In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed their education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 1)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 2)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 3)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 4)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 5)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 6)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 7)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 8)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 9)
- In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after (mẫu 10)
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 1
These days, it is not uncommon for young adults to continue housing with their parents even after they have finished education and entered the workforce. I believe that although there are certain benefits of this trend, the drawbacks are more significant.
It cannot be denied that living with one's parents into adulthood has a number of merits for both generations. The most obvious advantage is that young people can economise. Since property prices have risen, especially in urban areas where young adults congregate, it is much harder for them to find decent accommodation compared to their parents' times. Therefore, if they want to save up for their future plans, this way of living is a sensible choice. Also, young people can aid their ailing parents during their stay. Instead of sending senior residents into nursing homes, having their children take care of them may be better because they can receive more attention. In countries like Vietnam, this is the main reason why adults stay with their parents.
Nevertheless, this development can have adverse impacts on young people, psychologically and socially. Firstly, this arrangement can strip them of their privacy. Simple acts of freedom such as playing music at maximum volume, inviting friends over for a party or even barring parents from their room may be impossible, however necessary these things may be to adults' mental wellbeing. Secondly, with two generations living under one roof, conflicts tend to arise. This can be caused by a generation gap, or differences in personality. Whatever the case, it is quite likely that their relationship will become strained. Lastly, young people will have to face the social stigma of sharing a house with their parents. This means they may garner negative opinions from their peers, making it hard for them to lead a healthy social life.
In short, while sharing accommodation can benefit adults and their parents, from my perspective, this is disadvantageous for the former's growth.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 2
It is commonly believed that graduates usually leave their nests to look for independent living space, but in some nations, there is a staggering number of youngsters residing with their caretakers. While this trend can bring certain benefits, I believe that they are eclipsed by significant drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are tangible advantages when grown–ups stay in their own homes with their parents. Firstly, their living expenses can be reduced. While other adults have to pay for rents, bills and other necessities, in this case, the costs can be shared between family members. Consequently, young adults can save some money for other purposes such as further study or investment. Secondly, parents can provide immediate mental support for young people amidst their crisis when transitioning from studying to working. Living with parents, youngsters can confide in them and receive sound advice from experienced predecessors.
On the other hand, I opine that there exist detrimental impacts on those who do not live independently. The first disadvantage is that the young can be over-reliant on their family. With the help of parents, the young may not have to do household tasks such as doing laundry or washing up, which can later be huge obstacles when they have to move out. Furthermore, the autonomy and self-efficacy of youngsters can also diminish. Being with overprotective parents can deprive adults of the development of problem-solving and decision-making skills. Compared to other counterparts, they are less confident when choosing between different options.
In conclusion, although young people can receive financial and mental support from family members, it is advisable that they lead a life of independence after finishing studies.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 3
It is often expected of young adults to fly the nest once they have finished education and secured employment. However, this does not seem to be the situation in some countries where an increasing number of adults continue to live with their parents, despite having reached the mentioned milestones. Personally, I believe that this trend brings more benefits than drawbacks.
On the one hand, staying with parents allows young adults to have an easier start to the multifaceted adult life. To begin with, sharing accomodation with parents is economical. Fresh graduates and novice workers typically do not have a stable job or a steady income yet, which may make it hard for them to cover the living expenses if they are to move out on their own. In the same household, however, parents can save their coming-of-age children the troubles of monthly house rents and other concomitant living costs like water, electricity bills. Furthermore, living under one roof helps family members to keep a close eye on one another in case of troubles. Young adults may fall victim to social misconduct due to their inexperience with the complicated aspects of adulthood. Therefore, parent’s frequent observation and timely interference are much needed, which can be facilitated when living together.
On the other hand, there is the risk that young adults may become reliant when they let their parents invariably take care of every matter in their life. As such, these adults would have little room for personal growth and autonomy, and skills like financial management or problem solving would be diminished as a result. Consequently, when it is time to move out, these adults may find the transition rather challenging. However, this may not be the case if young adults learn how to assert their independence and self-sufficiency while still living with their parents, for example, by splitting costs and managing personal affairs.
In conclusion, despite some apparent drawbacks, the practice of continuing to live with parents, even after graduating and finding employment, has more benefits to offer.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 4
The boomerang generation's proliferation has given rise to a new concern - whether full-fledged adults continuing to live with their parents has more benefits than drawbacks. This essay will seek to shed light on this matter.
It is true that an average adult could benefit a lot if they live in the said way. By sharing the daily expenses with their folks, they would be able to cut costs, and being frugal is undoubtedly the healthy lifestyle in this wretched economy caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. In addition to the financial benefits, their parents are also capable of catering to them physically and mentally by simply cooking for them hearty, full of love meals or by talking to them at the end of the workday for stress relief. The depression and anxiety rate, especially among young adults, would go down by a landslide if they were to be surrounded with family love.
Despite all of the advantages, I am still of the opinion that this phenomenon is rather detrimental to adults by arguing that individual autonomy is of paramount power. Unfortunately, an adult could not act out of their volition when they live in their parents' houses for one simple reason "My house my rules". This transgression of autonomy, complemented with possible micromanagement, would render that functional adult submissive, indecisive and wavering. Being aware of this, Asian adults have gradually phased out the status quo of multi-generation families, paving the way for single households.
