Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 1

I do agree with the statement that children brought up in poor families are better prepared to deal with the problems of adult life than children brought up by wealthy parents.

Children of poor parents are prematurely exposed to the problems of adult life. For example, learning to survive on a low family income and sacrificing luxuries for essential items. These children begin to see the ‘realities’ of life in their home or social environment. Their parents' own struggles serve as an example to them. These children are taught the necessary skills for survival as adults from a very early age. Many children work on the weekends or holidays to either collect some pocket money or even contribute to their family’s income. A good example is the many children who accompany their parents to sell products at the market. They are making a direct contribution to their families in terms of labor or income. Children of poor families also are highly motivated. They tend to set high goals to improve their economic and social situation. A relevant example would be Mr Bill Gates (founder of Microsoft Corporation). He had an impoverished background, but he used his talent and motivation to set up the world’s largest computer organisation.

However, there are some problems that children from poor backgrounds do encounter. Many of these children who are ‘robbed’ of their childhood while working may feel cheated. They often turn to crime. This, however, is a small group.

In summing up, children with impoverished backgrounds are able to deal with problems of adult life because of early exposure, family role models, and sheer motivation.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 2

These days, the more society has developed, the better life will be, leading to most children being raised in good conditions of both material and spirit. However, some people believe that it's true the poor give their children more experience than the rich give. I totally agree with this opinion.

First and foremost, almost all children living with difficulties are aware of undergoing hard work and seek a way to overcome it. In fact, because of the shortage of material conditions like a computer, phones, or means of transport, poor children always strive to get over their miserable situation. Incredibly, they make a great effort to get a higher position in society and reach higher income. As a result, poor children soon get more mature than one living in a sufficient environment. 

Secondly, if a child stays in a terrible place, he will gather more skills than others. In other words, the challenges in many fields in life, such as earning money from a very young age, doing housework, help children learn a lot of soft skills which are necessary for their job in the future. For example, to help their parents, children have to do all housework, shaping their responsibility and how to care about others. Moreover, children living in poor conditions more frequently understand and sympathize with their parents' emotions than others of the same age.

In conclusion, although there are many views about whether it's true for children growing up in poor families to be prepared better for life, I completely believe that the children in families without affordable money will overcome their life’s problem easier and make a brighter scenario.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 3

One reason that people make money is to provide their children with a solid foundation for the future. However, the question has been raised as to whether children from wealthier families are really better prepared for life than those from poorer ones.

At first glance, it may seem obvious that children from wealthier families will be better prepared for life, since their parents can pay for a better education, usually at private schools, and can buy them the things they need or want, such as sports equipment and the latest technological gadgets. A better secondary education at a reputable private school gives a child a greater chance of attending a good university. Better sports equipment and the latest gadgets give a child an advantage over other children when competing in those fields. Wealthier people also tend to be better connected and are able to use these connections to get help from others.

Despite these possible advantages, some people claim that children from poorer families are better prepared for life because they are said to be more self-reliant. This is said to be because they rely on themselves more than on their parents. I agree that being self-reliant is good for later life when people cannot expect to receive everything they need from their parents. However, I know several people who attended private boarding school, and they were all encouraged to become self-reliant since they were away from their families.

My personal opinion is that children from wealthy families are better prepared for life than those from less well-off ones. However, I would not claim that this is the truth in every case. Wealthy parents can give their children more and this usually works to the advantage of the child. Having said that, a poor childhood can force a child to become more self-reliant and lead them on the path to a successful life.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 4

In today’s society, the assertion that children raised in families with limited financial resources are better equipped for life than those from affluent backgrounds has sparked a debate. This essay will argue in agreement with this notion, highlighting the character-building attributes that adversity fosters in children.

