Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city

Đề bài: Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 1

Some people believe that living in a horizontal city is the best, while the opponents of this idea prefer to settle in a vertical city. While there are benefits to residents who dwell in a city that consists of low-rise construction, I would argue that cities with skyscrapers and high-rise buildings offer more advantages.

On the one hand, it is beneficial for residents to live in a horizontal city based on a few financial and security reasons. Firstly, people have to pay less for building services. If residents settle in a private house, they may save a great deal of money since they won’t have to pay for building services. Secondly, living lower to the ground is safer for inhabitants when emergencies occur. For example, if a fire starts in the home, they can quickly escape from the dangerous areas because the building is not too high off the ground, and it won’t take much time to leave.

On the other hand, it seems to me that living in a vertical city is the best choice. A city with skyscrapers will have more space for public usage because there will be less land used for residential areas due to the number of people who can live in high buildings. As a result, the government would be able to use this land to build hospitals, schools or places for entertainment. Furthermore, it is much more convenient for residents to live in an apartment in a tall building that offers a wide range of goods and services, thanks to shopping malls and service centres on lower floors.

In conclusion, while living in a horizontal city does have some benefits, it seems to me that the advantages of living in a city with skyscrapers makes living in a vertical city the better choice.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 2

The debate between horizontal and vertical cities is an ongoing one, with compelling arguments from proponents of both schools of design. In this, I am inclined to side with living in horizontal cities, although the other choice merits some discussion as well.

On the one hand, vertical cities have their own advantages, chief of which being their efficiency in terms of land use. As locations that feature dense population and a prevalence of high-rise apartments, vertical cities accommodate more people in a smaller area, which can reduce the amount of land required for housing. China is at the forefront of this design scheme, as many of their major cities are highly vertical, allowing tens of millions of people to reside in an area typically suited for a fraction of that number in other countries. This urban planning, however, may cause distress in claustrophobic people and heighten a sense of crampedness in otherwise normal residents. It could go on to become a catalyst for aggravating the mental health crisis among urban dwellers.

On the other hand, horizontal cities seem just as beneficial, if not more, despite some concerns. While land would be a necessity, the population stands to directly benefit from having more living space. A municipality that is spread out over a large area would have more room for parks and other communal spaces, which can improve air quality and provide a pleasant environment for people to socialize. Additionally, while a vertical city’s design restricts its function to providing dwelling, a horizontal city might not be as limited. Thanks to lower population densities and more space, this town type has more potential to become tourist destinations. A horizontal urban development model is, therefore, clearly superior for living to its vertical counterpart.

In conclusion, while both horizontal and vertical cities have their own advantages and disadvantages, I am inclined to believe the former design is the sounder one. Overall, a horizontal city may be the option that suits the most needs.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 3

Some individuals argue that residing in a sprawling, low-rise city is ideal, while others advocate for settling in cities characterized by high-rise buildings. Although there are advantages to living in a city with predominantly low-rise structures, I argue that cities with skyscrapers and tall buildings provide even greater benefits.

On one hand, living in a sprawling city offers certain financial and safety advantages for residents. Firstly, people can save on building service costs by living in a single-family home, as they won't need to pay for shared services. Secondly, low-rise living can be safer in emergency situations. For instance, in the event of a fire, residents can more easily evacuate their homes since they are closer to the ground, and it takes less time to exit the building.

On the other hand, I believe that choosing to live in a high-rise city is the superior option. Cities with skyscrapers allow for more efficient use of land, as less space is needed for residential areas due to the vertical arrangement of housing. Consequently, governments can allocate this land to construct hospitals, schools, or entertainment venues. Moreover, living in an apartment within a tall building often provides residents with convenient access to an array of goods and services, as shopping malls and service centers are frequently located on the lower floors.

In conclusion, while there are certain benefits to living in a low-rise city, the advantages associated with residing in a city defined by skyscrapers make high-rise urban living the more appealing choice in my opinion.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 4

When it comes to urban planning, there has been much debate over which is the superior way to design a city. It is often argued that the most ideal scenario would be for cities to expand upwards, while others are fascinated by the idea of horizontal ones. This essay will examine both design approaches and then justify why I favor the former concept.

To begin with, advocates of low-rise housing often ground their arguments in the merit of security. Living in detached houses is generally safer than high- rise apartment complexes due to the basic nature of each structure. For instance, fighting fires in sky-high constructions would be a much more challenging task considering not all buildings offer an effective evacuation plan and sufficient fire escape routes, jeopardizing the lives of thousands of occupants. Moreover, some mega-structures are more vulnerable to natural incidents and might not be able to withstand extreme earthquakes or hurricanes. Collapses resulting from these towers would be much more tragic compared to lower ones and can cause irreversible damage to the regions.

