The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 1

It has been argued that a comprehensive prohibition of advertising in all forms brings about great values for society as a whole reportedly due to its uselessness or sometimes harmfulness. In my opinion, this assumption is a highly subjective point of view, and therefore I completely disagree with it.

It is, for starters, ill-founded to claim that commercials are purposeless and detrimental to consumers. We are living in a world where new products with distinct and revolutionary features to better our lives and solve problems that we used to think of as unraveled matters come into being almost every day. And we cannot ignore the fact that those products would remain unknown unless advertising of various types disseminated needed information to reach as many customers as possible. Businesses who thrive as a consequence will pay taxes so that the government can carry out a variety of functions, such as social security and education, to ensure the well-being of everyone.

From another perspective, dependency on the advertising industry is inevitable for any nation to prosper. Once commercials, by law, undergo a prohibitive order, unemployment rates would increase, and the burden would fall on the state. For example, Coca Cola dispenses thousands of employment opportunities in advertising throughout its branches across different regions in the world. If adverts are forbidden, an unthinkable number of workers, such as marketers, would either be driven to other jobs or stay unemployed. The government, as a result, have to provide temporary financial support for those people. In other words, banning any forms of commercial communication would lead to reverse and undesirable implications on society.

In conclusion, it is unreasonable to presume that it is for the sake of everyone’s interests that advertisements which, according to many, are irrelevant to their lives have to be prohibited.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 2

It is regularly argued that prohibition of all categories of advertisement, which are thought to be pointless and even detrimental, could generate numerous benefits for the community. Notwithstanding, from my standpoint, social members tend to not only reap advantages but also tolerate demerits from this trend.

On the one hand, it seems undeniable that the ban on multiple kinds of advertisement can be beneficial for consumers. Forbidding advertising is synonymous with the fact that purchasers may not have to pay a great measure of money for advertising services included in product prices. This can serve to reduce consumers’ expenditures for shopping. Moreover, no sooner are numerous advertisements exaggerating the functions, values and qualities of commodities to press citizens to purchase their products prohibited than individuals may select their items to fulfil their requirements without being adversely affected by the messages in which the truths related to these goods can have been exaggerated or even distorted.

On the other hand, it would appear that the ban to advertisement services likewise poses untold drawbacks to the community. The first shortcoming could be the joblessness which employees involved in advertising could be confronted with, in all likelihood, giving rise to an increase in the unemployment rate. Another disadvantage might be that this prohibition can keep consumers in ignorance of the latest goods available on the market. Hence, they may be faced with obstacles in searching for and comparing the quality and price concerning the products of the same category before deciding to purchase them.

In conclusion, it is my conviction that banning advertisements can wield both desired and adverse effects on community members.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 3

There is a common perception that every kind of advertising should be prohibited for its lack of utility or even detrimental effects on society. Personally, I disagree with this viewpoint considering the potential benefits of advertisements regarding economic growth and information awareness.

It is undeniable that society may reap numerous benefits from a universal ban on all forms of commercials. Firstly, advertising often employs manipulative techniques, such as false claims, exaggerated benefits, or misleading imagery, to deceive consumers into making purchases. A prohibition on all advertisements would encourage businesses to implement honest production and marketing strategies, thereby enhancing the overall consumer experiences. Secondly, advertising is widely deemed to foster a culture of consumerism and materialism where individuals place huge emphasis on material possessions over more meaningful aspects of life. If an official ban is imposed on every commercial, the social pressure towards constant consumption may be substantially reduced, contributing to financially healthier lifestyles for the public.

However, despite these perceived advantages, I contend that a complete ban on advertising might have severe economic repercussions. This is because the advertising industry is a significant contributor to employment and revenue generation, meaning a ban on all kinds of advertisements could lead to widespread job losses and even bankruptcy of some media outlets which heavily depend on advertising revenue. Additionally, commercials play a vital role in conveying important information about products or services, detailing their functions and characteristics. Without such information, consumers might encounter great difficulty searching for products that are tailored to their needs, potentially resulting in a lower level of life fulfillment.

To conclude, while a prohibition against all types of advertisements could improve consumer experiences and lessen the effect of consumerism on modern society, I am opposed to it given the value of advertising in terms of economic progress and information awareness.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 4

It is a fact that advertisements are now widespread on mass media. Some people believe that these do not serve any beneficial purposes and even spoil the society. There should be an advertising restriction to hinder their negative impacts on customers. So, everything has its own pros and cons and that is why someone rightly said that all that glitters is not gold.

