Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music
Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music, dance and arts lessons for children. Others think that they should be funded by private businesses or by children’s families. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.
- Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music (mẫu 1)
- Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music (mẫu 2)
- Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music (mẫu 3)
- Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music (mẫu 4)
Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music
Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music - mẫu 1
The debate surrounding the funding of performing arts education for children - whether it should be a governmental responsibility or supported by private sectors and families - is complex. This essay delves into both viewpoints before articulating a considered opinion on the matter.
Advocates for government intervention argue that state-funded arts programs ensure equitable access for all children, fostering a culturally enriched society. In Vietnam, for example, government support has played a crucial role in preserving traditional music and dance, integrating these art forms into the education system and thus maintaining cultural heritage among the youth. This state-sponsored approach ensures that arts education is not a privilege for the few but a right for the many. Nevertheless, the potential for complacency in government-funded institutions cannot be overlooked, as it might inhibit innovation due to a lack of competitive stimulus.
However, I contend that private and familial contributions towards the arts are indispensable. Such support not only relieves the fiscal pressure on the government but also promotes a merit-based artistic landscape. In Vietnam, private funding has been instrumental in bringing young artists to the forefront of the international stage, showcasing the effectiveness of personal investment in nurturing talent.
In conclusion, while government funding is vital for universal access to arts education, the engagement of private entities and family support is crucial for fostering a dynamic and innovative arts community. This dual approach ensures that the arts remain a vibrant part of our social fabric, enriching Vietnam's cultural identity and supporting the development of young talent across diverse socio-economic backgrounds. This blend of public and private funding models presents the most pragmatic path forward in cultivating and sustaining the arts as a pillar of cultural and societal growth.
Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music - mẫu 2
It is argued in the statement that government should contribute to music, dance and arts learning of the children whereas many others think that it is the responsibility of parents or local organisations to support these programs. In my opinion, the above-mentioned subjects should be aided by the concerning and governing bodies of a state.
On the one hand, it is often thought by many people that the government of a state should contribute to learning of arts and cultural subjects such as music and dance for the children. For example, in some secondary schools, the government provides material required in the construction of different art projects or instruments like guitar and keyboard to learn music. This example clearly shows that by providing support to the young students, the government could easily promote cultural and traditional values all around the world. Hence, governments are responsible for the growth of arts and music.
On the other hand, according to some people, instead of governing bodies, children's families or private agencies should participate in the growth and learning of music, dance or other arts work. For instance, students of a single class may not be equally interested in learning music or dance, so funding by the government could be wasted in this manner. Therefore, it is important that parents of interested kids should groom their children by sending them to private institutions where they can enjoy their preferences. In this way, funds by the government can be utilized well on some other things.
To conclude, I believe that government should provide all the facilities of learning arts and music, as this is the cultural heritage which should be preserved internationally.
Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music - mẫu 3
Some people believe that the government should fund training courses for performing arts like music, dance, and arts lessons for children, while others argue that businesses or students' families should bear this cost. I agree with the latter view.
On the one hand, proponents of government funding argue that arts education is a crucial part of a well-rounded education system. They believe that access to music, dance, and arts lessons should not be determined by socioeconomic status. Government funding can ensure that all children, regardless of their background, have the opportunity to explore their creativity and develop their talents. For example, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) in the United States embodies this approach, offering grants to bolster arts education initiatives nationwide, particularly benefiting students from economically disadvantaged backgrounds. By nurturing students' interests in various art forms like visual arts, theater, music, and dance, these programs not only cultivate a profound appreciation for the arts but also pave the way for potential careers in these fields, enhancing their lives and cultural experiences.
On the other hand, some, myself included, believe that businesses or students' families should fund these training courses. Firstly, private enterprises should support performing arts training courses as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives. Businesses benefit from a culturally enriched society and should therefore contribute to the development of future artists and performers. For instance, a 2018 study by the NEA in the US found a positive correlation between arts and culture and economic growth, with communities boasting vibrant arts sectors often experiencing increased tourism, job creation, and higher property values. Secondly, the primary responsibility for funding performing arts training should lie with families. Parents who prioritize their children's participation in such activities should bear the financial burden. This perspective aligns with the idea of personal responsibility and may encourage families to place a higher value on arts education.
In conclusion, while government funding can ensure equal access and foster societal benefits, I believe that businesses and families should primarily fund performing arts training, as this approach promotes personal responsibility and recognizes the significant benefits to both individual children and society as a whole.
Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music - mẫu 4
Art is paramount to the advancement of culture, making the teaching of arts for children an interesting topic of discussion. While some believe that the government should provide funding for this educational effort, others support the idea of private funding instead. In my opinion, training courses for performing arts should be paid for by businesses and children’s families.
The reasons to argue in favor of public funding vary. Firstly, the proponents of this claim believe that the responsibility of improving cultural talent for the young generation belongs to the entire society. The government, hence, has to represent the people in this endeavor and do whatever necessary to achieve this goal, including allocating the budget to performing arts education for children. If the authorities attempt this wholeheartedly, furthermore, they can produce the most far-reaching impact in improving the youth’s artistic, musical, and dancing skills. This is because the government has the most extensive tools at their disposal, such as bureaucrats and local authorities, to provide services to the population.
However, private funding sources seem more sensible in this regard. If the responsibility of paying for the youth’s artistic education falls upon businesses, the government would be able to maintain or prioritize spending on other necessities, such as critical infrastructure and healthcare. Because scouting and training new generations of artistic talent is a challenging process whose success is not always guaranteed, the expense might grow out of proportion and burden the government funding it. It can be up to wealthy businesspeople, for instance, to provide grants or scholarships for performing arts programs. At the same time, families should be responsible as well. As the closest people to their offspring, parents would likely be the first to discover, as well as benefit from their children’s artistic skills. It is naturally their role, hence, to spend on the honing of such abilities.
In conclusion, while the authorities can invest in performing arts education for the young generation, families and businesses are more well-suited for this role. If this responsibility can be assumed fully by the private sector, the government would be able to continue to function efficiently while the society enjoys cultural benefits.
Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:
Đã có app VietJack trên điện thoại, giải bài tập SGK, SBT Soạn văn, Văn mẫu, Thi online, Bài giảng....miễn phí. Tải ngay ứng dụng trên Android và iOS.
Theo dõi chúng tôi miễn phí trên mạng xã hội facebook và youtube:Nếu thấy hay, hãy động viên và chia sẻ nhé! Các bình luận không phù hợp với nội quy bình luận trang web sẽ bị cấm bình luận vĩnh viễn.
- Đề thi lớp 1 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 2 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 3 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 4 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 5 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 6 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 7 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 8 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 9 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 10 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 11 (các môn học)
- Đề thi lớp 12 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 1 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 2 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 3 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 4 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 5 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 6 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 7 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 8 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 9 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 10 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 11 (các môn học)
- Giáo án lớp 12 (các môn học)