In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government pays for them. Do you think the advantages that the government pays the money outweigh the disadvantages? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government - mẫu 1

It is no doubt that education has positive benefits for the society; therefore, some governments subsidize college tuitions. In my opinion, free university education brings both advantages and disadvantages, and the decision of whether tertiary education should be free should be based on the country’s resources.

On the one hand, college education subsidies promote equality of opportunity, which means less privileged young citizens would have the same access to higher education as ones from better-endowed families. This would lead to a more educated and productive workforce since countries with high rates of education generally have higher levels of innovation and productivity growth. This would also provide more skilled graduates for the current increasingly high-tech industries whose positions require employees of specialized knowledge and skill sets. Besides, graduates can also gain skills and awareness of civic institutions which offer intangible benefits to society.

On the other hand, there has been a rapid rise in the number of graduates, and many of those take jobs that do not require a degree; therefore, it would be a waste to continue to fund public university education when there are shortages in resources for core generic skills training, such as literacy and numeracy, and more basic vocational training so people could become social care givers, builders or electricians. Moreover, when people have to pay to go to university, they tend to value their education more and take their studying more serious, and schools should have more resources to maintain standards and quality of teaching and researching.

In conclusion, both charging and subsidizing college tuitions bring benefits, and governments should consider their resources and labor demands when making decisions of such matter.

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government - mẫu 2

In some nations, students have to allocate money for the tuition fee of college or university, while some governments spend money for their students' study careers. In my view, the government should make careful decisions when offering financial aid to students as this phenomenon's drawbacks outweigh its benefits.

It is undeniable that providing students with need-based scholarships creates a bunch of opportunities for students who cannot afford the exorbitant tuition cost. For instance, many states in the USA give financial support to poor citizens who are willing to pursue their careers in public universities. As a result, all students have their own chances to access with formal education in college or universities. However, it seems that the more money supply, the more laziness and dependence occurs on some students as they are fully ensured about their academic career by the governments. Those will become oblivious in their study or may spend the financial aid on other purposes. As a result, the authority may have wasted their budget investing in the wrong individuals.

Furthermore, governments' aids are not quite flexible, hence, they might not meet the students' requirements. For instance, Vietnam's national scholarship is stable at a thousand dollars per year which cannot fulfill the needs of every individual due to the inconstant cost of tuition fee as well as the basic studying materials of different majors.

In conclusion, some governments budget for the tuition fee of their students while in other countries, students have to pay it themselves. In my view, governments ought not to give financial aid to their students as the disadvantages overwhelm the opposite aspect.

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government - mẫu 3

In some countries, rather than students, governments shoulder the responsibility of paying tuition fees to colleges and universities. This essay will compare the strengths and weaknesses of this action taken by the government and argue that it is more beneficial.

I believe that governments affording education fees could benefit both individuals and nations. First of all, such action is beneficial to individual development. Without the need to worry about the tuition, students are able to put more focus on their study, which will help them develop into their full capability in the future. Moreover, social stability can be enhanced as every student can acquire the same opportunity to study, whether rich or poor, therefore narrowing the gap between social classes. Furthermore, through allocating public funds to the education sector, the country’s national quality will be improved greatly.

Nevertheless, the negative impact that came from bearing the student's tuition on local authorities also cannot be underestimated. First of all, it might impose a threat to economic growth if there are not enough funds to be allocated to areas that directly stimulate the economy such as the manufacturing sector. The entire nation's economic development might be impaired. Additionally, compared with affording the cost by themselves, students who are waived from this duty may not cherish the study opportunities, which lead to waste of educational resources.

In conclusion, although some disadvantages are associated with this phenomenon. I still support the government paying students education fees. In my opinion, this action’s benefits far outweigh the possible downsides.

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government - mẫu 4

In many countries, whether students or the government should pay for college or university fees has triggered a heated debate among the public. In my opinion, both views have their arguments.

Obviously, there are many advantages if the government can shoulder this responsibility. One such major advantage is that it would encourage young people to receive higher education. Provided that the government can pay for the university fees, students from low-income families would be encouraged to continue their study instead of working after their high school, which would benefit their career prospect. Another benefit is to create more talents for a country. With the free education provided by the government, more students can go to colleges and universities to broaden their knowledge and specialise their skills. As a result, in the future the country will have sufficient professionals and skilled labour to develop economy and public services.