It is understandable that people want to remove advertisements from our lives because advertisements can be disturbing, therefore the pumping out of advertisement on the internet is distractive when doing research online and insertion of ads during TV dramas and movies is obnoxious. Moreover, advertisements are sometimes misleading and cause impulsive purchase thus the exaggeration and eye-binding techniques employed in the advertisement overshadow the true function of products and the consumers, especially the young people, would fall victims to this intensive commercial completion.

On the other side, it is irrefutable that the proponents of advertisement argue that it is unfair to ban advertisement because it is the only efficient and viable way to show their products. If the advertisement is eradicated, the link between products and consumers would be cut off. Without advertisement, companies would find it hard to reach out to their customers. Consequently, giant companies would manipulate the market, and small companies would never be known by the public. Furthermore, advertisement provides more options to consumers.

To draw the conclusion, I pen down by stating that advertisement is disturbing now and then, there is realistic need of it. The government should make them more trustworthy. Nowadays, the advertisement is an inescapable and necessary existence.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 5

There is no denying the fact that advertisement plays a vital role in human life. The advertisement is the backbone of commerce and industry. It is a source of information as well as the source of entertainment. It is important for us. These days are the days of marketing. We cannot think of life without advertisement. Without advertisements, life is like a fish without water. No businessman or industrialist can ever hope of tapping the market without proper advertisement. Advertisements are all around us - on television, radio and newspaper.

Apropos to above parable about the conversation, many people hold the opinion that advertisement is an important part of our life because the advertisement is the best way to educate the people. For instance, they inform the people about new products, their uses, merits and other similar products available in the market. Moreover, many advertisements are issued by the government agencies, NGOs, and social welfare organisation which have great value in education the people. Furthermore, advertisements raise the standard of living of the people.

On the flip side, those who disagree with this point of view mention that those advertisements have their disadvantages because they distort and exaggerate reality. In addition to it, they aim at profits. Furthermore, another objection is that many advertisements are bad for that they provide the wrong information to the people. Besides this, the producers have become profit hungry. They throw the moral values to the winds.

To conclude, I pen down by stating that advertisements put deep influence on the people’s mind. Some advertisements advise people the direction of the right path. Good advertisements help the people to choose the right products and make informed decisions.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 6

There is an increasing popular tendency that the advertisements do not have any beneficial purposes and even spoil the society. There should be an advertising restriction to hinder the negative impacts on customers. From my perspective, I believe that there are both advantages and disadvantages of this situation and the essay will illustrate my point of view.

On the one hand, there are some undeniable advantages of this trend. One benefit is that because of the adverts, customers can know about the new products available in the market. As a result, they gain knowledge from a wide range of options and find the optimal items in accordance with their budget. Moreover, with the existence of advertising, there has been a driving force for economic development as it boosts the consumption demand. Therefore, a number of companies can promote their production and serve for commercial purposes worldwide. As a result, more jobs are created for unemployees.

On the flip side, I still believe that this trend can be seen as negative. First of all, we are living in a world where there are various forms of ads, even including disturbing adverts appearing in unnecessary ways. As a result, our daily life may be uncomfortable because we are disturbed whenever we want to relax and chill after a hard-working week. Moreover, some ads tend to be exaggerated and eye-binding techniques in adverts overshadow the true functions of products. Hence, people may be fooled by those advertisements and the impulsive purchase happens.

To sum up, it seems to me that although there are many benefits to be considered, this tendency is still a negative development.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 7

The ubiquity of advertising in today’s world is undeniable, as it has permeated nearly every aspect of our lives. From my point of view, although the proliferation of advertising brings certain drawbacks, mainly by changing what facets or values of life people should attach importance to, I do not totally agree that it solely has negative implications and that all forms should be banned.

Admittedly, it is true that advertising shapes people’s perception of what should be considered as important. Firstly, the bombardment of various forms of advertisements has given rise to a culture in which consumerism and materialism are promoted. In other words, the accumulation of material possessions and products take precedence over other values and experiences, which potentially results in a shallow pursuit of happiness when people are led to believe that what they possess is a determinant of their worth and value in society. In addition, some advertisements use manipulative or deceptive tactics to tempt consumers into buying products they may not need or that do not live up to their claims. It can appeal to emotions, create unrealistic desires, and exploit vulnerabilities, leading people to make impulsive and sometimes regrettable decisions.

