The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem

Đề bài: The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 1

In recent years, the scarcity of land used to build houses is the major obstacle people are facing. Many experts suppose that only the government can take action to solve it effectively. Personally, I strongly agree with the given statement as only with the regime can the city be planned in a better way and have sufficient accommodation for residents.

To commence, the foremost reason supporting the above idea is that the state solely has the authority to plan and manage the city and its infrastructure. One of the most optimal solutions is that the government should replace single-story houses with multi-story residences. For instance, by constructing vertical complexes instead of detached houses, the Singaporean government can solve the issue of the unavailability of houses. Besides, the state can also enact laws to avoid house overbuying as the Canadian government increased the prices of apartments with a view to restricting foreign purchases.

Additionally, the government is the only factor that can discourage people from migrating to urban cities. The residents from non-urban areas tend to move to big cities in search of better opportunities related to education, medical, and employment which causes inadequacy of residential houses. To avoid the above phenomenon, the government should levy less tax on companies in the countryside to encourage them to establish their offices in the rural areas so fewer people would migrate to cities. As a result, it would solve the issue of congested spaces, especially in the center of the city.

In conclusion, it is evident that only the state can take proper steps to solve the problem regarding the shortage of housing in urban spaces by decreasing the tax in the countryside and encouraging people to live in a flat but not a house.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 2

The issue of housing shortage in large cities is a significant concern, with potential adverse consequences. Some argue that only government intervention can effectively address this problem. While I acknowledge the role of authorities in resolving housing shortages, I do not completely agree with the notion that they are the sole solution. Businesses, too, can play a crucial role in alleviating this situation.

Certainly, the authority and legitimacy vested in governments enable them to address housing shortages effectively. Local authorities and city planners, for instance, can implement suitable planning strategies to improve land management, thereby preventing the wastage of this vital resource. Such measures are likely to facilitate the construction of more residential buildings, reducing homelessness and its associated repercussions. Additionally, governing bodies can contribute by providing affordable housing units to the underprivileged, not only improving their living standards but also fostering social cohesion.

However, I contend that addressing the housing problem requires collaboration with businesses. One justification is that companies bear partial responsibility for the shortage of urban land due to the expansion of their operations and the utilization of rural labor. Consequently, they should feel a social obligation to address this issue by constructing houses and apartments for their disadvantaged employees. Furthermore, relying solely on governments to tackle housing shortages could strain national finances, negatively impacting essential sectors such as education, healthcare, and transportation.

In conclusion, while governments can implement various measures to mitigate housing shortages in cities, collaboration with businesses is essential for enhanced efficiency and the conservation of resources for other critical societal needs.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 3

The lack of housing in metropolitan cities is becoming a more pressing issue for the citizens, yet many think that the government should be in charge of addressing this disaster through proper rules and regulations. I agree with the latter statement, and I shall support my views in the paragraphs that follow.

First of all, I believe that people are migrating to modern cities for a variety of reasons. One reason could be for financial gain or even to pursue higher education. Moreover, many believe that getting into a university is much simpler than finding a place to live, and this is unquestionable in today’s fast-paced world. For instance, it’s harder to locate an apartment in developing cities like Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, etc. than it is to get a seat in the city’s university. It is true that people must spend a significant amount of money just to survive as a result of modernization.

Adding on to this, the increase in population in certain major cities has a direct impact on this particular situation. Consequently, the limited availability of resources in those cities, including water, land and food, does not match with the increased demand. Hence, this becomes a hectic duty of the respective state government in order to minimize social consequences. For instance, the government can make a collective decision to implement efficient housing schemes in all the developing cities with the help of international agencies. As a result, this might help lower the housing issue and cause less of a hassle.

In conclusion, when a huge set of people move into a particular developing city to have a better and more sophisticated life, it obviously will come with certain drawbacks due to overpopulation. To tackle this, the government should take responsibility and try sorting out the issue soon to maintain harmony among the citizens and the society.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 4

Certain individuals believe that shortages of houses in major urban cities need substantial government intervention to effectively handle the related social consequences. I firmly agree with the statement that the government must intervene and try to solve the issue. Hence, this essay will discuss the same with appropriate examples.

To begin with, it is evident that the level of the housing shortage exceeds the capacity of citizens or private entities to address the problem hassle-free. Hence, governmental initiatives can organize resources properly on a larger scale, enabling the implementation of ambitious projects to increase affordable housing. Additionally, regulatory measures enforced by the government can put the process in a proper way, ensuring that the construction and development align with the broader goal of alleviating the housing crisis.

Furthermore, government action is crucial in establishing and enforcing policies that address the root causes of housing shortages, for instance, zoning restrictions and land use regulations. By taking a proactive role in urban planning, the government can create an environment conducive to sustainable housing solutions, fostering long-term stability. New Deal policies in the United States during the 1930s, for example, aimed at the creation of the Federal Housing Administration (FHA). This not only facilitated widespread home ownership but also stimulated economic recovery during a period of profound social and economic upheaval.

