Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 1

Many today feel that countries should prioritise vocational training over higher education due to changes in the labour market. In my opinion, though there are strong economic reasons to support this idea, university education holds greater value.

Those in favour of more practical skills training point out the financial benefits. Most university graduates are burdened with student debt and face uncertain job prospects. In contrast, training schools are cheap, fast, and ease students into steady employment immediately. The jobs they train for are also most likely recession-proof and durable, including positions as cooks, hotel managers, and skilled technicians. Someone who is firmly established in such a job in their early 20s does not have to deal with the pressures associated with university life and its incumbent debts. Instead, they can begin to set aside money for a house or start a family.

Nonetheless, lacking a university degree limits one’s options. The jobs available will pay well initially and be secure but offer a narrow scope for advancement and virtually no opportunity to switch career paths. An individual with a university degree, on the other hand, might begin from a lower position but has a higher ceiling on future earnings. It is also possible for them to explore a variety of fields. Most good jobs require at least a bachelor’s degree even for simple internship vacancies. Lacking such a degree means restricting oneself to manual labour or service industry jobs. The actual learning that takes place at university, particularly for those with multi-disciplinary majors or studying at liberal arts schools, also encourages students to consider a wide range of possible career options.

In conclusion, increasing funding for vocational training is an attractive yet short-sighted approach that curbs possibilities. Governments ought to continue to support higher education even in dark economic times in order to reap future rewards.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 2

The perennial debate on whether nations should predominantly invest in vocational training over tertiary education ignites varied perspectives. This essay contends that while practical skills are imperative, the merits of university education cannot be undermined.

Primarily, proponents advocating spending more money on skills and vocational training underscore the immediate applicability of such skills in the workforce. Practical work tends to offer swift economic benefits, as it equips individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labor market rapidly. For instance, a surge in skilled laborers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.

Contrastingly, those who support the motion to spend money on university education argue that higher education cultivates a more profound skill set, including critical thinking, analytical abilities, and versatility, which are indispensable in the dynamic global market. Universities act as incubators for professionals like engineers, doctors, and educators, whose roles cannot be understated. These institutions not only provide theoretical knowledge but also encourage research and development. A quintessential example would be the role university research plays in medical breakthroughs, which are fundamental to societal progression.

However, juxtaposing these two educational pathways presents a false dichotomy. It is crucial to acknowledge that both vocational training and university education serve distinct yet complementary purposes. Investing in both areas can yield a more holistic and robust workforce. A balanced approach would not only harness immediate skill sets but also foster long-term intellectual capital which could adapt to future changes in the job market.

In conclusion, a balanced allocation of funds towards both vocational training and university education is imperative. The former addresses immediate economic demands with practical skills, while the latter ensures long-term societal progress through intellectual development. This dual investment strategy is crucial for a nation's comprehensive growth.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 3

There is a claim that funding should be decreased for higher education and increased for the purpose of conducting workshops and trainings focused on obtaining jobs. This essay firmly concurs with this assertion since vocational training equips students with greater employability that enables them to land their desired employment without devoting years to obtaining a university degree.

To commence, vocational training facilities have given students hands-on opportunity to plan their professional paths. This practical sector has more overt goals of directing the students toward tangible job paths, in contrast to university education, which places a greater emphasis only on theoretical learning. Vocational programs provide internship opportunities as a component of the curriculum, which provide students with some relevant powerful skills that are crucial for their later entry into the labour market. Furthermore, because job-related training institutions are rapidly receiving accreditation from governments and concerned upper echelons, degrees from this education platform not only satisfy the standards for formal qualifications, but also serve as credentials for practical abilities.

Additionally, vocational training fields have higher cost-effective values in terms of both time and money. While employment-oriented trainings are far less expensive and more accessible, university education is so expensive that some students are unable to pay it and end up taking out loans. Moreover, students in vocational schools typically spend only two years for a degree, which is sufficient time for acquiring their necessary skills, and they find their suitable jobs immediately after the degree, whereas university degrees typically take four years to complete and even after that the graduates struggle to find their desired jobs, resulting in a continuous debt burden. It follows that those who receive vocational training don't need to pursue additional years of education or wait an extended period of time to secure employment.

In conclusion, people with vocational education join the workforce more quickly than university graduates do, with more precise skill sets and less expenditure. Therefore, the onus is on governments to allocate more funds for this efficient skill-based education sector.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 4

The allocation of a country's resources towards the betterment of its citizens' education has always been a topic of debate. Specifically, some argue that nations should channel more money on skills and vocational training geared towards practical work, as opposed to traditional university education. I vehemently agree with this stance, believing that the emphasis on vocational training offers more tangible benefits in the current global scenario.

One of the primary reasons for my perspective is the evident skills gap in many industries. While university degrees often provide a broad education, they sometimes lack the specialized training required for certain job roles. By investing more money in skills and vocational training, nations can directly address the needs of industries such as plumbing, carpentry, or even advanced roles in technology and healthcare. For instance, in countries like Germany, apprenticeship programs that focus on specific trades have led to lower youth unemployment rates, as young adults are equipped with the exact skills employers are seeking.

Moreover, the nature of work and employment is rapidly evolving with the advent of technology and automation. Practical skills that are honed through vocational training make individuals more adaptable and resilient in the face of such changes. A graduate with a degree in liberal arts might possess critical thinking and analytical skills but may find it challenging to secure a job without the necessary practical skills that many industries now demand. Conversely, an individual trained in, say, digital marketing or coding through a vocational course, would find it considerably easier to enter the job market and even command a higher starting salary.

