Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country rather than the works of the other parts in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 1

Some people say that museums and art galleries should focus on works produced by local artists and preserve local history and culture instead of showcasing international artworks and artefacts. I disagree with this viewpoint because I believe that the diversity of cultures and art forms is what makes these entities valuable and useful.

First and foremost, limiting museums and galleries to only display local works would be a disservice to visitors. Art is a universal language, and people from all over the world come to museums and galleries to learn about different cultures and art forms. By limiting exhibits to local works, museums and galleries would be depriving visitors of the opportunity to experience art from other cultures and learn about them.

Moreover, showcasing art and cultures from other countries also promotes cultural understanding and appreciation. By learning about other cultures, people can become more open-minded and accepting of diversity, which is especially important in today's globalized world. Art can be used as a tool to promote empathy and understanding, and museums and galleries have a responsibility to showcase a diverse range of artworks and cultures to fulfil this role.

Lastly, museums and galleries often collaborate with institutions from other countries to bring in exhibitions that showcase their art and culture. This exchange is crucial in fostering international relationships and promoting diplomacy. If museums and galleries were to only focus on local works, this exchange of culture would be limited, and it would be harder to establish these connections.

In conclusion, museums and galleries should not concentrate solely on local work, but rather embrace the diversity of cultures and art forms to promote understanding, empathy, and cultural exchange. By showcasing a variety of artworks and cultures, these institutions can fulfil their role as promoters of cultural appreciation and education.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 2

Museums and art exhibits have long been at the forefront of preserving and representing cultural values and histories, being utilized by almost all countries throughout the centuries. However, whether they should mainly represent local cultures rather than international collections is open to dispute. I personally believe that traditional museums should focus on outlining the cultural aspects and artworks of the country while having separate museums with items from other countries does not hurt the national feeling.

Educating people about the history and traditions of a country is the primary reason we have museums in the first place. They conserve important cultural specimens, artefacts, artworks and other items to boast about our past and help researchers dig deeper into history. Such museums, which primarily signify our tradition, should comprise things we, as a nation, can be proud of, rather than having internationally acclaimed artworks or sculptures. For instance, many national museums in Europe solely focus on preserving artefacts and artworks from the country and they are quite popular among international tourists.

Having said that, the concept of a museum, in the modern era, has changed to a great extent. We now have aviation museums, war memorials, motor museums, computer museums, archaeological museums and the list goes on. To make these types of museums popular and useful, we have to have international collections. For instance, the Motor Museum in Australia has a collection from more than 20 countries, and they serve their purpose just fine.

To conclude, national and traditional museums should focus on nurturing national history and heritage, but we also need museums with international collections to make them more functional and famous. One does not necessarily diminish the necessity and usefulness of the other.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 3

Museums and art galleries help visitors better understand the role of history, showcase important artworks, and preserve significant items. But many people opine that the collection should include only the artefacts and artworks of the host country. I disagree with this opinion since art is a medium to express thoughts and ideas beyond boundaries, and the history of nations is interconnected.

Art is an important medium of free expression, and history extends beyond the border. So the collection of a museum should not be confined to geographical boundaries. For example, "Mona Lisa" is a legendary artwork by Leonardo Da Vinci who was an Italian artist in the 15th century. Despite being Italian, Da Vinci is an iconic genius for the whole world. Mona Lisa is now preserved at the Louvre Museum in France, and having this artwork and many other famous international paintings and sculptures, France can only boast of its fine collection that showcases masterpieces, great artworks and world history to the global audience.

Moreover, history is not confined within boundaries, and if this was the case, we would have taught our students only our national history. The fate of nations was interconnected throughout history, and it still is. So when we want to teach our children about our history, we must teach them about international events. Since one of the primary objectives of museums is to teach people about history, they must have artworks and collections from the international arena.

Finally, when we display artefacts and works from foreign countries, we are connecting nations all over the world. Each culture has something new to teach and the cultural richness of a nation depends on how they accept a new culture. From this perspective, having museums that comprise collections only from the host country is a bad idea.

To conclude, museums and art galleries that have international artefacts and artworks besides having national collections are far rich and practical in exchanging cultural aspects and showcasing history.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 4

Museums and art galleries essentially showcase significant histories and artworks to the general audience both to educate them and preserve important artefacts. Though some people advocate for an international collection in such important places, I firmly believe that local works and national history should always get the highest priority.

