All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 1

There have been calls for large corporations to build sports and social facilities for the local communities where they operate. In my view, I would agree on the grounds that these facilities can strengthen communal bonds and promote a company’s image in a positive light.

Firstly, as most people are increasingly beset with professional and familial duties, they often lack the time to participate in communal activities and forge meaningful connections with one another. By constructing sports and social facilities, these companies can grant these people the appropriate setting for them to participate in common activities. This is evident in cities well-known for quality of life such as Hanoi where most of the parks there have been built by Vinaconex, one of the largest companies in Vietnam. Hence, most of the local denizens are able to engage in conversation with each other and forge new relationships during holiday seasons or through recreational activities held in those parks.

Secondly, the provision of communal facilities can create a positive image of the sponsoring companies. These facilities promulgate a sense that the sponsors are giving back to the community and fulfilling public promises of social responsibility. This can therefore build trust between these large companies and the local people. To cite one instance, Nostrand Ltd., a latex manufacturer based in upstate New York, provided funding for local sports centers in various towns across the state, enabling their citizens to engage in various community-based sports. A by-product of this act is residents there now appreciate the brand and purchase the company’s products at a higher rate.

In conclusion, large companies should be encouraged to provide sports and social facilities for local communities as they can help strengthen communal bonds and promote their brand. Such facilities will continue to flourish in the near future because of these decided benefits.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 2

It has been suggested that big businesses should support local communities by providing facilities for people to socialise and play sports. In my opinion, I completely disagree with this point of view as supporting local communities should not be the responsibility of businesses.

Firstly, the provision of such facilities should be the duty of the government, not businesses. Governments collect taxes from citizens, and therefore should be responsible for providing facilities that enhance people’s quality of life. In other words, taxpayers’ money should be used to provide them with a decent standard of living. The welfare of people in the community should not be the concern of local businesses. Instead, they should solely focus on their own growth, making profits, maintaining a competitive edge, and ensuring their development. For example, it seems unfair to force multinational companies into solving local problems that should be handled by local governments.

Secondly, it is better for companies to allocate their resources to other aspects of their business. Most businesses do not have the funds available to simultaneously support the local community and promote their own growth. Sports and social facilities might be too expensive, deterring companies from further developing. It would be better if money could be spent on other aspects of work, such as salary increases, bonuses, and extra time off. This certainly benefits employees, increasing the level of job satisfaction among them, thereby encouraging them to work more diligently. As a result, this contributes to the national economy, helping create a motivated and committed workforce.

In conclusion, I believe that promoting social development and sports in local areas should not be the obligation of large companies but rather that of governments, so that companies can fully concentrate on business growth and employee productivity.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 3

Opinions vary on whether the provision of sports and social facilities to the local community an obligation for all companies should be. Although I may acknowledge the benefits of this suggestion, I still firmly think that this should not be mandatory for all.

Those who are in favor of companies providing sports and social facilities may have several cogent arguments. They may well argue that by doing so, companies can enhance their public image. For instance, Google, Apple, and other technology giants have been known to invest in local community projects, which has boosted their reputation as organizations that fulfill their corporate social responsibility. Furthermore, providing sports and social facilities can have a direct positive impact on employees of the company. Access to these amenities can improve employee well-being, reduce stress, and increase overall job satisfaction, which can make them more likely to be productive and engaged in their work and in turn ultimately benefits the company.

Nevertheless, I am firmly against the notion that all companies should be responsible for providing these facilities. One primary concern is that not all companies have the financial capability to undertake such initiatives. Small and medium-sized enterprises, in particular, may struggle to allocate funds for community projects without compromising their core business operations. Another reason is that the responsibility of providing sports and social facilities traditionally should mainly fall within the realm of government and public institutions as these entities are better positioned to assess community needs and allocate resources accordingly. While corporate involvement is beneficial, it should complement, rather than replace, public efforts.

In conclusion, while it is beneficial for companies to provide sports and social facilities to the local community, this should not be an obligation for all companies. Large corporations with the necessary resources can and should contribute to community development as part of their corporate social responsibility initiatives; however, smaller businesses should not be compelled to undertake such projects if it jeopardizes their financial stability.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 4

Whether sports and social facilities should be built by large corporations for the local community has become a topic of discussion. From my viewpoint, I strongly believe that this practice is reasonable and beneficial for both the locals and the businesses.

