Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting. Discuss both views and provide your opinion. hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should

Đề bài: Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting. Discuss both views and provide your opinion.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 1

The debate on whether teenagers should focus on all subjects equally or concentrate only on subjects they find interesting has been ongoing for years. This essay will discuss both views and explain my opinion.

Proponents of the idea that teenagers should study all subjects equally argue that this approach provides students with a well-rounded education. By exploring a diverse range of subjects, students gain a broad knowledge base, develop critical thinking skills, and enhance their problem-solving abilities. Moreover, focusing on all subjects equally can help students develop essential life skills. For example, studying mathematics can improve logical thinking and decision-making, while studying literature can foster empathy and creativity. By exploring a wide range of subjects, students can cultivate a range of skills that will serve them well throughout their lives.

On the other hand, supporters of the idea that students should concentrate on subjects they find interesting argue that this approach fosters a passion for learning and increases motivation. When students are genuinely interested in a subject, they are more likely to engage deeply with the material, leading to improved understanding and retention. Furthermore, focusing on subjects of interest may lead to higher academic performance and better career prospects. By dedicating time and effort to subjects they are passionate about, students can excel in those areas, improving their chances of securing scholarships, admission to prestigious universities, or employment in their chosen field.

In conclusion, there are valid arguments for both sides of the debate. In my opinion, teenagers should be encouraged to explore a diverse range of subjects to develop a broad knowledge base and essential life skills. Although delving deeper into subjects that genuinely interest them has its benefits, a well-rounded education will produce well-rounded individuals, people whom society desperately needs right now.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 2

Opinions differ as to whether teenagers should pay equal attention to all subjects or only focus on the ones in which they are interested. Personally, I believe it is important to strike a balance between the two views.

On the one hand, there are some reasons why teenagers should focus on all subjects equally. First, all subjects have some value and can contribute to a well-rounded education. Science subjects like maths or physics strengthen students’ logical thinking abilities and teach them about the mechanisms of the world, while art subjects such as literature and music enhance their creativity and language skills and foster their emotions. All these aspects are crucial to any person’s adult life. Second, teenagers are still young and may not know what they are interested in yet, so it is important to expose them to different subjects.

On the other hand, teenagers can also reap several benefits when solely concentrating on subjects they find interesting. The first one is that teenagers are more likely to be motivated to learn if they are interested in the subject matter. This can help them develop a deeper understanding and expertise in whatever subjects they focus on. In addition, focusing on what is most interesting to the individual is more efficient, as everyone’s time and energy are limited. If teenagers have to split up their time between too many subjects, including those they may not like, they may not have enough resources to perform well and achieve their desired results.

In conclusion, it is important to make sure that teenagers are exposed to a variety of subjects, and that they have a basic understanding of important topics that may not be immediately interesting to them. However, they should also be encouraged to pursue their interests and passions, which can lead to better academic performance and a more positive attitude towards learning.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 3

Some individuals suggest that teenagers should give equal attention to all subjects, while others argue that they should prioritize the subjects that they find most engaging. While there are advantages to both views, I believe that teenagers should focus on all subjects equally.

On the one hand, allowing students to decide what they want to learn shows respect for individual freedom and therefore leads to greater engagement and understanding of the subject. When a topic piques their interest, teenagers are more likely to engage with the material and achieve a deeper grasp as well as better academic performance. For instance, a student with a strong interest in literature is inclined to read more books, analyze them in detail, and perhaps even compose essays on the topics they raise. Such interest and enthusiasm can blossom into a lifelong passion for learning, which will undoubtedly bring about far-reaching advantages in a person’s life.

While it is essential for young people to be permitted to pursue their interests, it is also necessary for them to receive a well-rounded education. Studying multiple courses can help students identify their strengths and weaknesses, enabling them to pursue future education and career prospects that match their interests and abilities. For instance, a student who succeeds in math and physics could develop a passion for engineering or technology, whereas a student who excels in languages and social sciences might discover a calling in law or public service. Additionally, a well-rounded education may assist young people develop a broader perspective on the world, leading to better empathy and understanding for various perspectives. This is particularly essential in today’s globalized society, where cross-cultural communication and cooperation are becoming increasingly critical.

