Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves

Đề bài: Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 1

The issue of providing financial assistance to retired individuals has been a controversial topic. Some people believe that the government should provide financial support to retired individuals, while others think that they should be self-sufficient. In my opinion, both viewpoints are justifiable, and it is essential to have both individual accountability and government aid working together to guarantee a respectable life for retired individuals.

On the one hand, those who argue that the government should support retired people financially claim that it is the government’s responsibility to provide for its citizens, especially those who have retired after contributing to society for many years. They argue that retired individuals may not have the means or ability to earn an income and that they have a right to a comfortable standard of living in their retirement years. Additionally, providing financial assistance to retired individuals can also help stimulate the economy by increasing spending in areas such as healthcare, travel, and leisure.

On the other hand, there are those who argue that retired individuals should take care of themselves financially. They contend that retirement planning is an individual responsibility, and that people should save and invest their money during their working years to support themselves during retirement. If the government provides financial support to retired individuals, it may lead to a dependency on the government, and people may not feel motivated to save for their retirement. Additionally, providing financial assistance to retired individuals can be a burden on taxpayers and may lead to an increase in taxes.

In conclusion, the issue of whether the government should provide financial support to retired individuals is a complex one, with valid arguments on both sides. While it is crucial for individuals to take responsibility for their financial planning, the government should also be held accountable for ensuring that all citizens have access to basic necessities such as food, shelter, and healthcare. Ultimately, a combination of personal responsibility and government support is necessary to ensure a dignified life for retired individuals.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 2

It is true that elderly people who have retired are in great need of care and financial support. Although I accept that the government should look after and financially support them, they need to have their own savings because the national budget does not suffice to pay for everything each citizen needs in their life.

On the one hand, it is necessary for the government to provide care and financial aid for retired citizens because each of them has certain contributions to society. Economically, some people enrich the national budget through the taxes they pay, while others spend money on commodities and services when going shopping, which allows businesses to earn profits and pay taxes as well. Such taxes can be used by the authorities to develop their country, such as building hospitals, and pay for officials like police officers or politicians. As a way of compensation for their devotion to their youth, the government ought to offer the elderly money-related assistance and care services, for example, regular free-of-charge health checkup.

On the other hand, the elderly should not entirely rely on the governmental support as this can cause a huge financial burden on the state budget. However wealthy a country can be, it can hardly satisfy each of their people’s demands, so every individual in society should save their own money to cover their non-essential expenses. Without a sum of savings, they would face a lot of difficulties when they need to afford entertainment or new fashion items. It is not advisable for the government to spend excessive amounts of money on public welfare as this will harm the budget used to solve pressing social issues such as environmental pollution or the housing crisis.

In conclusion, I believe the government should assist retirees with money and take care of them, but it is each retiree that needs to save certain amounts of money to stay financially independent.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 3

When population aging is becoming an issue in many countries, social welfare provision for the elderly has been a subject of significant concern. While the notion that governments should extend financial assistance to their senior citizens is held by many, I contend that these individuals should also take proactive measures to prepare for their retirement, thereby alleviating the strain on governmental budgets.

On the one hand, there are legitimate reasons why many assert that governments should prioritize the well-being of the elderly. The first rationale provided is that most elderly citizens have made substantial contributions to society, whether through taxes or work. Therefore, they are deserving of financial aid to ensure a decent quality of life during their retirement years. Moreover, the declining physical capabilities that often accompany old age can pose a difficulty for elderly individuals to find a job. Without government support, self-sufficiency seems to be too challenging for them. If governments turn a blind eye to the needs of this vulnerable demographic, it would be not only morally but also legally wrong.

Nonetheless, it is imperative for each individual to devise plans for their old age to minimize their dependency on government handouts. This is primarily because when governments have to fund all the expenses of the elderly, the national budget will be strained. Consequently, heavier taxes may be imposed on the working population, and funding for other important sectors, such as education and healthcare, could be impacted as a result. Furthermore, making financial security for the old a convention tends to result in idleness among citizens, which discourages them from working hard and saving for their old age. This, in turn, can take a heavy toll on long-term economic growth.