However, in the context of overpopulation and housing shortage, I believe that growing cities upwards would be a more feasible approach for future urban planning. Skyscrapers make much more efficient use of space, as they can accommodate significantly more inhabitants than low-rise buildings can afford within the same area of land. Vertical cities can also help to protect the environment. Many forests would be saved from being transformed into recreational parks and shopping malls as vertical buildings could provide such built-in amenities. Furthermore, this would greatly reduce the need to travel outside the buildings for local residents, benefiting the surrounding environments.

In conclusion, although there are considerable advantages regarding the safety aspects of horizontal cities, I would argue that building cities vertically could help cope with some of humankind's most pressing challenges, which are overcrowding and resource depletion.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 5

When it comes to urban planning, there has been a prolonged debate over the superior approach to city design. Some argue that cities should expand horizontally, while others are captivated by the idea of vertical cities. This essay will critically examine both design philosophies and present reasons for my inclination towards the latter concept.

Advocates of low-rise housing often underscore the security benefits of living in detached houses. They argue that such dwellings provide a sense of safety and privacy that high-rise apartment complexes may lack. In the unfortunate event of a fire, the evacuation process in towering structures becomes considerably more challenging, jeopardizing the lives of thousands of occupants. Additionally, some mega-structures may prove to be more vulnerable to natural disasters, lacking the resilience to withstand extreme earthquakes or hurricanes. The potential collapse of these tall buildings could lead to devastating consequences, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding areas.

However, in the context of overpopulation and housing shortages, I firmly believe that adopting a vertical approach to city planning is a more viable solution for the future. Skyscrapers offer a highly efficient use of limited urban space, accommodating a significantly larger population within the same land area that low-rise buildings would require. By embracing verticality, cities can mitigate the detrimental effects of urban sprawl and preserve valuable green spaces and forests that would otherwise be lost to horizontal expansion. In fact, vertical cities can incorporate built-in amenities, reducing the need for sprawling recreational parks and shopping malls, which often contribute to the depletion of natural resources and encroachment upon wildlife habitats. Moreover, these towering structures foster a sense of community, where residents can find everything they need within the same building or complex, thus reducing the need for extensive travel and promoting a sustainable lifestyle.

In conclusion, while horizontal cities may offer certain advantages in terms of safety and aesthetics, the urgency of addressing issues like overcrowding and resource depletion necessitates a paradigm shift towards vertical urban planning. The efficiency and sustainability offered by vertical cities make them a compelling choice in our ever-expanding urban landscape. By embracing this approach, we can forge a path towards a more sustainable and harmonious coexistence of human civilization and the natural world.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 6

It is true that the question of whether to live in a vertical city or a horizontal city remains a source of controversy in people's lives. While a number of people believe that there are benefits to residents who settle in a horizontal city, I would argue that cities with skyscrapers and high-rise buildings offer more advantages.

On the one hand, it seems to me that living in a vertical city is the best choice. Firstly, living in an apartment in a high-rise building would be a better alternative for people, especially those with low or middle income. In Vietnam, for instance, buying a two-story house would cost around 5 billion dong while buying an apartment for just around 1.5 billion dong. Secondly, people would enjoy more facilities such as supermarkets, banks, fitness clubs and many other convenient amenities when living in high buildings. Therefore, it is much more convenient for residents to live in an apartment in a tall building that offers a wide range of goods and services.

On the other hand, it is beneficial for residents to live in a horizontal city based on a few private space and security reasons. For example, citizens who live in a private house could have larger garages and gardens. As a result, they would be able to devote more time to hobbies such as gardening or car washing, which may be beneficial to their mental health. Another reason is that it is safer to live in a low-rise building in emergency situations such as a fire or an earthquake. ​​For example, if a fire starts in the home, inhabitants can quickly escape from dangerous areas because the building is not too high off the ground, and it won’t take much time to leave.

In conclusion, although both views certainly have some validity, it seems to me that living in a city with skyscrapers makes living in a vertical city the better choice.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 7

There are various models of urban planning devised to cope with the growing human population. Expanding cities thus have a choice: to grow upwards or to grow outwards. These both have their merits and choosing which is best is a difficult task. It depends upon whether you value efficiency or comfort.

When cities grow upwards, using large apartment buildings and skyscrapers to house their vast populations, they tend to make more efficient use of space. One tall building could perhaps house a few thousand people, whereas a smaller building of the same ground dimensions would only house a few dozen, at most. This is undeniably more efficient than spreading a city out over a vast area. Moreover, as technology improves, the height of buildings can continue to grow, housing more and more people. Through this sort of design, cities can stay within their geographical confines, but still allow for a growing population.

