Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like in libraries, shops, and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 1

Some people opine that the use of cell phones in public places such as libraries, shops, and public vehicles should be prohibited as it causes great annoyance to other people. Personally, I disagree with this point of view as I believe that with proper use, mobiles are still helpful.

On the one hand, it is true that mobile phones can be intrusive in public areas. For example, in places like libraries, where people are supposed to keep silent and concentrate on their books or reading materials, a mobile ringtone or a phone conversation can totally divert their attention, thereby disrupting the ideal work environment. Besides, mobile phones can be used to take photos of other people without their permission. On public means of transport like a bus, for instance, one can easily snap a photo of others without them even knowing. This not only invades their personal privacy but can also lead to potential risks, such as someone’s pictures being sold for commercial purposes or even other negative intentions.

On the other hand, despite the aforementioned disadvantages, mobile phones are useful in a number of ways. First and foremost, these devices are not necessarily synonymous with irritation since they can easily be turned into silent or vibrate mode. Furthermore, they are a real help in many adverse circumstances in public places. In case of emergencies, for example, a road accident, residents will have certain difficulties calling for the ambulance without phones. Additionally, when connected to the Internet via WiFi or 3G, these technological gadgets are a cheap source of entertainment on the move, comforting people on tedious journeys or in anxious situations. Therefore, a ban on mobile phones will deprive people of the undeniable benefits these devices provide.

In conclusion, although mobile phones may cause disturbance for the public, I maintain that they are advantageous if used properly.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 2

Some people applaud the prohibition of mobile phones in public spaces considering the possible disturbances resulting from notifications and bright screens. However, I believe mobile phones should be allowed in order to enable convenience for individuals at public facilities.

On the one hand, other members of the public at places such as libraries, shops and public transport might find sounds and the light from phones annoying. For instance, readers at a library can be distracted by disrespectful phone users who switch on the ringtone of incoming calls or through notification noises, preventing them from devoting their full time to research and reading. A related and common instance would be that a traveler’s short nap on a bus or night train might be interrupted by the bright lights emanating from smartphone screens.

On the other hand, I believe that handheld devices can greatly improve user experience. For example, a bus journey is less tiring when the rider can enjoy some relaxing music to relieve stress on his phone by using his earphones, avoiding the noise of traffic and immersing himself in the healing sounds of nature. Another great example is the use of shopping applications such as VinID, an application recently developed by the Vietnamese retail giant Vinmart+.  Thise app enables shoppers to not only precisely locate their desired items in vast supermalls but also to use self-service checkout without needing to wait in seemingly endless queues during peak shopping hours.

In conclusion, although the use of phones might be a distraction in public spaces, I am of the opinion that the total experience of users in public places is more important. Therefore, service operators should invest more in researching user behavior to develop more useful apps.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 3

The ubiquity of mobile phones has become a contentious issue in recent years, to the point that some have argued for a ban on these devices in public places. Despite some reasons to support this belief, I am inclined to disagree with it, as such a ban would be harmful and unnecessary.

There are sound arguments in favor of prohibiting mobiles in public space. A major one is that cell phones can be disruptive and distracting. In a library, for example, the ringtone of a phone can interfere with the concentration of other patrons who are trying to study or work. Moreover, this kind of ban may prevent children from picking up unhelpful habits. Without a ban, some children can witness adults using phones in public and attempt to imitate such behavior, consequently becoming glued to mobile devices. This is undoubtedly detrimental to children’s ability to concentrate and could affect their academic performance as well. A ban on mobile phones in public places, therefore, could reduce disruption and improve the young’s habits.

However, prohibiting cell phones in spaces open to the public should not be supported. Firstly, mobile phones can be a useful tool for communication and safety. If somebody is on public transport alone and facing an emergency, they may need to contact someone else, such as the police. A mobile phone ban in this case would prevent them from receiving help. Additionally, this policy could place an unnecessary constraint on people’s freedom of information. As mobile phones can access and spread knowledge conveniently, those who are affected by a ban would indeed feel restricted and become unhappy. Hence, outlawing mobile usage this way can end up doing more harm than good.

In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of banning mobile phones in public places, it is not a positive measure. Instead, it is recommended to come up with gentler solutions for problems caused by public usage of cell phones, instead of banning these devices outright.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 4

Mobile phones in this modern world play a vital role in sharing information and bringing people closer. Due to its constant usage, it has become a basic necessity and some feel that prohibiting mobile phone usage in public places is a good move. However, I partially agree with it and believe that allowing it in public places with some restrictions will be fine. This essay will talk about both cases with proper examples.

