Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 1

Lawlessness is spreading throughout the nation, and it affects people in both urban and rural areas. According to some people, violence in the nation could be directly motivated by media images of hate or cruelty. From my perspective, the media is not responsible for local citizens' unchecked partiality.

As a start, studies show that children who are subjected to both parental and peer pressure are more likely to act immorally and cause damage to others. Mental health concerns, such as depression, may potentially cause individuals to engage in unethical behavior, as well. Mental illness, familial pressure, and ties to unethical organizations have all been linked to a rise in transgressions in undeveloped nations.

Facebook and Instagram, on the other hand, encourage this idea in terms of media exploitation. People are more likely than ever before to use excessively defamatory language and cursing. So, someone who uploads an intimate picture on social media will be deluged with sexually explicit remarks. The effect will be that a person could act blindly. All countries have seen a decline in their tolerance levels over time. The terrorist organization "DAESH" has also been using numerous media venues to disseminate its brutal message. They've gained the support of a big number of teenagers as a consequence.

Because of this, it is difficult to demonstrate that the media is to blame for the rising rate of violence in our society. Medicines, regulations, and laws are often included while discussing the factors that contribute to an increased chance of a violation.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 2

Violence is often shown on TV, either on new channels or on regular shows. Some people say that this makes people more violent, while others say that people are already violent. I agree with the idea that people are violent by nature, and this essay will show why I think that way.

First and foremost, the news has to tell the truth about what's going on in the world. In this truth, different parts of society attack each other over things like religion, different beliefs, political instigation, and many other things. For instance, the conflict between Palestine and Israel has been going on since 1948, and it doesn't look like it will end any time soon. This fight didn't start because of an episode of a TV show or because of bad reporting on TV. On the other hand, it began when one country took over another.

Children are the most influential generation because they are easily persuaded to commit crimes, to look brave in front of their peers after seeing violent scenes in movies and thriller shows. To give an example, some children's rags and bully the week are read by students at the school, which is likely to be a crime because of how much media affects people. Because of this, they turn to crime, which can hurt their education and careers.

In conclusion, I think that even though the younger generation is more used to seeing violence on TV, that is not the only reason why there is violence in society.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 3

It is true that a lot of violence is shown in the media in the present period, which might influence how individuals behave. Some individuals think that exposure to violent media might lead to more assaults in society. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this viewpoint.

First of all, research demonstrates that children are greatly impacted by violent video games and films. Children who play video games, for example, lack empathy for others' pain throughout their lives. Additionally, because the only goal of these games is to praise violent behavior, children are often encouraged to believe that engaging in violent behavior would provide them with a feeling of accomplishment. As a result, young children are exposed to the idea of violence via media like video games.

Second, because of the proliferation of media outlets, the public is instantly exposed to violent messages and information. These messages are widely available through text messages and videos, and they often encourage the use of violence. For instance, large scale riots are often started by violent videos that are circulated on numerous social media sites. Another issue that contributes to general societal dissatisfaction is the lack of trustworthiness of such films. Therefore, violence is promoted by a variety of media outlets.

In a nutshell, the media affects every aspect of our lives and is crucial in fostering a culture of violence. This is evident when examining the negative consequences of violent video games and other media. In order to lessen its impact on society, it is crucial that such violent material be reviewed and removed from different platforms.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 4

The impact of media violence on societal aggression has long been debated. Some argue that exposure to violence in the media encourages violent behaviour, while others believe that media content has little to no effect on real-world actions. I believe that although media violence can influence some individuals, it is not the sole factor in promoting societal violence.

The primary reason for the argument that media violence promotes societal violence is based on social learning theory. This theory suggests that individuals, especially children, learn and imitate behaviours they observe in the media. When they repeatedly see violent actions in movies, or shows, they may come to view such behaviour as acceptable or normal. This can lead to an increase in aggressive behaviour, as individuals may mimic the actions they have seen portrayed.

