Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds

Đề bài: Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 1

The protection of wild animals and birds is an important part of preserving the natural environment. However, people are divided over whether more resources than necessary have been allocated to this cause. In this debate, I am against the belief that wildlife protection has received too much attention and investment.

Some might argue that enough has already been spent safeguarding wild creatures. They claim that pursuing this goal does not immediately provide economic benefits or improve people’s welfare. Therefore, any more time or resources allocated to conservation is likely to be a waste, and it is better to divert funds to education or healthcare investments, which directly benefit humans. In addition, there is a concern that more spending than currently to protect wildlife is unwarranted. As a matter of fact, much time and resources have been expended for this purpose, but some consider the effectiveness unsatisfactory. The illegal trade of wild animal parts such as horns and gallbladder, for instance, is ongoing and difficult to put to an end.

However, I believe the wild animals and birds deserve every penny to ensure their survival. This is because protecting them from extinction involves not only preserving existing individuals, but also enabling them to procreate. In the world, fewer than 3,000 Indian Tigers are left, yet each species requires 10,000 individuals to proliferate; these creatures are, therefore, in dire need of help in terms of breeding. Furthermore, safeguarding wildlife does positively impact the economy, as evidenced by safari parks. Wild animals live safely and freely in these locations, while visitors pay to observe them as a form of ecotourism. This, consequently, produces an additional source of income for local businesses. Taking these points into consideration, it can be clearly seen that wildlife protection is a multifaceted investment.

In conclusion, the various benefits of conserving wild animals and birds prove its worth, so spending on it is hardly ever too much. For the sake of biodiversity and ecological balance, it is essential that wildlife species are not driven to extinction; time and resources are necessary to realize this goal.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 2

In recent years, the increasing allocation of resources for the protection of wild animals and birds has given rise to the question of whether or not it is justified. While some argue that these efforts are crucial for maintaining biodiversity, others believe that the resources and attention dedicated to this cause are excessive. Personally, I think that humanity has other needs that are equally worthy of funding.

The first point to consider is that the disproportionate focus on wildlife conservation often overshadows more pressing human concerns. For instance, resources allocated for the protection of a single endangered species could potentially be redirected to address urgent human needs, such as healthcare, education, or poverty alleviation. In developing countries, where resources are particularly scarce, the choice to prioritise wildlife over critical human issues can be especially problematic. For example, in some African nations, vast sums are invested in protecting certain wildlife species, while basic human necessities remain unmet for a significant portion of the population.

Furthermore, excessive focus on wildlife protection can lead to unintended negative consequences for local communities. Often, conservation efforts involve restricting access to natural resources that communities have traditionally relied upon, leading to economic hardships. In parts of Asia, for instance, the establishment of protected areas for tigers has sometimes resulted in the displacement of indigenous communities or restrictions on their access to forest resources, which are vital for their livelihoods. Not only does this create conflict between humans and wildlife, but it also raises ethical questions about the fairness of such conservation strategies.

In conclusion, while the protection of wild animals and birds is unquestionably important, striking a balance is crucial. The current overemphasis on wildlife conservation, often at the expense of addressing human needs and respecting the rights of local communities, suggests a need for rethinking. A sustainable approach should consider both environmental and human factors equally.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 3

Many today would argue that there is undue emphasis on the safeguarding of various species of wild animals and birds. In my opinion, though there are legitimate practical objections, it is a positive overall given the potential impact of abandoning such efforts.

Opponents of current conservation initiatives argue they are an unnecessary waste of valuable resources. The natural development of ecosystems involves animals going extinct and fighting for survival. Human intervention can therefore be seen as unnatural to a certain degree as animals that adapt will flourish and others will become obsolete. Added to this is the economic burden. The majority of endangered animals are in developing nations in Africa, Southeast Asia, and South America. National governments in these countries have a variety of other concerns related to healthcare, education, employment, and so on that take precedence over animal populations.

