aimed at tourists will not save those cultures. Firstly, culture becomes meaningless when it is something which is presented to visitors simply to make money. Tourists, for instance, may want to try local cuisine in a restaurant which follows a traditional recipe, but it will not be eaten in the authentic surroundings of the home or served to accompany a traditional ceremony.

Secondly, many traditional cultures retain their vitality despite globalisation. Carnival in Brazil, for instance, is performed and watched mainly by local people, even though television and the tourist industry exploit it as a source of revenue.

In conclusion, I agree with the view that when a culture can only survive by turning itself into a money-making attraction, then that culture is already destroyed. All that remains is a spectacle for tourists.

Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed - mẫu 12

It is irrefutable that cultural traditions attract tourists from all over the world and develop local economy. Some individuals are of the opinion that these may be destroyed if they are modified to attract tourists. Others, however, hold the view that if we don’t use them for tourism, they will die. In the following paragraphs, I shall discuss both sides of the argument.

We have to make these cultural traditions alluring for tourists because we need tourists. Firstly, tourism boosts our economy and secondly, we get a chance to spread our culture to different countries. If our artists and artisans do not earn money from their art, which depicts our culture and tradition, then this art will die off and we’ll only be the losers.

Tourism is the backbone of any country’s economy, and every country makes an effort to attract tourists. Many people depend on tourism for their livelihood. People in the food industry, hotel industry and transport industry depend on tourism. Presentation is very important to attract visitors and to present nicely, some change is inevitable.

On the other hand, when cultural traditions are used as money-making attractions, they lose their original features. Sometimes it makes cultural traditions disappear altogether. However, I believe that culture and tradition are deep rooted and minor superficial changes cannot harm them in any way. Change is the law of nature and all we should look into is that the changes are made with caution to retain the inherent elements of culture.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, to save cultural traditions we need to make some changes to make them alluring to the tourist of today. If we don’t do so we’ll lose our cultural traditions altogether and we’ll lose our tourists also.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless or unemployed. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting. Discuss both views and provide your opinion.

• To succeed in a business, one needs to be good at maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---