In conclusion, although governments should have measures to ensure the life quality of the senior citizens, it is not advisable for the elderly to rely entirely on governments’ aid, as it imperils the fiscal health of the nation. Therefore, each person should work hard and make savings during their working years to be self-sufficient as much as possible after retirement.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 4

The question of who should assume responsibility for the financial aid of senior citizens has long been a debatable topic. While some argue that it is the government’s duty, others advocate that older adults should be accountable for their retirement. I think both governments and individuals have a role to play in financially supporting retirees.

On the one hand, governments should provide financial assistance for older people because they are unable to support themselves. The intervention includes pension schemes, healthcare benefits, and other social welfare programs, helping people have a comfortable and dignified life later. For instance, in developed countries, governments provide a monthly pension to all retirees, regardless of their previous income level, to meet their basic needs.

On the other hand, individuals should also be in charge of their own post-employment savings. While the authorities can offer some fiscal backing, it cannot be solely relied upon to provide financial security during retirement. Thus, aged people are better off saving and investing in retirement funds early in their working life. Doing so can help them be proactive when facing uncertainties in their later life. Governments also benefit from that decision and have a more abundant budget for other priorities.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that both governments and individuals should shoulder responsibility for the monetary assistance of older people. Governments should only provide social welfare programs to ensure a basic standard of living for the elderly, while individuals should also make economic plans to secure their own retirement funds. That approach not only assists old citizens to have a more prosperous future but also lightens governments’ load on the financial burden.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 5

Over recent decades, heated controversies have been aroused over whether the elderly should be provided with healthcare and financial aid after their retirement or manage through these years by themselves. The following essay elaborates on both perspectives before stating my personal viewpoint on this contentious matter.

On the one hand, the assumption that governmental authorities should financially support senior citizens is legitimate to a certain extent. Firstly, this policy would serve as a worthwhile compensation for these individuals’ contribution to national socio-economic development. Since the old have fulfilled all civic duties during their working years namely paying taxes, casting ballots or working for the community, healthcare and monetary assistance during old age is worthy of their previous efforts. Secondly, there exist certain individuals who are physically and financially incapable of looking after themselves. Indeed, since not all citizens are employed or receive adequate fringe benefits, particularly those facing bankruptcy and poverty, government funding to provide them a decent living standard should be an important humanitarian act to save them from destitution and misery.

On the other hand, it is also reasonable to claim that the elderly should fend for themselves by saving during their working years. Individually, senior employees, who can earn and save money on their own, can secure financial stability and independence after their retirement without relying on the government for life sustenance. In so doing, they could freely opt for various recreational activities, thereby leading a more fulfilling and comfortable life. On a wider scale, practicing self-sustaining retirement can also alleviate unnecessary burdens on the national budget. Due to the prohibitive provision of financial and human resources to support old people, that senior citizens fund their own retirement would relieve strains on the state capital, which could otherwise be allocated to education, healthcare systems and other integral sectors of the country.

In conclusion, proponents of both standpoints indisputably have valid arguments for their convictions. In my opinion, however, aside from retirement pension, healthcare and financial assistance should only be offered to those who are in genuine need to benefit both individuals and communal growth.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 6

The debate over whether governments should provide care and financial support for retirees or if individuals should save for their own old age is highly contentious. Both sides present strong arguments, but I align with the latter perspective.

On the one hand, advocates for personal retirement savings argue that this approach promotes economic growth. When individuals save independently, it alleviates the financial pressure on the government, allowing more funds to be directed towards productive areas such as infrastructure, industry, and healthcare. For example, Singapore’s Central Provident Fund (CPF) mandates that working adults contribute a portion of their income to a savings account, resulting in substantial retirement savings. This reduces the need for government assistance and enables greater investment in national development. Moreover, saving for one’s own retirement fosters self-respect and pride, as individuals are not reliant on state support for their living expenses, leading to a more dignified life.

