Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents should be punished instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents - mẫu 1

When children commit crime, many believe that they themselves should be punished, where there are those who argue that the parents of the children should face legal justice instead. In my opinion, parents should not be personally liable to the wrongdoing of their children, since they themselves have not committed a crime, and cannot therefore be responsible.

Some may argue that since children have not fully developed their mental faculties, that behaviours performed by them must be copied from their parents. Therefore, parents that teach their kids anti social behaviour therefore shoulder some of the blame for their child misbehaving. Studies have shown that children growing up in abusive households, for example, are more likely to grow up having psychological issues of their own. Thus, it might be suggested that since children’s cognitive functions are moulded by their parents, they should be punished instead of the child.

On the other hand, to punish the parents of children implies that the child has no free will. Although parenting does play a part in individual action, it must be pointed out that individuals also have a degree of autonomy (this of course by age; a four-year-old does not have the same level of cognition as a seventeen-year-old). Furthermore, to convict parents of crimes their children commit would be to indict them for acts they simply have not done - it could also be the case that the child was raised perfectly well, and still decided to become a criminal. Therefore, since it cannot be proven that a child’s criminal action is purely because of their parents instead of their own volition, their parents should not be punished.

Overall, I argue that since even children past a certain age have a degree of autonomy, we should not put a legal punishment on parents of criminal children.

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents - mẫu 2

The issue of children committing crimes and the ensuing consequences is a matter of significant concern in contemporary society. Two distinct perspectives have emerged on this matter, with one group advocating for the punishment of the children themselves and another arguing that the responsibility should fall on the parents. Personally, I firmly believe that parents should certainly be held more responsible in such situations.

On one hand, supporters of punishing children argue that accountability should be upheld regardless of age. They believe that punishment serves as a deterrent, discouraging the child from repeating their offense. This perspective emphasizes personal responsibility and the necessity of consequences to reinforce social norms and values. For instance, juvenile rehabilitation programs or community service act as effective ways to instill a sense of accountability and deter future criminal behavior in young individuals.

On the other hand, some people say that parents of the child should be held accountable for their actions. They say that parents are responsible for shaping their children’s behaviour and instilling moral values. They argue that inadequate parenting is often a contributing factor when a child commits a crime. Owing to this, punishing parents would encourage them to take an active interest in their child’s upbringing, potentially preventing future offenses.

In conclusion, parents undeniably shape their child’s behaviour, and I assert that they should bear some responsibility for their children’s crimes. Considering the child’s age and the nature of the offence is crucial in determining the extent of parental accountability. This approach offers a comprehensive solution to juvenile delinquency, addressing both symptoms and root causes, promoting accountability, and encouraging better parenting practices.

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents - mẫu 3

Opinions are divided on the topic of who should bear the most responsibility for crimes committed by minors. There are those who believe that the parents of children who commit crimes should be punished, while others disagree. I believe that while both arguments offer valid points, the decision ultimately depends on the individual circumstances surrounding each crime.

According to some people's perspectives, all children regardless of their age should be held accountable for their actions, and that any punishment meted out to the child will serve as a deterrent to others. There is also the beneficial prospect of rehabilitation and instilling a sense of responsibility in the young offenders. Rehabilitation programs aimed at juvenile offenders can effectively reform their behaviour, thus making them responsible members of society.

Conversely, another perspective contends that parents should be held responsible, especially if negligence or poor upbringing has played a significant role in the child's actions. The cornerstone of this argument is that parents play a vital foundational role in shaping a child's moral compass. When parents neglect their duties or act as an inappropriate role model, they indirectly contribute to a child's deviant behaviour. For instance, there have been a number of recent cases where children had unrestricted access to firearms at home and committed accidental crimes, which points directly to parental negligence.

In my opinion, a blanket approach cannot be applied in this complex matter. While children must learn about the consequences of their actions, it is also vital to assess parental roles in individual cases. A collaborative system which evaluates both the child's understanding and parental neglect would be most appropriate and beneficial for everyone involved.

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents - mẫu 4

Some today are calling for parents to be held responsible for crimes committed by their children. In my opinion, there are exceptions but many cases merit greater punishment for parents.

Those arguing against this reform point out that parents are not always culpable. There are numerous instances of loving parents who raise their child well but social problems still manifest from a young age. This is often the case if the child suffers from a mental illness such as schizophrenia or a dissociative disorder. These conditions may stem from simple genetics, in which case parents should not be punished, or from trauma the primary caregivers are unaware of. For example, if they have been abused at school or by a relative then it follows logically the offending, rather than innocent, party should be brought to justice.

Despite the important exceptions above that courts must sort through; parental abuse and neglect should be punishable. Studies have shown that most young children who commit crimes have been abused in some way by their parents. Serial killers are an extreme but useful case in point. Nearly every serial killer begins antisocial behaviour from a young age, including the criminal torture of animals. There are also no known examples of serial killers coming from happy homes; they are all the product of varying degrees of abuse from their parents. This is clear evidence that parents play the pivotal role in molding the psyche of young children. As children grow up and have more influences this may change but for young children, parents are chiefly responsible, and courts should recognise this fact.

