In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land and in the water. So, many people believe that plastic bags should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land - mẫu 1

Some people think that plastic shopping bags should be prohibited because they are one of the major pollutants of both land and water around the world. I completely agree, but I think there are other measures that can be taken before putting a complete ban in place.

The reason that plastic bags should be banned in the near future is because they do not biodegrade and continue to pollute the environment for hundreds of years after being discarded. Plastic bags are often used only once and end up clogging the land and polluting the water, causing about 100,000 marine animal deaths each year. Even when plastic does start to break down, it fragments into micro plastic which causes even more damage to all life on Earth. The only way to prevent throw-away plastic, such as plastic shopping bags, from seriously and irreversibly damaging our planet is to prohibit it.

However, it is best to try to change consumer behaviour before completely banning plastic bags. Plastic bags are not a vitally necessary plastic product, only a convenience and customers should learn to replace them by using bags from home. Another step to deterring people from using so many plastic bags is by putting a high price on them which will encourage people to reuse them. Finally, having recycle bins by which customers can get cash back for depositing used plastic bags will also help. By altering consumer behaviour, it is a good way of raising awareness of plastic pollution as a whole and this can lead to more action on other unnecessary plastic products in the future.

In conclusion, an eventual total ban on plastic bags is crucial to preserve life on this planet and protect it from the effects of throwing away non-biodegradable products.

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land - mẫu 2

Plastic shopping bags have become a ubiquitous source of environmental pollution in many nations, significantly contributing to water and land contamination. To save our environment, many suggest a complete ban on plastic shopping bags. It is also my firm belief that detrimental effects warrant a ban on plastic bags all around the world.

The environmental impact of plastic bags is substantial, particularly in terms of water and land pollution. These non-biodegradable bags often find their way into water bodies, posing a severe threat to aquatic life. For instance, marine animals mistake these bags for food, and ingest them, leading to fatal consequences such as choking or digestive issues. Additionally, when not disposed of properly, plastic bags end up cluttering landfills, where they can take hundreds of years to decompose fully. This accumulation of plastic waste not only contaminates soil but also seeps harmful chemicals, polluting the surrounding environment.

Moreover, the ban on plastic bags would not only mitigate environmental pollution but also encourage the adoption of eco-friendly alternatives. Several countries that have enforced strict regulations or imposed bans on plastic bags have witnessed a surge in the use of reusable bags made from biodegradable materials such as cotton or jute. For example, in countries where plastic bag bans have been implemented, citizens have transitioned to using reusable bags, significantly reducing the volume of plastic waste generated.

In conclusion, given the detrimental consequences of plastic shopping bags on the environment, their prohibition seems imperative. Not only would a ban mitigate the severe pollution caused by these bags, but it would also foster the adoption of more sustainable and environmentally friendly alternatives.

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land - mẫu 3

In many nations, plastic bags have become synonymous with pollution, cluttering landscapes and waterways, thus posing a significant environmental threat. Advocating for their prohibition, I strongly concur that eliminating these pollutants is a crucial step towards environmental sustainability. This essay will explore the detrimental effects of plastic bags on ecosystems and the benefits of alternative solutions.

Firstly, plastic bags significantly contribute to water and land pollution due to their non-biodegradable nature, enduring in the environment for centuries and posing severe risks to wildlife. Marine animals, such as turtles, frequently mistake these floating bags for food, such as jellyfish, leading to lethal outcomes upon ingestion. Similarly, birds can become entangled in these materials, restricting their movement and ability to feed. On terrestrial grounds, plastic bags obstruct drainage systems, leading to increased flooding risks and transforming urban areas into breeding zones for harmful disease vectors like mosquitoes. This exacerbates public health issues and damages ecosystems. The unsightly accumulation of plastic bags in natural and urban landscapes serves as a stark reminder of our consumption patterns, emphasizing the urgent need for regulatory intervention to mitigate their usage.

Secondly, imposing bans on plastic bags propels the shift towards sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives, nurturing a societal commitment to environmental preservation. The enactment of such bans or levies across various nations has catalyzed a significant increase in the utilization of reusable fabric totes, paper bags, and biodegradable alternatives, substantially curtailing waste generation. This transformation is not only pivotal in waste reduction but also in elevating consumer awareness and participation in environmental conservation efforts. It symbolizes a broader societal shift towards sustainable living, encouraging individuals to reconsider their daily choices and their impacts on the environment. Moreover, the transition underscores a global commitment to safeguarding natural resources and minimizing carbon emissions, aligning with international objectives to address climate change and promote a more sustainable future for all.

In conclusion, the ban on plastic shopping bags is not only imperative for mitigating pollution but also for steering societies towards sustainable practices. By acknowledging the environmental havoc wrought by these bags and embracing eco-friendly substitutes, we can significantly lessen our ecological impact.

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land - mẫu 4

The ubiquity of plastic shopping bags as a predominant form of waste has escalated environmental concerns, polluting water bodies and land. This essay staunchly advocates for their prohibition, focusing on environmental preservation and the promotion of sustainable alternatives.

Firstly, the environmental degradation caused by plastic bags is a pressing global issue. These non-biodegradable materials not only linger in ecosystems for centuries but also wreak havoc on wildlife habitats and the broader ecological balance. When marine creatures ingest plastic bags, mistaking them for food, the results are often fatal, leading to a significant decrease in biodiversity. The production process of these bags further compounds the problem by consuming vast amounts of fossil fuels, thereby accelerating the pace of climate change. A shift towards eco-friendly alternatives, such as cloth or paper bags, presents a viable solution. Research indicates that adopting a single reusable bag can eliminate the need for hundreds of plastic ones, thus substantially curbing pollution and fostering a healthier planet.