However, humans should protect animals as their disappearance is irreversible. The issue of responsibility is not, to my mind, a compelling enough argument as blame can be assigned in a number of directions and is too self-righteous to be persuasive. Instead, it can be argued that permanent damage to the Earth will impact future generations. The Earth depends on biodiversity not only for the development of new medicines and the functioning of a healthy food chain but also in order to showcase its varied expressions of life. As the only known home to life in the universe, it would be short-sighted to eliminate species of animals and damage this reputation.

In conclusion, despite the financial cost, it is essential to protect wild animals which may go extinct. Governments must sometimes prioritize the future over short-term considerations

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 4

Some people argue that protecting wild animals and birds is a waste of time and money. I completely disagree with this point of view.

Many current practices involving the use of animals illustrate that governments have not invested enough time in the issue of animal welfare. For example, lawmakers have banned the use of wild and exotic animals for entertainment purposes, yet wild animals are still kept in captivity for circuses. This inconsistency between law-making and law enforcement suggests that the issue is not being taken seriously enough by those in power. Furthermore, it seems that an educational approach is unlikely to change people’s awareness about the issue. For many years, people have underestimated the role of wild animals, and many today still hold a belief that wild animal products have exceptional powers. To re-educate such people requires patience and consistency.

In addition to this, resources spent on wildlife protection are still limited. Many authorities believe that wild animal and bird conservation is only of minor importance, and human welfare is far more of a priority. This is why governments are not willing to allocate large amounts of funds and resources to the conservation of wild animals, which makes it difficult for organisations that are actually trying to make a difference. For instance, in Vietnam, we do not see any long-lasting bird conservation campaigns due to a lack of funding from the government, and it is non-governmental organizations that currently raise the funds to take care of existing wild birds.

In conclusion, while there is some time and resources spent on wild animal and bird protection, I believe that far more resources are needed to achieve that ultimate goal.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 5

The allocation of attention and resources to the protection of wild animals has become a contentious issue. While some argue that excessive efforts are being directed towards wildlife conservation, others believe that such measures are necessary. This essay will discuss both perspectives and present my own opinion.

Critics of intensive wildlife conservation efforts argue that the resources could be better utilized to address more immediate human concerns. They contend that issues such as poverty, healthcare, and education should take precedence. For instance, in Vietnam, where rural areas still suffer from a lack of basic amenities, diverting funds to wildlife protection might seem unjustifiable. These critics believe that if resources were reallocated to human development, the overall well-being of society could be significantly improved. Furthermore, they argue that natural selection and evolution should take their course without human interference, allowing ecosystems to balance themselves naturally.

However, I believe that the protection of wild animals is of paramount importance and should not be diminished. Biodiversity plays a crucial role in maintaining ecological balance, which directly impacts human survival. For example, in Vietnam, the preservation of forests and their wildlife helps regulate the climate, prevent soil erosion, and maintain water cycles. If these ecosystems were to collapse due to neglect, the consequences for human populations would be dire. Additionally, many species are endangered due to human activities such as deforestation, poaching, and pollution. It is, therefore, our responsibility to mitigate these impacts and preserve wildlife for future generations. Conservation efforts can also drive eco-tourism, providing economic benefits and raising awareness about the importance of biodiversity.

In conclusion, while it is essential to address human development issues, I firmly believe that the protection of wild animals should not be compromised. Biodiversity is integral to the health of our planet and our own well-being. A balanced approach, where resources are allocated to both human and wildlife needs, would be the most prudent strategy. By ensuring the protection of wild animals, we safeguard the intricate web of life that sustains us all.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 6

In recent years, the debate surrounding the allocation of resources and attention to the protection of wild animals and birds has intensified. While some argue that too much focus is given to this issue, I firmly believe that the preservation of wildlife is of paramount importance and deserves the resources and attention it receives.