On the other hand, some cities grow outwards. The people planning these urban areas tend to think of tall buildings as unsightly and crude and prefer a more aesthetically pleasing design. People have more space to themselves, and the city less crowded. However, this sort of city grows further outwards, consuming more of the surrounding countryside, which would otherwise have been preserved with more tall buildings to house the people.

In conclusion, there is no correct way to design a city, but both “vertical” and “horizontal” urban planning have their benefits. Determining which approach is superior is simply a matter of perspective.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 8

The debate over whether it is better to live and work in a vertical city with numerous tall buildings or a horizontal city with fewer tall structures is multifaceted, with each approach offering distinct advantages and challenges.

Proponents of vertical cities argue that these environments maximize space efficiency, which is crucial in densely populated urban areas. Tall buildings can house more people and businesses on a smaller footprint, reducing urban sprawl and preserving green spaces. Additionally, vertical cities often feature well-developed public transportation systems and amenities within walking distance, fostering a convenient, car-free lifestyle. The concentration of resources and services in high-rise buildings can also lead to vibrant, dynamic communities with a rich array of cultural and social activities.

On the other hand, advocates for horizontal cities emphasize the benefits of a more expansive, spread-out urban layout. These cities typically offer more personal space, which can lead to a higher quality of life. Residential areas in horizontal cities often feature lower population density, resulting in less noise, pollution, and congestion. This setup can promote a sense of community and well-being, as residents have access to more green spaces and recreational areas. Moreover, horizontal cities are generally perceived as safer in terms of fire hazards and evacuation during emergencies, as high-rise buildings can pose significant challenges in such situations.

In conclusion, both vertical and horizontal cities present unique benefits. Vertical cities excel in space efficiency and convenience, while horizontal cities offer a more spacious, serene living environment. Personally, I believe the choice depends on individual preferences and lifestyle needs. For those seeking a bustling, convenient urban experience, a vertical city might be ideal. Conversely, individuals valuing tranquility and open space may find a horizontal city more appealing.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 9

There is a growing debate about the preferable way of living in a city – be it horizontally with sprawling houses and vast spaces, or vertically with towering buildings. Both urban design strategies have their unique advantages, but I personally favor the vertical approach due to the increasing scarcity of land in many cities worldwide.

Living in a horizontal city can be desirable for several reasons. Firstly, such cities generally provide more open spaces, allowing residents to enjoy nature and outdoor activities. This can lead to improved physical health and mental well-being. Secondly, horizontal cities tend to have less air and noise pollution because of fewer high-rise buildings and industries. Moreover, they often foster a sense of community as people live in closer proximity to their neighbors.

On the other hand, vertical cities also offer their own benefits. High-rise buildings can accommodate a larger number of people within a smaller geographic footprint, making them an efficient solution to rapid urbanization and population growth. Additionally, vertical cities can provide residents with convenient access to amenities and services, which are usually located within the same building or nearby.

In my opinion, while horizontal cities provide a tranquil and community-oriented living environment, the need for sustainable urban planning in light of increasing population pressure makes the vertical approach more practical. It facilitates high-density living without sacrificing accessibility to urban amenities.

In conclusion, both horizontal and vertical cities have their distinct merits. However, considering the current global context of limited land resources and rapid urbanization, I believe that vertical cities are the more sustainable option.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 10

The population of the planet is increasing at an alarming rate with the population increasing the demand for houses to live in and many other facilities. The demand for space is increasing, along with the need for personal space and urbanization. In the present era, most of the developing countries are facing the issue of space. Urbanization is a very old and important growth phenomenon. The process of urbanization takes place and divides the development of cities into vertical and horizontal cities. A horizontal city is a city in which the city spreads outwards across the ground while increasing the surface area of the city itself. While vertical cities are cities in which development is skyward, the area remains the same, and shelter is provided to many.