First of all, that large corporations build community facilities would improve the local’s welfare tremendously. Benefits and funds allocated to different areas in a country will vary depending on their economic and political importance. That is why in Vietnam, provinces like Hai Phong are less developed than Ho Chi Minh City or Hanoi, thus locals of Hai Phong do not have the chance to experience top-notch facilities as in big cities. Nevertheless, Hai Phong is home to various factories of well-known brands. If these businesses help pay for the construction of sports and recreational facilities in the province, Hai Phong’s citizens would have equal quality of life as Hanoians. Since the government cannot invest uniformly throughout a country, large enterprises building local facilities would be a great help in improving the country’s social welfare.

Moreover, providing sports and social facilities for the local community is a way for businesses to fulfill their corporate social responsibility. As a matter of fact, all corporations are bound to give back to the community in one way or another. However, in comparison to doing charities or organizing marathons, providing the community with sports and social facilities would leave a more lasting impact and on a much larger scale. Not only that people from different social classes can make use of the given installations, but these facilities would last for many years to come, reminding the locals of the businesses’ good deeds.

In conclusion, it is recommended that large businesses give back to the community by equipping them with sports and social facilities. In this way, the community’s welfare and the companies’ image would simultaneously be promoted positively.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 5

Whether large corporations should provide sports and social facilities within their local communities has been a cause for debate in recent years. While some claim that corporations should only be driven towards generating profit, I believe otherwise, as there are causes for doing so, and significant benefits that may arise from this.

On the one hand, this might be a frivolous idea because a corporation's usual responsibility is to its shareholders, and not the broader community. It is often believed that large organizations, firstly, should focus on staying profitable to sustain their own health. By emphasizing their core business and maximizing profits, corporations could indirectly contribute to society by creating employment, improving the economy in the locality where they operate as a result. Public welfare, furthermore, is chiefly the government's responsibility, not businesses’. Instead of having companies build sports and community facilities, the state can utilize tax revenue and fund the aforementioned public amenities and services instead.

There might be a case to argue for corporate sponsorship of sports and social facilities, however. Initially, large companies have an ethical obligation to contribute to their local communities. These gargantuan organizations, which may operate globally and generate substantial profits, should devote some of their resources for the public good, because they were able to take advantage of rules and regulations where they operate for business gain. Besides that, an initiative such as this fosters community spirit and a positive environment. A local area would appear livelier and more reputable if recreational and social facilities exist for the community to gather at and participate in various activities. This, in turn, has the added effect of enabling it to attract further investment, sparking economic growth.

In conclusion, despite the claim that large companies ought to be profit-driven, I agree with them contributing to their local communities by establishing sports facilities and the like for public use. However, rather than being mandated, such a contribution should be encouraged and incentivized by the state, so that all parties involved may derive maximum benefit.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 6

The role of large companies in supporting their local communities has long been debated, particularly regarding whether they should provide sports and social facilities. While some argue that this responsibility falls outside their primary business objectives, others contend that such initiatives can yield numerous benefits. This essay will discuss both perspectives before presenting my opinion.

Those who oppose the idea of large companies funding community sports and social facilities argue that these corporations should focus on their core business activities. They believe that diverting resources to non-essential projects could negatively impact a company's profitability and competitive edge. For instance, the allocation of funds to build a community sports center might limit investment in research and development, potentially stifling innovation. Moreover, the responsibility for public amenities traditionally lies with the government, which is better equipped to manage such projects efficiently. However, it is also argued that companies have a social obligation to give back to the communities where they operate, as this can enhance their reputation and foster goodwill among local residents.

However, I believe that providing sports and social facilities can significantly benefit both the community and the company itself. Firstly, these facilities can promote a healthier lifestyle among residents, reducing the prevalence of chronic diseases such as diabetes and heart conditions. For example, in Vietnam, where urbanization has led to a more sedentary lifestyle, access to community sports centers can encourage regular physical activity. Furthermore, the presence of such amenities can foster a sense of community and improve social cohesion, making the area more attractive to potential employees and investors. If companies invested in these facilities, they would likely see a positive impact on employee morale and productivity, as a healthier and happier workforce is more engaged and efficient.

In conclusion, while there are valid arguments on both sides, I am convinced that large companies should indeed provide sports and social facilities for their local communities. Not only does this fulfill a social responsibility, but it also offers tangible benefits that can enhance both community well-being and corporate success. By investing in such initiatives, companies can create a more supportive environment for their employees and contribute to the overall development of the areas in which they operate.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 7

Exercise and social interaction are obviously essential for human life in general. As a result, some argue that businesses ought to offer local communities sports and social amenities. Since people can take pleasure in it and share their expertise, in my opinion, it appears to be advantageous to the majority.

