Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think that it is a waste of money as there are many unsolved problems on earth. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think

Đề bài: Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think that it is a waste of money as there are many unsolved problems on earth. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 1

Opinions diverge on whether governments should invest funds in exploring other planets to secure a new home for humans or concentrate on resolving pressing issues on our own planet. This essay will examine both perspectives and then advocate for the latter argument.

On one side, those supporting government funding for the exploration of the universe may have a compelling argument. They may contend that discovering habitable planets beyond our solar system is crucial for the survival of the human race. Moreover, proponents assert that space exploration can yield various benefits for humanity, including technological advancements, scientific discoveries, and potential economic growth. Additionally, our planet is currently grappling with major challenges such as climate change, overpopulation, and resource depletion, and seeking an alternative habitat is seen as a plausible solution.

However, I am of the opinion that the government should prioritize addressing the problems on Earth before delving into space. Firstly, while space exploration holds the potential for scientific and technological advancements, it is not without risks. The hazards of space travel, such as radiation exposure, equipment malfunctions, and the possibility of accidents, should not be overlooked. Resources earmarked for mitigating these risks could be more effectively allocated to tackling issues on Earth, such as climate change, pollution, and deforestation. Secondly, space exploration demands a significant investment of resources, and the funds allocated could be more judiciously used to address more pressing concerns like poverty, hunger, and disease.

In conclusion, although both perspectives have merits, I firmly believe that the government should focus more on addressing the tangible issues that human populations face. Through strategic investments in education, healthcare, and social welfare programs, we can enhance the quality of life for people on Earth and ensure access to necessities.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 2

The allocation of government funds has been a topic of ongoing debate. Some argue that resources should be directed towards space exploration and the search for extraterrestrial life, while others believe that addressing terrestrial issues should be the priority. I personally lean towards the latter view, believing that our main focus should be on resolving Earth’s problems.

On the one hand, proponents of space exploration argue that it is essential for the advancement of human knowledge. The potential discovery of life on other planets could revolutionize human understanding of biology and the universe, challenging existing theories of evolution and offering insights into the adaptability of life forms in extreme conditions. Moreover, the technological innovations required for such exploration often have practical applications on our planet. The development of GPS technology serves as a prime example, which was initially designed for space missions but is now used by millions of people around the world for navigation.

On the other hand, critics argue that immediate concerns such as climate change, poverty, and healthcare should be prioritized as they have direct and immediate impacts on human well-being. Redirecting the billions of dollars allocated to Mars missions, for instance, towards renewable energy projects or healthcare infrastructure could yield immense societal benefits, contributing to an improved quality of life globally. Another reason for their objection is the morality of investing substantially in space exploration when many individuals are still enduring hardship. They argue that governments have a responsibility to prioritize the well-being of most citizens over speculative endeavors that might benefit only a small fraction of the population.

In conclusion, while the search for life on other planets can bring about groundbreaking discoveries, I firmly believe that it is more important to focus on solving the problems of our own planet to ensure a sustainable and thriving future.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 3

Opinions diverge on whether the state should finance the search for extraterrestrial life or alternatively, other pressing global issues are of more considerable concern. This essay will discuss both notions and explain why I believe that the funds are more justifiably utilised to mitigate pressing issues on Earth.

Proponents of investing in the search for outer-space civilisations cite two of its feasible benefits. The foremost one is that this may foster breakthroughs in many scientific realms which are conducive to the development of humankind. For example, the launching of spacecraft for interplanetary exploration can facilitate other practical applications of satellite technologies. Moreover, this activity can serve as a powerful diplomatic tool as many nations around the world can share their insights and manpower to cooperate toward a mutual goal, instilling a sense of shared responsibility and promoting peace.

However, critics argue that there are more thorny issues that necessitate pecuniary resources. First of all, many societal matters, such as starvation, or inadequate healthcare, require a substantial amount of financial investment from governments. Therefore, the diversion of the state budget to the exorbitantly expensive discovery of cosmic life forms may render insufficient funding to mitigate these challenges. Furthermore, several environmental problems, including climate change due to greenhouse gas effects, can threaten the survival of human beings. Consequently, governments should allot money to the research of eco-friendly technologies and renewable sources of energy instead of the investigation of the vague presence of alien territories.

In conclusion, I concede that the merits of delving into the signs of other galactic existence are somewhat promising to the provision of novel knowledge and the unity of humanity toward a collective endeavour of conquering the universe. However, I contend that they are very uncertain and earthly well-being should be prioritised since numerous social and natural issues pose more direct threats to mankind. If possible, only developed nations should spend money on this development while emerging ones should only focus on their immediate needs.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 4

The search for extraterrestrial life has been a topic of discussion and debate for many years. While some people believe that using taxpayer funds to find life on other planets is essential, others see it as a poor use of public money.

