Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old

Đề bài: Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 1

Education is a major concern in most countries, which determines young people’s life prospects and the whole social development. While some educationalists suppose all young people aged under 18 should receive full-time education, I can hardly approve of this opinion.

Admittedly, achieving universal full-time education among all under-18 youngsters, to some extent, exerts a positive impact on both the students and the whole society. For one thing, full-time education provides chances for the young generation to become adequate for future practical work, after being equipped with sufficient knowledge and skills. For another, it is more literate young people in the society that help to control the youth unemployment and in the long run, lower the crime rate, since juvenile delinquency is largely caused by idle adolescents, who have been out of school from an early age. After all, the well-educated youngsters are the driving force for social progress.

However, not all young people should be forced to attend full-time education until they are 18 years old. Some students are not academically capable, and they are eager to get rid of boring curricula as early as possible to pursue their own dreams in other fields. In other words, full-time education may deprive them of the basic rights to realize self-development, which may even lead to rebellion and strong aversion. Furthermore, the financial burden is another obstacle which cannot be ignored. Paying tuition fees for at least 18-year-period education is not affordable for all young individuals and their families. Therefore, taking the economic conditions into consideration, the youth from disadvantaged families are more willing to be engaged in the work earlier, rather than continue a longer period of high-level education, despite the higher income it may bring in the future.

In conclusion, the original intention of mandatory full-time education before adulthood is definitely beneficial to the young generation and the society, but the policy implementation must take the feasibility into account, to guarantee the ultimate effect.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 2

Owing to the surge of humanity's social and technological progress, education has been made more accessible to the young. Therefore, it is thought that primary and secondary education should be made compulsory. From my point of view, as education is fundamental to the growth of a human being, mandating children and teenagers to study full time should be of utmost importance.

Neglecting to educate young individuals during their growing phase can affect them morally, intellectually, and mentally. A prime example for this is that most children who do not receive education from their parents or teachers are observed to stray from their morally good path and tend to become vagrants or criminals. They can also become mentally stunted and behave outside established social norms. Academically, they may not attend higher education and resort to menial labor work. It is recommended that for the young to mature and satisfy the conditions which modern society demands of them, full-time education should be implemented.

Another aspect is that a lack of education severely affects one's drive and general purpose. As aforementioned, due to them being mentally stunted from potential neglect, not receiving any kind of education, or more precisely put, moral or career counselling can make them feel lost and more delayed compared to their peers. As a result of not being introduced to a way forward, they tend to feel as if they have gotten dealt a very bad hand in life and lose the drive to go on living. In fact, one of the main reasons that contribute to teenage suicides is that young people fail to see where they will be or what they will do in the future.

Based on these reasons, there is no doubt that proper education should be the first thing in mind for all young individuals. The public and the government should be aware of these scenarios to incentivize educational reform or make tuition free for the younger generation.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 3

In contemporary society, the proposition that adolescents ought to remain in formal education until the age of 18 has sparked a vibrant debate. This discourse examines the balance between extending educational opportunities and recognizing diverse pathways to adulthood.

Advocates for mandatory education until 18 argue that it equips young individuals with essential knowledge and skills, fostering a well-informed and competent future workforce. Within the Vietnamese context, this approach could significantly contribute to elevating the overall educational standard, aligning with the nation's aspirations towards becoming a knowledge-based economy. For instance, if young people were required to pursue their studies until this age, Vietnam might witness an increase in skilled professionals across various sectors, from technology to healthcare, bolstering economic resilience and innovation. Yet, this perspective might not fully account for the nuanced needs of all students, particularly those whose strengths lie outside the academic realm or who are eager to enter vocational training or entrepreneurship early.

However, I believe that while education is fundamentally important, a blanket mandate for full-time education until 18 may not serve every individual's best interests. The diversity of talents and career aspirations among young people necessitates a more flexible approach to education. For example, in Vietnam, many successful entrepreneurs and artisans began their careers without completing traditional full-time education until 18, instead opting for specialized training or starting their enterprises at a younger age. This pathway should be recognized as equally valid, provided that young individuals are making informed decisions about their futures.