In today's world, one way that people can lend a helping hand to their communities is by bringing up a cultural exposition and permitting members of the general public to display their own works of handicraft there. If they charge a fee to get in, not only will they be able to provide entertainment for their guests, but they will also be able to collect cash. In addition, it has the potential to serve as a tourism destination in each region, which has the dual effect of benefiting both society and the economy. In addition to this, the populace might pick up tidbits of information by working together as a team with a large corporation. Despite this, the events could end up costing a significant amount of money.

But there are many businesses on Earth. Several people from different places, families, and communities work for the same business. Putting in place sports and social facilities could be good for both societies and businesses. For a sports facility, a company might hold a sports event or sports day that local people can join. As a result, this may get most people to care more about their health and bodies. Also, it is likely to help people in the community get along well with each other.

In conclusion, even if a substantial budget is necessary, it is well worth it to have the sports and social facilities available because there are many benefits associated with doing so. It has the potential to enhance both the community and the general welfare of the population.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 8

Organizations are often urged to provide recreational and entertainment facilities such as gyms, cafes, and movie theaters for the local community. For many reasons, this is an assertion with which I agree wholeheartedly.

To begin with, amenities should be offered to the whole society as local communities are the most important group of society. It would be mutually beneficial to both the company’s sector and the communal group. In the first place, a great number of residents invest a significant portion of their free time in order to acquire the advantages of provided facilities; thus, they end up shelling out a significant amount of money. Therefore, businesses have the opportunity to boost their revenues by capitalizing on this repeated pattern.

Building hospitals and shopping centers can make people's lives better. This makes people more likely to try new things and do well in their communities. Second, making games and activities for the public helps people stay healthy. In addition, this trend of increasing numbers of businesses adopted in the modern era has resulted in the creation of a large number of jobs as well as a diverse array of entertainment options for people. This will not only boost the overall income but also enhance the economical condition of the economy in the global platform. 

To conclude, I am of the opinion that the preceding remarks lend support to the viewpoint that businesses ought to build social and sports facilities for domestic consumers because, in the long run, there will be benefits for both parties involved.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 9

Every individual, organization, and government in a community bears a unique obligation toward its members and toward society as a whole. This idea that the party needs to provide social amenities for the general population is one with which I fully disagree. In this essay, I will first provide a discussion of the topic at hand, then move on to offer a conclusion that is supported by logic.

Every nation has private teams that support its economy. They can offer an appropriate environment for the schooling of common people, as well as recruit individuals and pay them regular incomes. As a result, they assist in reducing unemployment. In addition, they may offer their personnel greater amenities including health care, sports facilities, and educational amenities. As a result, their workforce works harder and more enthusiastically, which ultimately produces positive results. More staff are required as a result of increased financial activity and additional benefits. The government can reduce unemployment with the aid of such a function.

However, if the club participates in additional activities, such as promoting social facilities, it is possible that its members will become distracted from the primary objective. In contrast, because members of private groups are responsible for paying their own costs and expenses along with their benefits, these groups are cost conscious. Additionally, they do not enjoy spending money in this sector. If kids are forced to participate in these activities, they probably won't do very well.

To sum up, to the best of my knowledge, it is preferable for the general public, businesses, and the government for this activity to be carried out by an organization that is not-for-profit or charitable, and businesses stand to gain more if they improve working conditions for their employees.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 10

It is often argued that major corporations are obliged to construct sporting and social facilities for local residents. I largely agree with this view, considering the positive contributions of such initiatives to the local community and companies themselves.

It is understandable why some individuals oppose the idea of placing community obligations on corporations. Specifically, establishing and maintaining such facilities often requires tremendous investment, which could otherwise be allocated towards core business activities. For instance, instead of building a public sports complex, a company could use these funds to develop innovative products or enhance operational efficiency. This redirection of resources is essential for staying competitive and ensuring long-term growth, both of which are aligned with a company’s primary business goals. Additionally, as companies usually prioritize areas where they operate, solely relying on them for such facilities may lead to unequal access across different communities. To address this issue, the government should play a key role in providing sports and social facilities using taxpayer funds.

Despite the opposition to the proposed social responsibilities for large corporations, I believe they should still contribute to the expansion of public infrastructure. Firstly, as regular physical activity is important for preventing chronic diseases and promoting overall well-being, the corporate provision of sporting facilities can foster a healthier community. For example, funded by Google, the recreational centers in Mountain View, California offer residents a space to exercise, socialize, and relax, thereby reducing stress and enhancing their mental health. Secondly, the construction of community facilities can enhance a company’s reputation and strengthen its brand loyalty. When a company invests in the local community, it sends a strong message about its commitment to social obligations, potentially promoting customer loyalty and attracting more talented candidates who strictly value corporate social responsibility.

