Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from TV as well as from international sporting competitions. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 1

Some people suggest that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from television broadcasts and international sporting competitions. I agree with the notion that such sports should be prohibited from these platforms due to the potential harm they can inflict on athletes and the promotion of aggressive behaviour as a form of entertainment.

One captivating reason for banning violent sports from TV and international competitions is the significant physical and psychological risks involved. Sports like boxing, wrestling and mixed martial arts are inherently dangerous, as they involve deliberate and forceful strikes to opponents' bodies. Such physical confrontations can lead to severe injuries, including concussions, fractures, and long-term brain damage. According to a comprehensive survey conducted by the American Journal of Sports Medicine, the injury rate in sports like boxing, wrestling, and mixed martial arts is remarkably high, with an average of 52.8 injuries reported per 1,000 athlete exposures.

Moreover, repeated exposure to violent sports may desensitize viewers to acts of aggression and violence, normalizing behaviors that can be harmful to society. According to a study conducted by the American Psychological Association, individuals who frequently watch violent sports on television or attend such events may experience a desensitization to acts of aggression and violence. Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable to the impact of violent sports on their psychological development. Studies have shown that exposure to violence in sports at a young age can lead to an increase in aggressive behaviours.

In conclusion, the debate over whether violent sports should be banned from TV and international sporting events is a contentious one. However, I firmly believe that taking such measures is necessary to protect the physical and psychological well-being of athletes and to uphold ethical standards in society.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 2

Some believe that fierce sports like mixed martial arts, fencing, and boxing promote aggression and desensitize viewers to violence, and therefore should be banned from media and international competitions. I tend to disagree as I understand that these sports have cultural and historical significance, their portrayal can be seen as a form of artistic expression, and they are conducted in a controlled environment with safety protocols in place.

One crucial reason for the acceptance of such sports in media and international competitions is their cultural and historical significance. These sports often have deep-rooted traditions and rituals that hold great importance for specific communities and societies. For instance, traditional martial arts like judo and kung fu are not only competitive sports but also essential elements of cultural heritage in their respective countries. Banning such sports could result in the loss of valuable cultural practices that have been passed down through generations.

Furthermore, the representation of fierce sports in media and competitions can serve as a platform for promoting understanding and appreciation of different cultures. Consider the Olympic Games, where combat sports like boxing and taekwondo are celebrated as part of the global event. The inclusion of such sports allows athletes from diverse backgrounds to showcase their skills and foster mutual respect among nations. The controlled and regulated environment in which these events take place makes sure that they are not violent and harmful. Organizations governing such sports have implemented strict rules and safety measures to ensure the well-being of athletes. For example, in professional boxing matches, referees closely monitor the bout, and medical teams are present to provide immediate assistance in case of injuries.

In conclusion, while there are concerns about the potential negative effects of violent sports in media and international competitions, their cultural and historical significance, as well as the controlled environment in which they take place, provide valid justifications for their acceptance.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 3

The debate over whether sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned from television broadcasts and international sporting competitions has stirred considerable discussion. In this essay, we firmly contend against a complete ban on these sports. While acknowledging the concerns surrounding violence, we advocate for responsible regulation rather than outright prohibition. We will emphasize the importance of personal freedom, safety through regulation, cultural significance, and the positive aspects of these sports. Additionally, we will address concerns related to media sensationalism and children’s influence.

Opponents of a complete ban on violent sports emphasize the value of personal freedom and choice. Individuals should have the liberty to decide whether to watch or participate in these sports. A ban would infringe upon these personal freedoms, limiting the choices available to individuals. Instead of an outright ban, a more effective approach involves regulating these sports to ensure the safety of athletes and participants. Proper safety measures, equipment, and medical supervision can significantly reduce the risks associated with violent sports, making them safer for all involved.

In addition to personal freedom and safety through regulation, we must consider the historical and cultural significance of these sports. Many sports involving violence, such as martial arts, have deep roots in various cultures around the world. A complete ban would disregard the historical and cultural importance of these practices to certain communities. Moreover, when practiced responsibly, these sports offer numerous benefits, including discipline, physical fitness, and mental strength. Banning them entirely would deprive individuals of the opportunity to gain these advantages.