In conclusion, although there are reasonable arguments on both sides of the debate, I believe that young people should devote equal time to all subjects.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 4

These days, many people are divided over the breadth of subjects that students should focus on at school. While some believe that only a few ones relevant to the learner’s interest deserve attention, others support showing equal diligence across as many subjects as possible. In this debate, I favor a less extensive approach, as it is going to result in the best learning outcome.

The reasons for a student to pay equal attention to all disciplines at school vary. Firstly, by adopting such a method, the learner may be able to develop a full spectrum of knowledge. This becomes a tremendous asset in some sectors, such as finance, where professionals may need to exert their management and mathematical abilities, among many. A universal focus, furthermore, has been utilized in past societies to educate the elite stratum. Throughout history, young aristocrats had to learn philosophy, history, arts, mathematics, and equestrianism, for instance, to become proper members of the ruling class. This extensive approach, albeit old-fashioned, was proven to produce generations of rulers who watched over their clans and nations alike.

However, letting students choose what few subjects to focus on seems more sensible. Such a learning method helps to make studying less mentally taxing for schoolgoers, no matter the age. With the extensive approach, students may be subject to burnout, whereas more perceptive ones are bound to feel discouraged. When they go with the knowledge that intrigues them, instead of attempting to cover everything, studying would likely remain joyful and stimulating. Additionally, a limited focus like this would enable students to quickly develop their expertise. The fact that doctors and professors would usually specialize in a definite area of academic research clearly proves this assertion.

The aforementioned points lead me to believe in the value of focusing solely on subjects that the academic learner finds engaging. Adopting such a learning strategy is likely to keep studying refreshing while staving off boredom, and hence, students would be able to accomplish the most out of learning.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 5

In the education system, there are two opposing views regarding the focus of teenagers on subjects they study. Some people believe that teenagers should strike a balance between academic subjects while others argue that they should spend more time on those they find interesting. In this essay, I will explore the topic from both perspectives and then express my own opinion on this matter.

On the one hand, it is my contention that high school kids should put equal effort into all subjects. The rationale behind this belief is that having a broad knowledge base is important for teenagers, as it helps them to understand the world around them. In fact, the curriculum for secondary education is structured mostly around the fundamentals of core areas of knowledge and hence focusing on only a few ones may limit teenagers’ perception of the natural and social world, as well as prevent them from developing a well-rounded education. To illustrate this point, imagine teachers letting a school kid off the bulk of math knowledge just because he takes no interest in that field. The implications of this for his later life would be wider when it comes to tasks that need basic calculations like paying taxes or sorting out his personal financial matters.

On the other hand, some people argue that teenagers should concentrate on only those subjects in which they find pleasure. One argument is that teenagers are more likely to succeed in their studies if they are passionate about what they are learning. For instance, if a child is spotted with an innate sense of music, then in order for it to be nurtured, he must be allowed to devote himself to it. Meanwhile, it is believed that when students are forced to study subjects that they do not enjoy, they are less likely to engage with the material and more likely to become disinterested in their studies, leading to ineffective knowledge acquisition.

In conclusion, the debate over whether teenagers should focus on all subjects equally or only those that they find interesting is a complex one. While there are valid arguments on both sides, I still believe that students should be encouraged to study a wide range of subjects in order for them to be well-equipped for their later life.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 6

Some assert that adolescents should prioritise all disciplines equally, while others state that they should focus on subjects they are interested in and excel at. This essay will elaborate on both perspectives and the reasons why I lean towards the former.