In summary, although some individuals may argue against placing community obligations on corporations due to potential financial strain and unequal access, I believe that such initiatives should still be highly encouraged as they would contribute to a healthier society and better brand recognition.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 11

The debate over whether large corporations should offer sports and social facilities in their local communities has been ongoing. While some argue that corporations should focus solely on profit generation, I disagree, as there are compelling reasons and significant benefits associated with such initiatives.

On one hand, it may seem frivolous to expect corporations to prioritize community welfare over profitability. It is commonly held that corporations should first and foremost ensure their profitability and sustainability. By focusing on their core business and maximizing profits, corporations indirectly contribute to society by creating jobs and boosting local economies. Public welfare, moreover, is primarily the responsibility of governments, not businesses. Instead of companies investing in sports and community facilities, governments can utilize tax revenues to fund such public amenities and services.

However, there is a case to be made for corporate sponsorship of sports and social facilities. Large corporations have an ethical obligation to contribute to their local communities. These global entities, which often earn substantial profits, should allocate resources to the public good, considering the benefits they derive from the regulatory environments in which they operate. Such initiatives also promote community spirit and a positive atmosphere. Communities with recreational and social facilities tend to be more vibrant and attractive, thereby fostering economic growth.

In conclusion, while it is argued that corporations should prioritize profit, I support their involvement in providing sports and social facilities for the community. Rather than mandatory, such contributions should be encouraged and incentivized by governments to maximize benefits for all stakeholders.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 12

There is a lot of debate about who should pay for recreational facilities in communities. Although some people believe the business sector should provide these facilities, it is my opinion that this is the role of government.

Some people think that companies should do more to support local communities. By providing sports and social facilities, it is argued that companies can directly benefit communities. Sports facilities will mean the local people are healthier and social facilities will provide meeting places and cultural attractions which will enrich people’s lives. However, it is likely that companies will see this as a way to advertise and may build facilities simply to improve the image of their brand.

Personally, I believe that the government should be responsible for providing recreational facilities. If they are provided by the government, facilities can be advertising-free, aimed solely at improving life in the community. Taxes on businesses could be used to fund these facilities, but the building and maintenance should be carried out by the government. All local businesses could be taxed, which would be more effective than just a few companies providing facilities. This solution provides facilities that will improve the community and are paid for by the business sector.

In conclusion, it is important that public facilities remain advertising free and so I believe it is better for the government to provide recreational facilities which could be funded by taxes on businesses. Before the government decides what to build in each area, local communities must be consulted to see what they really need and want.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 13

Major businesses are expected to contribute to society in the form of providing sporting and other communicative benefits. I strongly agree with this statement because it is their obligation to give back to people which can accelerate social prosperity.

Companies’ profit and revenue depends on people’s favour to their products and service; therefore, the businesses owe to the societies to give them back which could be in terms of donating infrastructure and services. This is resemblance to a win for both ends because a society is benefited from the given facilities, and at the same time, the contributing company can project its presence to a wider group of prospective consumers. Furthermore, from the society’s point of view, it might be too difficult to build sporting arenas and other congregational event spaces spending people’s hard-earned money, whereas big farms can easily build structures that facilitate a community’s engagement, healthcare, education, and employment etc.

Not only assisting with economic problems, but also it stimulates the cultural activities. If there are no places to play sports or gather around, people cannot present their work, share their thoughts, and care each other more directly. In fact, getting together somewhere boosts up emotional attachment among the community members. Furthermore, having the facilities, they can invite music concerts or sport competitions when famous athletes or singers can cause an occasion to bring the people under an umbrella of togetherness which flourishes a community to its best.

To conclude, I believe that big businesses are obliged to provide the society such structural facilities that can help its members to thrive. This social contribution is beneficial to both companies and societies as businesses showcase their presence, and the people are assisted with finance and culture.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 14

In today’s fast-paced and highly competitive world, the role of companies in contributing to the well-being of local communities has become increasingly important. While some argue that companies should focus solely on their core business activities, I firmly believe that they have a responsibility to provide sports and social facilities for local communities.

First and foremost, companies have a moral obligation to give back to the communities in which they operate. By providing sports and social facilities, they can contribute to the physical and mental well-being of local residents. This can have a positive impact on the overall quality of life in the community and foster a sense of belonging and togetherness among its members.