However, there are convincing arguments against the blanket statement that advertising detrimentally influences people’s lives. To begin with, advertising serves as a valuable source of information about products, services, events, and new innovations, which in turn allows consumers to stay informed about the options available in the market and provides details that can assist them in making informed decisions. Secondly, commercials have a crucial role to play in enabling businesses to build and reinforce brand identity. By increasing the products and services’ visibility via advertising, companies can target new markets and expand their customer base, both domestically and internationally, which contributes to long-term business success.  On top of that, some forms of advertising provide a platform through which social issues are brought to the fore and awareness-raising campaigns can receive more attention among the public.

In conclusion, while it is understandable why the advertising industry impacts what people regard as important, I am of the opinion that advertising should not be prohibited outright, as it also brings a great number of benefits to consumers, businesses and even society at large.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 8

There is an assertion that advertising in any format should be prohibited considering its uselessness and potential damage to society. Personally, I am mostly against the proposed ban as advertisements facilitate buying decisions and create jobs even though some of the advertised information might be inaccurate.

The foremost rationale for my disapproval of banning advertising is its informative nature. Specifically, advertisements can introduce people to a range of products that might directly address their problems or improve the quality of their lives as well as these products’ unique features and qualities. This information might allow consumers to acknowledge more possible options and make informed decisions more effortlessly.

Another concern for why I disagree with the prohibition of advertising in all forms is the risk of job loss. Advertising firms, along with companies in supporting industries such as printing and event organisation, are reported to be offering employment to millions of people including content creators, designers and campaign managers around the world. If an abrupt ban were to be introduced, these employees could be shed, possibly resulting in an increasing unemployment rate as some of them might struggle to secure suitable employment.

Nevertheless, I acknowledge the potential damage of misleading information incorporated into marketing campaigns. To explain, this can lead consumers to make unnecessary purchases that negatively impact their finances or health. This can be seen in the case of supplements. In fact, a number of customer protection associations have reported that many ordinary buyers mistake supplementary tablets for medicinal products as their health effects tend to be exaggerated in advertisements using the endorsement of paid doctors and health professionals. Consequently, these misled customers might have wasted their money on products that fail to fully provide the advertised benefits.

In conclusion, I mostly oppose the proposed ban of product promotion efforts as they can foster informed purchasing decisions and employment opportunities, although advertising might provide inaccurate information to viewers. In the future, governments should encourage the development of this industry while regulating unethical practices more stringently.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 9

Advertising, an omnipresent force in modern society, is a powerful tool used by businesses to promote their products and influence consumer behavior. While it is true that some advertising can be perceived as intrusive or manipulative, a complete ban on all forms of advertising would not serve the best interests of society for several reasons.

Concerning the negative aspects, advertising tends to perpetuate unrealistic standards and ideals. By often showcasing idealized and unattainable beauty standards, lavish lifestyles, and material possessions, advertisements create an aspirational culture that can lead to dissatisfaction and a sense of inadequacy among individuals. Furthermore, with persuasive techniques and emotional appeals, advertisements can sway individuals into making purchases based on desires rather than genuine needs. This manipulation fosters impulsive spending habits, leading to financial strain and disillusionment when products fail to meet the exaggerated promises portrayed in advertisements.

However, advocating for a blanket ban on all forms of advertising is not a prudent solution. Firstly, advertising plays a pivotal role in driving economic growth as it serves as a catalyst for businesses to thrive, promoting healthy competition and fostering innovation. This means that banning advertising altogether could stifle economic progress, potentially leading to job losses and hindering market development. Another reason worth mentioning is that advertising also serves as a source of valuable information for consumers. Advertisements often inform individuals about new products, advancements in technology, and available options, which is why a complete ban would deprive consumers of this information, potentially limiting their ability to make informed choices.

In conclusion, it is important to acknowledge the drawbacks of advertising, particularly its propensity to perpetuate unrealistic ideals and manipulate consumer behavior. Nevertheless, a total ban on advertising would not be a viable solution since this policy can be detrimental to the economy and prevent consumers from accessing valuable information.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 10

A blanket ban on all types of commercials could prove advantageous for society as they seemingly bring no practical value and potentially cause harm. I mostly disagree with this viewpoint, since advertising has the potential to elevate product quality and increase the efficacy of community work, although it might entice unnecessary purchases.

The first reason for my disagreement is that advertising contributes considerably to market competition. This is because most customers tend to constantly seek out superior alternatives to consume. For this reason, advertisements can inform buyers of the company's products and entice them to switch between brands. Ultimately, this forces companies themselves to produce higher quality or innovative goods to compete, thereby improving the overall quality of products in the market.