Those who believe in the importance of searching for extraterrestrial life argue that this is an opportunity to answer one of the biggest questions in science and human history: are we alone in the universe? They also believe that such a search will have tremendous scientific and technological benefits, including the development of new instruments, techniques, and methods of exploration that can be used for other purposes. Moreover, the discovery of extraterrestrial life, even if only in the form of microbial organisms, would have a profound impact on our understanding of the universe and the origin of life itself.

That said, I personally hold the view that though such research is important, the money spent on this should be balanced against other important needs and should not come at the expense of other critical programs. There are many pressing issues on our own planet that require funding, such as the major problems of poverty, hunger, disease, and environmental degradation. These are all urgent issues that affect millions of people around the world. We need to be mindful of the limited resources available to us and make sure that they are used in a responsible and effective manner.

In conclusion, the search for extraterrestrial life is an important and fascinating endeavour, but it must be balanced against other critical needs. The investment in this area should be used wisely and effectively, taking into account the benefits and limitations of the research, and should not be to the detriment of other important programs.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 5

Many people think that the field of astronomy should be invested for the quest for a new homeland. Although I do accept the argument for this idea, I believe that it is a waste of money and solving the problem in our home planet should be the first priority.

The first reason why governments should pour more money into space exploration and research lies in an anticipation that the Earth would not be able to sustain human lives. The problem of over-exploited natural resources and environmental damages are becoming insurmountable to deal with. Therefore, finding a potential backup is not simply an option. Another reason is that secondary uses of technology in space research as spin-offs could be used to solve problems on earth. For example, the satellite technology in space research has been used in data collection and analysis of the climate change.

However, I think space discovery is a waste as space shifts, researching projects or astronauts training fee is extravagant while the success of discovering alternative planets could not be guaranteed despite many years since the first steps of humans on the Moon or after centuries of watching the universe. In contrast, this money should be spent to improve the living environment on Earth. The degradation of the Earth is such a long-term process that we still have time to regenerate our current home. If so, human survival will not be threatened, and regenerating the Earth could be more promising than leaving it.

In conclusion, there are reasons behind the investment in search of living planets, but it seems to be wasted money. I think that the regeneration of the Earth is a better option.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 6

In the contemporary debate regarding governmental budget allocation, two contrasting perspectives have emerged: one advocating for the exploration of extraterrestrial life, and the other opposing it due to pressing terrestrial concerns. This essay will examine both viewpoints before articulating a reasoned stance.

Proponents of space exploration argue that the search for life beyond Earth could yield groundbreaking discoveries, potentially revolutionizing our understanding of the universe. For instance, in Vietnam, advancements in technology and knowledge gained from such endeavors could spur innovation in various sectors, enhancing the nation's global standing. This viewpoint holds that the potential benefits of discovering extraterrestrial life are monumental, possibly leading to unprecedented scientific breakthroughs. However, this argument overlooks the immediate challenges faced by humanity. The investment in space research, often seen as a long-term gamble, diverts resources from addressing urgent issues such as poverty and climate change.

Contrastingly, I am inclined to believe that governmental funds should prioritize earthly problems. Although the quest for extraterrestrial knowledge is fascinating, the immediate needs of our planet cannot be sidelined. In Vietnam, for instance, allocating funds towards improving infrastructure, healthcare, and education can have a tangible impact on the quality of life. This approach not only addresses the immediate needs of the populace but also lays a strong foundation for future generations. It is imperative that governments focus on sustainable development, ensuring that resources are utilized where they are most needed.

In conclusion, while the exploration of other planets holds the allure of the unknown and the potential for significant scientific advancements, it is crucial to address the myriad challenges that plague our world today. The allocation of funds towards improving living conditions and solving pressing issues on Earth should be the priority. It is only by establishing a strong base on our home planet that we can hope to responsibly explore the mysteries of the universe in the future.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 7

There has been an ongoing concern about how the government should allocate financial resources to facilitate people’s lives. While some assert that it is imperative for the authorities to use money to implement space exploration in search of new life, others believe this is rather impractical, given the unsolved problems on this planet. In this essay, I will elaborate on both views and present my perspective on this debate.

On one hand, it is reasonable for individuals to advocate for the allocation of governmental resources to search for life on other planets, driven by their concerns about the prospects of perpetual life on Earth. Indeed, the swift advancements in human society have induced countless fatal environmental problems.

For example, industrialization in developed countries has caused air pollution and greenhouse effects, damaging the natural habitat of animal species that play a key role in balancing the environment. If this situation prevails, life on Earth inevitably faces the risk of extinction. Therefore, humans need to find new external habitats, and to implement so, financial support from the government is necessary.

On the other hand, opponents of the aforementioned belief underscore the necessity of governmental support to address the remaining issues on Earth, arguing that there are still viable solutions. They believe that technological improvements nowadays can be harnessed to find sustainable approaches; for instance, channeling resources into renewable energy research and development can mitigate the environmental impact of industrialization and help address climate change. Moreover, advancements in medical research and education can contribute to the improvement of healthcare systems, enhancing the quality of life for millions.