In conclusion, there are some cases where parents may not be at fault for criminal acts by children but in most situations, they are the driving force. Trying parents for their child’s crime and seeking treatment for the children would therefore be a modern, progressive, and positive reform.

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents - mẫu 5

It is argued by some people that children should be responsible for their offences. However, others believe that the parents of these children should be punished instead. The following paragraph will be discussing both views.

To begin with, some folks believe that if children commit crimes. They should be punished by regulation for the youth. This idea was developed for children to acknowledge that they can not do anything just because they want to, and the penalty for a child should not be the same as an adult. For example, if they steal someone’s personal properties, they need to be sent to the reformatory instead of jail. For those children that need to be corrected, let them learn about the right decision that they should make.

On the contrary, there are a group of people with the idea that the father/mother should get punished instead of their kids. This opinion came from the idea that if parents taught their kids good enough, then they would not commit crimes and could live in the society without problems. And when the kids commit crimes, it will be the adults who will be sent to jail, and the kid can go live with their cousin or relative.

In conclusion, both opinions have their ideas and why these ideas have been developed. From my point of view, i strongly agree with the latter idea. Because young people need to learn about the consequences that will come if they do not follow society's laws.

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents - mẫu 6

It is argued that juveniles must be penalized for committing crimes in order to make them civilized. Others consider that their parents should be punished as they play a vital role in moulding their personality. In my opinion, giving punishment to children is essential for any crime to make their living comfortable and punishing parents is desirable as they have a big hand in shaping them.

According to the former view, nippers should be punished for doing wrong in order to make them civilized. To elaborate, when children commit petty crimes and if they are caught red-handed, they are punished for their wrongdoing. Thus, they become conscious of their actions’ bad consequences and avoid doing anything wrong. For instance, picking pockets, asking for ransom, and kidnapping are the crimes that most youngsters commit. Therefore, punishing them by sending them to jail, verbal warning, or physical punishment can create fear in their minds, and they will keep an arm’s distance from crime and will behave gently in society. So, giving punishment to them is indispensable for their living comfortably in society.

According to the latter view, punishing parents is good as they have a main role in shaping their behaviour. To explain it, children learn mostly from their parents, and whatever is taught to them, they fully act upon that. Therefore, saying nothing to their children upon doing anything wrong instigates the children to be involved in criminal activities. As a result, there are higher chances of becoming a thief or a smuggler in future. So, caretakers must be punished because they fail to turn their children into productive citizens of a country or society. To exemplify it, when a child steals a pen or other stationery of his friend, he or she is not deterred from repeating it. Consequently, they become criminals.

To conclude, it is clear that giving the right punishment for a crime is needed if children commit it. After getting punishment, children will avoid doing illegal activities. Parents must be punished as they have a greater influence on their children. Due to their negligence, children involved get involved in criminal activities and ruin their lives.

Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished. Others think the parents - mẫu 7

It is irrefutable that increasing crime among teenagers is the most noticeable problem everyone should recognize. It is believed by several individuals that kids ought to be punished for committing the crime; others reject this notion, arguing that their guardians should be punished rather than children. However, in my opinion, I strongly agree with the former statement. This essay will analyze both views by taking instances to demonstrate points and prove arguments in the impending paragraphs.

To begin with, many people believe that rather than punish children, it is better to give this to their parents due to a plethora of factors, but the most predominant one is careless behaviour towards their offspring. To elucidate further, both parents are working now, and due to this, they not only spend time with their juveniles but also neglect their online and offline activities. Despite this, some parents also perform inappropriate acts in front of their kids so that teenagers learn the same. A boy in Bihar, for instance, hit the girl because he always saw his father. Who beat his mother numerous times.

On the other hand, I would like to be on the side of those who assert that children should be penalized. First of all, if their parents or other regimes punished them, they would have some fear in their minds that they would not repeat this crime again in the future. Even though children may know what is right or wrong for them, giving punishment to parents instead of kids has a negative impact on society, and due to this, numerous youngsters commit offences unnecessarily. To exemplify, In India, it was written in a famous newspaper that some youngsters put acid on a girl because she refused the boy’s proposal. As a result, this type of offence is only controlled by giving strict punishment.

In conclusion, parents are sometimes equally responsible for their children’s crimes. It has a detrimental impact on society, so kids should be penalized for their own mistakes. I strongly assert that it benefits families and society; consequently, only children should be penalized.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Many studies show that poor people are more likely to be involved in petty and severe crimes than people who come from higher-income groups. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• What is the importance of stable family structures in preventing crime in a country? State your opinion.

• Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• Some people say that in our modern age, it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Every culture, throughout time, has recorded its history in one way or another. In what ways can history be passed on to the next generation? Why is history important to society?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---