In conclusion, while advocating for extended education until 18 is well-intentioned, aiming to prepare young people for the complexities of the modern world, it is crucial to acknowledge and support alternative educational and vocational pathways. A more inclusive approach, accommodating the varied talents and aspirations of the youth, would arguably contribute more effectively to both individual fulfillment and societal progress.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 4

Many feel that students should be required to attend full-time classes until the age of 18. In my opinion, when economically viable this mandate is advisable.

Those who oppose this policy argue it is impossible in more rural areas, particularly in developing nations. In such locations, children and teenagers often do not have convenient access to schools and assisting their parents with farm or other work is a greater priority. For example, in many rural villages in South Asia, even young children must lend a hand working to raise crops and livestock. The parents of these children can also make the legitimate argument that they are preserving a traditional and equally valuable way of life that does not involve modern schooling. However, these contexts are becoming rarer as individuals migrate to cities and the countryside receives improved infrastructure.

The main reason to support compulsory full-time education to the age of 18 is the opportunities it opens up in an evolving world. The lifestyle in rural areas that now seemingly justifies reduced schooling is disappearing due to more efficient farming equipment and the industrialization of production methods. Therefore, the most viable path for most individuals is to have an education through high school and ideally university that will endow them with employable skills. For instance, an individual who has learned a variety of subjects and graduated from formal schooling can then apply either for higher education or a job that requires a high school certificate. Both their worst- and best-case scenarios for the future improve considerably.

In conclusion, despite the valid reasons that exist in rural communities to de-emphasize education, it is worthwhile to enforce mandatory schooling for all minors. This is now more important than ever as job markets become more competitive.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 5

Some people think that all children should stay at school until the age of eighteen. Although staying at school until adulthood can produce a number of benefits, I personally disagree with this idea for a number of reasons, which will be outlined in this essay.

On the one hand, the idea that children should continue to study at school until the age of eighteen does have a number of benefits. Firstly, most young people under the age of eighteen have very little real-world experience and have very little idea of what career they will pursue, and therefore staying at school until the age of eighteen will allow them further opportunity to develop their education and time to decide upon a suitable career path. Furthermore, forcing children to stay at school until the age of eighteen will create a more educated future generation of people which may help to reduce some social and unemployment problems.

On the other hand, there are also a number of drawbacks that this idea may bring with it. For instance, many children these days do not fit-in with the current education system and forcing them to participate in school can cause many problems. For example, these kinds of students are usually very disruptive in a classroom, and this affects other students who are trying to learn. In addition to this, many children choose to follow careers that do not require them to continue studying in school past the age of sixteen. For example, for those who wish to pursue a career that requires more practical based learning, such as a qualified builder, electrician or machinery operator, it is quite unnecessary to remain at school until the age of eighteen.

In conclusion, although there would be a number of positive effects from children remaining at school until a later age, I personally feel that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits mentioned above.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 6

Whether every student should stay at school or not is a debatable topic. Some people argue that students should be allowed to leave school before completing their secondary education so that they can pursue their own interests. However, some people disagree with this fact. I agree that it is very important to complete education before adulthood. Education is a very integral part of one’s career. It should be completed before plunging into the professional world. Education can enrich students with the knowledge and skills that are required to survive in today's world. It is very important for everyone to learn the basics of human life and morals which can be attained through education. Youth is considered to be the developmental unit of every country. They should be provided with adequate knowledge and opportunities. Their knowledge plays an important role in the development of a country.

It is proven that students who have completed their higher education get better job opportunities than those who do not complete their education. For example, it is very important to learn a worldwide foreign language like English. It will help them to communicate and work with people around the world. Learning a global language helps to get jobs abroad and in other countries. This can be learned if the students complete their education in school properly.

Life at the school campus is very important. People need to socialize, and they learn this at school. Socializing helps a child to be mature and learn a variety of skills. Students are able to spend time with their peers and teachers. This helps them to be familiar with communal life and also prepares them for their workplace interaction. Students gain a huge amount of knowledge from their classrooms, textbooks, teachers, and school environment. Not only book knowledge but also real-life knowledge is gained. These play a vital role in framing the students' future and also preparing them for their future prospects.

