Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 1

Some people believe that countries should produce their own food for their citizens and reduce the amount of food that is imported. Personally, I totally agree with this point of view.

There are several reasons why a country should produce its own food for its population, one of which is the creation of more jobs. When the demand for domestically produced food grows within a country, there will be more job opportunities available for local people in farming and food processing industries, leading to a reduction in unemployment rates. Secondly, it may be easier to control food quality when it is produced domestically, as authorities can easily monitor farms and food processing plants, in order to maintain safe, hygienic food standards.

Additionally, food imports should be reduced due to a number of reasons. Firstly, putting barriers on importing food can help to boost a country’s economy by eliminating the competition that local companies face with foreign products, allowing them to be more profitable and contribute to the national economy. Furthermore, food importation can have negative environmental impacts due to the large amounts of carbon emissions released from the transportation of products all around the world via planes, trucks, and ships. By reducing food imports, countries can play their part in helping to protect the environment, rather than contributing to environmental issues such as climate change.

In conclusion, I believe that each country should invest in the development of its agricultural industry to provide food for the population itself and import as little as possible.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 2

There are some who believe that countries should be self-sufficient in terms of their food production. This essay disagrees with such a suggestion, due to the potential benefits that food trade brings to all parties involved. These benefits, including effective allocation of resources, improved political atmosphere, and cultural appreciation, will be analysed below.

Food trade maximizes the effective allocation of resources, as it encourages specialization of production. Due to different resource endowments, each country is effective at producing different food items. If they can import, nations can focus on producing their most efficient goods, then trade excess items with other countries. Otherwise, nations would need to reallocate resources to produce what they are not efficient at, driving up the costs of production and causing their citizens to suffer from inflated food prices. An example of this situation is the Common Agricultural Policy used by the European Union, which subsidizes European farmers’ food production. If the EU had imported food from more efficient foreign farmers, the subsidy money could be used elsewhere or saved, while food prices are still manageable.

In addition, foreign trade creates interdependence between parties involved. As national leaders must take into consideration the impact of political decisions on food trade and commerce, they are less likely to turn to hostile acts that might provoke animosity and lead to war. Thus, this improves the global political atmosphere. Moreover, speaking from consumers’ perspective, food trade brings about more diversity and appreciation for other cultures in terms of their cuisine. An example of this is the popularity of sushi and other Japanese rolls in Western countries, giving rise to the Californian roll – a unique food combination that symbolizes the unique, global world we live in today.

To reiterate, countries should not attempt to produce all food for their entire population, as trade plays an important role in promoting effective resources allocation, global peace, and cultural appreciation.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 3

The question of whether or not states should be self-sufficient in food production has long been the centre of intense debate, with some believing that countries should produce all foodstuff themselves. Personally, I do not believe states could and should be self-sufficient, since although this can have some positive economic effect e.g. a positive trade balance, it can also bring with it the instability of famines.

Firstly, a country producing its own food has the benefit of reducing the amount it spends on imports, which has a positive effect economically in the long term. This is a huge consideration in nation-states that are still importing more than they are exporting, for money is technically flowing out of the country. This is why countries such as the USA, despite being the most powerful country in the world economically, still rely on a strong agricultural industry in order to keep their trade balance.

On the other hand, food self-production can often lead to famines, for weather conditions can make or break a harvest. In the past, when countries grew their own crops and international trade was far lower, famines were much more frequent as there was more risk involved: a season of bad weather would mean a famine that could last year-round. Importing food from a variety of countries would minimize the risk incurred by fluctuating weather patterns, since risks to crops are more geographically spread out.

Overall, I argue that though there are economic benefits to having a country making its own food, the nature of the modern globalized economy means that in the long run, countries might find it much more beneficial to import their food from overseas.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 4

Ensuring food adequacy for the entire population has been a major concern for nations throughout the centuries. Some people believe that the government should focus on producing all kinds of food while importing as little as possible to ensure food sufficiency. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of food is an inevitable effort in terms of ensuring the nation’s food security.

Firstly, the more a country relies on imported food, the more food crises it faces. Food import includes transportation costs, taxation and other charges that eventually increase the food price. To tackle this problem, a government should allocate more budgets to improve national production by maximising the collaboration of research centres with farmers. Related university courses and diploma programmes can create more talented individuals who would be involved in domestic food production. Furthermore, by mass production of all kinds of food items, a country can prepare for the rainy days.

Secondly, by focusing on farming, irrigation and planting, a government can decrease unemployment problems. For example, in Indonesia, the farming sector creates the highest percentage of jobs. More than 50 per cent of Indonesians are directly or indirectly depends on the agriculture sector.