On the other hand, supporters of government support for retirees, including myself, argue that the elderly have made significant contributions to society and deserve assistance in return. Many have bolstered the national budget through taxes or stimulated the economy through their spending. Thus, it is fair for the government to provide them with financial aid and care services, such as regular health checkups and pensions. This ensures that the elderly can access basic necessities like housing, food, and medical care, reducing their risk of poverty. For instance, a study by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare found that pension recipients are less likely to experience poverty compared to non-recipients. Additionally, as more elderly people live alone, nursing homes that offer proper care and social interactions are crucial in preventing isolation and depression, providing a sense of community.

In conclusion, while encouraging personal retirement savings has its advantages, I believe government support is essential to ensure that the elderly live with dignity and receive the care they deserve for their lifelong contributions.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 7

The debate surrounding financial support for retirees is polarizing, with opinions divided between government assistance and self-reliance. I firmly believe that while personal responsibility is vital, government support plays an indispensable role in ensuring a dignified retirement for all citizens.

On one hand, proponents of self-sufficiency argue that individuals should prepare for their retirement without expecting governmental aid. For instance, my uncle, a diligent saver, managed to amass a considerable retirement fund through decades of frugal living and wise investments. This approach, they claim, instills financial discipline and reduces the dependency on social systems, which are often strained under the weight of aging populations. Furthermore, self-reliance in retirement planning encourages a culture of savings and investments, potentially leading to a more financially literate society. However, this view presupposes that all individuals have equal opportunities and resources to save for their retirement, which is not always the case.

Conversely, I am convinced that the government should shoulder a significant part of this responsibility. A close family friend, who worked in public service for over thirty years, relied on government pension schemes to navigate her retirement years. This support enabled her to cover medical expenses and maintain a modest, yet comfortable lifestyle. Governmental assistance is crucial for those who, due to lower earnings or unforeseen circumstances, are unable to save adequately for retirement. Such support not only guarantees basic living standards but also reflects a society's commitment to its elderly citizens' well-being. It acknowledges the contributions retirees have made and ensures they are not left in destitution due to circumstances often beyond their control.

In conclusion, while personal savings play a critical role in retirement, government support is fundamental to ensuring that all retirees can live with dignity. This dual approach fosters both individual responsibility and societal solidarity, ensuring a balanced and inclusive solution to retirement living.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 8

It is true that when people advance into their golden years, they require more help and attention. For that reason, a significant number of people hold the opinion that the government should provide financial assistance to the elderly. However, I tend to agree with those who argue that workers should be saving a portion of their income to have a nest egg in their retirement.

To begin with, a culture of saving rather than depending on the government may foster the overall economic development of a country. In other words, if people were to accumulate their own savings for their pension age, it would lessen the financial burden on the government. As a result, the government would be able to release more funds to more productive purposes, such as development of infrastructure, industries, hospitals, and so on, which may expedite the overall progression of a country.

In addition to economic factors, putting money aside has some personal benefits. Since savings-oriented people are not dependent on the state for their living expenses, this may instill a sense of self-respect and pride in them. On the other hand, those who are reliant on financial assistance very often face the negative societal stigma, as many people consider them to be inferior and unworthy members of society. Hence, to live a life with dignity and pride, taking responsibility for funding one's own retirement is evidently a better option from an individual perspective.

In contrast, the provision of monetary outlays for retirees has proven unfeasible in many countries. Since in many nations the number of senior citizens is on the rise, in the long run governments are likely to struggle to sustain the cost of providing for the elderly. The early signs of this have been seen in many countries that were forced to raise the retirement age, including my home country where men can now retire at the age of 67 instead of 65. Therefore, in the foreseeable future, these kinds of support may become completely unsustainable.

In conclusion, the provision of state monetary support may undoubtedly lessen the concern of retirees to some extent. However, considering the issue of sustainability of this provision, it is better to opt for individual savings from the very beginning of working life, for the benefit of both individual and national development.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 9

In today’s society, the topic of whether the government should financially support the elderly after they retire or if these individuals should fend for themselves remains contentious. This essay will delve into both perspectives before I share my viewpoint.

Many assert the belief that governments should bear the responsibility of financially supporting retired citizens. Primarily, it’s a societal duty to care for those who have devoted a considerable portion of their lives working and contributing to the nation’s development. They have paid taxes, provided services, and laid down the infrastructure for the younger generation. In many cases, retirees might not have a steady source of income, and thus, without government aid, they could face severe financial hardships, leading to an overall decrease in their quality of life.