In conclusion, advocating for the complete ban of sports involving violence from television broadcasts and international sporting competitions may be an extreme solution to a complex issue. Instead, responsible regulation can strike a balance between personal freedom and safety, respecting the historical and cultural significance of these sports, and recognizing the positive aspects they offer. Concerns related to media sensationalism and children’s influence can be addressed through responsible broadcasting and parental guidance. In a society that values personal choice and cultural diversity, regulating rather than banning these sports is a more balanced approach.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 4

Sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, have always been a topic of debate when it comes to their portrayal on TV and participation in international sporting competitions. While some argue that these sports should be banned due to their violent nature, I believe that they should not be prohibited entirely.

On the one hand, it can be argued that the violent nature of these sports can have a negative impact on viewers, especially children. The sight of two individuals engaging in physical combat can be distressing for some, and there is a concern that it may promote aggression and violence among the audience. Furthermore, the risk of serious injury or even death in these sports cannot be overlooked, and broadcasting such events on TV may desensitize people to the potential dangers involved.

On the other hand, it is important to acknowledge that these sports have a long-standing cultural and historical significance in many societies. Boxing and martial arts, for example, have been practiced for centuries and hold a special place in the hearts of millions of people around the world. Banning these sports would not only infringe on the freedom of individuals to participate in activities of their choice, but it would also disregard the rich traditions and values associated with these sports.

Instead of banning these sports, measures should be put in place to ensure that they are conducted in a safe and responsible manner. This includes implementing strict regulations to minimize the risk of injury, providing proper training and protective gear for athletes, and enforcing age restrictions for viewers. Additionally, TV networks can consider airing these sports during appropriate times and with appropriate warnings to ensure that they do not have a negative influence on vulnerable audiences.

In conclusion, while there are valid concerns about the violent nature of sports like boxing and martial arts, I believe that an outright ban is not the solution. By implementing appropriate safety measures and regulations, these sports can continue to thrive without posing a significant risk to society.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 5

For at least a few millennia, and perhaps longer, humans have enjoyed sports that could be considered violent. From the Roman gladiators to modern heavyweight boxing championships, it is evident that people like to watch men fighting one another. However, in the twenty-first century, some people believe there is no place for such barbaric activities.

The leading argument in favor of banning violent sports from TV is that it leads to the protection of children, who might otherwise see these events and attempt to copy them. Campaigners against violence on TV cite evidence that suggests children are highly impressionable and would idolize sportsmen who use violence. This could lead to an increase in violent activity among children in the wider society, with other children getting hurt.

On the other hand, it should be noted that actual violence and so-called violent sports are quite different. In sport, there are very definite rules to be followed. If someone breaks these rules, he or she is punished by a referee. While boxing or martial arts may seem violent to an uninformed spectator, they are events featuring highly skilled athletes who have agreed to participate, and are watched by medical professionals at all times. This seems rather different to other forms of violence.

In conclusion, it is possible that banning certain sports from TV or halting their inclusion in international sporting competitions may be beneficial to society, but the argument is not wholly convincing. These sports are not violent in the traditional sense, and they probably don’t send a bad message to children.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 6

The debate surrounding the broadcasting of violent sports such as boxing and martial arts is multifaceted, with proponents arguing for freedom and tradition, and detractors concerned about societal impact. I contend that while these sports should not be completely banned, stricter regulations on broadcasting are necessary. The key issues revolve around the potential glorification of violence and its impact on young viewers.

Critics of violent sports often highlight the inherent risk of glamorizing aggressive behaviour. Boxing, martial arts, and similar activities showcase physical confrontations as a form of entertainment, which can desensitize viewers, particularly impressionable children, to the seriousness of violence. Studies suggest that repeated exposure to simulated violence in media can increase aggression in young people, potentially leading to increased bullying in schools and aggressive behaviour in other social settings. This is not to undermine the skill and discipline involved in these sports, but to emphasize the need for responsible broadcasting that does not obscure the dangerous and painful realities of such violent encounters. Properly contextualizing these sports within broadcasts can help maintain a responsible narrative.

On the other hand, supporters argue that sports like boxing and martial arts are steeped in tradition and discipline, often embodying cultural histories and personal achievement. Banning these sports would not only infringe on personal freedoms but also neglect the potential for positive influence. These disciplines teach values such as respect, perseverance, and self-control, virtues that extend beyond the sports themselves into personal and professional realms. They are often highlighted in detailed athlete profiles and thoughtful commentary, which can serve as powerful narratives of overcoming adversity. Thus, the focus should be on promoting these aspects rather than the purely combative elements, ensuring broadcasts provide a balanced view that can inspire rather than incite. By emphasizing the holistic development of athletes, media can showcase the true spirit of these disciplines.

