Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments

Đề bài: Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 1

Whether students should be allowed to criticize and give recommendations to their teachers has been a hotly debated topic. While some people argue that this means a loss of respect and order in a classroom, I support the view that this development could lead to a better educational experience.

On the one hand, two-way feedback between teachers and learners could possibly result in a lack of regard and discipline. First and foremost, most students lack emotional maturity and thorough understanding of the world’s workings to give constructive comments. In case a student is impulsive and immature, he could sabotage the teacher’s reputation by giving unjust criticisms should he be hostile towards the teacher for giving him bad marks or reprimanding him. Moreover, as each student holds different opinions, it would be difficult for the teacher to come to a unified conclusion as to what he should improve on. This could lead to confusion and strenuity for educators who are trying to establish themselves as better teachers.

On the other hand, I agree that empowering students with the ability to assess their educators could lead to the betterment of education. To start with, the core of education is to serve students and equip them with more knowledge, thus, understanding their insight and needs are critical to being a successful educator. Through learners’ responses, teachers could refine their methods and make adjustments to their lesson plans to better suit their students, resulting in more educated and motivated learners. Furthermore, this development could help teachers to hone their pedagogical skills. As teachers are forced to alter their teaching methods, they will encounter more innovative approaches and become more flexible in dealing with special cases in the classroom.

To conclude, while it is a fact that disrespect and a loss of order could ensue from equipping learners with the power to judge their teachers, the notion’s advantages such as gaining better understanding and innovation have overshadowed the disadvantages.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 2

In recent decades, the question of whether high school students should be free to evaluate and criticise their educators has evolved into a major topic of concern. While some people think that disrespect and indiscipline are an unavoidable outcome of this approach, there are stronger reasons why it would result in increased educational quality.

On the one hand, there is a common belief that enabling students to judge teachers may undermine students’ sense of respect and discipline. This is primarily because some high school students are generally immature and inexperienced. Therefore, some of them tend to lose their temper and overreact each time they are disciplined by teachers. The problem can be further exacerbated when all the students see their peers criticising the teachers. They may think of such action as the right way to behave and start to imitate it. The respect for teachers may therefore be lost, which means the classroom learning environment may be detrimentally affected.

On the other hand, there is strong evidence that giving students total freedom in expressing their thoughts and feelings towards teachers may enhance educational quality. To explain, many countries are promoting student-centered teaching with two-way communication where open discussions between teachers and students are encouraged on any topic, including teaching methodology and the effectiveness of the teaching programmes. This approach has the substantial advantage of making students become proactive in studying and providing teachers with a chance to better their pedagogical skills by receiving feedback from students. In this way, both the learners and the educators can achieve higher academically.

In conclusion, the educational method of encouraging high school students to judge their teachers is likely to lead to enhanced academic achievements, despite the possibility that some classes may experience some initial instability in the form of disrespect or lack of discipline. It is recommended that schools should adopt this approach so that education quality can be improved.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 3

People have different views on whether high school students should be allowed to evaluate and criticize their teachers. Although this could be perceived as being disrespectful, I believe constructive feedback from students could do wonders for our education system.

On the one hand, proponents of the idea that students should not be allowed to make comments regarding their teachers claim that this can result in disrespect and lead to poorly behaved students. It is common knowledge that students should look up to their teachers and obey all of their instructions. Having a student, who is impulsive and inexperienced, criticizing a professional teacher is not appropriate in many cultures. In addition, even the majority of high school students are usually not mature enough to make objective judgments. Their feedback might end up being personal criticism, which contributes nothing to the improvement of the quality of education.

 On the other hand, many people, including myself, believe that it is beneficial for both students and teachers if there is an open environment where students can freely express their opinions, including their thoughts about their teachers. This two-way communication allows students to actively think about the lessons, and specifically what they want their teachers to improve. Moreover, thanks to student feedback, teachers might recognise their own weaknesses and find ways to make adjustments to their pedagogical skills. Consequently, their lessons are likely to become more interesting as it suits both parties, which might result in a better learning outcome.