Firstly, growing up in financially constrained circumstances encourages resilience and adaptability in children. When faced with challenges such as economic hardship, they learn to find creative solutions, manage limited resources, and develop a strong work ethic. For instance, a study conducted by the Institute for Fiscal Studies in the United Kingdom found that children from economically disadvantaged families often exhibit a greater determination to succeed academically and pursue higher education as a means to uplift their socio-economic status.

Secondly, experiencing financial limitations can cultivate empathy and a deeper understanding of societal disparities. Children exposed to financial constraints are more likely to develop compassion and an awareness of the struggles faced by others. They tend to value non-material aspects of life, such as relationships and personal growth, which contribute to their overall well-being. A vivid example of this can be seen in the philanthropic efforts of individuals who have overcome adversity in their childhood, as they frequently channel their success towards uplifting their communities.

In conclusion, while financial difficulties may pose immediate challenges, they often lead to positive long-term outcomes for children. The skills and values instilled through these experiences are valuable assets that can equip them to navigate the complexities of adult life. As such, it is reasonable to assert that children raised in families with fewer financial resources are, in fact, better prepared for the challenges and opportunities that lie ahead.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 5

Though many people firmly believe that children from less wealthy families are better prepared for life than their rich counterparts, it is disputable. I disagree with the proposed opinion as I believe that several factors influence children’s preparedness for life including good parenting, education, skills and dedication, and sometimes not having proper means to support education by less wealthy families may be a hindrance than an advantage.

It is often pointed out by many that children from poor and middle-class families face hardships in life and have better adaptability. But it is important to acknowledge that children from economically disadvantaged families may face obstacles that hinder their preparation for life. Limited financial resources can restrict access to quality education, extracurricular activities, and essential support systems. For instance, a child growing up in a low-income household may lack the means to attend private tutoring or participate in enrichment programmes that could enhance their educational prospects. This lack of access to resources can potentially limit their opportunities for personal and professional growth, ultimately impacting their preparedness for life’s challenges.

Good parenting, regardless of economic conditions, puts us ahead in our life. Compassionate, loving and responsible parenting can make us ready to face challenges in life. This is because responsible parents, even if they have a huge fortune, will teach their children to face hardship in life. A good family bond gives us positive childhood and better mental health in adult life. This has a direct impact on the person we become and how prepared we are to face challenges. Moreover, in this era of technological marvels and democracy, people have access to education and online information. So, everyone with a desire for success and dedication can develop their skills to have a better career in life. This is why when we look at the list of most successful people in modern times, we do not see a particular pattern where only people from rich or poor families become successful.

In conclusion, despite the common belief that children from less affluent families are better prepared for the future than their rich counterparts, I strongly hold the opinion that preparedness in life depends on parameters like good parenting, education, skills and dedication and sometimes family wealth is a positive aspect rather than being a negative one.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 6

Childhood experience and learning ascertain someone’s personality and determination to prosper in life. Today, some people believe that children in wealthy households are overindulged and do not learn the vital lessons to confront future challenges while middle and low-class families prepare their offsprings. I feel that better parenting, irrespective of family prosperity, is much more important.

To start with, children in low-income and middle-class families learn how to face difficulties in life, talk about something with others, work hard to get a better life, and this is the reason it is believed that they are better prepared to face life. For instance, our school’s highest scorer was from a lower-middle course family, and he dedicated most of his time to study. He valued good grades more than any other student in our class. Somehow, he was convinced that the only way to escape from financial problems is to become the best scorer. On the contrary, kids from wealthy families get better amenities, education and livelihood opportunities.

I believe that parenting is much more important than money. It is not always the money of expertise that produces a responsible citizen. Instead, the morale of the parent’s enhancement in a child often determines how prepared he is to confront life.

To conclude, though it is usually believed that children from less fortunate families are much better prepared for the future, I, on the other hand, think that proper parenting is a lot more significant.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 7

Normally, wealthy families compensate for a better lifestyle for those kids. I feel that kids from wealthier households get improved chances and know much more to be ready for future struggles.