To begin with, using cell phones in public spaces might be a distraction to other people and divert their attention. For example, in libraries where people are found reading books of their interest, they can be easily distracted when a person’s ringtone of an incoming call strikes all of a sudden or when any individual is found talking over the phone in a loud manner. Moreover, using phones in places like hospitals can also easily interfere with the serene environment that is a much needed one for the patients. Hence, restricting people from using mobiles in these kinds of common places can help fellow mates to carry on with their lives peacefully.

On the other hand, prohibiting the usage of mobile phones in public spaces can cause problems for people as well in some instances. For example, if an individual wanted to contact their loved ones in case of an emergency, they wouldn’t be able to reach them instantly without a mobile phone in hand. Adding on to this, people usually love listening to music during travel and mobile phones can without hassle be switched to a silent mode, and this will not disturb others.

In conclusion, I, in fact, believe that phones can be allowed in public places but with some specific restrictions so that people can remain in touch with their friends and family members whenever they need to.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 5

Recently, it has been suggested that people should not be allowed to use mobile phones in public places. In my view, although this ban could have certain benefits, it is highly impractical and therefore should not be implemented.

Proponents of a mobile phone ban often point to cases when phone use in public areas is intrusive. In a library, sometimes concentration is disturbed by someone making/taking phone calls or incoming SMS sounds. Phone use can also ruin the experience for others, as is the case where some moviegoers constantly use their phone, which emits annoying blue light or interrupts others with sounds from texting. More importantly, phone use in public allows for privacy intrusion. This happens when someone takes pictures or videos of others without their knowledge and uses them for unlawful purposes, with consequences ranging from unintended inconvenience to outright invasion of privacy. With a mobile phone ban in place, the number of the aforementioned incidences would decrease, making for a less interrupted experience when using publicly accessible services.

Nonetheless, such a ban is unrealistic because, for most people, mobile phones have become an indispensable part of life. Individuals in the technological era utilize the mobile phone for various tasks, both personal and professional. For instance, mobile technology has made it possible to check out quickly and conveniently in shops and supermarkets. Digital maps are now available via mobile devices, helping people navigate more easily. Another reason for phone use is to minimize boredom by listening to music or surfing the internet while waiting, say, for the bus. Besides, many people have to be by their phones even after work; without a phone, their productivity might be compromised. In short, a prohibition of phone use would unnecessarily deprive people of the important benefits of technology.

In conclusion, while a ban on the phone may ensure people’s experience in public places, it is outweighed by its impracticality, given the fact that the phone has been an integral part of life.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 6

Mobile phones have become not only increasingly ubiquitous over the last few decades but also an integral part of modern life. It is, however, believed by some that there should be a ban on those devices in public areas. I think this is an unreasonable suggestion and should not be adopted.

Banning phones in public places seems impractical owing to their importance when it comes to communication for work reasons. The majority of jobs these days require employees to be constantly available for any problem that may crop up. For example, doctors need to be ready all the time for any emergency or surgery that needs their presence, which requires them to have their phones with them at any place, even in public areas. Therefore, if cellular devices are prohibited in such places, people’s daily work will be hindered to a great extent.

Apart from communication functions, mobile phones nowadays can serve as a device for multiple purposes, which are of great use in public places. In libraries, people can use their phones to search for different sources of information that are not available in paper books. Or phones also enable consumers to compare the price of a particular product between different shops so that they can make a wise purchasing decision. Another striking feature of cellphones in recent years is their built-in GPS, which allows, for example, owners to search for directions while traveling or parents to track their children so as to avoid the risk of kidnapping. Those electronic gadgets are also a huge source of entertainment for people to while away the time by reading news, watching films or playing games when taking public transport.

Opponents of mobile use in public places may argue that phones’ rings and sounds can disturb the surrounding people and ruin their experience; nevertheless, this can easily be solved by switching phones to silent mode.

In conclusion, there are no reasons to put a prohibition on mobile phones in public areas as long as they are used with respect to others.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 7

Telecommunication technology has played a vital role in information sharing and bringing people closer. Its usage has become a basic necessity of life, and one cannot imagine living without mobile phones. The prohibition of cell phones in public places is laudable, but I don't agree fully and believe that their usage should be allowed in public places but with some restrictions.