In conclusion, the broadcasting of sports involving violence should be carefully regulated rather than completely banned. By focusing on educational and respectful presentations, broadcasters can mitigate the adverse effects of exposure to violence while still celebrating the rich traditions and personal disciplines these sports offer.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 7

The question of whether sports involving violence such as boxing and martial arts should be restricted on television and international sporting competitions raises significant concerns. I firmly believe these sports should indeed be banned due to their promotion of violence and their potentially harmful influence on viewers, particularly young audiences. The following discussion will explore the detrimental societal impact and the normalization of aggression these sports can perpetuate.

Firstly, violent sports contribute to the normalization of aggression. Activities like boxing and martial arts, when broadcast widely, send a clear message that violence is not only acceptable but also a celebrated means to achieve victory and fame. This message can be particularly influential on the youth, who are in their formative years and susceptible to imitating such behaviours. The glamorization of physical assault in these sports can diminish the seriousness of violence in the eyes of young viewers, potentially leading to increased aggression in schools and social interactions. The implication here is profound: what is intended as sport could be misconstrued as a legitimate way to resolve conflicts in everyday life.

Moreover, the international broadcasting of these sports often sidelines the serious long-term physical and psychological effects experienced by the athletes involved. The focus on victory and strength overshadows the numerous cases of brain injuries, trauma, and long-term health issues that athletes suffer. By banning these sports from TV and international arenas, the media would cease to endorse an activity that risks the health and wellbeing of its participants. Additionally, this would promote sports that emphasize health, teamwork, and personal development without resorting to violence, thereby fostering a healthier view of sportsmanship globally.

In conclusion, the prohibition of violent sports from television and international competitions is a necessary step toward cultivating a more peaceful and respectful society. By eliminating these sports from mainstream media, we help prevent the glorification of violence and protect the physical and mental health of athletes, setting a more positive example for our youth.

Some people think that sports involving violence, such as boxing and martial arts, should be banned - mẫu 8

The proposal to ban violent sports such as boxing and martial arts from television and international sporting competitions sparks a contentious debate. I staunchly oppose such a ban, arguing that these sports are not only an essential part of cultural heritage but also play a significant role in promoting discipline, resilience, and fitness. This essay will elaborate on the merits of these sports and the implications of preserving their presence in the media.

Firstly, sports like boxing and martial arts are much more than mere displays of violence; they are disciplines steeped in rich tradition and rigorous training that instill values such as respect, self-control, and perseverance. Removing these sports from public view underestimates the capacity of audiences to discern the context of controlled sporting environments from real-world violence, thereby simplifying complex cultural practices into negative stereotypes. Furthermore, these sports offer a platform for individuals from diverse backgrounds to achieve personal growth and international recognition, often providing life-changing opportunities for the underprivileged. These opportunities can propel individuals towards economic stability and social mobility, significantly impacting their communities.

Secondly, banning these sports on television and in competitions would not effectively address the root causes of societal violence and could even be counterproductive by driving fans to seek unregulated, potentially more hazardous viewing. Such a shift could lead to underground events lacking proper oversight and safety measures, increasing risks for participants and spectators. The regulated environment of professional sports ensures safety standards and ethical guidelines are upheld, which educates viewers about the importance of rules and fair play. Moreover, the presence of martial arts and boxing in mainstream media encourages healthy physical activity and provides a constructive outlet for aggression under professional supervision, serving as a model for handling conflicts and challenges in a disciplined way.

In conclusion, the outright ban of violent sports from television and international arenas is an excessive measure that overlooks the positive impacts of these activities. Preserving their visibility promotes not only cultural enrichment but also educational and physical benefits that contribute to societal well-being.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Schools concentrate far too much on traditional subjects which do not adequately prepare students for the realistic demands of the modern working world. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• It has been claimed that workers over 50 are not responsive to rapidly changing ideas in the modern workplace and that for this reason younger workers are to be preferred. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• It is better for college students to live in schools than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?

• It is better for college students to live far away from home than to live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?

• With an increasing overweight population, some people think universities should make sport a compulsory module on all degree courses. To what extent do you agree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---