Hence, it is very important for a child to complete their education. I believe that higher secondary education exists for a reason and that cannot be broken. The authorities should also take part in this by stopping students from leaving school before they complete their school education. parents should be encouraged to keep their children at school until they are prepared.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 7

It is very essential to be regular in school until the student attains 18. I am for this view. Every student must go to school until he is 18. Here are some positive and negative impacts of not attending school.

Schooling provides huge opportunities to acquire skills, knowledge, and moral values. Which are essential in future life. School life also provides the students an opportunity to mingle with other students, which makes them learn how to socialize with others. They get to know many moral values like how to behave in a public place, how to interact with each other, etc. All this learning will help them in their professional life in the future and will widen their job opportunities. Educating all the children will also reduce illegal activities and child employment. For example, if all the children in a village complete their schooling. Instead of helping their family in the field of farming. Then they will acquire the basic skills and knowledge that are essential to get a better-paid job than farming. Then their family can also get relieved from poverty.
On the other hand, if they do not have proper schooling, or drop out of school early, then they can get engaged in criminal activities. As they get enough spare time, and do not get proper guidance or cannot build the basic intelligence to decide. Which is good or bad for themselves, they fall into the wrong pockets. They will become lazy, and as the saying goes, 'a lazy mind is the devil’s workshop.' They will lose their capability to work hard and will get engaged in criminal activities. For example, one of my distant relatives in my village did not send their son to school as they had some family issues. Therefore, their son used to ramble about here and there without any planning and did not have any moral, social, or cultural values. Thus, slowly he started losing his capability to work, and ability to make a wise decision. Eventually, he joined a racket.

Thus, these two instances have a positive and negative impact of completing the schooling until 18. Hence, it is very important for everyone to stay at school till 18.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 8

It is a universal fact that education is a prodigious tool for survival. However, it is a controversial topic among people whether involvement of adolescents in full time education is indispensable or not. To my mind, this practice is not only a primary assignment, but a key to secure future despite some potential risks.

It is conspicuous that full time education is not entirely prosperous for teenagers because it is virtuous for them as adaptation of such practice can feed them with infallible information with limitless insight on various subjects which in turn will equip them with more opportunities. There have been some recorded instances that by contributing full time in study students can evaluate problems by having improvement in their intelligence quotient.

To discern the beneficial functioning of full-time education for under 18 it is justifiable to mention that engaging in this activity may facilitate it for students to dispose of the ideas of acquiring knowledge concerning to violent activities and negative habits whereas the inimical side of full-time education persisted. Not to mention the deplorable effects associated to mind as it can exacerbate the mental health, but it is righteous to comment that students should have the choice to pursue their own path instead of devoting all time in obtaining education.

To conclude, it is apropos that full time education should be prioritized to compile knowledge while in some cases isolation from education is mandatory for regulating life in precise manner.

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old - mẫu 9

It’s undeniably true that instruction is a tremendous device for endurance. Anyway, it is a questionable subject among individuals whether inclusion of youths in full time schooling is imperative or not. To my brain, this training isn’t just an essential appraisal, but a key to get future notwithstanding of a few expected chances.

It is obvious that full time instruction isn’t totally prosperous for teens since it is righteous for them as variation of such practice can take care of them with faultless data with boundless knowledge on different subjects which thusly will outfit them with more open doors. There have been a few kept occurrences that by contributing full time in concentrate on understudies can assess issues by having improvement in their IQ.

To perceive the advantageous working of all day training for under 18 legitimate to make reference to taking part in this action might work with it for understudies to discard the thoughts of getting information worried to vicious exercises and negative propensities while the unfriendly side of full-time schooling is persevered. Also the unfortunate impacts related to the mind as it can intensify the emotional well-being, yet it is honest to remark on that understudies ought to have the decision to seek after their own way as opposed to giving untouched in getting schooling.

To conclude, it is pertinent that full time instruction ought to be focused on to arrange information while now and again confinement from schooling is obligatory for managing life in exact way.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• It is important for all towns and cities to have large public outdoor places like squares and parks. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• Nowadays a large amount of advertising is aimed at children. Some people think this can have negative effects on children and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In many nations, people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units, instead of in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend?

• Many people find it hard to balance their work with other parts of their lives. What are the reasons for this? How can this problem be overcome?

• Children's education is expensive. In some countries, the government pays some of or all of the costs. Do the advantages outweigh its disadvantages?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---