From my perspective, while the quest for interplanetary exploration is undoubtedly valuable, a balanced approach is crucial. Governments should prioritise addressing pressing issues on Earth, allocating resources to improve environmental quality and combat climate change. However, a portion of funding could still be dedicated to scientific exploration, including space missions, as this pursuit may yield valuable insights and technologies that could benefit both Earth and potential future space exploration projects.

In conclusion, both sides of the argument are valid, but I believe a balanced approach from the government is crucial to address issues on Earth and support space missions looking for new life.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 8

According to some people, the government should not spend money on space exploration. I agree with this view. In my opinion, there are other areas that need public spending. Also, space exploration is not crucial for the development of a country.

Of course, there are some benefits to investing in space research. It helps us to learn more about the universe we are a part of. Also, there is a possibility that some space missions may find life on other planets. We may also be able to find other inhabitable planets. Since population growth is leading to a resource crunch on planet earth, finding another planet that can sustain life is in the larger interest of the whole humanity.

On the other hand, there is no guarantee that we will find another planet that we can colonize. It is a mere possibility, and it may take hundreds or thousands of years before we actually manage to achieve it. Hence, spending public money on such projects is unlikely to offer much in return at the moment. What’s more, there are several other pressing needs on earth that need immediate resolution. For example, millions of people still do not have access to potable water or education. Even today, thousands of people die in war and conflicts almost every day. It is foolish to spend money on space programmes before addressing these issues. Actually, making our planet more livable is much better than finding another planet to live on.

In conclusion, although outer space exploration projects help us to learn more about the universe, these projects are not crucial for the development of a country. Moreover, public money should be spent on more pressing issues like healthcare and education because they directly impact the public.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 9

Many countries are spending money to find out if there are living conditions in space. While this may be useful to us in the future, some people believe that this is not a priority. They believe that there are more pressing problems on Earth that need the governments’ attention. Although I support the second argument, this essay shall throw light on both.

The main reason for finding life on other planets is to find natural resources that are useful for us to survive, like water. This is being done because the natural resources on Earth are depleting, and the remaining ones are being polluted by humankind. Another motive behind searching for life on other planets is that if the population rises to an uncontrollable extent in the future, we would have the facility to accommodate people on other planets as well. For example, if we are able to successfully build a colony in space where humans can live with similar natural resources like on Earth, we won’t have to worry about the resources being less as compared to the population. Nevertheless, it is important to mention that the problems of natural resources being scarce and population rise are man-made. Therefore, they can be solved.

The amount of money already spent on space research is in billions. However, it has achieved considerably little when we compare the amount of money on space exploration spent and the results that we’ve got. To be specific, we have still not been able to find any other planet in our Solar System that houses the same conditions as Earth does. All the succeeding space projects would require more money, and it would result in increasing the burden on taxpayers. It would be better if this same money can be allocated to solving immediate problems like global warming, world hunger, poverty, illiteracy, or finding cures for deadly diseases. Working towards these problems would at least have a direct effect on the population.

To conclude, while finding life on other planets would be a huge achievement for humankind, the Earth still has problems that first need to be solved. I support the opinion that right now the governments’ main priority should be to find an answer to the current problems that people are facing.

Some people think governments should spend money looking for life on other planets, while others think - mẫu 10

Every year governments of rich nations spend billions of dollars on exploration of space and extra-terrestrial life. Considering the problems on earth, this expenditure on space programmes has become a highly debatable topic. Some people are in favour of investing time and money in search for life beyond earth. Others, however, feel that this money should be used for improving the quality of life on earth. In my opinion, space research is an investment for our future generations. Definitely, pressing problems like famine, illiteracy, unemployment, poverty and many more deserve attention. Sincere efforts at a national and global level are required to solve them.

It is certainly true that space research is an expensive affair. In my view, the ultimate objective of searching for extra-terrestrial life is to find a new home for humans. If we look at the exploitation of resources like land, water and fossil fuels etc., it is possible that our earth will not be able to sustain the pressure of rising population. Exploring space is therefore paramount for a sustainable future. If we look for life beyond earth, we can come across fascinating discoveries such as planets that can be our future motherland.

Coming to the current issues on earth, the biggest problem is the unfettered growth of global population which has crossed the mark of 7.5 billion. Fulfilling the basic needs such as food, accommodation, and education etc. of their citizens is a herculean task for the governments of underdeveloped and developing countries. Climate change, pollution and terrorism are some other major global problems. Unquestionably, handling these problems is as important as finding life beyond earth.

To sum up, spending money in search for extra-terrestrial life is vital. It should not be viewed as a waste of money.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• It has become easier and more affordable for people to travel to other countries. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

• Fresh water has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What are the causes of the increased demand? What measures could governments and individuals take to respond to this problem?

• The position of women has changed a great deal in many societies over the past 50 years. But these societies cannot claim to have achieved gender equality. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree?

• The relocation of people from urban areas to the countryside has both positive and negative implications. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---