On the one hand, using mobile phones in public places can distract other people and divert their attentions. For instance, libraries where people reading material of interest can be easily distracted through ringtones of incoming calls or people talking over the phone loudly with their loved ones. Mobile phone usage in public places like hospitals can easily interfere with the medical equipment which can be harmful to the patient. Moreover, talking over the cell phone can increase the suffering of the patients waiting in the room to see the doctor. Mobile phones can easily slip from the hand when someone bumps in department stores. It will not only damage the devices, but it can block the entire lane at the billing counter. Often the environment at shopping malls, stores and other public avenues is very noisy and talking over cell phones will add extra decibel. Moreover, its usage in Music galleries or prayers room can result in discomfort for others and spoil their entertainment or offerings.

On the other hand, restricting usage of mobile phones in public places can keep people away from staying in touch with their loved one in case of emergency and so on. Mobile phones nowadays come up with cameras and other services like Email, Entertainment and so on. This would keep them away from capturing the pictures of events in music galleries or taking selfies in public buses and sharing with their friends on the go. Moreover, people who love to listen to music while travelling will have little to enjoy. Cell phones can easily be switched to silent/vibrate mode, this will not distract people due to loud ringtones of incoming calls or messages.

To conclude, the above points provide plausible arguments in favour of both views. However, I personally believe that cell phones should be allowed in public places but with some restrictions in place so that they can remain in touch with their friends and family members whenever they need.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 8

Nowadays, mobile phones have become an inevitable part of life. Although they have made communication much easier in each step of our daily life, some people opine that they should be restricted in public places such as libraries, shops and public vehicles. I totally support the view and the reasons for this will be discussed below.

Firstly, public places are usually expected to be quiet and peaceful so that they are acceptable to everyone and the use of mobile phones in such places is likely to disrupt the desirable working environment. For instance, in a library, where people are pondering over the books, the constant mobile ringtones or the phone conversation will be intrusive or irritating.

Secondly, the use of mobile phones for luring activities as facebook chatting, taking pictures, playing games, listening to songs and so on can prove to be undesirable in public places. It is quite noticeable that these days, teenagers are taking pictures everywhere, at libraries, trains, buses, roads, hospitals etc which is a matter of annoyance. An example of this is my friend, who once was taking selfies continuously on the train when the passenger beside her got offended. For these reasons, restrictions on mobile phones in public places would prove to be useful in creating a sense of comfort in public.

In a nutshell, although the merits of mobile phones are numerous, it would be a definitely good decision to ban them in public places as it would create a sense of comfort and a harmonious environment for all.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 9

The mobile phone has become the most popular gadget in today’s world. Some people argue that usage of cell phones should be prohibited in public places. Personally, I completely agree with this idea due to many reasons.

In my opinion, there are many health and social problems that can occur as a result of using mobile phones in public places. Socially, a mobile phone can be described as an intrusive tool. It can disturb others while they are concentrating and reading in some places like libraries. Mobile phone etiquette is an important issue when mobile ringing at movies or in the libraries. Users often speak with loud volume and annoy the other people nearby. It has become common practice for places like bookshops and libraries to post a sign prohibiting the usage of mobile phones.  Also, many public trains offer 'quiet zones' where phone use is banned.

Another lethal concern is the health problems that can be caused by using cell phones in public places. Firstly, I believe that there is a strong correlation between the usage of the mobile phone in public places, like public transportation, and the increased numbers of traffic accidents. Mobile has been a major distraction on the road even when using the ‘hands-free' system (talking without the involvement of the hands). Some studies have shown that talking on a phone while driving is equally impairing as drinking and driving.  Secondly, there are possible radiation impacts on the brain from mobile phones, with increased possibility of certain types of tumours in long - time, to persistent heavy users.

Finally, the signal of mobile phones can cause serious problems in some public places like hospitals and public transport by interfering with the signal of medical and communication devices. Even in public transport if any patient wears an implanted heart device, the mobile phone can interfere with it, and it could be stopped completely. So mobile phones can have fatal consequences for patients in the hospital and other public places.

In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that the use of cell phones in public places should be prohibited completely.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 10

This is a true fact to consider that in the present days the mobile phone has become a vital part of our life and the majority of the people in the world are using it. However, this biggest revolution seems like has been a cause for irritation in some places. Considering this some analysts insist that mobile phones should be banned in public places. I staunchly agree with the above-recommended proposition due to a variety of notable reasons.