Moreover, offering sports and social facilities can also be beneficial for companies themselves. By promoting a healthy and active lifestyle, they can improve the physical fitness and overall health of their employees. This, in turn, can lead to increased productivity, reduced absenteeism, and lower healthcare costs. Additionally, providing social facilities such as community centers or event spaces can enhance the company’s reputation and create a positive image in the eyes of the public.

Furthermore, investing in sports and social facilities can help companies build stronger relationships with the local community. By organizing events, tournaments, or social gatherings, companies can create opportunities for interaction and collaboration between their employees and local residents. This can lead to a greater sense of unity and cooperation, ultimately benefiting both the company and the community as a whole.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. Not only does this fulfill their moral obligation to give back, but it also brings about numerous benefits for both the company and the community. It is imperative for companies to recognize the importance of investing in the well-being of local communities and take proactive steps to contribute to their development.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 15

A bone of contention here is whether large-scale organizations should support the local community by setting up recreational facilities. While there are obvious financial implications involved in this decision, I stand in firm agreement that the aforesaid approach can be proven as a win-win situation for both companies and the general public.

To commence with, the local inhabitants are likely to benefit immensely from this approach’s implementation. To be precise, the availability of a well-equipped sports club in the neighbourhood with sponsorships could pave the way to success for many young athletics, who often are deprived of such facilities owing to the limited funds. In addition, setting up free local commuting, bus shelters, medical camps in the community is beneficial for many people in need. For instance, the ITC organization sponsors the annual marathon in Chennai and sponsors the winner, consequently supporting local runners.

Probing further, the large-scale companies are expected to be equally in gain. First, sponsoring the social events can be a shortcut to increase brand visibility and build a company’s positive image. To put it simply, the large firms can gain the local population’s trust via these events and get their visible support in the company’s future endeavours. To exemplify, Cognizant, a multinational firm, has a dedicated department called corporate social responsibility to support the local community, which has earned it a good reputation on humanitarian grounds.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down stating that sponsorship of sports or social events by the gigantic firms can be equally beneficial for them and local people. Hence companies should contribute more which would be ploughed back to them in the form of goodwill and raising its profile.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 16

It is a saying that exercising and socializing is a necessity of human life. Thus, some experts suggest that companies should provide sports and social facilities intended for local communities. According to me, it is a beneficiary approach for the majority of the people as it allows them to enjoy and exchange their knowledge. As of today's date, there are several organizations functioning globally. A given organization consists of a number of workers that originate from a different place, family and community. Organizing sports and social facilities helps with the provision of a positive impact on both societies and organizations. This will lead to encouraging more awareness based on health and body. Additionally, it helps with building the foundation for a good relationship between people and community. People can also consider supporting localities by organizing cultural exhibitions and allowing the public to cooperate and display their handicrafts or relevant skills. Along with entertaining visitors, it will also help with generating a sufficient amount of revenue in return. Moreover, it will work as a tourist attraction for the concerned area where it is being organized that will help with enhancement and upliftment of the society and economy at the same time. This will also help with development of skills and knowledge. This will also provide individuals with opportunities to work for big giants and build their own reputation. However, these events might cost a lot of investment for an organization, but eventually it is a positive investment. This will help with building the reputation of the organization and ensure a long-term positive relationship. These initiatives will help with improvement of the lives of locals, help with declining rates of poverty and further ensure decreased crime rates. This will help with increased socialization and communication within their own communities and further ensure that there is a positive bond being built and established. To conclude with, there are a number of advantages that sports, and social facilities will help with, such as raising a lot of funds and several others. It can improve and uplift the living standards of communities.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 17

Needless to mention that companies intend to sustain sports and local facilities in order for local communities. I strongly agree with the statement as there are a number of factors and these have been discussed in the preceding sections below. I believe that efforts provided by organizations towards creating facilities for employees will build a friendly and productive environment. These will help with building an appropriate workplace environment, develop goals and ensure appropriate employee appreciation. To understand, we can quote the example of Jack Ma, who is the creator of Alibaba and is a successful businessman in today’s era. However, before he started his business, he made an attempt towards building lifelong friendships amongst the members of his concerned team. He was able to yield productivity due to the application of concepts of sports and social facilities that ensured improved relationships and increased productivity for his concerned team. These have proved to be beneficial in the long term to ensure appropriate productivity for his concerned workplace and ensure that employees get appropriate breaks and not unnecessary ones that lead to a loss of productivity at the workplace. It is true that companies always intend to develop their business opportunities in order to ensure increased turnover, improve the quality of the product or service and quality of work for the workers associated with the organization. However, there are few bad outcomes of these kinds of sports and social facilities for local communities, such as making workers irresponsible, and further this will also lead to loss of ability of the workers to ensure productivity on a daily basis. This will also lead the individuals to forget their responsibilities associated with modern companies at the global level. In order to conclude with, providing opportunities for workers to solemnly depend upon the managers of concerned organizations for the purpose of management of worker’s condition at a workplace. On the other hand, organizing sports and social events for local communities is a positive approach towards providing excitement and enjoyment.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 18