In conclusion, the disadvantages of the premise outweigh its benefits.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 5
These days it is quite common for people to live with their parents even after they have graduated from university and found a job. There are various reasons for this situation, as well as some consequences. Overall, it is impossible to say whether it is a good or a bad phenomenon, so this essay will explore both the advantages and disadvantages.
On the plus side, people who live with their parents after university may save money which they can then use later in life. This is preferable to paying rent and bills for several years after graduation. Instead of this, young people can live with their parents and then buy a house when they are ready to settle down. In addition, this situation can allow young people to stay closer to their families and maintain traditions. In the modern world, lots of old values have changed or been lost, and this can help continue closer family relationships.
There are also a great many negatives to this. Unfortunately, living at home restricts a young person’s freedom, and thus they cannot forge close personal relationships with their peers. It is important for young men and women to live together as young adults so that they can know each other before marriage and living with parents makes this impossible. More than just impacting social development, living alone or with friends or a partner allows for many other responsibilities, and living with parents also restricts this. For example, it is good for young people to learn about the difficulties of paying bills and doing their own chores rather than relying upon their parents.
In conclusion, it is hard to say whether there are more advantages or disadvantages. It seems there are different cultural perspectives to be taken into consideration. All that can really be concluded is that there are certainly many big differences between living alone and living with your parents.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 6
In recent years, the number of adults still living with their parents has been on the rise due to recent economic upheaval. While some argue that this trend helps cement relationships between members of a family, I believe it is largely disadvantageous due to the growing dependence of children on their guardians.
On the one hand, staying under the same roof can help forge stronger bonds between family members. One of the primary reasons for this is there are abundant opportunities for regular face-to-face interactions and intimate conversations. For example, a newly graduated student can get advice, discuss problems at work, and confide possible setbacks to his parents. This kind of conversation will likely help build confidence which is widely regarded as a key to success in an increasingly competitive business world. This ideal scenario seems less likely if, however, the son is settling down in a new home, with a different timetable from members of his family and only speaking with his parents on occasion over the phone.
On the other hand, I am firmly of the opinion that those who refuse to live on their own are more likely to experience a prolonged period of immaturity. Firstly, those who remain at home are usually exempt from mundane tasks such as preparing meals, doing laundry and tidying their rooms. Consequently, they are likely to be dependent on their parents and have trouble developing the capacity for self-reliance that is essential for personal and career success. It will be more difficult for them to make their own well-informed, responsible decisions. Indeed, many helicopter parents, such as those in Vietnam, closely monitor their children, failing to guide them properly in how to gather relevant information, and evaluate possible options for a final sound decision. Both of these failures are likely to have detrimental effects, preventing many from leading a self-sufficient life.
In conclusion, although young adults might be better supported emotionally in staying home, over-reliance on one’s parents is not a wise path towards becoming a well-adjusted, high-functioning member of society. In my opinion, teenagers should start taking full responsibility for their lives at the age of 18.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 7
In many cultures, children and their parents make conscious decisions to live together well into the children’s adulthood when they have all the means necessary to establish an independent life. Although this practice could have some benefits to both the parents and their offspring, I strongly argue that it could do more harm than good to a person in the modern society.
When adult children and their parents live together, a couple of economic upsides could be identified. By residing in one property instead of splitting into two, the incurred spending on electricity, water and cleaning services is potentially just half as much. This effect is even more profound if a family stays on rental properties. It is more economical to rent one place in lieu of two. Another advantage of living together is familial support during hard times. In the event that one of the members in a family falls ill, especially the aging parents, it is much easier for their sons and daughters to tend to them as they do not have to travel to another place; thus, this helps save the cost on taking care of the sick.
I, however, assert that the often-overlooked pitfall of living with one’s parents for too long can inflict irreparable damage to a person’s life and negate any benefits that it brings. In countries where parents and adult children live together, families usually have strict hierarchical rules that the children must follow whatever their parents order them to do. Consequently, this practice brings up generations of adults who do not know how to make decisions until they get married and when they do, they mirror their parents. Today’s economy rewards ingenuity and decisiveness, so a person’s chance to succeed in life is negatively affected if that person does not have the opportunities to make uninfluenced decisions early on.
In conclusion, a family model which consists of parents and their adult children has some positive effects worth noting, yet the long-term outcome is undesirable. I am a firm advocate that this family model should cease to continue.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 8
In recent years, the number of adults living with their parents has increased due to the ongoing economic crisis. While many people argue that this trend may save them a lot of money, I believe it will be harmful in the long term due to the increasing dependence of adults on their parents.
To begin with, living with family has an advantage for adults in saving up their money since members can share fees. In other words, living alone may be expensive. Housing price has increased recently due to inflation and most students may not be able to afford them after college. In Hanoi, for example, the average salary of graduates is five million VND. An adequate one-bedroom apartment, however, costs two to three million, making up half of their incomes. Moving out also necessitates increased spending on new furniture and other essential utilities such as electricity, gas, and wi-fi which further aggravates their financial stress.