Firstly, the conservation of wild animals and birds is essential to maintaining the delicate balance of ecosystems. Each species plays a unique role in their habitats, and the loss of these species can have far-reaching consequences, including the collapse of entire ecosystems. For example, the disappearance of a single predator can lead to an overpopulation of prey species, which in turn can damage plant life and disrupt the ecological balance. Therefore, allocating sufficient resources to protect these species contributes to the overall health of the environment and the planet.

Secondly, preserving wildlife has significant economic benefits. Ecotourism, which revolves around the appreciation and exploration of nature and wildlife, is a rapidly growing industry. Many countries rely on this sector to generate revenue and create jobs, making it essential to protect and conserve wildlife populations. Without allocating adequate resources and attention to the conservation of wild animals and birds, these economic opportunities could be lost, leading to negative consequences for local communities.

Finally, wild animals and birds serve as vital resources for scientific research and medical advancements. Many species possess unique traits and abilities that can help researchers develop new treatments and therapies for various diseases. For instance, the venom of certain snakes has been used to develop life-saving medications, while the study of migratory birds has led to a better understanding of navigation and climate change. Therefore, protecting wildlife is an investment in the future of human knowledge and well-being.

In conclusion, I disagree with the notion that too much attention and resources are dedicated to the protection of wild animals and birds. I wholeheartedly believe that investment should be given to this cause for the benefit of all. 

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 7

In recent decades, an unprecedented global increase in awareness of wildlife preservation has been recorded. There are those who are concerned that too much attention and allocation has been spent on this. This essay strongly disagrees with the statement and will elaborate on the evidence and give relevant examples.

It is undeniable that wildlife has economically benefited humans for centuries. First and foremost, agricultural production activities greatly rely on wildlife. To be more specific, without the intervention of wild animals, farming processes would deteriorate. This is because a great deal of wild species, such as bees, worms and several types of birds, play pivotal roles in the ecosystem which includes crops that are planted by farmers. Therefore, more resources should be aided in maintaining the biodiversity of the ecosystem, and the word ought to be spread to raise awareness amongst the community. Furthermore, protecting wild animals also means prosperity for the tourism market. Some species are exclusively indigenous to certain lands and require tourists to travel in order to see them. To illustrate, kangaroos are a local species of Australia, and they have assisted the country’s economic growth significantly just by attracting international travelers. As a result, more resources should be subsidized to wildlife conservation as an investment for long-term benefits.

In spite of all the advantages wildlife preservation offers, some still argue that wild animals do not deserve that much concern. They claim that a portion of the fund for protecting wildlife should be invested in other fields such as scientific research and healthcare. However, such thinking is only valid to a limited extent, because what this argument fails to consider is the devastating result of an unbalanced and damaged ecosystem. Take bees as an example, they pollinate flowers in the process of producing honey, thus helping plants grow and ensure the continuity of many other species, therefore without which the ecosystem will be completely devastated. Considering the current situation in the world, environmental habitats are being destroyed at an alarming rate despite the considerable effort that was put into conserving the environment. This implies that even more resources and effort must be put into protecting wild animals and habitats.

To conclude, wildlife is continuously being degraded globally, and more measures must be conducted to alleviate the damage and assist recovery. Any act of funding or propagating to raise international awareness should be appreciated.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 8

There is a prevailing debate on whether wildlife protection is a significant concern given the rapid advancement of human activities. I totally disagree with the notion that protecting wild animals and birds is of minor importance.

Firstly, human activities severely impact wildlife. The natural habitats of many animals and birds are increasingly encroached upon for poaching, exploitation of resources, and illegal settlements. This intrusion leads to habitat destruction and puts wildlife at significant risk. For example, the Amur leopard, native to Russia and China, suffers from habitat loss and poaching due to logging, development, and illegal hunting. This has reduced its population to around 84 adults, threatening ecosystems and biodiversity. Conservation efforts, such as protected areas, anti-poaching patrols, and community outreach, emphasize the critical need to preserve wildlife and habitats for future generations.