Finally, imported food does not have the same quality and freshness as locally produced food and crops. If food is imported from a long distance, the food value degrades and, in some cases, toxic chemicals are used to preserve the imported food. Thus, the local production of foods would ensure better food quality and sound health of citizens.

In conclusion, preventing the food crisis, ensuring better food quality and decreasing unemployment could be achieved if a country becomes self-sufficient in its food production. It is expected that countries would emphasize their domestic food production as it gives many competitive advantages over importing.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 5

Every country wants to reduce its dependency on imports while maximising its exports including items such as food and crops. However, not all countries have the same geographic location, weather condition, technology and suitable lands to produce each type of crop the citizens need. This is why a country should focus more on its overall economic growth rather than using manpower and budget to become self-reliant on food.

To commence with, soil, weather condition, available lands, technology and demographics of a county determine what crops, vegetables and fruits it can produce. Not all countries have the same geographical features and manpower, and thus, it is obvious that the country needs to import some of the items. In many cases, this is more advantageous than producing or growing crops and then harvesting the grains. For instance, it is impossible for an Arab country to produce all types of foods due to its weather condition. If they focus on growing these food items and engage their manpower to do that, their economic growth would be hindered.

Moreover, a country like Germany and China can focus on manufacturing and industrial innovation while import food from other countries. The ultimate outcome is more beneficial for them. However, this might not be the case for a country that solely depends on the agriculture sector and where a majority of its population is already dependant on it. They can focus on improving their productions, but this model is not suitable for industrial countries.

To conclude, I believe that free trade and globalisation have made the world a global village. And with the speedy transportation system, food import costs have already declined. Since fulfilling the mass people's diverse needs for various kinds of food is not feasible for a country, it should focus on its true potential rather than allocating budget and manpower to become self-dependent on food.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 6

Ensuring adequate food for the whole population was a significant concern for nations throughout the centuries. Many people believe that the government should concentrate on producing all kinds of food while minding as little as possible to ensure all taxpayers’ buying capacities. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of food is an inevitable effort concerning ensuring the country’s food safety.

Firstly, the greater a country depends on imported food, the greater the food crisis it faces. Food import includes transportation costs, taxation and other fees that eventually increase the food price. To handle this issue, a government should allocate more funds to improve national production by assessing faculty and research lab alliance. Therefore, this idea may produce more gifted people who would participate in domestic food production. Furthermore, by mass production of all types of food items, a nation can prepare for its rainy times.

Secondly, by focusing on farming, planting and irrigation, a government can reduce unemployment problems. Greater than 50 percent of Indonesian are directly or indirectly is dependent on the agriculture industry.

Lastly, imported food does not have the quality and freshness that locally produced one can offer. If food is imported from a long distance, the food worth degrades, and in some cases, toxic chemicals are used to preserve the food. Thus, the local manufacturing of meals would ensure better food quality and solid health of taxpayers.

In summary, preventing the food crisis, ensuring greater food quality, and decreasing unemployment problems could execute if a nation becomes self-explanatory in their food production. Massively producing all sorts of foods is a great effort that the government could pick and take advantage of.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 7

Every nation wants to decrease its dependence on importing while wishing to increase its export things, and food is not an exception. However, not all nations have identical geographical characteristics, weather conditions and appropriate lands to create every kind of food the taxpayers want. That is why a nation should concentrate more on its general financial expansion than using budget and workforce to turn into self-reliant food, despite a few people’s contradictory views.

To start with, dirt, climate condition, accessible demographics and lands of a county decides what fruits and crops it can create. Not all nations have the exact geographical attribute and workforce, so many things inevitably require importing. Frequently, importing is quite beneficial compared to generating it. For example, an Arab state cannot create all kinds of meals because of its weather illness. Should they concentrate on growing those food items and participating in their human resources to do so, their economic development would diminish.

Furthermore, a nation like Germany and China can concentrate on the industrial and manufacturing invention during import food from different nations. The best result is much more valuable for them. Nevertheless, this may not be the situation for a nation that solely depends upon the agriculture industry, and the vast majority of its inhabitants are already dependant on it. They can concentrate on enhancing its creation, but this version is not appropriate for industrial nations.

Since fulfilling the bulk of people’s varied needs for several types of meals is impossible for a nation, it must concentrate on its true capacity instead of devoting funding and workforce to turn into self-dependent on meals.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 8

Many people suggest that a country should prioritize self-sufficiency in food production and minimize its reliance on imported food. I am inclined to agree with this perspective. This essay will explore the reasons behind this viewpoint and provide examples to support the argument.