It is very difficult to decide between a horizontal city and a vertical city, which one is better? Benefits and disadvantages they both have their own. In my opinion, I like horizontal cities. Horizontal cities are cities with fewer tall buildings. Living and working in horizontal cities is a pleasure. Horizontal cities are basically found under rich and liberal government housing societies. These cities have cottages or houses with wide lanes, private gardens. And are available with more individual space while vertical cities are provided with fewer individual spaces. These cities are also responsible for the expansion of the area of a particular city. Each developed new area is self-sustainable and self-sufficient and completely loaded with basic amenities. This development of new areas reduces the pressure in the central part of a city. Living and working in a horizontal city is a pleasure. Real estate prices of these cities are very high while in vertical cities property prices are under control. But I still prefer horizontal cities to self-sustainability and living close to nature. In a horizontal city, living is safe like in case of fire or earthquake the escape is very easy and quick for people. The horizontal city is very civilized and modern with a lot of convenient services and high-quality living standards. With all these interesting benefits I am ready to pay more money to live in the horizontal city.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 11

When we are discussing horizontal city and vertical cities, I feel that vertical city is a need of an hour. As we all know, vertical cities are made up of multiple tall buildings which provide space for living to many individuals in the same area. In the current time, all the developing countries are facing problems. Like land scarcity, growing population, lesser space, and willingness to live close to the main city. The growth of vertical cities is the result of the lack of land and the growth of population. These two demands forced people to move skyward.

The population growth is straining the earth’s resources to the breaking point. Hence in my opinion vertical cities can fulfil the demand for more space and more natural resources can be saved in this process. As with increasing urbanization, it is very difficult to provide individual space for each person. So to fulfil the demand for personal space, the vertical city can be an answer. The vertical city is designed in such a way so that there is ample space for parking, malls, hospitals, parks. And all the basic social amenities required by an individual of this modern current era. In the current era, people need houses with all the supporting infrastructures which is easily possible with the layout of vertical cities. In vertical cities work is easily available, property prices are not that high unlike horizontal cities and easily affordable by individuals. Vertical cities are also not a threat to the environment as no regular cleaning of forests is required for the expansion of the city. The main concerns about residing in high rises are elevator breakdown and safety escape during the time of calamity. Reduced interactions with neighbors, and water supply. After all these concerns, I still favor the vertical city, as the construction quality of high rises is generally very high. And so natural calamities like wind pressure can be taken care of. Most high rises nowadays are built with safe fire escape routes and earthquake resistant so living in the high rises is made safe and sound.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 12

The world is facing multiple crises in the 21st century like the clean water crisis, global warming, increasing population etc. In this situation, living space for people is becoming an unintentional requirement and the reason to think where the world is going. As urbanization increases, it is very difficult to accommodate individuals with individual space. Previously we had individual houses and streets with separate garages and parking spaces. However, the number of people is increasing but the space that we have is still the same, which is making cities crowded. The concept of having separate houses where the cityscape increases horizontally is no longer a trend and horizontal cities have given space to vertical cities. In a vertical city, the city increases upwards, towards the sky. It is designed in such a way that very minimal space is utilized, and all the amenities are included that a person might need to survive. In place of separate houses, there are apartments one above the other. The floor increases towards the sky. People staying near the ground in such skyscrapers do not face many issues. The people staying above might face elevator breakdowns, power cuts, and water issues. However, it is safe to stay in these buildings as they are built after all the clearance like fire escape and safe from natural calamities. I do prefer a vertical city as this will help the environment to prevail and lesser horizontal space will be used. This will be useful to save our planet from different crisis situations.

Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city - mẫu 13

With industrialization came urbanisation, meaning the formation and development of metropolitan cities. These mega cities tended to grow at rapid paces, sometimes vertically and sometimes horizontally. Depending on the authorities and the level of development at the time, there developed vast differences between the two.

The first type of city, the horizontal city, was usually found under rich and liberal governments housing individual cottages with wide lanes and private gardens. Today these cities, also referred to as garden cities, are spread out on a vast area of land usually in sparsely populated expanses.  Living and working in such a city would definitely be a pleasure, although the real estate prices in such locations tend to be unusually high. The drawbacks would mainly be regarding the area of natural habitation which constantly needs to be cleared in order to maintain the pace of development.

The other type of city, which is the vertical city, is more commonplace nowadays. The origin of most of these cities was due to the unfettered growth of population and lack of land for further development, which forced people to move skyward. Here, work is easily available, and property prices tend to be much more affordable as compared to the horizontal cities. Although the main problems with these cities include sound nuisance, garbage management, water shortages and a host of other problems, land is not an issue. These urban spaces not only offer modern and sustainable living but also provide room for corporate development.

To give my opinion as a summary, I would state that looking at today’s advancements and weighing the pros and cons of both lifestyle choices, horizontal cities sound very appealing but are not likely to last for very long.  In contrast, vertical cities are by far more economical and sustainable. I believe that vertical cities are the way forward.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people think that shops should not be allowed to sell food or drinks that are scientifically proven to be bad for people's health. Do you agree or disagree?

• Art classes, such as painting or drawing, are important for children's development, so they should be compulsory in high school. Do you agree or disagree?

• Leaders and directors in organizations are normally older people. Some people think that younger people could be leaders. Do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion

• It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environments, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---