A further explanation for my opposition is that advertising is also useful for propagating the social activities of companies. By using advertising channels to inform consumers about their campaigns, socially responsible brands can attract a large number of volunteers to join their community contribution programs. Vinmart, as an example, after the advertising campaign that announced it was providing free meals for the poor during the COVID-19, attracted a lot of students to partake.

However, I concede that infomercials may induce unnecessary purchases. To remain competitive in the market, businesses often employ different marketing platforms to create artificial demands from consumers, stimulating impulsive purchase. Consequently, this may result in individuals squandering money on useless products and services, rendering undue financial burden.

In conclusion, I reiterate that advertising is beneficial to society in terms of enhancing overall product quality in the market and attracting the public into companies' social campaigns, despite a minor drawback involving financial issues for consumers. Therefore, I consider that a comprehensive prohibition on advertising might not be as advantageous to the public as would be commonly believed.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 11

Advertising in modern society is ubiquitous – on the radio, TV, the internet and in our letterboxes. While advertising has many disadvantages, the positive influence of advertising outweighs the negative. So, I disagree that there should be a ban on all advertisements.

It is true that advertising provides us with information on new products. If it were not for electronic and print advertising, many products would not be bought. In this way, advertising provides an important service to manufacturers and some consumers. Additionally, it fuels the advertising industry, creating jobs for thousands of people. In this respect, it has the backbone of many economies of the world.

Furthermore, advertisements touch on social issues. For example, when Amitabh Bachchan tells people to bring their children for pulse polio immunization, people listen. Then there are ads against female foeticide which are very informative. Advertisements also teach a lot about the country from where the ads come. This is because through satellite TV we can see ads from all over the world. When we see a Japanese advert for a lady in a kimono, we come to know about the clothes of Japan.

However, Adverts also have a downside. Television commercials are a great example of this. Just as we are enjoying a TV program, a commercial break occurs, forcing us to listen. Advertising can also promote consumerism. People can become greedy for a new product, and they can become discontent with what they already have. In the end, the consumer is never really satisfied, always wanting ‘newer and better’ products. Then, ads show dangerous stunts which may be copied by children, and they may get hurt. Finally, some ads target children and so children pester parents to buy things which can upset the family budget.

On balance, I believe that as every rose is accompanied by thorns, ads too have their disadvantages. Overall, the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages. So, we should not ban ads. The government can, however, ban some ads which show stunts, or which make false claims.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 12

Advertising has been blooming in the past decades due to the ever-soaring development of commercial industry. However, some think it serves no useful purpose, and can sometimes be damaging, thus all forms of advertising should be banned. In my opinion, not all froms of advertising is useless and some would even play a positive role in improving the society.

The origin of advertising rooted in the very beginning of commercial industry. Advertisements were printed on newspaper and broadcast on air in order for a good sale. The basic concept goes on for centuries. Today there are so many forms of advertisements that they may become annoying sometimes. Admittedly some advertisements were misleading, deceptable, or even damaging to customers because the products are not as good as they are claimed to be. For instance, the advertisement of "san lu" milk for infants has been broadcast for so many years and the products have earned customers' trust throughout china, however years ago incidents have been reported that infants have suffered from kidney stones after using the product, only to find the milk has an ingredient that is far beyond national standard. This kind of advertisement should certainly be banned for the benifit of society.

Nevertheless, not all products on advertisements are fake or harmful. Cooperates and companies nowadays needs advertisement in order to survive in fierce competition. These kinds of advertisement should not be banned, otherwise huge impact would affect the business and commercial world. Beside there are other forms of advertising that we call public-interest advertisement, aims in broadcasting healthy concept in helping to make a better world, such as protecting environment or eliminating discriminations. Never should any advertisment in this form be banned but they should even be encouraged.

So the question lies in whether there is a mechnism to filter the unnecessary and farmful advertisement. It is the duty of governments and media organizations to establish such a system to make sure that customers are the beneficiaries of the advertising, rather than being the victoms.

To conclude, not all forms of advertising should be banned, and those which have a positive inflence to the society should be preserved.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 13

This is an era of marketing, and it plays a huge role in the development of business in the market. And advertising is an integral part of marketing, be it for print, electronics, or digital marketing. Advertising is an important pillar of mass media. It is the most powerful medium for businesses to propagate their goods and services in the market. However, this advertising field has become a curse for society these days, especially for young minds. Different reasons have made advertising affects bad and spoiling. Therefore, I firmly agree that society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising.