Firstly, achieving self-sufficiency in food production enhances a country’s food security. By relying on domestic production, a nation can ensure a stable and consistent food supply for its population, reducing vulnerability to external factors such as trade disruptions, price fluctuations, or geopolitical tensions. For instance, countries like Japan and South Korea, with limited arable land and a high population density, have prioritized self-sufficiency to safeguard against potential food shortages and maintain a reliable food system.

Moreover, promoting domestic food production stimulates the growth of the agricultural sector and supports rural economies. When a country invests in agricultural infrastructure, technology, and training, it creates employment opportunities and income sources for farmers and agricultural workers. This, in turn, fosters economic development and reduces rural-urban migration. For example, countries like the Netherlands and Denmark have implemented advanced agricultural practices and achieved high levels of self-sufficiency, resulting in thriving rural communities and a strong agricultural sector.

In conclusion, prioritizing self-sufficiency enhances food security, supports rural economies, and promotes environmental sustainability. Countries that have embraced this approach have reaped the benefits of a stable food system, vibrant agricultural sectors, and reduced ecological impact. Therefore, governments should encourage and invest in domestic food production to secure the well-being of their populations and foster sustainable development.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 9

In recent years the topic of food sovereignty has become a pressing issue for many nations. It is a commonly held belief that countries should prioritise being self-sufficient by producing all the food necessary for their citizens instead of importing it. Although this viewpoint has its merits, I believe that this is not a feasible or beneficial option.

To begin, utilising local food production will enhance a country's national security, as this will prevent international disputes that may occur over pricing and other financial issues related to importing goods, such as taxes and other costs. In addition, local food production will promote sustainable agricultural practices according to a country's regional climates, which will preserve local biodiversity.

However, it must be noted that this method might not be beneficial for all nations, as not every country possesses arable land or a climate that is conducive to cultivating a variety of produce. For example, countries in colder parts of the world would not have access to tropical fruits like mangoes or bananas. Therefore, importing food is vital to provide a variety of food items as well as ensuring that certain items are available even during off seasons or other times of shortage. I also believe that being exposed to food items from other countries can add to our cultural diversity and enrich our culinary experiences.

In conclusion, while it might be beneficial for some nations to strive for food self-sufficiency, for many others this approach is unrealistic and could deprive a large part of the world of the broader benefits of global trade. Therefore, a balanced combination of domestic production and imports would be a more suitable option.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 10

Most people think a nation should be self-sufficient in growing its crops for its entire population, thereby reducing the goods from overseas to as little as possible. However, I disagree with it for two significant reasons, and in the following few paragraphs, I will explain them.

To begin with, each crop requires an ideal climate and soil for growth; therefore, it is impossible to produce every type of consumption product in one country. For example, apples need cold weather to grow, and therefore, Eastern desert countries like the UAE, Saudi Arabia, etc., will have to import them from other apple-producing countries. There are still many fruits, vegetables, and grains that cannot be grown in deserts. Hence, relying on minimal homegrown crops would not be practical. Therefore, a country must depend on other nations for food commodities.

In addition, if imports are reduced, there would be a price hike for locally produced crops. This is because product quantities available locally would be lower, and subsequently, the price would also soar due to high demand. It would result in no profit for anyone. As a result, most countries import items to stabilize the economy.

In conclusion, it is argued by most people that a country must produce its food for the entire nation. However, I firmly believe that importing is necessary as different crops require various environmental factors to grow, and fewer imports would result in a rise in the cost of commodities.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 11

Some people argue that countries should depend on domestic rather than imported produce to feed their population. I completely agree with this point of view because if they don't, low-income people might face hunger, and agricultural workers might lose their jobs.

A country's over-reliance on global markets for food can put people on low incomes at risk of starvation. This is because it does not have complete control over the food supplied by these markets. For example, if flooding hits the rice production of Thailand and Vietnam, the two biggest rice exporters to China, its supply would decrease dramatically. The price in turn might increase to the point at which the poor would be unable to afford it. This might lead to hunger since rice is a staple food in China.

In addition, the more food a country imports, the higher the unemployment rate among its farm workers. Countries that mainly rely on domestically grown produce to feed their population usually have a robust agricultural industry. This means there are many jobs available for farm workers: they can be hired to grow crops or raise animals for slaughter. If these countries switched to food imports, there would be large employment losses in farming. Therefore, farmworkers would be struggling to earn an income since it is very unlikely that they have the skills needed to work in another sector.