On the one hand, paying attention to their favourite subjects can be beneficial to students to some extent. The first reason is that it can develop a passion for learning. More specifically, they are motivated to explore in-depth knowledge about the subject in lieu of being unsatisfied if they are forced to learn something they are not keen on. A student who struggles with maths might become frustrated when attempting the assigned homework, and therefore approach other disciplines with a negative mindset, reducing their potential and outcomes in all parts of the curriculum. Therefore, enabling students to study with their favourite disciples can act as a motive for them to reach their full potential and achieve better learning outcomes. Furthermore, this practice potentially helps adolescents identify their career interests. This is because they are more likely to realise their aptitude for certain areas of expertise, encouraging them to pursue a job related to their favourite subject in the future.

On the other hand, opponents consider devoting equal focus to all subjects is wiser due to several reasons. Chief of these is that this approach provides a well-rounded education. By learning a variety of subjects, teenagers can develop a broad knowledge base and a range of skills, facilitating comprehensive development. To illustrate, logical thinking acquired during maths lessons and critical thinking fostered by literature are prerequisites to fostering nuanced problem-solving skills, allowing them to better tackle real-life difficulties they encounter. Another appealing justification is that studying different subjects can help students identify their strengths and weaknesses. Thus, they can develop critical thinking skills, promote their advantages and improve on their disadvantages to become better versions of themselves.

In conclusion, although both viewpoints are justifiable, I contend that it is more crucial to place emphasis on all subjects for comprehensive education and self-improvement. It is advisable that teenagers should plan to allocate their time to different disciplines equally to become knowledgeable, well-rounded individuals.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 7

The debate over the most effective educational focus for teenagers is a complex and nuanced issue. On one side, some argue for a specialized approach, encouraging students to concentrate on subjects that spark their interest. On the other, there is a call for a broad-based curriculum, advocating for equal attention across all subjects. This essay aims to explore both perspectives, ultimately arguing in favor of a comprehensive educational strategy that equips students for a rapidly evolving world.

Proponents of focusing on interesting subjects argue that motivation is a key factor in educational success. When teenagers are allowed to concentrate on areas, they find fascinating, their intrinsic motivation skyrockets, leading to better engagement and a deeper understanding of the subject matter. This approach not only makes learning more enjoyable but also fosters a sense of competence and confidence in students, as they are more likely to excel in areas, they are passionate about.

However, the argument for a well-rounded education is compelling for several reasons. Firstly, a broad curriculum fosters a well-rounded knowledge base, which is essential for critical thinking and adaptability. In an era marked by rapid technological advancements and shifting job markets, these skills are invaluable. Students exposed to a wide range of subjects are better prepared to connect disparate ideas, think creatively, and adapt to new challenges. This holistic approach also ensures that students develop foundational skills in key areas such as mathematics, science, and language arts, which are crucial for a wide range of careers. The superiority of a comprehensive educational model lies in its ability to prepare students for the realities of a fast-paced and unpredictable world. By balancing depth with breadth, students not only gain expertise in areas of personal interest but also acquire a broad perspective and versatile skill set. This preparation is indispensable, as it enables individuals to navigate complex problems, embrace lifelong learning, and adapt to various career paths over their lifetime.

In conclusion, while specializing in subjects of interest has its merits, the benefits of a well-rounded education cannot be overstated. Focusing on all subjects equally equips teenagers with the critical thinking skills, adaptability, and versatile abilities necessary for success in today's diverse and ever-changing landscape. Therefore, a balanced approach to education, one that fosters depth of knowledge in areas of interest while ensuring a broad-based educational foundation, is crucial for personal and professional growth.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 8

While some individuals believe that studying all subjects is necessary for a well-rounded education, others argue that it is more beneficial to concentrate on the areas in which children excel. In my opinion, both perspectives are valid since learning all subjects can aid students in obtaining a diverse set of skills, while concentrating on a single subject can facilitate deeper comprehension and analytical abilities.

On the one hand, studying all subjects can help students develop a broad range of skills, such as time management, problem-solving, and communication. Exposure to various subjects can broaden their perspectives and help them appreciate the value of different disciplines. Moreover, in many educational systems, a wide range of subjects is required to progress to higher levels of education. Studying them all can improve a student's chances of success in exams and future academic pursuits. Therefore, proponents of studying all subjects argue that it can lead to well-rounded individuals with diverse skill sets and a better understanding of the world.