There is human psychology that people usually run behind the things that attract their eyes the most without weighing their pros and cons or their significance. Advertising makes use of such psychology to persuade people in their trap to increase the profits and business of the companies. Since the internet has become a part and parcel of our lives especially for the young people who tend to rely completely on the internet for their living. Advertising has made use of this platform vastly and has created a huge impact on young minds. Youngsters and children are more attracted to the stuff they see on the internet that is harmful to them. The latest trends of cookie hacking have made the scenario even worse. Now, the stuff they have viewed once or opened the link to once will be visible to them on every internet site they surf due to cookie hacking. This creates a stronger persuasion in the minds of the people to buy the stuff, even more, even if it is not their needs. Now mainly because of advertising of discount offers offered on the shopping sites, people are largely influenced to buy the useless stuff for them. They tend to create a need out of their wishes.

In conclusion, from the above facts, it is clear that all the glitter is not gold. Similarly, advertising has played a huge role in spoiling the majority of human minds. Therefore, the best solution for this is a complete ban on all kinds of advertisements.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 14

Advertising is the most essential component of mass communication. Its benefits are twofold, for the business and the marketing world as well as for the consumers. These are informative, persuasive and build a sense of awareness among the masses and for the business industry, advertising as a component of digital marketing works as a boon for them. The digital marketing industry is booming like anything, especially after the covid pandemic. In such scenarios banning all kinds of advertisement may harm society and the business instead of benefiting them.

The advertising sector is an important sector for the media and the marketing industry both for economic and business purposes. To reach the masses, the easiest and simplest way for businesses is to advertise their products and services. Many reasons claim that banning advertisements is not the solution for benefitting society. Instead, advertising serves as a medium of benefit for society. For the consumers, advertisements serve as a medium of awareness and information. They inform the consumers about the latest products and services, their plus points, and backlogs and help them in doing a comparison between the same products and services of the same company. Without advertising, society will remain unaware of the new launches and will find it hard to choose which is the right product for them. Likewise, for the business industry, advertisement is a medium to propagate their new products among the masses and tell consumers about their USP. Without advertising, it will become really hard for the industry to let the masses know about their different products and services. Also, banning advertisements will result in a loss of a major sector of mass media, i.e., the advertising sector. Banning will result in a job loss of a huge number of people and will significantly result in the loss of business for the different industries. The digital marketing industry will become the major sufferer of the losses incurred by the ban.

In conclusion, after analyzing all the above points, it is clear that the banning of all kinds is not going to benefit society from any end.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 15

People nowadays argue that advertising has ruined society to a greater extent, and it is better to get rid of all forms of advertising for the benefit of society. However, in my opinion, everything has pros and cons attached to it and similar is the case with advertising. Banning all forms of advertisement is quite an unreasonable statement but a considerable ban would work great without doing any harm.

While analyzing the pros of advertising we find that they serve as a medium of propagation for different industries’ products and services. Advertising is an integral part of the booming marketing industry. It serves as a tool of awareness for the masses to make them aware of the recent launches of the products and services in the market. It helps them make a better comparison between them which is the right product with better qualities and features and cheaper prices. A considerable amount of the population has found employment in the advertising industry, and banning advertisements will leave them unemployed. Advertisements also serve the purpose of making people socially aware of the rules and regulations and the social issues of society.

While studying the cons of advertising we realize that the much-hyped advertising industry has negatively impacted the minds of the people especially the youngsters. Secondly, the majority of the advertisements seem to be less reliable and authentic and seem to advertise overemphasized information than the actual details. This hyped information of the product attracts the customers and traps them. advertising has become more of a trap for the customers. They tend to attract glitter like gold and invest their valuable money in the wrong products. Banning such fake and hyped advertisements will save society from the vicious trap of the advertising industry who makes their business by trapping innocent people.

Thus, after analyzing all the pros and cons, a conclusion can be drawn that banning all kinds of advertisements will not benefit society at all as it will make them unaware and ignorant of society. However, a reasonable ban is required to protect society especially the young people from this huge trap and to benefit them to be more sensible and aware.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 16

It has been argued that a complete restriction on all forms of advertising would be of great value for society as a whole, due to its apparent lack of usefulness and sometimes harmfulness. In my opinion, this assumption is highly subjective, and therefore I completely disagree with it.