However, there are some disadvantages. To start with, it lays a huge financial burden on the government. In order to pay the tuition fee for each student, the government has to allocate a large portion of budget to education, thereby causing a significant deficit to a country. Moreover, it would be a waste of resource if students are simply encouraged to go to university only because it is free rather than pursuing their own interests. This waste could also impede the development of other important areas such as infrastructure and medical services to a country because of the limited resources the government have.

In conclusion, although it may cost a large sum of money, I still think the government should pay college and university fee for their citizens. This is because this investment in education can benefit both individuals and the whole country.

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government - mẫu 5

In some countries, the issue of who pays for college or university fees has been a subject of debate for many years. In some nations, students are expected to pay for their own education, while in others, the government covers the costs. This raises the question of whether the advantages of government-funded education outweigh the potential drawbacks involved.

Firstly, one of the most significant advantages of government-funded education is that it provides equal opportunities for all students, regardless of their financial background. By covering the costs of education, the government ensures that every student has access to high-quality education, irrespective of their financial circumstances. This fosters a more equitable society and helps to address the issue of social inequality.

Moreover, government-funded education can also help to alleviate the burden of student debt. In countries where students are expected to pay for their own education, many young people end up accumulating large amounts of debt in order to pursue higher education. This can have long-term negative impacts on their financial stability and can limit their opportunities in the future. With government-funded education, students are able to graduate without the burden of debt, allowing them to start their careers on a more solid financial footing.

Additionally, government-funded education can also be seen as an investment in the future of the country. By ensuring that more individuals have access to higher education, the government can contribute to the development of a more skilled and knowledgeable workforce. This can have positive implications for the overall economy, as a more educated population is better equipped to drive innovation and economic growth.

On the other hand, there are also potential disadvantages to government-funded education. One of the main concerns is the potential strain on government finances. Covering the costs of higher education for a large portion of the population can be a significant financial burden for the government, especially in countries with limited resources. This can lead to budget constraints and may limit the amount of funding available for other essential public services.

Furthermore, government-funded education can also be perceived as lacking in individual responsibility. When students are not required to contribute financially to their education, there may be less motivation to take their studies seriously and make the most of their educational opportunities. This could potentially lead to a decrease in overall academic performance and engagement among students.

In conclusion, while there are both advantages and disadvantages to government-funded education, it can be argued that the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks. By providing equal opportunities, alleviating the burden of student debt, and investing in the future of the country, government-funded education can have a positive impact on society as a whole. Nonetheless, careful consideration must be given to the potential financial strain on the government and the need to encourage individual responsibility among students in order to ensure the effectiveness and sustainability of such a system.

In some countries, students pay their college or university fees, while in some others, the government - mẫu 6

It is true that the government bears the cost of tertiary education in some countries. Although this is advantageous for some underprivileged students, I believe the drawbacks certainly outweigh the benefits.

The main advantage of the government paying for college and university is that this creates equal opportunity for everyone and reduces the disparity between the poor and the rich. The poor are unable to afford college education because of lack of family support and concerns about debts in the future. With government paid university education, everyone can go to college and acquire a college degree without crushing debt on their shoulder. The career opportunities that come with a university education can get them out of the endless cycle of poverty.

However, the drawbacks of public funded university education are far too many. One of the main drawbacks is that the quality of education goes down. When more people go to college, the campuses get overcrowded, making the classes larger and reducing teacher attention to students. Also, the value of education comes down. Universities become full of non-serious students, just whiling away their time and the number of dropouts also increases. If students know that their parent's hard-earned money is going into their higher education or if they have monstrous student debts, they would not relax and study seriously.

Another drawback of government paying the fee is the lost opportunity cost. In other words, tertiary education is very expensive and if the government pays college fees for everyone, it's going to be left with little resources to spend on other important sectors like healthcare and infrastructure. The government can offer loans or scholarships for poor students, but completely funding higher education would come at cost of development in other areas.

In conclusion, I would like to reiterate that though government paid college education benefits the poor, the disadvantages are far too many to be ignored.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Many people say that smoking should be banned while others say it is not a good idea. What is your opinion on this?

• Many people say that we now live in ‘consumer societies’ where money and possessions are given too much importance. Others believe that consumer culture has played a vital role in improving our lives. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some people believe that the best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and the poorest members. to what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some scientists think that there are intelligent life forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them. Other scientists think it is a bad idea and would be dangerous. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some sports are considered extremely dangerous, but many people still like them. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---