On the other hand, advocates for self-sufficiency among the elderly argue that it fosters a sense of responsibility and lessens the burden on the state’s coffers. This viewpoint emphasizes the importance of personal savings and investments made during one’s working years, anticipating the needs of retirement. By being financially independent, retirees can maintain their dignity and reduce the strain on public funds, which could be allocated to other pressing societal needs.

In my opinion, while individual financial planning is crucial, it’s the government’s duty to ensure that its senior citizens live comfortably after retirement. Not all retirees have the means or foresight to save adequately, and it’s a mark of a compassionate society to care for its elderly.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 10

People work hard so that they can earn money to fulfill their needs. However, working has an age limit. Everyone has to retire after a certain age. The source of income stops after that. Some people think that retirees should be provided with support from the government monetarily. There is another group of people who think that they should take care of themselves. I agree that the government should be responsible for some instances. However, I believe that people should be responsible and mature enough to keep their savings. These savings can be used at the time of retirement. The main reason many supports a government-backed retirement plan is the horrible condition of many seniors.

There are scenarios where senior citizens require the help of the government. There are several possible serious causes deserving due attention. There are senior citizens who need to live away from their families. There are war veterans with a disability. Few senior citizens and retired people go through economic crises. Without the provision, these people are dependent more on the mercy of society and might end up taking charities or in worse cases, begging on the streets as well. They might face many difficulties unrelated to economics. They might not be able to go to the market themselves, they might need to visit doctors. For them, governments are their last refuge and in the best position to lend a helping hand. Despite the rare instances presented above, countries must inspire ownership of one’s own future. If all citizens knew that they would get a handsome retirement fund in later years of life, they would become less interested in working hard, saving money, and making wise investments. Since governments are responsible for dealing with larger populations, they may not always focus on responsible adults who are well-equipped to take care of their own needs. One fine and classic example of this kind of situation is parents raising their children. Parents take care of the child till a certain age and provide free education and places to stay. However, after a certain period of time, children are expected to support themselves. Parents that pamper their children for too long, in fact, spoil them in the same way a national retirement fund can demotivate individuals from working harder in life.

I believe that there should be a balance between support and complete help. The government should identify people who genuinely need help. Also, the common people should not be taking advantage of such policies.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 11

It is often argued that older people have difficulty in managing their finances after they retire because of which government support becomes necessary. On the other hand, some people believe that older people should have the means to support their own financial needs. By discussing both the views, I would put forward my preferred opinion on this issue. Considering the argument where people believe that older people should be able to manage their expenses themselves, it is quite possible.

Most elderly people are found to be left alone in most of the countries in the world during their old age. Either they have children who work far away from home or have been married away living separately from their parents. In such a situation, managing one’s own financial affairs is essential, and one must be capable enough to support themselves financially. While government’s support can be considered an added benefit, the lack of the same should not be considered a major issue when one has enough financial management. However, on the other hand, one of the most important aspects is that after a certain age, older people are not able to take care of themselves. Because of their old age, their health issues, etc they become dependent on their children or other younger people. As a result of old age, monthly income for the older people becomes short in relevance to their daily medicinal and homely expenses. The medicinal expenses are quite expensive for those suffering from chronic diseases and financial requirements could be fulfilled with support. Government support for retired people is hence essential for older people despite the fact that they can manage themselves. This is because the older they grow, the more difficulties they face. Accordingly, different governments in different countries should take steps to support their aging population with retirement benefits.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 12

In light of rising costs of living, the sources of income for retirees have become a topic of debate. It is generally believed that senior citizens in retirement should receive monetary assistance from governments, whereas other people argue that saving up money for their retirement stage is each individual's duty to enhance their living standards in their later life. In my opinion, both states and citizens should be equally responsible for the financial support in retirement.

On the one hand, it is the state obligation to allocate public funds to subsidising retired individuals. Members of governmental bodies are elected by citizens who believe their needs would be satisfactorily served. Therefore, governments need to fulfil such a mandatory public duty to promote the general welfare of their people of all ages. The elderly entering their retirement stage are often no longer able to maintain their employment due to various age-related chronic illnesses they might suffer. Social and financial assistance such as tax-free pensions, health service discounts, free public transport passes should be provided to the older members of society. These financial supports would play a vital role in ensuring the standard quality of life for retired individuals.