There are significant facts and reasons that affirm that mobile phones should be banned in places like hospital, public bus, train, library, shops, convention centres and many other public places because it has been the reason for the annoyance of other people in many ways. First and foremost, distraction could be a significant factor why people get annoyed when other people talk loudly over their mobile phones. For instance, a library mainly focuses on providing a quiet environment for readers; however, when people use mobile phones inside the libraries, the serenity of the environment is lost. The mobile phone should be completely banned in the hospital as it not only disturbs the patients and others but could also tamper with the highly sophisticated machines that are used to diagnosis patients. The mobile phone usages in private cars are one of the main reasons for increased road accidents these days. The use of this device in public transportation is also a violation of privacy and people’s right to travel peacefully.

In spite of the views discussed above regarding banning the mobile phone in public places, there are some groups who consider mobile phones should not be banned in public places. They opine that this is the primary communication device for people and if it is banned, people would suffer greatly and would face many incomprehensible inconveniences. For instance, if someone is travelling in a public vehicle and his office needs to update him for a very urgent issue, banning the use of cell phone would make it impossible. Banning cell phones in places like shopping mall would make it impossible for people to get directions to a shop, compare products online and make an informed decision about purchasing a product.

In summary, due to some benefits offered by the mobile phone usages in public places, it would be hard to ban its usages in public places. However, I think that imposing some restrictions on mobile phone usages in public places would be a better idea.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 11

Mobiles have made communication easier and more convenient. However, sometimes people talking on their mobile phone disturb the surrounding environment and the general public. Because of this reason, several people have opined that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops and on buses and trains. I agree with this view.

When people traveling on a bus or train make or receive calls on their mobile phone, they are causing a great deal of disturbance to other passengers. In order to ensure that the listener can hear properly, the caller often talks too loudly. This can disturb fellow passengers who may be reading or sleeping. And when people driving a vehicle talk on their mobiles, it can result in fatal accidents. This cannot be allowed at all.

Libraries are another place where the use of mobile phones should be banned or discouraged. Library is meant for reading and thinking. If people use mobile phones when they are inside the library, they will unnecessarily disturb other people reading or studying there.

By simply banning mobiles in public places, we cannot perhaps solve this problem. We also need to create awareness about the proper and polite way to use mobiles in public places.

Mobile phones have become an integral part of our lives. In fact, most of us can’t even imagine a life without our mobiles. They are also a blessing in emergencies. In such situations, their use must be permitted.

To conclude, there is a real need to ban the use of mobile phones in public places. It is true that they are a necessity and have enriched our lives in many ways, but their excessive use in public places must be discouraged at any cost.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 12

There have been growing concerns about mobile phone use in public, which leads to proposed restrictions on it. From my perspective, this would be too heavy-handed a measure which does more harm than good on the whole.

Admittedly, the opposition to phone usage in public spaces comes from seemingly legitimate reasons. The ringtones and loud conversations on the phone could act as a disturbance to other people. A case in point is a library where readers’ attention is likely to be disrupted by ringing sounds, or a chilling experience at a peaceful coffee shop being ruined by a fellow customer talking too loud on the phone. Despite this argument, a blanket ban on phones would highly likely prove impractical. Phones have been so integrated into our everyday life that the resulting inconvenience of their ban would be massive. This, coupled with the ease of turning on and off one’s phone within seconds, would suggest a high rate of no-phone policy violation. A more acceptable solution would be to require phone owners to use silent mode or to detach themselves from the crowd when a call is coming in.

A strong argument for the right to use mobile phones in public is probably their role in ensuring personal safety and facilitating everyday activities. In the wake of the Covid-19 outbreak, mobile payment, which allows transactions to be conducted conveniently and contactless, is increasingly becoming the norm. With this payment method, the risks of disease transmission could be significantly mitigated as payers could make a wireless transaction to the intended recipient, and if it is a store visit, the add-in QR code-scanning feature allows customers and cashiers to be separated by a transparent screen. Moreover, in an emergency in public, it would be faster and more practical to make a call to seek support. An individual surrounded by fire in a building, for example, could find it safer to reach for his or her phone and contact fire departments instead of crossing the fire to approach the fire alarm.

In conclusion, the inconvenience caused by mobile phone usage in public could easily be eclipsed by the benefits it brings about, making the ban on it arguably insensible. A more viable alternative would be regulation on appropriate mobile phone use in public.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 13

The issue of whether mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport has generated significant debate. While some advocate for a ban to maintain public decorum and tranquility, others argue that such a measure would be overly restrictive and impractical. I contend that while some regulations are necessary, a complete ban is not warranted.