On the one hand, it is stated that households with less cash prepare their kids for a better future. It is correct that those kids learn the crucial elements of life within their youth, like the actual value of money and how hard it can be, the significance of family ties. Many times, those kids learn how to save money for their potential use. Therefore, they mechanically prepare for placing a goal in life and create plans for chasing them. As a result, many critical qualities of life are learned by these children from such households during their early phases of life.

However, they have all of the facilities that they need for their future and education. For example, they are equipped with all the essential requirements to initiate a company or combine a project with no hassle. Additionally, those families construct the basis for their kids to start their life. The schooling, facilities, and teaching those wealthy children get are much superior to the bad children’s instruction and instruction. Additionally, those wealthy children eventually understand the most crucial facets of life, might be modest later than the bad kids, but they have much greater facilities that finally give them benefits in life.

In conclusion, education and money construct a better future life. Owing to that, more intelligent children have a far better and elastic lifestyle than bad kids. Thus, I think children from affluent families receive a competitive edge compared to kids from low-income families concerning instruction and preparation for the long run.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 8

Over the past few decades, along with growing interest in child education, people's attention to the family environment where a child is brought up has also significantly increased. Some people have begun to feel that a child who has grown up in a poor family tends to be better prepared to deal with problems. In my opinion, however, family environment alone does not influence a child’s ability to solve problems much.

A child who was born into a poor family would have had more situations where they had to solve a problem or make a decision on their own. This is because in most unfortunate families, both parents are usually working, and children are put into situations where they have to take care of themselves. By contrast, due to their wealth, rich children can experience and learn things that unfortunate children cannot. For example, they usually go to the best schools and receive a higher education there, which prepares them better for solving problems in their life.

However, few would disagree with the fact that each individual is different. That is, problem solving skills come more from life experience. That is, the more a person experiences life, the more they can use these experiences to adjust, to adapt and to solve problems they encounter. Personality also can be a factor in dealing with problems. A person who is optimistic, outgoing, confident and open-minded can look at and solve problems more effectively.

As discussed above, nature and nurture have an equal influence on a child's ability to face challenges. Parents should spare no effort to figure out how they can help their children to be independent. I hope that in the future the next generation will grow up as mature citizens.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 9

Childhood "experience" and "learning" determine someone's personality and ascertainment to prosper in life. Some people believe that children in wealthy families are over-indulged and do not learn many important lessons to face future challenges while middle-class and lower-middle-class families better prepare their offsprings. Personally, I believe that better parenting, regardless of family wealth or status, is more important.

To begin with, children from less wealthy families learn to face difficulties in life from early childhood. They know that they need to work hard to succeed in life, and they start to appreciate the value of money and time. It gives them a competitive advantage to face life in the future. For instance, the highest scorer in our college was from a lower-middle-class family and he devoted most of his time to studying. He valued excellent academic results more than most students from wealthy families. He was convinced that the only way to get out of their financial problems was to become the top scorer and have a better career in the future. No doubt, this determination, hard work and mindset will help him become successful in life.

Reversely, children from wealthy families, most of the time, get better facilities, education and career opportunities. Despite being an average student, Patrick, one of my classmates, got admitted to the best private university in our country. This exemplifies that he has a better career prospect than the top scorer in our college. So, the connection, influence and money that rich families own often help them better educate their children while also giving them a head start in life.

Personally, I believe that parenting is more important than having and spending money on children. It is not always the money that makes someone successful and a good citizen. When parents implant good qualities among children, these qualities alone can make a difference in their life.

To conclude, though it is generally believed that children from less fortunate families are better prepared for the future, I believe that proper parenting is far more important than any other factor.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 10

Money plays a pivotal role in people's social and family life, and it influences the way a child grows up and prepares to meet future challenges. Usually, rich families compensate their children for a better life, but some people argue that children who are brought up in less wealthy families are often better prepared to face difficulties in life. However, I strongly believe that children from affluent families get better opportunities and better prepared for future challenges.