On the other hand, some argue that studying all subjects can be overwhelming and lead to a lack of depth in learning. Students may need more time to fully understand and engage with each subject, resulting in surface-level knowledge. In contrast, children can delve deeper into the subject matter by focusing on their strengths and interests, leading to a more profound understanding and critical analysis. Furthermore, this approach can help children build confidence in their abilities and feel more motivated to learn. However, critics of this approach argue that children may miss out on important subjects essential for their future academic and career paths.

In conclusion, while children must have a well-rounded education, it is equally important to let them focus on their interests and strengths.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 9

In contemporary education systems, there is an ongoing debate about whether teenagers should evenly distribute their attention across all subjects or concentrate solely on those they find most engaging and excel in. Both perspectives have their merits, but I personally lean towards the latter for the reasons below.

On the one hand, supporters of a balanced education contend that it equips teenagers with a versatile skill set crucial for their future endeavors. Proficiency in, for instance, both analytical thinking from science subjects and communication skills from literature would be more beneficial for students to cope with the multifaceted challenges of the modern world, compared to those only adept at either area. Moreover, a well-rounded education could allow teenagers to explore their potential and discover latent talents via exposure to a variety of subjects. As proof, many Vietnamese secondary school students, although initially disinterested in arts, have discovered a passion for it later on through exposure to a balanced curriculum, leading them to pursue a career in a creative field.

On the other hand, proponents of specialization argue that teenagers should be allowed to concentrate on subjects they find most captivating in order to maximize individual potential and productivity. This is because when students are passionate about a particular subject, they are more likely to invest time and effort into mastering it. Specialization can also cultivate expertise, which is increasingly valued in the professional world, leading to greater career opportunities for these individuals. For example, teenagers with a strong inclination towards computer science may benefit significantly from focusing on coding and programming languages. This in-depth knowledge, in turn, can enable them to have lucrative career paths in technology-related fields.

In summary, while a balanced education equips students with a versatile skill set and encourages exploration, I believe that specialization is a finer approach as it would allow students to cultivate their expertise, potentially resulting in greater career opportunities.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 10

Our education system has evolved in the past few years. Teenagers go to schools to gain knowledge on a variety of subjects. This idea is controversial, and people opine differently. Some people say that students should have the freedom to study the subjects of their choice, whereas others say that equal attention to all the subjects is beneficial. In my opinion, teenagers should learn all the subjects and gain knowledge about each and every discipline in their curriculum.

On one hand, high school curriculum is tailored to teach important subjects such as mathematics, science, English, history, and geography. These act as a foundation for future career applications. Not only are they designed to provide knowledge, but also allow the students to select the subjects that they might wish to take up for higher studies and career opportunities. Moreover, teenagers are not capable enough to make the best decision pertaining to one particular subject that they would want to study in the foreseeable future.

On the other hand, if a student wishes to be selective, it might be beneficial as well. This would let him ensure undivided focus on his choice of subjects and help him build a sound foundation during the formative years. This would provide students with more time and resources to spend on comparatively lesser and more interesting subjects, leading to better results.

According to me, the option of studying all the subjects enables the students to keep their options open and possibly widen their range of interests. To conclude, I would say that it is best for them to study all the subjects and figure out a particular stream or subject at a later stage in life, preferably during higher studies.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 11

People are divided on the issue of the subjects which teenagers should be required to study. Some believe that these young school goers should be made to study all subjects, whereas others say that they should be given the choice of studying subjects of their interest. This essay shall analyse both perspectives. l, personally side with the former view. I believe that in today's competitive world, a broad knowledge is needed to succeed in any field.