Secondly, the resources dedicated to wildlife protection remain limited. Many believe that human welfare takes precedence over animal conservation, leading governments to prioritize funding towards human-related issues. Consequently, wildlife protection receives minimal financial support, hindering the efforts of organizations striving to make a difference. In Vietnam, for instance, there are no long-lasting bird conservation campaigns due to insufficient government funding. Non-governmental organizations must raise funds to care for existing wild birds, showcasing the financial challenges faced in wildlife conservation.

In conclusion, the detrimental impact of human activities on wildlife and the insufficient resources allocated for their protection highlight the importance of prioritizing conservation efforts. Ignoring these issues would lead to irreversible damage to biodiversity and ecosystems.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 9

The protection of wildlife has become a frequent subject of debate with strong arguments for and against. Personally, I believe that humans are paying too much attention and allocating too many resources to this issue, as will now be explained.

Firstly, if we allow any species to disappear, this is actually not a disaster. Some people may argue that biology will be seriously affected if birds and wild animals are on the verge of extinction, but this is an exaggeration. Fossil evidence suggests that the mass disappearance of the dinosaur did not cause any harm to other species on the Earth but merely triggered the emergence of others such as the mammal. Therefore, we should not devote too much attention to the protection of wildlife.

Secondly, public money is limited. This means that the national budget should be allocated to more urgent issues rather than expanding too much in the conservation of wild animals and birds. For example, more resources should be diverted to medical research to find out remedies for fatal diseases such as HIV and cancer, which may help to save thousands of lives in society.

Finally, the government can simply protect wildlife by continuing campaigns to raise public awareness of the protection of wildlife habitats or impose stricter punishments on activities that may harm wild animals. Any individual who hunts wildlife for food or for pleasure should be given a heavy fine, and this may discourage them from threatening the life of wild animals. In conclusion, while I do not refute the argument for the conservation of wildlife, I believe that it should attract less attention and fewer resources from the public.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 10

Many people suppose that we are devoting too much attention and resources to protecting wild animals and birds. So, are we truly expending too much attention and too many resources as they have claimed? I would say no. In this essay, I will explain why I disagree with this view and present some arguments and examples to support my opinion.

On the one hand, it can be argued that we are not paying enough attention to wildlife conservation. There is a significant bias in the allocation of funding and assistance for different species, depending on their popularity, size, or attractiveness. For example, tigers, elephants, and lions receive more direct support than reptiles, amphibians, insects, and corals. Similarly, among mammals, big carnivores and primates are favored over small rodents and bats. Even pollinators like butterflies and bees are given more help than beetles and flies. Furthermore, richer countries tend to fund their own endemic species over other countries’ endemics. However, most of the world’s species, especially endangered ones, are found in the tropics, which are poorer than the temperate regions. Moreover, wildlife conservation is often seen as a charitable cause rather than an essential part of caring for the planet.

On the other hand, we are actually harming wildlife rather than protecting it. We often claim to support the preservation of animals, but we do not act accordingly. For instance, we advocate for the protection of polar bears, rhinoceroses, etc. but we still consume plastic goods, fur coats, leather boots and bags, etc. Additionally, we engage in many activities that destroy wildlife habitats. We deforest land for wood fuel, paper, and other products. We displace wild animals by expanding our urban and industrial areas. We emit greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels and this causes global warming, which affects the climate and weather patterns.

In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the idea that we are spending too much attention and resources on protecting wildlife animals. I have shown that we are not paying enough attention to many species that need our help, and that we are actually doing more damage than good to wildlife with our actions. Therefore, I believe that we should increase our efforts and awareness to conserve wildlife for the benefit of ourselves and future generations.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 11

Our ecosystem depends on the harmony between each living species on the earth. Some argue that until now, we have spent a lot of money and attention on the conservation of wild animals and birds. However, I completely disagree with the above-mentioned statement, and in the upcoming paragraphs, I will highlight the reasons for my disagreement.