To begin with, a single museum can not represent all the important histories of the world due to space and budget issues, and the organisers of public art galleries need an exorbitant amount of money to display famous foreign artworks or sculptures. Thus, a museum should focus on becoming a place where people would learn about their own history and culture rather than being a place where they would wonder what the collections are all about. Visitors of a museum or an art gallery, which even include schoolgoers, should be able to relate the items they see so that they get inspired to foster nationalism and learn about their country, heritage and culture.

Moreover, museums and art exhibits are frequently visited by foreigners who want to get a glimpse of the local culture and history rather than seeing items that they have already seen in other museums perhaps in some other countries. So, museums and similar other places become more acceptable when they conserve local culture and present national history. For instance, most of the tourists in my country find the national museum more interesting than other museums we have because our national museum offers a true insight into our past and heritage.

To conclude, museums and art galleries have significant roles in teaching people about their past and nurturing the talents of enthusiastic artists. It is more important that they have local collections and not foreign relics and arts which have little or no meaning to people who visit them.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 5

Some people insist that museums and art exhibitions ought to focus on showing local works to visitors instead of artefacts and artworks from overseas. I, however, disagree with this notion and believe that exhibitions of a wider range of artworks, including foreign ones, are quite beneficial to local people and culture.

The primary reason I disagree that museums and art centres should concentrate mainly on displaying local artworks is that it restricts the opportunities for spectators and artists to watch, enjoy and learn about diversified global artworks. Diversification helps citizens learn and appreciate various artworks which eventually enrich the culture of a nation. Since local museums and art galleries are perhaps the most accessible venues for residents and aspiring artists to learn about arts and history, their collections should be as rich as possible.

Another rationale behind my view is that art galleries would offer more benefits when they display artworks created in other regions. This is because exhibitions of galleries could thus let children comprehend brilliant aspects of different nations and their cultures. Art galleries are one of the most common destinations for school trips, and the impressions that students get from these galleries may broaden their horizons. Thus, displaying diversified arts is imperative to develop children’s knowledge and understanding of other cultures.

To conclude, a variety of artworks and artefacts in museums and art galleries would have more positive influences on cultural advancements and developing global perspectives of children and people alike. It is expected that museums and art centres would focus on these important issues when deciding the type of collection they are going to have.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 6

These days, there has been a debate about whether museums and art galleries should prioritise showcasing local works over artworks and cultures from other countries. Some people argue that museums and galleries should focus on local works over displaying items from foreign countries to better promote the local culture and community while also avoiding creating confusion and cultural rip-off. In this essay, I will argue in favour of prioritising local works in museums and galleries over international items.

Firstly, museums and galleries have a responsibility to promote local culture and artists. Displaying works by local artists can support the local economy and encourage emerging talent. It can also help to preserve local traditions and heritage. For example, showcasing traditional crafts and art forms from a particular region can attract tourists and create a sense of pride and identity for local people.

Secondly, exhibiting international artworks and cultures can sometimes lead to cultural appropriation and misrepresentation. This can occur when cultural artefacts are taken out of their original context and displayed in a way that is insensitive or inaccurate. Additionally, displaying international artworks can sometimes lead to a sense of cultural superiority, where foreign works are seen as more valuable or interesting than local ones.

In conclusion, it is important to promote local culture and artists, and museums and art galleries should primarily aim to focus on the art and history of the nation. By doing so, museums and galleries can fulfil their role as cultural institutions that educate and inspire their audiences while promoting local culture and art.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 7

It is sad but true that the museums and art galleries represent the cultural and historical works of non-native nations, and as a result some experts claim these places should exhibit the local lifestyle and society. I firmly agree with such a viewpoint. Both the viewpoint and my preference are elaborated below.

The first and foremost reason for my inclination is that every country requires its students to study their nation's history, but these lessons can feel impersonal and abstract. The opportunity to view authentic historical documents in a museum can revitalize history and inspire patriotism. The Rutgers Institution exemplifies this in the United States, which houses significant historical and cultural artifacts. Reflecting on the struggles and accomplishments of their ancestors can help visitors from various regions and ethnic groups find common ground.

However, it cannot be denied that more can be learned from international art by the general public. The majority of people are well-versed in the history of their own country but have a limited understanding of other cultures. Visiting a museum containing objects from all over the world is therefore an enlightening experience. For instance, the British Museum in London is renowned for housing one of the world's largest collections of culturally significant artifacts. By viewing and reading the plaques for a variety of artworks, both young students and adults can gain a deeper appreciation for the traditions, cultures, and events that underpin the modern world. This can eventually lead to a more inclusive and culturally diverse society.