One compelling argument for banning mobile phones in certain public places is the need to maintain a quiet and respectful environment. For instance, in libraries where people go to study or read in peace, the intrusion of ringing phones and loud conversations can be extremely disruptive. Similarly, on public transport, incessant phone use can disturb passengers who may wish to rest or travel in silence. In Vietnam, many public libraries already request patrons to keep their phones on silent mode, demonstrating a compromise that respects both the need for quiet and the practicalities of modern communication. If people adhered to these guidelines more rigorously, the need for a complete ban would likely diminish. This approach suggests that regulation, rather than prohibition, can effectively address the issue of noise pollution.

However, I believe that imposing a total ban on mobile phones in public places is neither practical nor necessary. Mobile phones have become essential tools for daily life, providing access to information, emergency services, and communication. For example, a shopper may need to check product reviews or prices online, and a commuter might rely on navigation apps to reach their destination. Banning phones outright would deprive individuals of these conveniences, leading to frustration and potential safety issues. Additionally, enforcing such a ban would be challenging and could create unnecessary conflicts between authorities and the public. Instead, promoting responsible usage through public awareness campaigns and designated quiet zones could mitigate disturbances without the need for a blanket ban.

In conclusion, while the disruptive potential of mobile phones in public places cannot be ignored, a complete ban is excessive and impractical. Implementing regulations and promoting respectful usage can preserve the benefits of mobile technology while maintaining public order. This balanced approach ensures that public spaces remain harmonious without unnecessarily restricting the advantages of mobile phones.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 14

There have been recent calls for the regulation of mobile phones in public areas. In my opinion, though this would have a positive effect on social interactions, a complete ban is unrealistic and impractical.

Those in favour of such sweeping reforms can point to reduced communication in society. Look inside any public space, whether it be a library, a store, a bus, or a park, and most likely the majority of individuals will be staring at their phones. This stands in stark contrast to the days before smartphones when people had to resort to talking to each other, or, at worst, reading a book to curb social anxiety. In the last two decades, mobiles have greatly reduced chance encounters, potential friendships, and conversations with both strangers and friends. The long-term effects of this are still unknown but it is safe to say that future generations will be less sociable and dynamic and more isolated and passive.

Nonetheless, banning phones in public is purely theoretical as they have become indispensable. Most jobs require employees to either be available by phone, for example doctors and police officers, or to use their phones throughout the day, as is common with businessmen and lawyers. This means most people must have their phone on them in public places for work reasons. Moreover, phone addiction has reached a point where nearly everyone in public is either messaging, playing a game, reading the news, or scrolling through social media. These have become important escapes for individuals and serve the practical purpose of minimising boredom during breaks and while waiting. Phones are therefore no longer a luxury but a key ingredient in daily life.

In conclusion, despite the impact of phones on social interaction, I believe a ban would interfere too much with ingrained habits. It is instead the responsibility of individuals to police their own behaviour.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 15

Mobile phones have become an integral part of our daily lives, offering convenience, connectivity, and information at our fingertips. The debate over whether mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries, shops, and on public transport is a contentious issue. In this essay, I will argue against the complete ban of mobile phones in public places.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the potential disruptions that mobile phones may cause. There is no denying that in some cases, loud phone conversations or constant notification sounds in quiet environments like libraries can be annoying. However, this does not mean that a complete ban is necessary. Instead, public awareness campaigns and strict guidelines on phone etiquette can be more effective in managing such behavior.

On the other hand, mobile phones provide essential services, especially in cases of emergencies. Banning them entirely in public places can lead to problems when people need to call for help, report crimes, or get assistance. Furthermore, in shops and on public transport, mobile phones offer convenience for payments and navigation. In this digital age, they have become an essential tool for many individuals.

In conclusion, while it is important to address the potential disturbances caused by mobile phones in public places, an outright ban is not the solution. Instead, a balance can be struck through public awareness, etiquette education, and the recognition of the invaluable services that mobile phones provide. It is crucial to consider the convenience and safety aspects that mobile phones offer before deciding to ban them completely.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 16

In recent years, the use of mobile phones has become ubiquitous, and it has led to debates regarding their usage in public places. While some individuals believe that mobile phones should be banned in public places like libraries, shops, and public transport, I completely disagree with this view.