However, it is also important to consider other factors contributing to societal violence. Many studies indicate that personal circumstances, such as family environment and education, play a significant role in shaping behaviour. For instance, individuals raised in violent households are more likely to exhibit aggressive behaviour, regardless of their media consumption.

I believe, on the other hand, that while media violence can have an impact, it is not the primary cause of societal violence. People have the ability to distinguish between fiction and reality, and many viewers of violent media do not become violent themselves.

In conclusion, while media violence can influence certain individuals, it is not the main driver of societal violence. Other factors, such as family environment and socio-economic conditions, play a more substantial role. Therefore, it is essential to consider these elements when addressing the issue of violence in society rather than placing sole blame on the media.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 5

The debate on whether violence in the media promotes violence in society remains contentious. While some believe that exposure to violent content directly influences individuals to act aggressively, others argue that media alone cannot be blamed for societal violence. In my opinion, media violence does contribute to societal aggression to some extent, but it is not the predominant factor.

One reason supporting the view that media violence promotes societal violence is the desensitisation effect. Repeated exposure to violent scenes in films, television shows, and video games can make individuals less sensitive to real-life violence. This desensitisation can reduce empathy for victims of violence and lower inhibitions against aggressive behaviour.

However, it is essential to recognise that media is not the sole contributor to societal violence. Factors such as upbringing, mental health, and socio-economic conditions play significant roles in shaping behaviour. For instance, a person with a stable family environment and good mental health is less likely to be influenced by violent media content compared to someone with a troubled background.

On the other hand, it is crucial to consider that many people consume violent media without becoming violent themselves. This suggests that personal responsibility and societal influences are critical in moderating the impact of media violence.

In conclusion, while media violence can contribute to societal aggression, it is not the primary cause. Factors such as upbringing, mental health, and socio-economic conditions significantly influence behaviour. Addressing societal violence requires a comprehensive approach that considers these various elements rather than focusing solely on media content.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 6

The issue of whether violence in the media promotes violence in society is widely debated. Some contend that exposure to violent content directly leads to aggressive behaviour, while others believe that media violence has a minimal impact. I believe that media violence can influence societal behaviour to some degree, but it is not the sole or most significant factor.

The first reason for believing that media violence affects society is the influence of imitation. According to social learning theory, individuals, especially children, tend to mimic behaviours they observe. When they frequently see violent actions in movies, TV shows, or video games, they might imitate these behaviours, thinking they are acceptable ways to resolve conflicts.

However, attributing societal violence solely to media exposure ignores other crucial factors. Individual behaviour is influenced by a combination of elements, including family environment, education, and peer influence. For instance, a person raised in a supportive and non-violent family is less likely to resort to violence, regardless of their media consumption.

On the other hand, it is essential to recognise that not everyone who consumes violent media becomes violent. Many people can distinguish between fictional violence and real-life actions, suggesting that personal responsibility and context play significant roles. Additionally, parental guidance and societal norms can help mitigate the potential negative effects of media violence by promoting critical thinking and empathy.

In conclusion, while media violence can influence societal aggression to some extent, it is not the primary cause. Factors such as family environment, education, and personal responsibility play more substantial roles in shaping behaviour. A comprehensive approach addressing these various elements is necessary to tackle the issue of societal violence effectively.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 7

One of the most potent instruments in the modern world is the media, which has many advantages but also many disadvantages. Positive or negative media information frequently has an impact on people. I agree that violent media might encourage violent behavior in society but fail to ignore its benefits which is why I want to talk about its advantages and disadvantages in this essay.

Before discussing the disadvantages of the media, we must acknowledge its current level of influence over society. In addition to providing entertainment, the media and its contents inform people about current events, emerging trends, risks, and possible difficulties. One strategy to lessen violent crimes is to show violent instances in the media so that everyone is informed. For instance, news of a robbery in a specific region encourages others in that area to exercise greater caution and build defenses against criminal activity.