To recapitulate, it is crucial and mandatory to know the historic background, customs, and traditions of the native country, and therefore, it is the duty of the legislation to present such work in art galleries and museums.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 8

Museums and art galleries play an essential role in the dissemination of diverse knowledge to the public. Some individuals believe that these institutions should prioritise local art and history over global art. Nonetheless, I disagree vehemently with this viewpoint because international works benefit the public in numerous ways.

To begin with, the purpose of museums and art galleries is to facilitate the study of cultural heritage. By focusing solely on local history and art, these institutions confine the public's knowledge to domestic borders. In contrast, exhibiting art and history from other regions of the world demonstrates multiculturalism by allowing individuals to comprehend distinct histories and cultures, thereby promoting globalisation. The Vatican Museum, for instance, displays works from several European countries, allowing the world's smallest nation to serve as a bridge to explain the cultural values of various nations under one roof.

Moreover, international historical and cultural works would provide individuals with an understanding of the critical international issues that many nations face concurrently. Numerous museums choose to host informative international exhibitions on significant political and social issues, which may be more enlightening than the media. According to a survey, 88% of visitors to the Melbourne Art Gallery felt more informed about poverty, war, and trade after visiting the museum than after reading the news.

In the nutshell, I do not support the notion that museums and art galleries should prioritise the history and art of their own country over international works, as the latter create a platform for globalisation and multinational knowledge.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 9

Museums and art galleries have been at the forefront of preserving and representing cultural values and histories for centuries in virtually every country. However, it is debatable whether they should highlight traditional and local cultures or an international collection. Personally, I believe that traditional museums should highlight the country's cultural aspects and artworks, whereas the presence of separate museums containing objects from other nations does not diminish the national spirit.

One of the primary purposes of museums is to educate the public about a country's history and traditions. They preserve significant cultural specimens, artefacts, and other items to commemorate our past and to aid historians in their research. These museums, which primarily represent our heritage, should include items of which we as a nation can be proud, as opposed to internationally acclaimed artworks or sculptures. Numerous national museums in Europe, for instance, focus exclusively on preserving artefacts and works of art from the nation, and they are extremely popular with international tourists.

Nevertheless, the modern museum concept has evolved substantially. There are now aviation museums, memorials to war, automobile museums, computer museums, and archaeological museums, among others. These types of museums require international collections to be popular and useful. The Motor Museum in Australia, for instance, has collections from over twenty nations that serve their purpose admirably. Museums with international collections are an excellent way to promote tourism, as they frequently attract tourists.

To sum up, National and traditional museums should prioritise the preservation of national history, whereas museums with international collections are necessary to make them more functional and well-known. The necessity and utility of one category does not necessarily diminish the necessity and utility of another.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 10

Some feel that museums and art galleries ought to primarily focus on showcasing local, rather than international, works. In my opinion, despite the importance of domestic pieces for national cohesion, there is greater value in international items.

Those who advocate for domestic art in national museums and exhibition halls point out the unifying effect. Students in every country are expected to learn their national history but these lessons can often feel impersonal and abstract. The chance to visit a museum and see authentic documents from the past revitalises history and can inspire patriotism. A standout example of this would be The Smithsonian in the United States, which houses key historic and cultural artifacts. Visitors from different parts of the country and disparate ethnic groups can potentially find common ground by reflecting on the struggles and achievements of their forefathers.

Regardless, the citizenry as a whole can learn more from international artworks. Most people have learned their own nation’s history well but possess limited understanding of other cultures. Going to a museum featuring items from around the world is therefore an enlightening experience. For example, The British Museum in London famously contains one of the world’s largest collections of culturally significant artifacts from around the world. By seeing and reading the plaques for a variety of artworks both young students and adults alike have the opportunity to broaden their understanding of the traditions, cultures, and events that underpin the modern world. Over time, this can lead to a more inclusive, culturally diversified society.

All in all, the patriotic positives of locally themed collections are outweighed by the educational benefits of globally sourced institutions. There must be a degree of balance but those in positions of authority should emphasise cultural diversity.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 11

Museums and art galleries play an important role in offering multifaceted knowledge to the public. Some individuals opine that these institutions should primarily focus on their local history and art instead of global works of art. I, however, largely disagree with this viewpoint as international works provide various benefits to the public.