Firstly, mobile phones are an essential means of communication for people, especially in emergencies. For instance, if someone is traveling on a bus and suddenly falls ill, having a mobile phone on hand can make all the difference. They can quickly call for emergency medical assistance or alert their family members for help. In such a situation, a mobile phone can save a person's life and banning them in public places could result in dire consequences. Therefore, banning mobile phones in public places can deprive individuals of their ability to contact others in case of an emergency.

Secondly, mobile phones are also essential for people to stay connected with their work and colleagues. In today's fast-paced world, communication plays a vital role in staying updated with work-related activities, and a mobile phone allows for quick and easy communication. To illustrate, a business professional needs to travel frequently for work, and during their travels, they need to communicate with their colleagues and clients constantly to stay updated on work-related activities. A ban on mobile phones would make it difficult for this individual to respond to urgent emails or phone calls, leading to potential missed opportunities and a negative impact on their work. As a result, a ban on their usage in public places would be detrimental to the individual's professional life.

In conclusion, I disagree to a large extent that society should ban mobile phones in public places as it is not a practical solution, and it would deprive individuals of their ability to communicate, work, and entertain themselves.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 17

Mobile phones have revolutionized the way we connect with one another, yet concerns have been raised about their appropriate use in public spaces such as libraries, shops, and public transport. While I acknowledge that phone usage in certain scenarios can be disruptive, I firmly believe that an outright ban is neither reasonable nor necessary.

Mobile phones, as the tool for instant communication, offer undeniable benefits in public spaces. They enable people to stay connected, be it for responding to an employer's call or accepting an invitation from a close friend. These connections often provide a sense of security, as they ensure individuals remain reachable and informed about important work or personal matters. Therefore, banning their use could sever these critical connections, with potentially dire consequences resulting from missed calls or messages from significant contacts.

Furthermore, considering the versatility and multifunctionality of mobile phones, a ban in public places would prove impractical. Mobile phones serve as more than mere communication devices; they facilitate payments, provide access to information, and offer entertainment options. Banning mobile phone use in such situations would undoubtedly lead to inconvenience, requiring individuals and organizations to adjust to a significant change that might not be well-received.

It is true that mobile phone usage in certain public settings like libraries, public transport or restaurants can cause disruptions. For instance, loud conversations or ringtones can disturb readers or passengers nearby, while the excessive use of mobile phones can also hinder face-to- face interaction. However, rather than implementing blanket bans, a more effective approach would involve clear guidelines and etiquette for mobile phone use such as designated "quiet zones", signs that remind individuals to lower their voices or use headphones.

In conclusion, despite the potential drawbacks of mobile phone use in public places, I contend that an outright ban is not the solution. Instead, a more balanced approach involving clear guidance and regulation is needed to ensure that mobile phone use does not cause significant disruptions.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 18

The omnipresence of mobile phones in people’s daily activities has been certainly noticeable, if not glaringly obvious in certain cases. Some even go as far as to suggest that mobile phones be banned in public places. I personally disagree with this statement.

Admittedly, it is not hard to see the reasoning behind this proposed ban of smartphones, which has mainly to do with a concern for preserving public atmosphere. In fact, the device’s artificial bright blue-light and nerve-racking notification alarms become so conspicuous that they border on obtrusiveness in certain cases. For example, in settings that demand absence of visual and aural disturbance like libraries, the presence of smartphones would probably be distracting, hence an unwelcome sight. As such, a ban on smartphones would help ensure the intended spirits and activities of such public spaces.

Given the compelling argument above, mobile phones should not entirely be banned in public spaces. The main reason for this is that many public places, due to their inherent dynamic nature, not only are unaffected by the presence of smartphones but also necessitate the use of such devices. Specifically, on public transport, typically trains and buses, passengers opt to keep mobile phones alongside themselves in case of an emergency or accident. Likewise, in a shopping scenario, a mobile phone would certainly prove useful in the event of a robbery or a fire. Besides the aforementioned urgent needs, mobile phones offer users great convenience in public places, in the form of entertainment while waiting or as a means of transaction in lieu of actual cash.

In conclusion, though there is no denying the intrusion of smartphones into the activities of certain places like a library, a blanket ban on smart phones in all public spaces would seem rather absurd.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 19

The ever-growing use of mobile devices has become a controversial topic. Some individuals believe that the administration should issue a complete ban on mobile phones in publicly accessible places, including libraries and public transport. I cannot entirely agree with this perspective in some instances.