From the current standpoint, we believe that the earth is the only planet where life exists, and each and every animal, plant, insect or bird has their own role in maintaining the ecosystem on earth. Nevertheless, human activities have disturbed this balance for a few centuries. In order to expand, humans have destroyed many forests, which were natural habitats for a plethora of wild animals and birds. Because of our activities, the place of natural forest is taken up by the concrete jungles we build without thinking about this outcome. To elaborate, many animals are on the verge of extinction because of the removal of their habitats, such as koalas, Asian tigers and many more. This also affects the food chain of other animals because they depend on each other. Hence, it is necessary to protect wild animals and birds to save the earth, and we have to spend resources for it because we are the ones who are responsible for this situation.

Furthermore, people believe that we have been protecting them by creating zoos and wildlife for centuries. Still, individuals do not understand that the zoo’s environment can never be compared to the natural habitats. Many zoos’ animals live in climate conditions that are not comfortable for them. For instance, bears require cold weather and large open areas, but in the zoo, they live in a hot environment and a small cage just to entertain humans. Moreover, when individuals visit wildlife centuries, they pollute these centuries and throw plastic and litter here and there. These all things affect the breeding of animals too. So, ultimately zoos serve the purpose of entertaining humans and not protecting animals.

The people who believe that we are spending too much on the protection of them do not understand the importance of animals and birds in maintaining the ecosystem. They are not able to see the future threats that their extinction can lead to. Such people believe that we should spend more money on healthcare, education and space exploration instead of protecting animals, but they forget that we can not survive without animals. To illustrate, for healthcare research, we require animals. Some medicines are made from animal products and many more.

To conclude, wild animals and birds are also as important as other animals for maintaining the ecosystem and human activities threaten such animals. Therefore, it is our responsibility to save them in order to protect our earth. So, we should definitely give more attention to them before it is too late for all on earth, isn’t it?

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 12

Some individuals believe that too much attention and exorbitant finances have been utilized towards the protection of wildlife across the world. I disagree with this notion to a great extent.

To begin with, the reason why I believe animals need protection is that it is important to keep biodiversity. As an explanation, every species has its own role in the food chain; therefore, if one species of animal disappears, probably the other will also become extinct. For example, if we take a food chain, frogs use flies as their food, but frogs are snakes’ food. If flies disappear, the frog will disappear; therefore, it is significant to preserve biodiversity. Furthermore, today humans intervene and manipulate nature exceedingly more than ever. That’s why many animals have vanished or lost their inhabitants. Therefore, wildlife protection is important.

To continue, another reason for my disagreement is because of irrational human activity. It’s crystal and clear that the world is advancing before, and this naturally has a huge impact on the environment pollution, and over-exploitation of natural resources are just a few on this list; therefore, humans are responsible for the protection of wildlife. For instance, the Australian government uses huge amounts of money to protect forests because they exploit almost half of their wildlife. On the contrary, when spending a huge amount to ensure wild animal safety, the remaining sector may be underdeveloped.

To conclude, some peoples claim that too much focus and resources have been spent to protect wild animals may cause a decrease in another section; however, I disagree with this notion to a great extent because animals should be protected because there is part of biodiversity, and it is humans responsible for protecting them.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 13

It is commonly witnessed that too much emphasis is placed on allocation of attention and resources towards the preservation of wild animals and birds. I firmly believe that these efforts are essential for preserving ecological balance, promoting biodiversity, and safeguarding the health of the planet.

First and foremost, wildlife upholds the intricate harmony of ecosystems. To explain, every single species, regardless of its size, is a crucial part of the environment. For instance, bees are tiny creatures, but they help in pollinating crops and ensuring agricultural success. Meanwhile, predators play a significant role in regulating prey populations, thus preventing overpopulation. Therefore, failure to safeguard these species could result in disruptions in ecosystems and jeopardizing the invaluable services they offer.

