Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems

Đề bài: Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems - mẫu 1

From the perspective of some people, aid agencies can take advantage of celebrities’ fame to raise public awareness of certain important matters. Others, however, hold the view that such a method may only bring counterproductive results. I find the latter argument more convincing.

Those who support the idea of using famed individuals’ assistance have their own justifications. First of all, people who are considered role models have considerable influence on the public. Emma Watson, for instance, being a prominent actress, is currently the goodwill ambassador for the United Nations, promoting gender equality and undoubtedly drawing a great deal of attention from her admirers. Furthermore, a wider range of population can be reached if an organisation’s campaign is represented by a popular star. In many parts of the world, some film stars are even more well-known to the locals than the organisation itself owing to their appearance in familiar cinematic products. Therefore, the introduction of a humanitarian campaign can be further facilitated thanks to the artists.

Nevertheless, I can understand why other people are against inviting celebrities for assistance. When relying on the fame of some people to attract more public attention, an aid programme can also be affected by their scandals. Mass public disapproval may arise from a representative receiving a speeding ticket, or getting caught using illegal drugs, undervaluing the significance of the aid programme. Another foreseeable drawback is that the public might take the presence of famous entertainers as a mere publicity stunt. Without evidence of real actions taken to mitigate a problem, such as participating in a voluntary team to help the people in need, famous people may fail to draw the attention of people to the situation.

In conclusion, while some people have reasons to believe in the success of celebrities in getting people to pay attention, I tend to think that such an approach might not prove to be effective for aid organisations as expected.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems - mẫu 2

There has been much debate regarding the role of famous people in raising public awareness of major issues. While celebrities can attract people’s attention to the problems, I would argue that they are likely to make the problems become less crucial.

To begin with, well-known people can assist international aid organisations in raising people’s awareness of social issues. Firstly, celebrities can communicate information about big problems to a large audience around the world. For example, by taking part in the Ice Bucket Challenge in 2014, various celebrities such as Bill Gates or Mark Zuckerberg have helped the ALS Organisation to let millions of people know about a disease called ALS. Secondly, since people tend to listen to the ones they admire, famous people are much more likely to be able to ask their fans to take appropriate action. For instance, a well-known football player can ask people to donate money to help homeless individuals.

However, I believe famous people might make the problems become less important. The first reason is that individuals tend to only pay attention to what celebrities do and say rather than what messages they want to convey. In the aforementioned example about the Ice Bucket Challenge, many people watched videos of celebrities taking up the challenge without actually learning anything about the ALS disease. This makes little contribution to solving the problem compared to the large number of famous people involved. Furthermore, in order to attract viewers, well-known people usually try to deliver their messages in a funny and entertaining way, which might lead to the problems becoming less serious.

In conclusion, while celebrities can contribute greatly to tackling social problems, I believe they are more likely to make these problems seem less important.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems - mẫu 3

It is thought that the support given by prominent people to international charity organizations makes the problems known, however, many believe that those people simply overshadow the issues. In my opinion, I believe the problems will certainly be given more importance when those people publicize their humanitarian work with the organizations.

To begin with, public figures' support of international aid organizations raises people's awareness about the problems, and I agree with that. Those famous people can easily educate or influence the public since they have a platform where they can easily disseminate information about world issues that common people are not aware of. For example, the Hollywood actress and UNHCR ambassador, Angelina Jolie, has traveled the world to spread awareness about the conditions of refugees from different parts of the world. As a spokesperson of the organization, she has educated millions of people about the struggles of refugees and informed the public on how they can help. As a result, more people have become aware and concerned about the problem which has led them to give donations to the organization as well.

On the other hand, it is often believed that the problems are not given more value when famous people show their support to those organizations. This is simply because the public is more interested in the celebrities themselves than the work that they do with the organization. In other words, when they go to the public and talk about world problems, some people do not care about their advocacy because they are simply fixated on the fact that they are watching a celebrity in person. In addition, the media usually highlights the celebrities' persona rather than the problems that they are working with the organization because it is more appealing to their audiences. Therefore, all these things make those main problems trivial.

To conclude, despite people having different opinions, I think the problems will be highlighted and supported even more when the help of famous people towards international organizations is made public.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems - mẫu 4

To raise public perception on social issues such as poverty reduction, plagues, international organizations often borrow celebrities’ power as a key tool. However, there is a fact that global campaigns are likely to be neglected or even boycotted due to illegible public figures. In my opinion, celebrity-driven international aid might significantly change community awareness, providing that both associations and artists get on with each other.

The main reason that organizations repose trust in famous people is due to their far-reaching influence. They are paid attention by not only international but also mass media all over the world; stories on the plight of the poor or devastating consequences of plagues might therefore make the headlines. Thanks to celebrity involvement, the public will mutually help the needy and patients by fund raising as well as other contributions. For example, Lady Gaga and her supporters donated a large amount of money for an anti-cancer movement in a very short time which most ordinary people find impossible because they are not as influential as superstars.