On the other hand, this trend may decrease the independence of students, which may create dysfunctional families. In some Asian countries, parents believe that it is the best way to reinforce family connections. In China, for example, many couples still live with their family after marriage, bringing burdens on their parents. Some cases are not responsible enough to raise their babies who require essential care from their parents. Not only does the emotional gap negatively influence the psychological well-being of the babies, but also creates an onerous workload for the parents.
In conclusion, although young adults might be better supported emotionally by staying home, over-reliance on one’s parents is not a wise path towards becoming a well-adjusted, high-functioning member of society. In my opinion, teenagers should learn to take full responsibility for their lives at 18.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 9
In the last few decades, there have been some modifications in the family structure and relationship; yet there still has a trend that greater numbers of adults opting to reside with their parents after graduation and securing a job. While the benefits seem to be stopgap, I believe the drawbacks involved are significant.
There are several significant merits as adults return to parental homes. It is undoubted that saving money is the first benefit. In other words, people can save on rent, utility bills, renovations, shared grocery bills, and many more. Of course, people should be contributing to the household expenses, but they will not have to spend as much as they would if they were on their own. Another potential benefit is that people can have more free time. Living in a multigenerational setting means that there are a lot more hands to the work. Further, living with their parents usually comes with the added benefit of enjoying warm, home-cooked meals even when people do not have time to cook.
Despite some benefits above, I deem that the negatively far-reaching impacts outnumber the positives it induces. Firstly, living with their parents can strip people of their privacy or freedom, and that can be a psychological burden, especially if they are used to living alone. Their parents may likely intervene in one’s lives, like when to sleep or eat or what can do at home. Secondly, those who select this lifestyle may be less independent. By living with their parents, people are shielding themselves not only from hardships but also from the lessons that life has to offer. Eventually, they may fail to manage themselves as moving out, living alone, and could turn out to be a shockingly unpleasant experience since they tend to count on their guardians beforehand.
In short, although living at home with their caregivers may provide adults with some advantageous factors, such as financial betterment and gaining time, I opine that the side effects it causes are more serious. This temporary lifestyle may not assist people in preparing for everyday struggles in the future.
In some countries, more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after - mẫu 10
In recent years, we have seen that a majority of mature people are preferring to live with their families despite having a good education and successful careers. In my opinion this trend has both pros and cons in equal measures.
Some benefits can be easily identified. One clear advantage of staying under the same roof, is that it allows the living costs to be shared amongst the family. The cost of housing in particular is a major factor as we have seen property prices and rentals increase dramatically in cost. Furthermore, those who earn only a moderate income may not have sufficient funds or may struggle to pay other living expenses such as utilities and food. As a result, they rely on the totally need a financial support from their family in order to avoid bearing the weight of all household bills and responsibilities on their own.
A second benefit is that it creates a convenient way for them to spend sufficient time taking care of elderly parents. It allows them to provide good quality health care which is particularly important if their parents have mobility or mental health problems. Thirdly, parents can offer practical and emotional support because Parents would prepare home cooked meals which are healthier than eating out for their sons and their daughters. Moreover, living on your own can be very lonely so living with parents gives people someone to talk to, especially if they are worried about something. As the saying goes "a problem shared is a problem halved".
On the other hand, living together with one's father or mother is not always a good thing. Firstly, a one-person household can be seen as positive for both personal and broader economic reasons. Those, who choose to settle in their family may not only become less independent but also less self-reliant than those who live alone. A young adult, for instance, would actually lack valuable life skills such as cooking, earning money to pay bills and even self- management of his or her budget.
Secondly, there is a huge percentage of adults losing their freedom due to the over control of parents over in their private lives. Particularly, in Asian culture, and in particular in Vietnam parents assert a strong influence over their children even into adulthood, such as, parents prohibiting children to participate in some activities like dating day and traveling without family permission. Therefore, these mature people may experience negative feelings which may lead to resentment, suicidal thoughts and depression, due to the inability to relieve their stress how they wish, or form relationships of their choosing.
In conclusion, sharing a house as an adult with relatives will have both beneficial and detrimental effects on adult individuals. I still believe that more advantages are gained by people who prefer to stay in their family unit, as everyday financial burdens would appear not to concern them, and they have a built-in support mechanism for the trials and tribulations of everyday life.
Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:
Đã có app VietJack trên điện thoại, giải bài tập SGK, SBT Soạn văn, Văn mẫu, Thi online, Bài giảng....miễn phí. Tải ngay ứng dụng trên Android và iOS.
Theo dõi chúng tôi miễn phí trên mạng xã hội facebook và youtube:Nếu thấy hay, hãy động viên và chia sẻ nhé! Các bình luận không phù hợp với nội quy bình luận trang web sẽ bị cấm bình luận vĩnh viễn.
- Đề thi lớp 1 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 2 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 3 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 4 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 5 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 6 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 7 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 8 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 9 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 10 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 11 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 12 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 1 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 2 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 3 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 4 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 5 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 6 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 7 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 8 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 9 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 10 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 11 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 12 (các môn học)