On the one hand, allowing mobile phones in public areas might benefit travelers, customers, and the community. Firstly, it could significantly enhance the traveler experience as visitors in understaffed public spaces could conveniently use their handheld devices to access essential information and instructions on the site without bothering any staff to ask for their help. For example, visitors to museums could simply scan QR codes to explore the information about painters and their masterpieces, or shoopers could use their phone to navigate and locate products in department stores. Secondly, during public health crises, like the Covid-19 pandemic, using phones in public areas could reduce unnecessary contact, contributing to contain the transmission of the virus in the community. For stance, ticket collectors could scan the e-ticket code by bus riders instead of collecting traditional paper tickers, or customers could pay their bill at shops and restaurants by scanning QR codes with their smartphones rather than using physical cards or cash.

On the other hand, I still argue that the ubiquitous mobile phones could degrade the public perception of public space as they create portable personal territories. Cellphone users might be under the illusion that they have privacy even in public areas, so they are more likely to violate social norms about having disruptive, private phone calls. They could also become more detached from the surroundings as they are engrossed in texting or browsing websites. As the discrepancy of public and private spheres might become less transparent, while the role of public spaces in educating people about how to behave and interact with those different from themselves might be incredibly hindered if smartphone users no longer feel they need communication with strangers. By banning mobile devices in public sites, organization and the administration could keep the public in the oublic sphere, and actively encourage people to observe and interact with one another.

In conclusion, while mobile phones could be beneficial to visitors’ experience and help contain the spread of virus during public health crises, I still believe that banning these devices could preserve the public spheres’ originality and enhance social interactions.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 20

The prevalence of mobile phones has become a contentious issue in recent years, to the extent that some have argued for a prohibition of these devices in public spaces. Despite some reasons to support this belief, I am inclined to disagree with it, as such a ban would be harmful and unnecessary.

There are valid arguments in favor of prohibiting mobiles in public space. A major one is that cell phones can be disruptive and distracting. In a library, for instance, the sound of a phone ringing can interrupt the concentration of other individuals who are attempting to study or work. Additionally, such a prohibition may prevent young people from adopting negative behaviors. Without a ban, some youngsters may observe adults using phones in public and attempt to replicate such behavior, subsequently becoming attached to mobile devices. This is clearly harmful to children’s ability to focus and could also impact their educational achievement. Therefore, a ban on mobile phones in public places could decrease disruption and improve the habits of the youth.

However, prohibiting cell phones in spaces accessible to the public should not be supported. Firstly, mobile phones can serve as a valuable tool for communication and safety. If an individual is traveling alone on public transport and faces an emergency, they may need to contact someone else, such as emergency services. Prohibiting mobile phones in such instances would hinder their ability to seek assistance. Additionally, this policy could impose an unnecessary limitation on people’s access to information. As mobile phones enable convenient access to and dissemination of knowledge, those affected by a ban would inevitably feel restricted and dissatisfied. Hence, outlawing mobile usage in this manner may ultimately cause more harm than good.

In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of banning mobile phones in public places, it is not a beneficial measure. Instead, it is advisable to devise gentler solutions for issues arising from the public use of cell phones, rather than implementing a complete ban on these devices.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 21

It is argued that a ban on mobile phones in public spaces should be enforced. From my perspective, such a ban would be unreasonable, but there should still be restrictions put in place.

Prohibitive measures on mobile phones are redundant for the reasons below. First of all, these devices are vital in case of emergency. Should there be an accident, for instance, people would be able to contact medical support or their family promptly, thus avoiding worse outcomes. Secondly, cell phones can be switched to silent or even airplane mode with a few simple manipulations, which means they do not have to be intrusive to others in shared spaces. Another point to take into account is that phones provide users with entertainment during long journeys, especially on public transport.

Nevertheless, it is my belief that mobile phones should be restricted in public places. One reason is how phones can intrude on others' privacy when noises are leaked from them. These unwanted sounds can disrupt people from their tasks, or worse, be a source of annoyance for them. This is especially the case in music halls or libraries, where even the slightest interruptions can spoil people's enjoyment. Furthermore, using phones in public, specifically when conversing with others, is deemed antisocial. Instead of exchanging interactions, interlocutors can miss out on parts of the conversation, or not participate altogether while on their cell phones, which can be considered disrespectful.

To summarise, although mobile phones should still be allowed in communal spaces, usage should still be limited on the aforementioned grounds.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 22

There are some who believe that cell phones should not be permitted in spaces meant for the common masses, like libraries, stores, and public transport. I completely disagree with the given notion because it may adversely impact the productivity of individuals.