However, not every famous person is worth an icomnic figure. Some artists lead an unhealthy lifestyle such as sexual scandals, fraud indictment and thus worsen community campaigns that they participate in. Take, for instance, Lindsay Lohan, who is notorious for uncontrolled behaviors. What if organizations present her in movements for children’s rights? The very high possibility is that the public has a bad impression on what organizations impart to them. As a result, she is likely to be criticized severely, and this activity might also be unable to attract further attention.

In conclusion, the importance of public figures in international aid is undeniable. However, to ensure that movements are on track, associations had better consider whether celebrities’ record is clear enough to perform the role of a representative.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems - mẫu 5

In recent years, many global aid agencies have used celebrities to excite attention to important issues, and many people think that it is quite effective. Others opine that the involvement of such famous personalities actually downplays the problems. I believe that despite their face value, celebrities often denigrate the severity of social, environmental and humanitarian problems despite their good intentions.

No doubt, well-known people’s endorsement is an effective strategy that can gain momentum in attempts to raise public awareness of pressing problems. They argue that famous persons are distinguished by their unique personality traits and success to engage and attract diverse audiences ranging from the media and fan base to philanthropists and political elites. A case in point is Princess Diana; she helped place a Red Cross campaign to ban landmines in the international spotlight. Diana, perhaps the most celebrated woman in the world back then, visited Angola, and dared to enter a live minefield, met amputees, and compelled unprecedented worldwide attention for banning minefield. This was quite effective.

However, it is also true that celebrated persons can often undermine the severity of an issue as their approach to humanitarian purposes is likely to cause more of an ego response than a profound moral response. To put it another way, such celebrity activism can never work effectively because media and mass people often pay more attention to the persons than to the issues they supposedly represent. Take Angelina Jolie for example. Last year, when she participated in an anti-corruption campaign, the media ran more stories about her personality, private life and lifestyle than the original issue. On top of that, it sometimes depoliticizes the issue. For instance, complex social issues like women empowerment, in women’s magazines particularly, are depoliticized by the individualistic narratives of the empowered famous white women.

In conclusion, it is a fact that celebraties make problems seem less serious as they bring rapt attention to their personalities and lifestyles. Therefore, global aid groups should carefully engage renowned people to grab attention to the issues about which people are indifferent.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems - mẫu 6

In today's interconnected world, the disparity between wealthy and impoverished nations has become more pronounced. To bridge this gap, international aid organizations often leverage celebrity endorsements to attract public attention. This approach has sparked a debate on whether celebrities enhance or trivialize the significance of the issues at hand.

On the positive side, the involvement of celebrities can greatly benefit international aid organizations. Due to their widespread recognition, celebrities can effortlessly draw public attention to critical issues. This heightened awareness often translates to increased donations and support for various causes. Celebrities also lend their social credibility and positive public image to these organizations, thereby enhancing their reputation and trustworthiness. Moreover, when people see their favorite celebrities advocating for a cause, they are more likely to follow suit, bringing about a widespread change in societal attitudes and actions.

However, there are negative aspects to using celebrities in such campaigns. One primary concern is that the presence of celebrities might make the organizations appear less serious and professional. The glamorous and often entertainment-focused image of celebrities can clash with the gravity of the issues that aid organizations aim to address. This could lead the public to perceive these initiatives as superficial or insubstantial. Furthermore, there is the risk that people might focus solely on the celebrities themselves rather than the underlying problems these organizations are striving to solve.

In conclusion, both perspectives offer valid points, but the advantages of using celebrities seem to outweigh the drawbacks. The primary objective of aid organizations is to garner public attention and support, and celebrities are exceptionally effective in achieving this goal. When utilized correctly, celebrity endorsements can significantly advance the mission of these organizations.

Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems - mẫu 7

Today, it is not rare to see celebrities actively take part in philanthropy activities, giving rise to the term “celebrity humanitarians”. While some people advocate that this development will help raise public awareness regarding the issue, others believe celebrities instead make the problem less important than it ought to be. I will discuss both views and then state my opinion.

On the one hand, some people believe celebrities dilute the importance of the problems. There have been many cases where the involvement of a celebrity only serves as tabloid materials rather than educates the public about the issue, especially when the celebrities’ main motive is to promote their name. For example, a model once published a series of her nude photos, citing her opposition to the illegal poaching of animals in Africa as the main motive, but never mentioned anything about how serious the issue of illegal poaching was in following interviews.

On the other hand, it is undeniable that celebrities are ideal candidates to alert the masses to the pressing issues, if for no other reason than their unparalleled diverse audiences. The large fan base of famous people is very likely to support the good cause that their idol endorses. In addition, celebrities can gather huge media coverage, and as a result, even people who are not their fans can be aware of the problem. Such attention-catching ability is very important to spread the message about international aid needed.

Having evaluated both sides of the argument, my conclusion is that the charity organizations can harness the celebrities’ star power, at the same time combat the afore mentioned problem by choosing their spoke person wisely, so that the ambassador sincerely has the best interests of the troubled people or animals at heart, and not to divert public attention to himself.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has had a negative effect on young people's reading and writing skills. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs. What problems does this cause? What are some possible solutions?

• Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Others, however, believe technology is the way to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

• Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

• Nowadays, more and more people decide to have children later in their life. What are the reasons? What are the effects on society and family life?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---