To begin with, to claim that commercials have no use and are detrimental to consumers is completely ill-founded. We are living in a world where new products with distinct and revolutionary features to better our lives and solve everyday problems are being released almost every day. We cannot deny the fact that such products would remain relatively unknown unless advertising was used to reach customers on a large scale. As a result of advertising, many businesses will thrive, and in turn, pay taxes to the government which will help contribute towards a variety of governmental systems, such as education, healthcare and social security. Such systems help to ensure the well-being of all citizens.

From another perspective, dependency on the advertising industry is inevitable for any nation to prosper. Once commercials, by law, undergo a prohibitive order, unemployment rates would increase, and the burden would fall on the state. For example, Coca Cola dispenses thousands of employment opportunities in advertising throughout its branches across different regions around the world. If adverts are forbidden, an unthinkable number of workers, such as marketers, would either be driven to other jobs or become unemployed. The government, as a result, have to provide temporary financial support for those people. In other words, banning all forms of advertising would have many undesirable implications on society.

In conclusion, it is unreasonable to presume that advertisements are irrelevant and need to be prohibited for the sake of societies best interests.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 17

With the increasing competition among a medley of different advertisements, some advertising companies even use exaggerated or deceptive information to boost sales. It seems right to prohibit advertisements; however, a majority of them still serve the public in a useful aspect.

For the sake of getting a good result of marketing and competing with their counterparts, some advertisers exaggerate the effect of products. As a result of it, consumers who bought the goods due to the advert cannot benefit from it. Even worse, some of the advertisements have bad influence on the people who bought it. Plenty of evidence can be found in our daily lives, for example, a large number of customers suffered from serious diseases, such as stroke or asthma, due to the deceptive advertisement of fake diet pills. Therefore, it is reasonable to ban this form of advertising.

On the other hand, not all types of adverts give us useless information. Advertisements refer to a media strategy to enhance selling and a large proportion of them are serviceable oriented. They tell us the features of products, according to which we could make decision to purchase desirable products. Meanwhile, abundant information from advertisements makes shipping much more efficient. This may include specialty, purchase channel or even price etc.

Based on all the understanding above, advertisements play a pivotal role in our daily lives. So the key is, I believe, to set regulations and censor advert strictly so that to prohibit deceptive advertisements.

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose - mẫu 18

Advertising has great emphasis on the general public. Nowadays, the consumerism changed the dynamics of shopping trends. The vast media and advertising go hand in hand. The numerous ways to advertise the product hit the general attitude of buying the product. There is always clash of arguments among people, some assert that the society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging while others presume that advertising plays a crucial role in today's scenario. In my perception, advertising is the present and the future and it must not be banned.

To begin with, one cannot shun the fact that solely because of advertisement, an individual came to know about the ongoing trends and the new better products available in the market. It has been seen that from last one decade, advertisement substantially affect the industry. Advertisement should not be banned because it attributed to numerous parameters. Firstly, convenience for public, an individual may learn and aware about the new products and items in the market for example, television is the ultimate source to fetch information about the different product currently present in stores. Secondly, price list, one could compare the prices of various products present in the market and could buy as accordance to his/her pocket as for an illustration, there are countless food brands in the market, offering same item at different rate such as potato chips etcetera. Thirdly, one can learn about the difficult schemes and offers in a simple way because the company portrays their products in a most effective and easy way. With the passage of time, everything is changed in the surroundings and advertisement is the ultimate result of technological development, so it must be welcomed, and one should enjoy the immense benefits from the advertisement.

Moving further, as everything that glitters is not gold, sometimes the faux people portray their product in a wrong way for an example the fairness creams and lotions which offer skin fairness in 4 weeks and pragmatically it is not possible. The general public is very innocent and struck in the traps of the leading companies. Some advertisement serves no useful purpose. The monopoly of the leading companies, largely harm the public. These are the reasons because of which the good products also seem to be fake. There are some herbal products which has got no severe harm but an individual never believe on it because of bad experiences in the past. Moreover, the companies target children because they are most innocent and largely influenced customers. In addition to this, companies offer different perks to children as for an example, a free toy with a chocolate or any food item. An individual must not trust the advertisement blindly and must take care of the plagiarism.

To recapitulate, I would like to say that advertisement is an essential need of today. One must enjoy the benefits of advertisement and keep himself/ herself updated and should also take care of the faux products.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income. Unfortunately, tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly. What are the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world? Do you think that the benefits of tourism outweigh its drawbacks?

• Nowadays, there is more and more competition for getting into university. Is this a positive or negative development?

• Many foods are shipped from far away. Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically beneficial. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

• In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed their education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---