In conclusion, the serious social problems caused by housing shortages make it clear that we need solid government intervention. Only with strong and coordinated efforts from the government can we really deal with all the challenges linked to not having enough housing in big cities, making urban living fairer and more stable.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 5

It is argued that, due to urbanization, the housing shortage is a rising issue that is causing major social problems, and that the intervention of the government would play a crucial role in solving it at the earliest. While some argue that important government measures must be taken to tackle this, others emphasize the importance of collaborative efforts between public and private entities. I partially agree with the given statement and will be discussing it in this essay.

Firstly, strong government action will clear the housing crisis of such magnitude and complexity if authoritative interventions happen because the government has the resources and power to quickly carry out big projects for affordable housing. Moreover, proper government plans can set clear rules about where and how buildings can be constructed, making a better environment for more housing to be built. In countries like Sweden and Germany, for instance, active government involvement in housing policies has contributed to stable and inclusive urban development in the modern world. Government-backed programs ensure a balance between supply and demand, promoting affordability and preventing social stratification based on housing accessibility.

However, a more nuanced perspective suggests that rather than just relying on the government to take initiatives, collaborative endeavors between the public and private sectors are to be seen as essential for a holistic approach. Private enterprises, for instance, can also contribute innovation, efficiency, and investment capabilities, offering a dynamic response to the housing shortage. On the whole, public-private partnerships, fostering the development of mixed-use spaces, can integrate residential and commercial areas, creating vibrant and sustainable urban environments.

In conclusion, while recognizing the potential of government intervention in solving housing shortages, a balanced and pragmatic approach involves collaborative efforts. A synergy between the public and private sectors can yield innovative solutions, ensuring the creation of adequate housing while effectively addressing the intricate social consequences of this pervasive issue.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 6

Some today argue that only governments are capable of countering problems in cities resulting from housing shortages. In my opinion, although governments should be the primary actors, individuals can also offer aid.

On the one hand, only governments have the authority to enact truly large-scale change. Governments by design make decisions for the benefit of the entire citizenry. An example of how this could relate to housing issues would be the urban planning in New York City over the last century. The authorities there had to contend with an unprecedented population surge in a limited urban area. They responded by building skyscrapers that could house many residents, expanding public transport, and constructing various highways to allow commuters to live nearby the city. These solutions could only have been successfully undertaken at the behest of the government.

However, though the role of individuals is less prominent, it still exists. In the previous example, voters in New York City were able to make their voices heard by voting for mayors and governors that best served them. In the event that the government is not addressing housing problems sufficiently, then citizens can write to their representatives, organize protests, or take more drastic action such as relocating to a new city. In the era of social media, it is now more possible than ever before for the average person to openly discuss these issues. Individuals will always find methods to pressure governments, including in areas related to housing.

In conclusion, I disagree with those who contend only government action can improve housing issues in major metropolitan areas as individuals can collectively always engender some degree of reform. Governments will ideally enact laws based on the needs of the general populace.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 7

The population in many urban areas is booming, which exerts pressure on the provision of accommodation for city dwellers. In the middle of this problem, some assert that only the government can resolve housing shortage for its citizens, but I believe this should be also addressed by the private sector.

The government's role in balancing demand and supply in housing is indisputable. With huge resources from the national budget from tax collection, the ultimate right in land management and planning, and the priority in the mobilization of human resources to serve the cause of bringing stability to society, the government can build social housing at low prices coupled with the financial package for people with low income to afford their apartments with mortgage loans. Besides, the greatest challenge of technical and social infrastructures like costly and even non-profit transport facilities, hospitals, schools and markets can be easily provided by the government for the establishment of new residential areas.

However, private real estate corporations are also a necessary driving force behind the supply of more housing. While the provision of social housing aims at meeting the demand of low-income earners, for the middle class or the wealthy, their property needs, which are often more demanding, can be better catered for by companies with great customer care and professional teams to build made-to-order houses or luxury condominiums. Also, these businesses are normally smaller and more active than state owned enterprises in their operation, and thus meet housing demands faster and sometimes even more efficiently.

In conclusion, the housing shortage can be best solved when both government and private companies shake hands to provide for the diverse needs of people from all walks of life.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 8

Housing shortage has become a serious urban social issue in many parts of the world. It has been argued that only when the government has taken action can demand for homes be fulfilled. Yet to the best of my knowledge, the government alone cannot cope well with housing shortages.