On the one hand, many believe that families with less money prepare their children more realistically. Those children admittedly learn to face obstacles in their childhood that give them an advantage when they grow up. They also learn to appreciate the value of money, savings, time and hard work, and the importance of family ties. They are not pampered with everything they want or need, rather they need to earn them through hard work. Therefore, they automatically prepare for setting a target in life and make plans for pursuing them.

On the other hand, children from wealthier families are sometimes a little behind in terms of learning many important lessons in childhood when compared with the mindset of their counterparts. However, they have all the facilities they need for their education and future career. For instance, they are well adorned to go to the best schools, have the best teachers to teach them, money and connections to start a business or join a job, and an affluent family to support them whenever needed. Furthermore, those families build the foundation for their children to begin their life - a much-needed push to have a better career. These rich children eventually learn the most important aspects of life, maybe a little later than the poor children, but they have far greater facilities that ultimately give them advantages in life.

To conclude, money and education build a better future life. Because of that, wealthier children have a much better and more flexible life than poor children. Therefore, I believe children from wealthy families get a competitive advantage over children from poor families in terms of education and preparation for the future.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 11

Who gets better prepared to face life - people who were raised lavishly or in a destitute condition, is debatable. I agree that children who were raised in a low-income family are better at facing life than those who came from an ultra-rich family.

For several reasons, many believe that children who are brought up in middle and low-income families are better prepared to face life. Firstly, these children are accustomed to living a simple lifestyle and they know the value of time, money and relationship. Instead of having their own room, with all the toys and comfortable beds in the room, they had to sleep with their siblings in a small room with a limited number of toys and facilities. They learn how to share important things, take care of others, manage the budgets and most importantly become contented with whatever they have. As these children do not have many luxuries in life, they would easily adapt to the harsh conditions. Secondly, these children are already taught to be independent at an early age. Many of their parents could not afford to pay school tuition fees, therefore they have to have a part-time job to pay the fees. Thus, they learn to be independent at an early age.

Moreover, children who are raised in rich families will face difficulties when they grow up and face the real world. One of the reasons is that their parents have always provided them with all the materials they wanted and needed. They get fancy clothes, expensive toys and the latest gadgets without having to work hard. As they rely heavily on their parents’ wealth, they will face problems if there is a financial crisis.

To conclude, the upbringing of children defines who they will become in the future. Since families with less money have to teach children to work hard, save money and become satisfied with things they have, they are better prepared in life than their rich counterparts who got everything ready for them by their family.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 12

The role of family atmosphere in a child’s development is a cause of concern. However, I disagree with the notion that children of poor families are better equipped to deal with the challenges of adult life than those of rich families. No doubt, adversity is a good teacher of life, but rich parents can also prepare their children to face the problems of adult life by good education and good nurturing.

A child of a poor family has more situations to solve a problem or make a decision as both parents are working to make ends meet and children have to look after themselves. They realize the value of money as they have to live with the barest minimum and as a result, they find it less difficult later on in life when they face financial challenges. In contrast, the children of wealthy families are born with a silver spoon in their mouths. They are completely ignorant of the value of money as everything is provided for them in their youth and expect the same situation in adulthood.

On the other hand, children of rich families study in the best schools and get the best higher education. They can learn problem-solving in such academic institutes. Moreover, a wealthy child may be well-guided by parents who possess strong financial knowledge. Such parents themselves know money management better and can pass on those skills to their children.

Life experiences also play a role. Children can have an innate ability to face problems in life. They may have personality traits such as being optimistic, outgoing, confident and open-minded. Due to these abilities, they can solve problems in a better way.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that a poor child may learn to get along without wealth and a wealthy child may be well trained by a parent to face hurdles of life by effective education. Therefore, I disagree that the economic situation of the family has a role in problem-solving skills.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 13

There is a common belief that children who grow up in financially disadvantaged families are better equipped to face the challenges of adult life compared to those raised by wealthy parents. While it is true that hardships can build resilience and problem-solving skills, it would be unfair to generalize that all children from families with limited means are better prepared for the future. The extent to which this opinion holds depends on various factors such as the individual's mindset, available opportunities, and support systems in place.