In conclusion, countries should encourage homegrown production and not just depend on uncertain global markets for food. Otherwise, people with low incomes may suffer hunger and the jobless rates for farmworkers may rise.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 12

In the contemporary world, the idea that a country must be self-sufficient has gained major attraction. It allows reducing dependency on foreign food imports and ensuring a stable supply of food for their population. However, I disagree with this notion because I believe that in the present global scenario, a country cannot stop imports as it would not only cause loss to the country’s economy but also deprive citizens of dietary diversity.

Complete self-sufficiency is not practically possible or desirable for all nations. Factors such as climatic changes, geographical features, and resource availability can significantly influence a country’s agricultural potential. For example, desert nations like Saudi Arabia have limited arable land, which makes it challenging for them to produce diversified crops domestically. In these cases, food imports are not just a luxury but a necessity. Furthermore, global trade allows various countries to try the food of other countries that cannot be domestically produced in their own countries. For example, tropical fruits like bananas and mangoes are available in colder regions like Canada thanks to international trade.

Additionally, in our interconnected world, trade plays a crucial role not only in economic growth but also in cultural exchange and mutual benefit. Importing food can lead to a more balanced diet, improved health outcomes, and a richer culinary culture. Moreover, food imports can serve as a safety net in times of domestic food shortages due to unforeseen circumstances like natural disasters. This can ensure a steady supply of food and prevent potential crises.

In conclusion, while self-sufficiency is a commendable goal, it is not the most practical or beneficial approach in today’s globalised world. A balance between domestic production and imports can lead to a more resilient and diverse food system. This approach allows countries to enjoy the benefits of self-sufficiency while also taking advantage of the opportunities offered by international trade. It promotes economic stability, cultural exchange, and dietary diversity, contributing to a more secure and prosperous society.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 13

Many today are increasingly of the opinion that countries should be self-sufficient in their food production and import as little as possible. Though I grant this is unrealistic in certain countries, the economic implications are convincing.

In most countries, imported foods are simply a luxury but this belies those nations where imports ensure survival. Some of these countries include populous Southeast Asian nations, and numerous Middle Eastern and African countries. The reasons range from poorly developed infrastructure, little arable soil, and increased vulnerability to natural disasters. Many Asian countries in particular, import and stockpile basic foods such as rice for potential catastrophes. As agricultural technology develops and allows for crops that require less water, their desperation will lessen but it would be inhumane today to starve citizens in these countries.

The above-mentioned scenarios are exceptions; the majority of countries would be better served through vibrant food cultivation and production industries. The economic impact is twofold. First, these industries employ thousands of agricultural and meat-packing workers. Secondly, these workers then contribute to the local economy by buying goods and services. Replace them with international food conglomerates and suddenly they are funding the GDP of another country. A good counter-example to this would be in South Korea where the vast majority of products are nationally produced and, in fact, were some of the initial, primary sources of income for technology giants like Samsung and LG.

In conclusion, except in extreme cases, countries should import fewer food products to better serve their citizenry economically. There will always be a place for a limited range of imports, but it should not supersede local production.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 14

People have different views as to whether countries should import less food and, instead, try to produce all of their food locally. In my opinion, countries should continue to import food normally.

On one hand, producing food locally helps support the local economy. Money spent on these domestic products ends up in the hands of local farmers and distributors, keeping the money within a country instead of having it flow to foreign countries. Another benefit is that local food is often fresher and healthier than imported food, which is typically frozen so that it can be transported across the world. Moreover, these transportation costs are passed down to customers, making imported food considerably more expensive than local food. Transporting food across countries also harms the environment, as food miles contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Producing local food, in other words, helps curb climate change.

However, I still believe that countries should continue to import food as they normally do. First, imported food can be safer and of higher quality than local food, and it would be wrong to deny people food safety. Imported food also provides people with a greater variety of options. For example, many types of cheese, meat, and fruit are produced only in foreign countries. Being able to buy these foods results in a happier and more content general population. Additionally, importing food grants people access to food that is out of season in their country. It allows people, for instance, to enjoy mangoes all-year round instead of just during summer when they're in season.

For these reasons, I would argue that countries should continue to import food normally instead of trying to replace it with locally produced food.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 15

It is suggested that a country should avoid importing food and meet all of its demands with national production. From my perspective, this idea should never be implemented in practice.

The most common argument for food autarky is to maintain food security. Food, unlike other types of goods, is essential for human survival; a mass shortage of food in just a few days will lead to riots. Therefore, ensuring food supply independent from import supply seems reasonable; however, this line of thought is not without a flaw. In reality, a food crisis can be the result of natural disasters; tying the whole country's food demand with domestic supply is actually risky. An example is the North Korea famine during the 90s, which happened due to a series of droughts and the lack of imported food. In practice, a good network of food trade reduces the risk of national famine.