In conclusion, while university education remains valuable, it's vital for nations to prioritize skills and vocational training in today's dynamic job market. This shift not only assures economic stability but also paves the way for a prosperous future for their citizens.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 5

The allocation of government funds to either skills and vocational training or university education is a subject of significant debate. While some argue that resources should be primarily directed towards skills and vocational training, I firmly disagree with this viewpoint. This essay will present arguments against this proposition, highlighting the crucial role of university education.

First and foremost, it is essential to recognize that university education is not merely about acquiring specialized knowledge but also about fostering critical thinking, creativity, and innovation. Universities provide a holistic learning environment that encourages students to explore various disciplines, enabling them to develop a wide range of skills beyond practical, job-specific training. For example, a student studying history may develop research, analytical, and communication skills that can be applied to various professions, not just history-related roles.

Furthermore, universities serve as hubs of research and innovation, contributing to advancements in various fields that benefit society as a whole. Many groundbreaking discoveries and technological innovations have originated from university research. For instance, universities have played a pivotal role in the development of life-saving medical treatments, environmentally sustainable technologies, and revolutionary scientific theories.

Finally, technical and specialized universities, often associated with university education, are instrumental in producing highly skilled professionals in various fields. These institutions offer comprehensive programs that nurture engineers, inventors, scientists, artists, and other experts who possess a depth of knowledge and expertise that surpasses what most ordinary vocational training institutes can provide.

In conclusion, while skills and vocational training are undeniably valuable for equipping individuals with practical skills, the assertion that the government should allocate more resources to this area at the expense of university education is flawed. Universities offer a broader spectrum of benefits, including fostering critical thinking and driving innovation, which are vital for societal progress. They also create leaders, inventors, engineers and so on who contribute to the development of the nation.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 6

While some people believe that the government should allocate more subsidies for vocational education than higher education, personally, I believe these two forms of education should be equally invested.

It is understandable why some people advocate for more funding towards trades training. Firstly, such programs are more cost-effective than university education. Unlike academic studies which normally requires at least 3,5 years to complete, students choosing vocational courses can graduate after 2 years. Secondly, vocational schools can alleviate the nation's labor shortage. Higher education tends to prioritize theoretical knowledge. Some majors even place a heavy emphasis on theories rather than practical skills, which would cost businesses time and money to retrain these graduates. Trades schools, on the other hand, equip students with more specific skills for the in-demand jobs. This helps vacancies to be quickly filled, allowing smooth operations.

Despite the benefits of vocational programs, higher education also has its own merits. Firstly, tertiary education provides high-quality workforce, contributing to a developed economy. Universities produce intellectual graduates from various fields such as science, medicine, technology, and engineering. These professions can foster innovation and encourage new technologies, playing a crucial role in the development of the economy. Furthermore, thanks to high workload and requirements from academic studies, students can be equipped with necessary transferable skills such as time management, problem-solving and presentation skills. Acquiring these skills, students would become more prepared for their future careers, making them more competitive in the labor market.

In conclusion, degree programs and technical training have their own merits, which benefit both learners and the nation's economy. Therefore, I hold a belief that the government should prioritize neither, instead, resources should be equally invested.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 7

Pragmatism is a dominant tendency in today’s world, exemplified by the emphasis on training for practical work over university education. Although I do not question the importance of vocational training, I object to the notion that it is superior to university education.

Equipping the workforce with relevant skills and knowledge is definitely important and beneficial. Apparently, not everyone is capable of learning in a research-oriented environment, which is typical of university education. In fact, it would be detrimental to assume that all individuals, no matter how competent, should be given an equal opportunity to attend university. This will certainly result in the decline in the quality of higher education, illustrated by the on-going deterioration at many institutions in the US, as depicted by Tom Nichols in ‘The Death of the Expertise’. Meanwhile, a skilled worker can create tangible values for society, which is worth encouraging.

However, this does not mean that the above-mentioned emphasis is appropriate. On the contrary, negligence towards higher education would cause incredible damage to a country’s sustainability and growth. For instance, without continual research into and teaching of the basic sciences, which have recently been under attack and accused of being impractical, no foundation could be laid for further scientific and technological applications. Similarly, studies of history, literature, and philosophy are usually condemned as abstruse and therefore unnecessary, yet without them, human beings would suffer immeasurable mental poverty and are no different from mindless labor-machines.

In conclusion, as I have mentioned, just as researchers play an indispensable role in society, skilled workers are equally essential and respectable. Nevertheless, recognizing the significance of vocational training is completely different from underestimating higher education.

Nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work, rather than - mẫu 8

In response to the prompt, I strongly agree that nations should allocate more funds towards skills and vocational training for practical work. While university education is essential, it is not the only means of acquiring knowledge and skills.

Firstly, practical skills are in high demand in the workforce. Vocational training can equip individuals with the expertise to fill the gaps in the labor market rapidly. For instance, a surge in skilled laborers like electricians or plumbers can bolster a nation’s infrastructure and economy. In the same vein, vocational training can be seen as a catalyst for innovation. When technicians and craftsmen excel in their trades, it paves the way for enhanced productivity and, eventually, technological advancements.

Secondly, vocational training is more cost-effective than university education. University education is expensive, and not everyone can afford it. In contrast, vocational training is more affordable and accessible to a broader range of people. This accessibility can help reduce the skills gap in the workforce and promote social mobility.

In conclusion, nations should spend more money on skills and vocational training for practical work. By investing in vocational training, nations can equip their workforce with practical skills, promote social mobility, and foster innovation.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Many working people do not have enough free time off work to spend with their families and friends. Why? What are the effects on family life and society as a whole?

• These days, there’s no need to go to watch live performances (e.g. a show or a concert) because what we can see on TV or computer screens is better. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• The natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems?

• These days more fathers stay at home and take care of their children while mothers go out to work. What could be the reason for this? Is it a positive or negative development?

• In some countries, it is possible for people to eat a variety of food that has been transported from all over the world. Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---