It is undeniable that experiencing financial difficulties during childhood can foster a sense of resourcefulness and adaptability in individuals. Children in low-income families often learn to make the most of limited resources, helping them develop practical skills and a strong work ethic. The real-life difficulties they encounter can prepare them to face adversity with resilience and determination. This can be seen in many success stories of individuals who emerged from poverty and achieved great success in their careers.

Furthermore, children from less affluent backgrounds may appreciate the value of money and understand the importance of financial planning better than their wealthier counterparts. Having to make tough decisions about expenditures and prioritize essential needs fosters a sense of frugality, budgeting, and long-term planning. These skills are crucial in navigating the complexities of adult life, regardless of one's financial background.

However, it is important to note that not all children from families with limited financial means are automatically prepared to face adult life challenges. The lack of opportunities and necessary resources can hinder their personal growth and limit their potential. Education and extracurricular activities, for example, play a vital role in a child's development, and without access to quality institutions or enrichment programs, their chances of attaining success could be constrained. This can lead to a cycle of disadvantages that are difficult to break free from.

In contrast, children from wealthy families typically have access to better education, healthcare, and a wider range of opportunities. They may be exposed to diverse experiences, fostering creativity, critical thinking, and broader perspectives. While it is true that an abundance of resources can sometimes lead to a sense of entitlement, their access to resources can better equip them to tackle certain challenges. It is worth noting that wealth can also come with its own set of problems, such as pressure to maintain a certain social status or expectations to conform to certain societal norms.

In conclusion, while there is some truth to the notion that children brought up in families with limited financial means can be better prepared for adult life challenges, it is essential to consider the multitude of factors that influence an individual's readiness. Resilience and resourcefulness can emerge from adversity, but access to opportunities and support systems are equally crucial for personal growth and success in adulthood. Ultimately, the extent to which this opinion holds true depends on the interplay of individual circumstances, upbringing, and available resources.

Children who are brought up in families that do not have large amounts of money are - mẫu 14

It is primarily the responsibility of parents or family members to raise their children in a way that equips them to cope with real-life challenges in adulthood. Many people think that upbringing of a child in a family which is not financially stable can make a real difference in his personality than to a kid who is born with a silver spoon. This essay will discuss why I completely agree with this viewpoint.

In this fast-paced world, no one can survive but the 'survival of the fittest'. People with a humble background know the harsh realities of the world from the early stages of their lives, hence, well equipped to excel in practical life. They know how to control the desires and spend the money within limits. Another factor which enables them to make the best decisions in their life is the practical approach to every situation. Therefore, they are always on top in their respective professions unlike the ones who rely on wealth from their parents.

On the contrary, rich parents keep their kids away from real-world problems. Those kids always dependent on someone even for their tiny needs such as a driver to roam them around, maid to clean their clothes or a chef to cook food. Furthermore, they merely know the value of the money. They spend it without any check and balance and end up in shackles when they have to manage the financial matters by themselves. Overall, this sort of upbringing restricts a child from becoming independent which is the basic ingredient to be a successful person in the real world.

In conclusion, it is high time for parents to guide their children in a way that they can adjust to any situation. However, it is observed that many successful personalities belong to very humble families. This essay discussed why I completely agreed with this observation.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In many countries, modern buildings are changing the character and appearance of towns and cities. Some people believe that countries should protect their cultural identity by insisting that all new buildings are built in a traditional style. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think women should be allowed to join the army, the Navy and the Air Force just like men. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that people moving to a new country should accept new culture in the foreign country. Others think that they should live as a separate minority group with different lifestyles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicines should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree?

• Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country’s police force or military force, while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---