Nowadays, people usually access the internet on their mobile phones while on the move. It not only allows them to stay connected but also enhances their overall efficiency. For example, many working professionals read and reply to their emails while travelling by metro. If such usage is prohibited, it will be a drastically negative step as in this digital era, many people work remotely, using their cell phones. This, in turn, would also have a negative consequence on the earnings of many people.

Besides, even in places like libraries and shops, people should not be restricted from using them because there are various features that can be turned on in order to avoid disturbing others. For instance, if one wants to listen to a podcast while sitting in a library, one can simply plug in some earphones. Even silent communication is possible by means of text messages, which create no noise. Finally, although people may overuse this gadget at times, it is an integral part of modern society. Banning it could create panic in case of emergency situations. To illustrate, nobody would want to be blissfully ignorant while being in a library reading a novel for pleasure when there could be a medical emergency with their friends or family.

To conclude, prohibiting cell phones in public areas will not be a judicious move as, in my opinion, it will bring down the working capacity of people. Apart from this, modern technology has certain features which allow a person to use it without causing any disturbance to others.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 23

Opinions are divided on whether cell phones should be prohibited in public spaces. Personally, I think that a complete ban on this versatile device is unreasonable and that certain restrictions on usage are more advisable.

On the one hand, opponents of the ban claim that cell phones can be intrusive in public areas for some reasons. Firstly, there are particular places in which people have certain expectations of the environment and code of conduct. For example, mobile phones are considered disturbing in libraries because their notification sounds can disturb those requiring a quiet working environment, or banning phones with camcorders in cinemas is to prevent audiences from violating copyright laws. Another common argument for prohibiting mobile phone usage in public areas is that it might interfere with particular medical electronic devices, such as pacemakers. Banning mobile phones in such places is arguably a coherent policy if this could propose a valid threat.

On the other hand, I would argue that prohibitive measures on mobile phones on public premises can prove injudicious to enforce for two reasons. First, the mobile phone is an essential tool that has been integrated into modern human life. The device has been developed to fulfill a variety of human needs, from serving as a recorder, a camera, and a calendar to a music player and even an encyclopedia with the power of the Internet. Public places with strict regulations against distraction, like libraries, still allow functions without external sounds. People could put their phones in vibration mode, take pictures without the shutter sound and listen to music using earphones. Second, there are many situations where people need to be available constantly. It could be a job-related or family-related emergency that necessitates their presence immediately. Even in hospitals, both patients and medical staff use mobile phones to communicate. The former may have to contact their relatives, while the latter may require the devices for effective inter-staff communication.

In conclusion, while suitable restrictions on mobile phone use in public spaces are necessary to avoid causing problems for others, I still maintain that this multi-purpose technology should not be completely prohibited but used with respect for others instead, after considering its utility and permeation.

Some people think that the use of mobile phones should be banned in public places like - mẫu 24

Mobile Phones have become the rage of present times and has led to formation of a new kind of addiction i.e. of mobile phones. People are often seen on their phones almost every time. Some people, therefore, believe that a ban must be put on using phones in public places such as libraries, shops or public transport. In my opinion, banning mobile phones will surely have great benefits, however, it will also create a sense of restriction.

Mobile phones bring with them their own set of issues. Firstly, phones are too anti-social as people are too busy sending messages to talk to the people in front of them, for example in a shop when they are being served. Secondly, signals can cause problems in some public places such as hospitals by interfering with delicate instruments or equipments. Thirdly, in public places such as libraries, music halls or gallerias, phones can annoy and ruin the experience of others.

However, phones also bring with them some added advantages. Firstly, they can be useful in case of emergencies such as accidents in public places. Secondly, they are useful for families living overseas to get in touch, which may happen any time even when out in public. Thirdly, phones are multi-functional and can be used as recording devices or cameras. Even more a phone can easily be put into silent mode.

Overall, I believe, mobile phones should be banned in places where they interfere with with equipment, interrupt a service or break rules, such as in a library, but in all other public places they should be allowed as long they are used with respect to others.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In the modern world, schools are no longer necessary because there is so much information available through the Internet that children can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Large companies use sports events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative impact on sports. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Is this a negative or positive development?

• Ambition is a positive quality for people to have in society today. How important is it for people who want to succeed in life? Is it a positive or negative characteristic?

• Some people think that competition at work, at school and in daily life is a good thing. Others believe that we should try to cooperate more, rather than competing against each other. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---