On the other hand, the opposite school of thought argues that individuals should also proactively take responsibility for accumulating their own retirement savings rather than entirely placing financial reliance on the states. People should be prepared to set aside money for their future during their tenure, by properly establishing their monetary objectives. Making long-term investments and obtaining social insurance can also enable individuals to achieve financial security when they embark on their retirement. Private enterprises should also be held accountable for offering monetary support to their employees when they take a leave from the workforce. Consequently, senior citizens can enjoy their financially comfortable life, without merely depending on the public funds.

In conclusion, I opine that governments should allot the state funding to pensions for retired people, who also have a significant role to play in being financially self-reliant following their withdrawal from employment.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 13

In today's society, the issue of whether governments should provide for retired individuals has become a topic of considerable debate. While some argue that the authority should primarily focus on providing money and care for the elderly, others contend that individuals should be encouraged to save up for their retirement. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my opinion on this matter.

One viewpoint suggests that governments have a responsibility to provide care for retired individuals. Advocates of this view argue that as people age, their physical and mental well-being may deteriorate so that they are incapable of working and making ends meet. Therefore, they would become vulnerable and require specialized care and assistance. For this reason, it is sensible to expect the governments to allocate resources to establish quality healthcare services, retirement homes, and social programs that cater to the specific needs of the elderly to ensure that they receive the necessary support and enhance their overall quality of life.

On the other hand, an opposing viewpoint asserts that senior citizens should be encouraged to budget their finances for retirement. By being financially independent, retired individuals can maintain control over their lives and make choices with their own will. Encouraging personal savings through financial programs can equip people with the means to support themselves during their retirement years without relying solely on the assistance from the people in charge. As a result, individuals will be empowered to take responsibility for their financial well-being.

In conclusion, while care is essential to meet the specific needs of the elderly, financial independence empowers individuals to maintain control over their lives. Therefore, I believe that a balanced approach that incorporates both aspects is necessary.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 14

Many today have come to the conclusion that retired seniors should be supported by the government and not left to their own meagre resources. While I agree there are certain cases where governments are liable, citizens ought to be incentivised to handle their own finances.

The main reason many supports a government backed retirement plan is the dire condition of many seniors. There are a number of possible causes deserving due attention. Some seniors are without family, others may be war veterans and have trouble finding work due to physical or psychological impairments, and still others may be victims of economic downturns. Without support they must fall on the mercy of society and will wind up in soup kitchens and seeking out chronic charity or even begging. Simply put, governments are their last refuge and in the best position to lend a helping hand.

Despite the rare instances mentioned above, nations ought to encourage ownership of one’s own future. If all citizens knew the government would provide a decent retirement fund for them, they would have little incentive to work hard, save money and make wise investments. Governments deal with large sample sizes and, granted this would not happen with many responsible adults, it still poses a sizeable national risk. An analogous example of this is the way parents raise their children. They provide for them early on, much like how governments offer free schooling, but then children are expected to grow up and take responsibility for their own lives. Parents that coddle their children for too long end up spoiling them in the same way that a national retirement fund would deprive individuals of the opportunity to become self-reliant.

In conclusion, the advantages of a more self-assured, mature citizenry outweigh the odd unavoidable case of desperation. There should be a degree of balance to allow for these exceptions while still nurturing more life-affirming values.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 15

Retirement is an essential stage for every working person. Few people plan their post-retirement income source well in advance, while others do not. Hence, the government must take care of retired people either by giving them financial support or taking good care of them. In my opinion, instead of providing financial support, the government shall take care of them by reimbursing their necessary expenses.

Some people favour financial support from the government for retired people. According to them, the government shall deposit the minimum fixed amount directly into retired people accounts so that they can meet their basic expenses. This amount shall be annually increased by inflation to cope with market prices. All expenses shall be managed by retired people out of the provided financial support. However, this may limit the government’ responsibility towards retired people, which shall not be the case.