One of the main objections to government intervention is that it would hamper the private sector and simultaneously pose a huge burden upon the state. In countries where the government is on a tight budget and the homeless population is large, the involvement of private property developers is required and recommended. Not only does it release the government from the burden of funding large-sized construction programmes but it also fosters the housing industry. Given its role in attracting public consumption and accelerating economic development, the housing industry should be at the mercy of the market, rather than the government.

Another drawback of state control over the housing market is that it could result in the stagnancy of construction quality, functionality, facilities and other aspects of housing. Apartment blocks or other residential constructions would be built in a similar pattern and the cityscape would be monotonous. Excessive uniformity, especially in the size and number of rooms, will fail to meet comprehensive requirements raised by citizens on properties.

Despite these objections, government intervention is essential in some segments of the market and can render more resistance to citizens. Single parents, the people with disabilities and other disadvantaged people are among those who are not ready to afford commercial housing. The government can provide them either with housing allowance to purchase their private properties or directly with economical houses.

As indicated above, in addressing homelessness and inadequate housing, the joint effort of both government and private sector is required. While government intervention would impede the property market and negatively influence the supply and demand relationship, government assistance is essential for low-income families and vulnerable individuals in need of housing.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 9

It is commonly argued that only the authorities can alleviate the scarcity issue of accommodation in metropolises. I mostly contend that the proactive role of the authorities is of paramount importance to resolve the lack of housing in metropolitan areas; however, public private partnerships are also critical.

My advocacy is predicated on the notion that the government is capable of implementing large-scale policies to tackle this matter. In particular, they may enact measures such as zoning regulations to expand designated residential regions or capacity. For example, the Vietnamese government has applied many urban planning strategies including subsidies for affordable housing, and the provision of incentives for real estate developers to address housing deficits for poor demographic segments, thereby ensuring equitable access to shelters for all cohorts.

Moreover, I also believe that governments possess substantial resources and manpower to execute solutions that promote housing availability. This is because allocation of budgets, infrastructure development, and land acquisition capabilities empower governments to drive housing construction initiatives. With regulatory oversight, they ensure compliance with quality standards and fair pricing, effectively utilizing their resources and authority to tackle housing shortages.

However, I concede that engaging private sectors with their expertise, innovative approaches, and financial resources is vital. Encouraging companies to invest in affordable housing projects as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives not only supplements governmental efforts but also fosters a sense of social accountability among corporations. Therefore, collaboration between the government and socially responsible corporations can create impactful solutions to address urban housing deficits.

In conclusion, while some of the funding for housing construction can be deducted from businesses’ contribution, I largely agree with this notion as governments can implement nation-wide regulations and have the power to allocate the national resources to resolve this menace.

The shortage of housing in big cities can cause severe consequences. Only government action can solve this problem - mẫu 10

The scarcity of housing in major cities has emerged as a critical issue, leading to a range of adverse effects. Some opine that only government intervention can effectively address this problem, and I am inclined to agree with this perspective. This essay will delve into the reasons why resolving the housing shortage requires the involvement of the government.

One compelling argument for government action in addressing the housing shortage is the scale and complexity of the problem. The rapid urbanization and population growth in major cities have resulted in an increasing demand for housing that surpasses the available supply. Private market forces alone may not be able to keep pace with the growing demand, leading to skyrocketing prices and housing unaffordability for many residents. The government, with its resources and regulatory powers, can implement policies and initiatives that promote the construction of affordable housing, regulate rental prices, and ensure equitable access to housing opportunities.

Furthermore, the consequences of a housing shortage can be far-reaching and detrimental to both individuals and society. When people are unable to find suitable and affordable housing, they may resort to substandard living conditions or face the risk of homelessness. This not only compromises their well-being but also contributes to social issues such as overcrowding, strained public infrastructure, and increased socioeconomic inequalities. By actively engaging in addressing the housing shortage, the government can mitigate these consequences and promote a more inclusive and sustainable urban environment.

Government intervention in resolving the housing shortage also allows for strategic planning and coordination. Urban development requires careful consideration of factors such as transportation networks, infrastructure, and environmental sustainability. The government, as the entity responsible for urban planning and public infrastructure, can integrate housing initiatives into comprehensive urban development strategies.

The shortage of housing in big cities presents significant challenges that require government intervention. With its ability to enact policies, allocate resources, and coordinate various stakeholders, the government plays a crucial role in addressing this issue. Failure to take action can result in dire consequences, including increased housing unaffordability, homelessness, and social inequality.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people believe teenagers should focus on all subjects equally, whereas other people think that they should concentrate on only those subjects that they find interesting. Discuss both views and provide your opinion.

• To succeed in a business, one needs to be good at maths. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In the future, it seems more difficult to live on Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Would the drawbacks be greater than the benefits to the community and the young adults themselves?

• In the past, many male leaders had led our society to conflicts and violence. The world would be better governed and more peaceful if it were ruled by women. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---