Despite that, there is also a significant drawback. Television shows like this encourage the younger generation to emulate them, which eventually brings out the worst traits in them and utterly destroys their moral sense. Children, for example, often act violently after being influenced by action scenes in movies or sports like kickboxing. Something like that can destroy a child's entire future.

Furthermore, it manipulates a number of adults, who then turn to violence and devastation in their daily lives. For example, the perpetrators of a number of real-life crimes have acknowledged that they were influenced by crime television. In addition, violent television shows and films, such as those involving vehicle chases, bike races, and physical torture, can cause adults to behave dangerously in real life, which can have disastrous results.

In conclusion, my opinion is, that if violence of any kind is replicated in real life, it could be dangerous and even life threatening. People ought to screen media content appropriately and get inspired by its advantages and discouraged by its disadvantages not the other way around.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 8

The media, with a plethora of benefits and drawbacks, is one of the most powerful tools in the contemporary world. Broadcast content, whether favorable or unfavorable, frequently affects individuals. Since I agree with the aforementioned topic, but cannot completely refute its advantages, I'm inclined to offer my perspective on its benefits and drawbacks in this essay.

First, before illustrating the media's drawbacks, let's admit how much of an influence it currently has on society. Digital contents not only entertain people but also educate them about current affairs, new trends, dangers, and potential challenges. Publicizing violent incidents to educate the public is one way to reduce violent crime. For example, hearing of a robbery in a particular neighborhood can prompt people there to increase their vigilance and fortify themselves against criminal activity.

Still, there's a big negative. These kinds of television programs breed envy in the younger generation, bringing out the worst in them and completely undermining their moral compass. In particular, action sequences in movies or combat sports can influence children to engage in brutality. That kind of behavior has the potential to ruin a child's entire future.

Moreover, it manipulates several adults, who subsequently live lives filled with violence and destruction. For instance, crime television has been acknowledged as a source of influence by the perpetrators of some real-life crimes. Moreover, adult behavior can be disastrously affected by violent television series and movies, that feature scenes of physical altercations, bike races, or heinous murders.

In summary, it could be risky and even fatal if barbarity of any kind is recreated in real life. Thus, I believe, multimedia broadcasting content should be evaluated properly so that people are inspired by its positive aspects and deterred by its negatives.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 9

In contemporary discourse, there exists a contention that the portrayal of violence in the media contributes to an increase in violent behaviour within society. I am inclined to agree with this viewpoint as the depiction of violence in various forms of media tends to desensitise individuals and can potentially influence their actions.

Firstly, the omnipresence of violent content in media platforms such as movies, video games, and television programmes desensitises individuals to violent behaviour. Repeated exposure to graphic imagery and explicit content numbs the sensitivity towards violence, making it seem commonplace. For instance, studies have shown a correlation between prolonged exposure to violent video games and an increase in aggressive behaviour among adolescents, indicating the potential influence of media content on behaviour.

Moreover, media representations often glamorise and normalise violent actions, shaping societal perceptions about the acceptability of such behaviour. Characters portrayed as heroes in movies or television series sometimes resort to violent means to solve conflicts, inadvertently sending a message that violence can be a justifiable means to an end. This normalization of aggression can lead to a skewed understanding of conflict resolution among impressionable audiences.

In conclusion, the media's pervasive portrayal of violence can indeed have a detrimental impact on society by desensitising individuals and normalising aggressive behaviour. While acknowledging the importance of artistic freedom and the complexities of societal influences, it is imperative to recognise the responsibility of media in shaping perceptions and behaviour. Thus, measures to regulate and monitor violent content in media platforms should be considered to mitigate its potential negative effects on societal behaviour.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 10

Many argue that the depiction of violence in the mass media encourages violence in society. I entirely agree with this opinion and believe that violent media content contributes to the prevalence of violence in society because it desensitizes human beings and influences individuals to show aggressive behaviour.