Museums and art galleries offer a medium to understanding cultural heritage. By focusing on local history and art only, such institutions limit the knowledge of the public to the domestic borders. Conversely, if art and history from other parts of the world are displayed, museums and art galleries exhibit multiculturalism, allowing people to understand distinct histories and cultures, and thus, enhancing globalization. For example, the Vatican Museum exhibits works from several European countries, allowing the smallest country in the world to be a bridge to explaining the cultural values of distinct nations under one roof.

Moreover, international historical and cultural works would allow individuals to gain information on critical international issues that many countries face together. Many museums choose to have educational international exhibitions of important political and social issues, which may be more informative than the media. For instance, the Melbourne Art Gallery has collections from across the globe in order to depict thoughts on poverty, war and trade, and in a survey, 88% of visitors declared that they felt more informed about such issues from the museum than from the news.

Countries might fear the loss of cultural heritage owing to having a multicultural setup of museums, however, that is not the case, one never tends to diverge and bias the topics of history on the basis of nativity.

In conclusion, I disagree to a large extent with the belief that museums and art galleries should focus on the history and art of their own country rather than international works, as with the latter, these museums and galleries build a platform for globalization and multinational knowledge.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 12

The debate over whether museums and art galleries should primarily exhibit artworks that reflect the history and culture of their own country, as opposed to global works, is a topic of considerable interest. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before concluding with a personal perspective.

Supporters of the notion that museums should focus on domestic artworks argue that this approach is vital for preserving national heritage. In Vietnam, for instance, the War Remnants Museum in Ho Chi Minh City powerfully encapsulates the country's turbulent history, thereby fostering a sense of national identity and pride among visitors. By showcasing artifacts unique to a nation's history, museums serve as custodians of cultural legacy, ensuring that future generations remain connected to their roots. However, this perspective might overlook the benefits of cultural exchange. In an increasingly interconnected world, exposure to diverse cultures fosters understanding and tolerance.

However, I believe that embracing global art is equally important. For example, the Hanoi Fine Arts Museum, by displaying both Vietnamese and international art, acts as a bridge connecting Vietnam to the world. This approach not only enriches the viewers' experience but also promotes cultural dialogue and mutual respect. In a globalized era, understanding different cultures is imperative, and art serves as a universal language facilitating this understanding. It's not necessary to limit the scope of learning and inspiration to national boundaries when the world offers a rich tapestry of artistic expression.

In conclusion, while emphasizing national art and history is crucial for preserving cultural identity, incorporating international artworks offers invaluable insights into the global community. Museums and galleries, by adopting a more inclusive approach, can become platforms for cultural exchange and global understanding, which is essential in today's interconnected world.

Museums and art galleries should concentrate on works that show history and culture of their own country - mẫu 13

Museums and art galleries have played a major role in preserving and conveying historical values for a long time. While many people suggest that they should focus purely on displaying works that represent the nation’s culture and history, others with contradicting views affirm that international works are also of great worth. Personally, I think both viewpoints are equally valid.

On the one hand, there are reasons why it is believed that artifacts and works of national value should be given priority. Firstly, museums and art galleries should be places that honor indigenous history and culture. By going to these museums and galleries, people will gain a deeper understanding of their nation, along with the golden ages and hard times that the country has been through. The exhibitions therefore serve an educational purpose as they instill patriotism and promote a sense of national pride in the citizens of that country. Apart from that, such places also help to preserve traditional and historical values. In the 21^st century, many ethnic minorities are in grave danger of losing their culture, and therefore, the display of their works and artifacts will help to preserve their culture and the cultural diversity of a nation.

On the other hand, showing international works of art has several merits. Works from other parts of the world help to diversify the content of museums and art galleries. Admittedly, even though the value of museums and art galleries cannot be denied, their failure in adopting changes and updating collections has discouraged people from visiting these places. For that reason, international works will add appeal and aid museums and galleries in attracting more visitors. Furthermore, if museums display international works, people will have more chance to gain knowledge and insight into other cultures as well.

In conclusion, the ultimate goal of museums and galleries is to spread knowledge and wonder far and wide. Therefore, my suggestion is that local artifacts and works should be prioritized, while those of other nations can still be exhibited but in separate museums and galleries.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people say advertising has positive economic effects. Others think it has negative social effects because it will make people dissatisfied with who they are and what they have. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• Some people think young people should follow the traditions of their society. Others think that they should be free to behave as individuals. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some believe that more actions should be taken to prevent crime, while others feel that crime is being tackled effectively now. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

• Watching TV shows and movies about crime is becoming more and more popular. Why is this? What effect does that have on society?

• In many countries, the number of animals and plants is declining. Why do you think this is happening? How can this issue be solved?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---