Another reason for not importing food is protectionism, or in other words, restricting imports in order to shield the domestic industry from competition. Protectionists argue that without tariffs on imported goods, many imported products are cheaper than their domestic counterparts. Consumers usually pick the cheaper ones, this causes local firms to be unable to sell their products and lose their revenue, making local workers lose their jobs. However, this argument overlooks the bilateral aspect of international trade. If a country insists on exporting but not importing anything from its foreign partners, every nation will eventually adopt the same strategy. Many workers will lose their jobs if there is no market for their products. Therefore, protectionism does not necessarily prevent unemployment.

In conclusion, it is best practice to let the market dictate the import flow.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 16

It is believed that nations should grow crops themselves to feed their residents, and imports should be reduced to a large extent. This essay agrees with this statement because this initiative will make food items cheaper and improve the financial status of farmers.

Firstly, the food items grown in the nation will be much more affordable for its citizens. This is because grains produced in the nation do not need to pay the international transportation cost and other international charges. As a result, the price of locally grown food will much lower. For example, in South-east nations, they import much of their wheat and rice from other nations and thus the cost of these food grains is quite higher in these nations as compared to other parts of the world.

Secondly, when governments push their residents to produce more grains for domestic consumption, it is more likely that the income of local farmers will increase. This is because all crops that they grow will be sold in the local food markets either purchased by the government agencies or private companies. This will enable farmers to earn a good amount of money. To illustrate, in India, the government procures grains from farmers at a minimum support price and thus this has enabled farmers to have an assured income for their work and have a decent lifestyle.

In conclusion, domestically grown food products will result in lowering the prices of food items and it will raise the economic status of the farming community.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 17

It is commonly suggested that food grown by the nations should satisfy the needs of all their citizens and imports must be curbed as much as possible. I completely agree with this point of view as this will help countries to save money and create many opportunities for the residents.

One of the biggest benefits of producing food in-house is that it can financially favor the governments. Becoming self-sufficient in food production and minimizing imports makes the country less dependent on others and at the same it benefits local producers. This will also give the upper hand in trade-related decisions with other nations. Moreover, food grown in the country will have lower base prices as it becomes a regular item in people’s diet. For example, 30 years ago, India was totally dependent on foreign countries for wheat and then wheat prices were high. However, now the country produces enough wheat for its people and prices have fallen by 50%. Thus, domestic production of foods benefits national economies.

Additionally, the idea of growing food to fulfill the country’s demand will create many opportunities for their people to grow. This will create higher employment in this sector and will motivate the researchers to develop new technologies. For instance, the state of Punjab created 30% more jobs for its residents since the time it started to lead the nation in the production of wheat. Furthermore, the state government was able to allocate more resources to the research and development making wheat much more affordable to the people of India.

In conclusion, the idea of growing food that can fulfil the need of the country and curtailing imports is entirely justified. This will not only make the country financially strong but also generate more employment opportunities employment and elevate its technological capacities in the long run.

Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import - mẫu 18

There exists an opinion that each country should ensure its food security as per the food demands of its population rather than relying heavily on other countries. I too think the same way, despite some strong exceptions.

The primary reason for my view is because of the fact that many countries across the world face food shortage, though they are capable of being independent in case of meeting the food demands. This might be due to changing the focus of development from the agricultural sector to other sectors like tourism and infrastructure. Admitting the fact that development is needed in all the sectors, I think a country should never deviate its focus from food produce, as it is one of the basic needs of mankind.

In many countries, hectares of agricultural lands are converted to either residential or industrial areas, and they depend heavily on food imports. The most undesirable situation might arise when there occurs a shortage in these imports due to any unforeseen events like natural calamities or war. In such a case, the citizens of the dependent countries might suffer severe food shortage or even famine. In order to avoid such incidences, it is better to produce and store enough food items a country’s population demands.

However, there are countries where extreme climatic conditions are present. For example, it is difficult to meet the food demands of middle east countries, as the area suitable for agriculture is too less, compared to other countries. The situation is similar in the case of countries where frequent floods and droughts occur. The modern technology is not yet fully developed to solve these issues.

In conclusion, even though adverse conditions hamper the food production process in certain countries, I think a country should ensure minimum food imports by promoting cultivation of edible food products, whenever and wherever possible.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the Internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music, dance and arts lessons for children. Others think that they should be funded by private businesses or by children’s families. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Everyone should stay at school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that language should be taught in small classes, while other people think the number of students in a language class does not matter. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Some parents buy their children whatever they ask for and allow their children to do whatever they want. Is this a good way to raise children? What consequences could this style of parenting have for children as they get older?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---