Regular exposure to violence in the media can desensitize people to real-life acts of violence. When the portrayal of violence in media becomes frequent, it may reduce emotional response and the feeling of shock associated with violent behaviour. Over time, people tend to lose their inhibitions about violence, thereby adopting a tolerant attitude towards aggressive behaviour. A recent study, for instance, has revealed that people who consume a substantial amount of violent media content, such as violent films or video games, may become desensitized to violence. This desensitization can make individuals less empathetic towards victims of violence and tend to engage in violent behaviour.

Likewise, media violence also promotes violence through glamorization. That is to say that the media often depicts violence in a way that glamorizes perpetrators as heroic, powerful and victorious. This, in turn, can create an overwhelming impression that violence is a necessary means of solving problems, achieving goals, or gaining dominance. Such depictions tend to encourage people, especially those who are vulnerable to aggressive tendencies, to view violence as a heroic act. For example, research carried out by psychologist L. Rowell Huesmann found that teenagers who watched extensive hours of violent TV shows associated with heroism when they were in primary school were more likely to exhibit higher levels of aggressive behaviour when they became adults.

To conclude, I think that media violence breeds violence in the community because it can desensitize individuals to violence and also encourage them to perform violent acts.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 11

It is often pointed out by many that the portrayal of violence in the media encourages violence in the community. I totally concur with this opinion because children and certain people may behave violently by watching it, and individuals also become numb to violence.

The prevalence of violence in mass media can make children aggressive. To commence with, children, nowadays, spend a considerable amount of time watching videos, like cartoons or films. Most of these programmes depict a sympathetic, strong and aggressive hero who can overcome every adverse situation by exercising miraculous power and thus solve his issues by brute force.  Since children and many people are unable to discriminate between exact right and wrong, they can take the aggressive behaviours of the fictional characters as a model. A case in point is recent research, which reveals that young children tend to imitate the aggressive behaviours they watch on television.

Likewise, the gruesome portrayals of violence in media breed violence in the community through desensitising people. This is because repeated exposure to violence normalizes violence over time and this, in turn, causes violent incidents in society. Put simply, desensitised individuals tend to downplay egregious harm done to others, thereby behaving violently. Desensitized people, in fact, consider that violence is a normal way of life, and they resort to violence so as to solve conflicts. This is illustrated by the fact that people who are exposed to violent content may become desensitised to violence, emulate the violence, and show more aggressive behaviours.

To reiterate, the extensive viewing of media violence may cause behavioural issues because children, as well as many people, become aggressive by mimicking protagonists it may instil violence among desensitised people.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 12

From the last few decades, media has become part and parcel of our life, irrespective of age, gender or profession of a person. Different genres of programs, like comedy, romance, fantasy, animation have attracted audiences worldwide. But the genre that has enticed the maximum number of people is action which stimulates them to undertake certain wild activities. So, I think media does promote violence, and in this essay, I will further discuss my viewpoint.

Most of us like superhero movies like Avengers, Batman, Justice League, to name a few. Young children and sometimes, adults love to copy the frenzy shown in the action scenes of such movies. As a result, without supervision, they get hurt or incapacitate others in the process. For example, when a person riding a bike at a high speed hits another person walking on the pavement, he may get hurt. But the person he hits may die or become a cripple for life. Secondly, the image of a ‘manly’ personality is created by the ability to fight others and defeat enemies, not paying heed to the injuries they may suffer. Young minds take up these images and make it their passion and they are diverted from the correct path.

Crime shows or popular movies based on robbery, bank loots, murders, like Money Heist, Dhoom, Catch me if you can, etc, inspire people to initiate such actions. They either imitate those crimes in the same manner or take clues of how to grab the attention of the public and rise to instant fame. Sometimes, people are led astray by the violent, partial news shared on social media. They shape the young minds in such a way that they become passionate for a wrong cause and give in to terrorism. Moreover, fake news may lead to communal riots, which disturb the balance of society.

However, the history of human civilization shows that violence has been an integral part of our society way before the advent of media. The havoc caused by wars, both internal and global, raids by invaders, and atrocities like the Holocaust by Adolf Hitler during the Second World War are few examples of how violent humans can be, even without the aid of media.