There are many reasons why some people hold the opinion that students should not have to study all the subjects and should be allowed to choose the subjects they want to study. They opine that in this case the students will probably be more enthusiastic about their study. ln addition, if students are forced to study all subjects, they can easily lose interest in education. What is more, if all subjects are compulsory for studying, students will not have enough time to learn all of them properly; therefore, they will be constantly under a lot of pressure.

However, I believe all subjects are of great importance and for the holistic development of the students they need to study all subjects equally at school level. Later on, during admission to colleges, students can select the subjects of their choice and can explore them further. At that age they are mature enough to decide their subjects for themselves. At school level the student may not know what his real interests are.

Furthermore, nowadays, the job market is very demanding and the recruiters select students who are skilled in various fields. Having the basic knowledge of varied subjects during school time definitely widens the horizons for the students. To add to it, it is a well-known fact that most subjects are related to each other in some way or the other. For example, a basic knowledge of mathematics is needed to excel in computer languages. Finally, I believe that it is up to the teachers to develop the interest of the students in any subject. For instance, during my school days, my history teacher was so good that a boring subject like history was the favourite subject of the whole class.

To sum up, it can be said that students should learn all subjects at school level, as they are not mature enough to know their real interests at school level and a broad knowledge is also needed for their holistic development.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 12

Education plays an inextricable role in deciding what kind of person we become and which career we choose and therefore finding the optimal curriculum has been a perennial debate. Some believe that schools should focus on subjects that can arouse students’ interest, while others assert that adolescents should be exposed to all disciplines evenly. From my perspective, whilst the former approach is highly suitable for talented students, the latter is more appropriate for average ones.

On the one hand, young talents in athletic or artistic fields and gifted students who excel academically should be allowed to concentrate more on subjects that pique their interest. The rationale is that they would be more motivated, engaged, and invested, leading to mastery of their favorite fields. Such talents should also be given permission to study at their own pace due to their faster progress, and since teachers can tailor the curriculum to meet students’ needs, they tend to challenge themselves with trickier tasks in order to achieve their full potential. Vietnam provides an example of this approach, as the country supports elite athletes, artists, and top scholars in prioritizing their preferred subjects during their teenage years.

Most ordinary students, on the other hand, should be exposed to all disciplines equally, thereby enabling them to gain a comprehensive understanding of the world. By combining this approach with appropriate career guidance, students can gain a better understanding of their strengths and weaknesses, which can lead to greater self-confidence and improved decision-making when it comes to career choices. Another compelling point is that these students can develop transferable skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, and communication by understanding how different disciplines interact with each other. These qualities can make them highly employable as all of which cannot be fully recreated by AI or technological advancement.

In conclusion, I am convinced that students who are endowed with aptitudes for sports or arts and those who are academically inclined should put more effort on their strong suits, while a balanced education is more suitable for most average ones.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 13

The debate over whether teenagers ought to allocate equal attention to all academic subjects or solely focus on those they find intriguing and excel in is a contentious one. This essay will explore both perspectives, ultimately endorsing the latter viewpoint, which emphasizes specialized focus based on individual interests and strengths.

Advocates of a balanced educational approach argue that an equal focus on all subjects is essential for the comprehensive development of young minds. This perspective emphasizes that a broad curriculum exposes students to a diverse array of knowledge, fostering well-rounded individuals. It cultivates a versatile skill set, enabling students to tackle various challenges and adapt to changing circumstances in the future. For instance, excelling in both humanities and sciences ensures that a student develops both analytical and creative thinking abilities. This approach also prevents premature specialization, allowing teenagers to discover and explore their interests thoroughly before making pivotal career decisions.

Conversely, many, including myself, believe that teenagers should prioritize subjects that captivate their interest and align with their innate abilities. Focusing on areas of strength and passion not only boosts academic performance due to heightened engagement and motivation but also fosters deeper learning and expertise. Specialization can lead to early professional development, providing students with a head start in their future careers. A student passionate about mathematics, for instance, would benefit more from intensifying their focus in this area, potentially leading to innovations or advanced studies in mathematical fields. This tailored approach respects individual differences in interests and aptitudes, promoting personal and academic fulfillment.