Secondly, ecosystems rich in diversity possess a higher ability to adapt to various changes, including climate shifts, diseases, and invasive species. Ultimately, prioritizing the safeguarding of wild animals and birds increases the longevity and robustness of the environment. Furthermore, the vast array of wild species holds an inherent worth, as well as a special place of importance in various cultures. Apart from this, the presence of rich and thriving wildlife is crucial for ecotourism, a key source of revenue for local societies and an important means of protecting these diverse creatures.

However, it is important to recognize the importance of finding a balance in resource allocation. To explain, while preserving wildlife is undoubtedly critical, other urgent matters, such as poverty alleviation, healthcare improvement, and education access should also be addressed. Achieving equilibrium among these priorities is crucial in promoting sustainable development.

In conclusion, it is clear that the allocation of attention and resources towards safeguarding wild animals and birds is not only necessary, but also justifiable as by doing so, a healthy ecological balance and biodiversity is promoted.

Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds - mẫu 14

It is argued that protecting wild animals and birds is drawing/attracting too much concern and too many resources of society. Personally, I totally agree with this point of view.

There are two main reasons why I think people have paid too much attention to the protection of animals. One reason is that many non-governmental organizations have been established in order to protect animals all over the world. However, they are too concerned about animal-related activities in many parts of the world. For example, it is unreasonable PETA, an animal-protecting organization, accused Katy Perry of using tigers and elephants in her music video “Road” for commercial purposes while she did not. Furthermore, news about the wild can be shared rapidly on the Internet. If a bear is imprisoned somewhere, this news will be widespread on social networks such as Facebook on a large scale immediately.

In addition, people have also spent too many resources protecting wild birds. Firstly, a great deal of money is required to carry out any project to protect wild birds, in which infrastructure and research are the two most expensive. The more difficult research to preserve the DNA of wilds is, the more it costs. Secondly, the expenditure for this protection is quite unnecessary to some extent. While funds should be raised to improve the living standards in some regions, investment in bird protection appears to be a waste of money.

In conclusion, it seems to me that both concern and resources are focused too much on the protection of wild animals and birds in this modern world.

It has long been considered that protecting wildlife is the responsibility shared by all humans. There are some people, however, who argue that this topic is being given too much attention and that the resources allocated to wildlife protection are much higher than they should be. While I agree that we are making great efforts to ensure the safety of wild animals, I do not believe that these efforts are being misplaced.

One of the reasons why we are not wasting our money, time or other resources on these tasks is that the results of our endeavors are still largely inadequate. Each year, the number of extinct animals still rises, and there are still poachers and consumers of animal products who are untouched by the laws. Clearly, the fact that we have not finished the task of protecting the animals of our planets suggests that more, not less, effort and attention should be given to this.

Secondly, the protection of wile species of animals or birds can benefit us in many ways; therefore, it should not be considered a waste of our investment. For example, the Chinese’s successful breeding program of giant pandas have not only managed to save these animals from the brink of extinction, but also generated great amounts of revenue from tourism activities to their pandas’ zoos. Similarly, reservation areas in Africa, the original purpose of which was to help protect wild animals such as lions or giraffes, also welcomes flocks of tourists every year. It appears that by spending and focusing on protecting animals, we are also encouraging tourism and earning ourselves profits much greater than our initial investment.

In short, I am skeptical of the idea that we are spending too much on wild animals’ and birds’ protection. On the contrary, as the arguments above have pointed out, we should invest even more in ensuring the safety of Earth’s biodiversity. Only by doing so can we both fulfill our responsibility with other animals, while still benefiting ourselves greatly.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?

• Nowadays, many families have both parents working. Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children, while others think childcare centers provide the best care. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

• Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion

• Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs. What problems does this cause? What are some possible solutions?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---