Thus, to conclude, I would like to point out the fact that although humans might be violent by nature, the projection of violence in the media in various forms definitely has aggravated the rate of violent crimes in society. So, we should be aware of the type of programs to watch and keep ourselves in a positive mindset so that we are not affected by the violent scenes on media.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 13

In the last few decades, due to the evolution of media, the popularity of aggressive content on television and online games has increased drastically. While some argue that this trend makes people more violent, others insist that it has no impact on their conduct. In my opinion, despite the constant exposure to terrorising content in the media plays a significant role in encouraging violent behaviour, it is not the only element in promoting violence in humans.

Firstly, many individuals, especially youngsters are attracted towards online games, which include substantial violence and aggression. This creates a lasting impression on their mind and motivates them to imitate the same actions. For instance, a controversial, highly addictive online game called “PUBG” has played a key role in exposing children to a world of criminality.

Secondly, the portrayal of violent content in movies is unrealistically stylised and glamorous. Several action movies or crime series include gruesome acts of brutality. For example, several crime thrillers have a lot of elements of physical conflict, frauds, sadism and injustice, which in turn influence the public, especially the youngsters, to model these hazardous acts.

However, it is also known that humans are violent in nature by evolution as well. The history of human civilisation shows that violence has been an integral part of our society long before the advent of media. The merciless havoc caused by wars, both national and international, raids by invaders, and heinous atrocities such as the Holocaust by Adolf Hitler during the Second World War are few examples of how violent humans can be, even without the aid or influence of media.

To conclude, it is undoubtedly true that we are influenced by what we see, hear and experience. In my opinion, although the projection of violence in the media in various forms definitely has aggravated the rate of crimes by normalising violence and aggression, it is not the sole source and cause of violent behaviour in our society.

Some people say that violence in the media promotes violence in society. To what extent do you agree - mẫu 14

A few individuals accept that savage media straightforwardly comes about in savage behaviour. The reference to violence reflected in news, social media and films contributes to behavioural implications in both children and adults. I agree with this idea that violent images and incitements have a negative impact on behaviour.

In fact, human behaviour learns from any act by adaptations and imitations. Psychology has clearly implied the impression that visual simulation can have on the mind of children and adults. When media broadcasts horrifying crimes, news or when any violent content is projected on screen or in newspapers, psychologists suggest these as the real factor instigating a crime in reality. Subsequently, violent or neo-noir films develop a passivity towards life, feeding an aggressive mood within the society. For example, a film on war and agony contributes to both patriotism and passive aggression.

Moreover, simulation games and VFX universes are becoming addictive among adolescents. A large portion of time spent by a teenager on such video games aiming at ‘headshots’ instigates their social behaviour in the real world. Peer aggression and violent behaviour has been seen to be a major contribution of these games. Since people kill each other as mercenaries in these games, their social life seems to be falling apart. Films such as "squid game", became popular in Japan and in Korea reflecting the desperation among human beings in actual life. It was reported how a number of people started killing each other due to this game, resulting in banning of such shows.

To conclude, I therefore agree that any visual impetus has a longer impact for better or for worse. As a result, seeing violence bring out aggression and violent change in behaviour among youngsters and adults.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• The majority of news being reported is bad news such as wars, famines, accidents, and crime. Why do you think that is? Do you think the news should be a balance of both good and bad news?

• In recent years, there has been growing interest in the relationship between equality and personal achievement. Some people believe that individuals can achieve more in egalitarian societies. Others believe that high levels of personal achievement are possible only if individuals are free to succeed or fail according to their individual merits. What is your view of the relationship between equality and personal success?

• Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contributions to the company by giving them extra money. This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others. To what extent is this style of management effective? Are there better ways to encourage employees to work hard?

• What are your views on the false means of advertising used by media agencies?

• Some of the methods used in advertising are unethical and unacceptable in today’s society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---