Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social issues. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.
- Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social (mẫu 1)
- Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social (mẫu 2)
- Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social (mẫu 3)
- Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social (mẫu 4)
- Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social (mẫu 5)
- Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social (mẫu 6)
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social - mẫu 1
It is widely discussed that all well-known television shows should attempt to raise public awareness about social concerns. In my opinion, such initiatives by well-known entertainment shows are necessary. The main reason for my viewpoint is that the general public extensively watches all popular entertainment programmes. Therefore, by communicating a social message, they may educate people about it. In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall explain my point of view.
These days, entertainment shows are popular among all ages and genders. Suppose TV shows focus on teaching people about social concerns in their communities. Then it’s without a doubt that it will reach the masses and subliminally inform and help people become more conscious of the country’s problems. Moreover, these messages raise awareness of social concerns such as rising crime, environmental difficulties, and many others that occur on a daily basis and pose possible hazards and threats to people’s lives. Hence it allows people to defend themselves and enhance their quality of life.
Another aspect to consider is that there aren’t enough mediums for individuals to learn about their concerns. Because the publications that usually cover these topics, such as newspapers and magazines, are not regularly read by the general public, especially young people. The best method to reach out to them and pass on information, whether directly or indirectly, is through entertainment programmes. Even if a portion of the show’s time is devoted to educational programming, this would have a ripple effect on society at large.
In a way, it might also be true that such inclusion would jeopardize the essence of the programs. However, program directors’ creativity can assist in delivering social message while still protecting the program’s core in a unique way.
To conclude, popular entertainment programmes are the most successful means of reaching and influencing the public. Hence the inclusion of social awareness segments is a laudable initiative from the program owner.
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social - mẫu 2
It is often said that all influential TV entertainment programs should be geared towards raising people's awareness about social issues that matter. While some TV programs could be suitable for this purpose, I disagree with the view that it should be mandatory for all of them, as the decision whether to do so must take into account the nature of the TV content and the channel's audience.
There is a large group of professionals who would benefit from deepening their understanding of what is happening in the world. Stock traders and bankers, for example, must always keep track of numerous business trends on a global scale, and they would appreciate this type of information on their favourite TV shows. Young people are another suitable audience due to the fact that they enjoy learning about popular topics from TV programmes. For instance, SDGs or the Sustainable Development Goals have now become an important topic to learn for children at school. Educational TV would provide a welcome alternative to textbooks, making learning more fun.
Despite the potential advantages of incorporating educational content in TV programs, it is important to remember that the purpose of entertainment TV is for people to escape reality, to take a break from their hectic lives. Being reminded about some troubling social issues would not be appreciated by those who just want to unwind after a long day at work. Another consideration is how the content is perceived by the audience, because broadcasting serious topics as part of a comedy show might lead some viewers to believe they are of lesser significance. This would make TV shows of light-hearted nature a poor choice for inclusion of content on pressing social issues.
In conclusion, entertainment TV programs can be an effective form of education for some people and a great tool to spread information. However, not all of them should be used for this purpose as there are various ways people appreciate them.
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social - mẫu 3
Critics of the quality of televisions shows these days argue that more educational programming related to key social issues is needed. In my opinion, though there are legitimate reasons to support such reforms, I believe television should be mainly for entertainment.
Those in favour of raising awareness of social problems claim that television is not currently serving a socially viable purpose. The most popular shows are dramas, comedies, and reality TV, all of which are purely for entertainment. If the time wasted on such shows was diverted towards educational programs, this would have a ripple effect on society at large. For example, more informed news shows about underprivileged segments of society could lead to outpourings of empathy and encourage a nuanced understanding of the causes of poverty. This greater awareness would translate to real action in many cases. Powerful figures and small activists alike could contribute to socially beneficial causes.
Nonetheless, the actual impact of the proposed changes is questionable, and most people do not watch TV out of altruism. Raising awareness of social issues, depending on how it is handled and the self-righteousness of the programs, is just as likely to provoke a negative backlash and hinder progress. Moreover, people watch TV in order to relax and let their minds rest or to experience a feeling of excitement. Forcing viewers to think about complex societal problems would simply discourage them and they would instead watch videos on YouTube or Netflix. It would be impossible to regulate all media and there would be public uproar at the attempt.
In conclusion, though it would be ideal for television to inform citizens of social problems, this solution is not practical. Individuals will always seek out the pastimes that entertain, not educate, them the most.
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social - mẫu 4
A small number of people argue that TV shows should all be required to present their viewers with educational material or material that otherwise discusses social issues. This essay will strongly disagree with that notion.