On the other hand, People demands that a retired person’s well-being should be ensured by the government. Retirement people are looking for more care post-retirement and giving them financial support isn’t enough. Their medical expenditure rises with their age, which cannot be met by providing them a minimum fixed amount because of the rising cost of medical services. Also, providing them with financial support may expose them to fraudsters, who hunts for old age people to fulfil their ill intentions. These people need good care of themselves and look for more emotional support from society.

Hence in order to provide a better life post-retirement, I strongly believe that government shall take care of retired people by preparing society for retired people and creating more leisure activities options for these people. Only providing financial support to retired persons will not suffice the purpose.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 16

It is a customary notion that individuals who have retired from work need monetary support to manage the demands of daily living. Some people opine that the government should lend a hand to these people, while others suggest that the individuals should be financially self-reliant. I agree with the former and in this essay, I will discuss these contrasting viewpoints and examine how individuals’ and governments’ contributions play a role in retirement.

Firstly, I think it is the government’s job to see to the needs of all people and therefore, it is their duty to provide succour to retired persons for sustenance. They could do this by providing benefits or pensions as well as offering subsidies. The government can also provide free healthcare since many older people frequently suffer from chronic health issues. Providing bus passes and transport at a rebate may considerably help people who have retired. Lastly, ensuring that the passive income generated by retired persons through their pensions remains tax-free will also financially aid them.

However, it can also be argued that individuals themselves should have saved up enough when they were in active service so that they could look after themselves following their retirement. Moreover, organisations also have a duty to their employees to grant financial support to their pension funds. Individuals can also save up for the future during their tenure by setting financial goals and reining in their spending. Also, investing in funds and getting insurance can help provide financial security when the individual ultimately leaves the workforce.

Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that both government and individuals have significant roles to play when providing monetary assistance to people who have retired, with the individual contributions being more significant while the person is actively working and the government’s contributions emerging as more significant when the person in question has withdrawn from work.

Some think that the government should support retired people financially while others believe they should take care of themselves - mẫu 17

The issue of financial support for retired individuals has generated contrasting viewpoints, with some advocating for government assistance while others contend that retirees should take responsibility for their own financial well-being. This essay will explore both perspectives. Personally, I agree with the opinion that it is the responsibility of the government to look after those retirees.

Proponents of self-sufficiency in retirement contend that individuals should be responsible for planning and saving for their own retirement. They emphasise the importance of personal financial discipline and investment in retirement funds or private pension plans. From their perspective, relying on the government for financial support can create a culture of dependence and discourage personal responsibility. For instance, individuals who diligently contribute to retirement accounts throughout their working years can build a substantial nest egg, ensuring a comfortable and secure retirement without relying solely on government assistance.

Supporters of government-funded retirement benefits argue that it is the responsibility of the state to provide financial assistance to retirees. They assert that individuals who have devoted their lives to contributing to society deserve a dignified and secure retirement. Government-sponsored pension schemes, such as social security or national pension programmes, are seen as essential to ensure the well-being of retired individuals who may not have sufficient personal savings or alternative sources of income. Moreover, these proponents argue that a society’s progress and development are reflected in how it takes care of its elderly citizens.

In weighing these viewpoints, I wholeheartedly believe that not all individuals have the means or knowledge to effectively save for retirement. Moreover, unforeseen circumstances such as economic downturns or health issues can significantly impact an individual’s financial stability in old age. So, the governments should provide a safety net through comprehensive social security systems, ensuring that retirees have access to financial support. The elderly retired people have contributed to society through their taxes and work, and the government must take responsibility for looking after them when they are most vulnerable in their old age.

In conclusion, government assistance can provide a necessary safety net for retired people and a crucial aspect of a functioning society. It is essential to support retirees with government funds and foster a society that values and protects its elderly population.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Fewer and fewer people walk on a daily basis. What are the reasons and how to encourage them to spend their time walking?

• Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree?

• Studies show that many criminals have a low level of education. For this reason, people believe that the best way to reduce crime is to educate people in prison so they can get a job when they leave prison. Do you agree or disagree?

• Whether or not a person achieves their aims in life is mostly related to luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---