 In conclusion, students might not be the best people to comment on their teachers. However, I strongly believe that encouraging students to provide relevant feedback about their teacher’s teaching methods is advantageous for the education system.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 4

In almost every educational system, finding strategies to increase educational quality is a major priority. High school students are encouraged to express their thoughts about teachers in some cultures, while others believe that this might lead to a lack of respect and discipline in the classroom. Both points of view will be carefully examined throughout this essay before a sensible verdict is reached.

On the one hand, it is true that student input can aid in the enhancement of educational quality. In many circumstances, the level of comprehension of pupils is highly dependent on the manner teachers perform the class, rather than the content of the lesson. If the class is slow, for example, it will be ineffective for professors to teach too quickly, causing the majority of students to forget what they have learned. Without student feedback, it would be difficult to determine whether the lesson pace is adequate for the class, which could compromise the session’s quality.

Allowing students to submit comments and criticisms about their teachers, however, has significant disadvantages. For starters, teachers are susceptible to students’ unfavorable remarks. Many would believe that praise, rather than criticism or any other type of feedback, is due to their efforts in presenting the lesson. This is a popular belief among teachers in many Asian countries’ educational systems. Furthermore, due to a large number of comments, the classroom may become chaotic. Students’ opinions differ, and it would be impractical for teachers to devise a teaching method that would satisfy all of them.

In conclusion, encouraging high school students to make comments about their professors, despite being appealing in theory, does not appear to me to imply an enhancement in educational quality.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 5

Despite educators’ willingness to better themselves, they are not necessarily happy with all forms of feedback. In particular, they often have mixed feelings about having their students evaluate them. Is this concern justified?

Some people believe that learners are not the best candidates for giving constructive criticism, and I can understand their point of view. The primary reason, according to some educators, is that when teenagers are aware of their ability to influence their teacher and the change in power dynamics, they are likely tempted to challenge the preset classroom rules, in effect undermining the authority of the teacher in change. Another concern is some students, especially those who regard disciplinary actions or low grades they have previously received as unfair, are said to make use of this opportunity to vent on a personal level. However, these claims are unjustified, as they assume that students work against the best intentions of educators, which is simply not the case for most high schoolers.

Others, however, argue that student feedback is essential for continuous professional development, a position that I can readily side with. The main reason is that students, as the primary audience of teaching, possess the most intimate knowledge of their daily experiences under a teacher's guidance. Their feedback is therefore less likely to be skewed compared with reports produced by directors of studies who only sit in on a class or two over a semester. Being asked to provide feedback on a regular basis is also good for students, because it helps them feel more fully engaged in their education. Those who feel their opinion matters are far more likely to have a personal stake in the educational process, so their learning outcomes are unsurprisingly better than those of under-appreciated students.

In conclusion, although teachers may hesitate to grant their students the power to evaluate their teaching, doing so can offer excellent insights into the effectiveness of their work. When this is done regularly, the quality of the educational experience is sure to improve for both the teacher and the students.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 6

Some today contend that high school students should have greater latitude to critique and question their teachers, despite the risks this presents for classroom management. I am strongly in agreement as this enables the ideal classroom environment.

Critics of this shift in mentality point out that the teacher position requires respect. A teacher who is consistently being interrupted by students will not be able to lecture and assign and mark homework well. Many students might exploit a rule that encourages questions in order to intentionally derail lessons and undermine the teacher. There is also the possibility that the negative attitude of some students will create general unrest that is not conducive to learning. However, I would argue that the appearance of respect, when in reality most students question their teachers in private, holds little actual value beyond preserving unwarranted pride.

Moreover, the free discussion of ideas is essential to the best learning. Students who are sitting quietly and feigning interest in class are likely to become less motivated. On the other hand, if a class is studying a work of literature or an event in history, students will engage more fully in lessons given the opportunity to ask questions. By asking questions, even if these queries are loosely defined as criticisms of what is being taught, they will suddenly have a reason to learn and the lesson will become more memorable for all students. The questions might also lead the class to novel insights as long as the teacher is confident enough to embark on collaborative explorations.