In conclusion, while evenly distributing academic efforts across all disciplines can create well-rounded individuals, concentrating on subjects that align with one's interests and strengths offers profound benefits in deep learning and personal satisfaction. The latter approach, which I advocate, respects individual uniqueness and can lead to significant achievements and fulfillment in students' chosen areas.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 14

Education plays a vital role in each and every person’s life because it opens the doors of employment in the future. A camp of society thinks that adolescents ought to learn all the subjects of the school curriculum whereas another segment of people believes that teenagers should concentrate on these subjects in which they are interested. According to my point of view, learning all school subject is a better aspect for adolescents to choose their specification in their future. There are various reasons for it. I will elaborate on some causes in the following paragraphs of this essay.

On the one side, according to some human beings, a teenager ought to focus on all subjects because the whole curriculum is crucial for students. Firstly, a learner can acquire fundamental knowledge and information about basic principles by reading all subjects. As a result of it, they could become able to apply it in their future as well as knowledge is a cornerstone for trainees to achieve a peak of glory. Secondly, reading all subjects helps juniors to enrich their knowledge and cultivate personal interests. By this, they acquire the creativity of mind which makes them select a suitable profession during their future time.

On the other side, a group of humans tends to believe that it is more beneficial to learn one subject according to his/her interest. Because this aspect brings more benefits to a pupil. When a student gives full attention to only one subject, the learner can get high proficiency in their fields in the future and live a better life. Moreover, concentrating on one captivating subject enhances student’s efficiency of learning. Due to it, an individual’s stress of picking a profession has become lightened.

In my own opinion, learning all curriculum subjects makes a good way for a human being to select a specification by getting knowledge about all subjects. Through this, they can gain multi-disciplinary information. So, the overall cognitive skills develop in a student.

To conclude, concentrating on all school subjects instead of one specific subject offers us a variety of options for taking a profession in the future. By this, a learner gains more and more knowledge to become multi-tasking. I believe reading all subjects makes a human being interdependent and skillful.

Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should - mẫu 15

The topic of whether adolescent students should dedicate attention to courses that attract them, or allocate a balanced effort into every subject, has sparked controversy. This essay will elaborate on both viewpoints and provide the reasons for my advocacy for the latter.

Proponents of the sole commitment to preferred subjects assert that this strategy assists in acquiring deep knowledge and wellbeing for teenagers. To begin with, it helps students accelerate in excelling in their chosen field. By allocating extensive time and effort on favored subjects, teenagers can grasp a more comprehensive understanding. This provides them with a firmer foundation of expertise compared to their peers in future professional endeavors. Additionally, without the necessity of full attention to all courses, pupils can distribute more time for leisure activities, which can positively impact their mental and physical health. For instance, those who adopt this approach are required to only perform adequately in the remaining subjects, allowing them to invest more time in sports or other hobbies.

Nonetheless, others believe that providing effort equally to all subjects can optimize youngsters’ career prospects as well as personal growth. Specifically, this practice broadens the range of prospective opportunities available to students. This is because distributing focus on all subjects assists them with fundamental understanding of different domains. Consequently, in their future professional life, they have the capabilities to apply for different lines of work that they had not previously considered. Furthermore, similar distribution across all subjects equips juveniles with various life skills. To illustrate, math facilitates critical thinking ability, while literature improves communication skills.

In conclusion, while the concentration on only interested subjects provides positive effects including in-depth knowledge towards the matter and enhanced health, I would argue that distributing focus evenly between all courses provides greater benefits since it helps students become more versatile in their career lives and facilitates the development of diverse skills.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• To succeed in a business, one needs to be good at maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Would the drawbacks be greater than the benefits to the community and the young adults themselves?

• In the past, many male leaders had led our society to conflicts and violence. The world would be better governed and more peaceful if it were ruled by women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people believe that education and healthcare should be free of charge and funded by the government. Others think that it should be the responsibility of the people to pay for these services. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---