Secondly, beyond the environmental toll, the widespread use of plastic bags has significant economic repercussions. The costs associated with cleaning up plastic bag waste place a substantial financial burden on local governments and communities, diverting resources from other critical public services. This economic strain underscores the need for a systemic shift towards sustainable bag production. Such a move not only promises to reduce the environmental footprint but also stimulates job creation within the burgeoning green sector, driving economic growth and innovation. The success story of Rwanda, which has witnessed remarkable improvements in urban cleanliness and environmental integrity following a plastic bag ban, serves as a compelling example of the positive outcomes that can be achieved. This transition not only fosters a cleaner environment but also propels nations towards a more sustainable and economically viable future.

In conclusion, the ban on plastic shopping bags is not only a critical step towards environmental sustainability but also a catalyst for economic benefits. By embracing alternatives, we can protect our planet for future generations while promoting sustainable development.

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land - mẫu 5

Inset of countries, plastic grocery bags in the rubbish has become an immense influence on natural resources. Such water and land pollution have occurred to another level to ban the usage of plastics. Completely agree with the given statement, and the following paragraphs will demonstrate the relevant points.

Prohibition of the non-disposal of garbage is a great decision that a government can take for the safety of the country. This means that when the water and land get polluted, there will be a plethora of incidents to overcome as a nation, like diseases and the loss of crops. When water gets polluted where a human cannot consume it, or people consume polluted water due to the absence of pure water leads to many diseases among them, especially kidney failures. Because of that, most citizens have to pay a higher cost for a kidney transplant. For example, rural villagers are at risk of kidney difficulties due to the unavailability of clean water.

Moreover, damage to fertile land puts farmers into poverty, and the needy people who used to harvest on their own to consume their own food are in danger situation. This means that when farmers cannot farm the vegetables and fruits in the soil, it leads to insufficient food for the demand. For instance, people will not have enough vegetables to buy from the market due to fewer crops. Therefore, this has to be discussed and come to a favourable solution.

To conclude, plastic destroys the valuable resources of the earth, and the issue should be addressed and sorted out for better surroundings for human well-being to be healthy and survive. Banning plastic materials and giving guidelines for a protective environment to the government would be ideal.

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land - mẫu 6

The polluting effects of plastic are often featured in the news these days. We have realised how damaging plastic can be and there is a strong public reaction in favour of reducing plastic waste. Banning plastic bags would be one way of dealing with the problem. However, in my opinion there are other, more effective, strategies that could be implemented, targeting not only consumers but also the manufacturers and retailers of plastic products.

The main problem with plastic bags is that they take many years to decompose and are often only used only once for convenience and then discarded, ending up in rivers and seas where they cause particular harm to marine creatures such as whales and turtles. The obvious response might be to ban plastic bags. If shops stopped supplying them, customers would be forced to re-use existing bags or find other ways of carrying their shopping. This has had a great deal of success in many countries. But this ban should extend to all plastic which is used in packaging, much of which is unnecessary. Fruits and vegetables, for example, have their own natural covering and do not need a further layer of plastic.

While banning plastic bags would be beneficial, this measure would not be enough to solve the problem. People also need educating about littering and recycling in general. Many people still do not dispose of plastic properly and as a result, even if less plastic is produced, much of what is in existence finds its way into the natural environment. Heavy fines should be introduced for those who do not respect the laws regarding the protection of the environment.

In conclusion, the required approach should be to both limit the production and use of plastic and also to ensure that people understand the impact that it can have on the environment if plastic is not correctly managed.

In many countries, plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land - mẫu 7

Opinions are divided on whether the authorities should impose a ban on plastic grocery bags due to their adverse environmental impacts. I believe they should not, because although these bags may lead to various environmental issues, their economic benefits far outweigh the potential consequences.

Admittedly, it is known that plastic bags can cause harm to the environment in several ways. It is unfortunately common these days to see popular recreational areas littered with plastic bags and bottles, discarded by consumers lacking environmental awareness. Besides polluting the surroundings, these non-degradable packages can also block drainage pipe systems, thus contributing to floods in many city centers around the world. Additionally, plastic waste in the ocean poses a risk to numerous marine life forms, as they can mistakenly consume bags while searching for food, thereby ingesting microplastic particles, which, in turn, could impact human health when we consume these animals as seafood.

However, despite the aforementioned environmental concerns, plastic bags offer significant benefits in economic terms. In terms of employment, the bag manufacturing industry creates millions of jobs worldwide, ranging from purifying crude oil used in plastics to distributing these bags to shopping centers. A total ban on them would likely deal a huge blow to the livelihoods of the related workforce, driving them to the verge of unemployment and inability to make ends meet. Furthermore, plastic shopping bags have long been preferred by consumers due to their convenience and durability, especially during inclement weather. As a result, the disappearance of these bags would force shoppers to opt for less favorable alternatives, such as paper or other types of bags, which are usually more expensive and not as convenient or versatile.

In conclusion, plastic bags may indeed cause some harm to the environment; however, they provide far more advantages to consumers and society as a whole. Therefore, they should not be banned from use by the public.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language still could be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Most people do not care enough about environmental issues. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Nowadays nurses should not just be required to do basic training, but they must have other qualities as well to do their jobs well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world’s resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---