Although it may seem reasonable to suggest that TV shows be required to provide some redeeming social value through deliberately educational content, it is a naïve proposal. Humans have always enjoyed entertainment of different sorts, and whilst much of this imparts implicit messages, its primary function has been for the enjoyment of the viewer, listener, or reader. Life can be difficult or exhausting and people need entertainment as a form of release. To suggest that this is taken away from them through the deliberate insertion of educational material is misguided.
Additionally, one might well ask who or what is to decide the definition of “important social issue” and what sort of message should be taught. In authoritarian states like China, this would surely be values related to keeping the peace at all costs and obeying the government, which is of course problematic under brutal regimes like theirs. In Western nations, there is presently a “culture war” on-going that bitterly divides the population, with hysterical attitudes displayed on both the right and left of the political spectrum. Which side would have their views forcefully inserted into TV programmes, and who would force writers, producers, and directors to incorporate views that may be anathema to their personal perspectives into their artistic works? These are difficult questions and ones with no good answers, suggesting that it would be nearly impossible to achieve this in some countries.
In conclusion, it is a terrible idea to force educational material about social issues into TV shows for several reasons, including the difficulty of choosing what to include and the fact that people would more than likely cease enjoying the programmes they used to watch.
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social - mẫu 5
I disagree with the statement that all popular TV entertainment programs should aim to educate viewers about important social issues. While it is beneficial for some shows to address social issues, people switch to entertainment programs to relax and enjoy their lives. Forcing every show to have an educational component can reduce the diversity and creativity of television content. For example, many shows like comedies and reality TV are popular as they offer an escape from daily stress. So, requiring these shows to tackle serious issues will diminish their entertainment value. Furthermore, every viewer has different preferences and needs; some do not even want educational content in their entertainment.
In addition to this, many platforms showcase various documentaries and news programs that are specifically dedicated to educating the public about social issues. These platforms can effectively inform viewers without compromising the purpose of entertainment shows. Moreover, incorporating educational content into all entertainment programs could lead to viewer fatigue and decreased engagement. Audiences might feel overwhelmed if every show they watch is laden with serious messages.
In conclusion, while it is valuable for some TV programs to educate, it should not be a requirement for all entertainment programs. Maintaining a balance allows for a variety of content that caters to diverse audience preferences, ensuring that TV remains a source of enjoyment and relaxation.
Some people say that all popular TV programmes should aim to educate viewers about important social - mẫu 6
In the modern era, television is considered a must-have device in every household. Some people argue that popular TV programs broadcasting to audiences should raise awareness of urgent social problems. I totally agree with this opinion.
First of all, nationwide programmes are the best method to communicate with the viewers. In other words, citizens should know about important information, which is included in news and daily reports when they are watching. As a result, everyone can update current situations and find solutions to address them appropriately. For instance, when big storm hit Vietnam in 2008, some warnings about floods were be transferred to people thanks to weather forecasting, so they could be ready and prepared and reduced the damage of this upcoming events. Therefore, television makes it easy for audiences to gather emergency news with the up-to-date content.
Secondly, entertainment game shows seem to be appealing to all ages and genders. If the broadcasters focus on teaching people about social concerns in the community, they will help people become more conscious of global problems such as rising crime rates and poaching endangered species. Discovery channel, for example, announces that there are thousands of rhinos and elephants killed by illegal hunters each year with the aim of trading purposes, leading to the extinction of many animals on earth. Hence, this news then will be delivered to all viewers and encourage them to protect our world.
To conclude, it is necessary to make well-known television shows because they can be used as effective tools for alerting people to happening situations. The more people continue watching TV, the more social problems can be addressed.
Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:
Đã có app VietJack trên điện thoại, giải bài tập SGK, SBT Soạn văn, Văn mẫu, Thi online, Bài giảng....miễn phí. Tải ngay ứng dụng trên Android và iOS.
Theo dõi chúng tôi miễn phí trên mạng xã hội facebook và youtube:Nếu thấy hay, hãy động viên và chia sẻ nhé! Các bình luận không phù hợp với nội quy bình luận trang web sẽ bị cấm bình luận vĩnh viễn.
- Đề thi lớp 1 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 2 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 3 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 4 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 5 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 6 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 7 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 8 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 9 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 10 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 11 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 12 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 1 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 2 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 3 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 4 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 5 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 6 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 7 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 8 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 9 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 10 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 11 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 12 (các môn học)