In conclusion, although certain educational institutions fear that questions may undermine teachers, they in fact are the foundation of a positive learning environment. Schools should embrace academic rigor in all its forms.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 7

Excellent education is now difficult to find in modern society. There is an ongoing argument about whether it is advantageous for students to assess and criticise their classroom instructors. There will be a deeper investigation of both the opinions and my own opinion.

Understanding the formal viewpoint, it was believed that allowing students to rank and criticise their professors would improve education. If students have the authority to give remarks and question their professors, then teachers will develop their teaching techniques and will try to teach students by applying easy and effective techniques. To cite an example, an article in a local newspaper proved that, since students criticise and review teachers, they not only started to recognize their mistakes but also improve them. Thus, remarking is beneficial for both of them in the learning process.

In contrast, other supporters who assess and criticise their professors would lead to a significant drop in discipline and esteem. Although it depends on the conduct of the students, the majority of instructors dislike getting criticisms and comments about themselves; as a result, it has a negative impact on their respect and the classroom atmosphere. For example, a teacher refuses to instruct in the classroom since the students were misbehaving and making irrelevant remarks. Consequently, the behaviour of the students affects their learning itself.

To conclude and express my opinion, allowing students to give reviews and criticise their professors is a great way to improve educational quality; but it should be acceptable to a limited extent as their behaviour does not affect teachers' respect.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 8

In recent times, finding methods to enhance instructional content is often one of the top concerns of any education system. In certain countries, high school students are encouraged to comment on their professors; while others think that this might lead to a lack of respect and classroom discipline. The viewpoints and my opinion will be addressed further.

On the one hand, it is true that allowing students to critique and assess their professors will increase the quality of education. In many instances, the amount of comprehension of a student relies more on the manner in which the instructor conducts the study than on the study materials themselves. To cite an example, it would be impossible for professors to evaluate if their technique of instruction is correct or incorrect if they did not get feedback from the students who are having difficulty with it.

On the other hand, there are several downsides to commenting on and criticising their lecturers. For instance, teachers are prone to offensive remarks from pupils; as a result, teachers believe that they are exerting effort in the classroom and deserve respect and admiration from their pupils instead of critique. For example, in the school systems of many Asian countries, instructors often hold this viewpoint. Apart from this, the classroom may be in disarray as a result of the many remarks; however, without feedback, it would be hard for instructors to satisfy their students, who have varied perspectives.

To conclude and to offer my position, the education system is not necessarily improved by inviting high school pupils to remark on their instructors.

Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments - mẫu 9

Finding techniques to improve instructional material has been one of the most important problems of education systems in recent years. In certain nations, high school students are urged to remark on their teachers, while others believe that this might result in a lack of regard and classroom discipline. The viewpoints and my opinions will be examined in further depth.

Discussing the formal standpoint, it is advantageous for the overall quality of the educational experience if students are allowed to talk and express their opinions. In addition, it will aid educators in enhancing the strategies and resources they employ to educate. For instance, if teachers gather student comments, they will be able to identify their errors and design more effective teaching tactics. Therefore, for the betterment of the education quality, encouraging students to provide feedback is not only good for professors but also helpful for the students themselves.

However, this argument has a negative influence on the classroom's discipline and the instructors' respect. Since some students' unappreciated behaviour affects the environment of the classroom and their inappropriate comments, lead to difficulties for their teachers. The findings of the survey indicated that at least one instructor has been terminated as a direct consequence of a student's inappropriate comment. Therefore, it is immoral for students to make remarks and assertions while behaving improperly.

In conclusion and offering my position, although classroom environment and discipline is important, permitting students to provide feedback is essential for enhancing the quality of education; however, they must do it in an acceptable way and conduct.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life?

• Some people prefer to provide help or support directly to the local community. Others prefer to give money to national or international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

• Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet. They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Most large companies nowadays operate multi-nationally. To what extent do multi-national companies have responsibility toward local communities in which they operate?

• People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out. What are the causes? What are the solutions?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---