These days companies and global organizations are opting for exploration of several avenues towards ensuring promotion of their companies as well as their products and services. It is a compelling measure to ensure provision of these relevant facilities for local communities. The major move that can be considered is to provide immense support to the individuals that think this is a good initiative. People in today’s era are burdened with responsibilities both in the fields of professional and personal life. Thus, it becomes complicated to ensure active aprticfiaption in communal activities. Organizing these social and sports facilities will help these individuals to actively engage themselves and be part of fun activities and engage with communities at the same time. It will help them with provision of a potential break from their daily life that might be a burden or might seem boring to them. These will help with engaging in active communication with individuals with different mindsets. Additionally, organizations considering these kinds of activities will help embrace the young talents present within the companies. Moreover, these kinds of opportunities will help with showcasing talents and become a part of the limelight. This will also help organizations with opting for brand ambassadors for their product or services. This will encourage communities to educate their children and become a part of these kinds of potential organizations. These events in the long run might turn out to be profitable for the companies as well and help with reaching out to more people and uphold their goods. For instance, a football match or series is organized by a sports company to promote their products. This will provide youngsters and players to avail and use the products and provide helpful reviews that will ensure free and appropriate promotion of their products. Moreover, this will help with appreciation of values and stocks owned by the company and will definitely increase the interest and consumer base for the organization. I would like to conclude this essay by highlighting a certain set of rules that can be built by an organization to regulate and ensure the participation of young employee bases and people from local communities.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 19

Many believe that substantial businesses should construct sports and communal amenities for the local populace. While I admit that this practice can help promote companies' image, I still mostly disagree with this opinion as this may distract them from their main target and governments should undertake responsibilities of looking after their citizens.

The first reason for my belief is that offering leisure structures and public gathering places to the masses can be a distraction for companies' business activities. This is because their primary goal is to survive in a hyper-competitive global market and any extra social obligations can be exorbitantly expensive. Therefore, this action can decrease their competitiveness and impact their financial stability by diverting resources to irrelevant purposes rather than investing in research and development or in-house training, thus driving them away from their core operations.

Moreover, I also consider that these social responsibilities should be associated with governmental initiatives. In fact, the general public pay tax in hopes of the authorities providing them with improved public welfare. By allocating the state budget to develop sports centres and communal venues, policymakers can be seen as more reliable and promote unity amongst the citizenries.

However, I concede that this can help enterprises enhance their brand awareness. If companies showcase their commitment to the physical and mental well-being of the public, they can gain more support. Therefore, this can somehow increase the profit since businesses can attract more loyal customers that align with companies' sets of values, increasing their market share.

In conclusion, I somewhat believe that companies should not bear the role of developing sports and community infrastructure for society because they might deviate from their main objectives and governments are responsible for such construction. However, I acknowledge that this can assist corporations in articulating a positive organisational image to consumers. Where possible, large conglomerates should cooperate with the government to provide beneficial amenities to the population.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 20

The provision of sports and social amenities by companies for local communities is a topic that sparks debate. I am inclined to support this notion to a certain extent due to various reasons.

On the one hand, offering sports and social facilities can significantly benefit the community. Individuals require venues for physical activities and social interactions. For instance, companies can establish parks or sports centers, which can contribute to the well-being and contentment of the residents. Such initiatives may not only enhance the physical health of the individuals but also foster a sense of community spirit. Furthermore, by demonstrating a commitment to the welfare of the locality, companies can improve their public image, potentially attracting more clientele.

On the contrary, it is essential to acknowledge that not all companies possess the financial capacity to develop such amenities. Smaller enterprises, in particular, may face constraints in terms of financial resources. The construction and upkeep of sports and social facilities entail substantial expenses. Imposing such obligations on small companies could jeopardize their sustainability. Moreover, the responsibility of providing public amenities like parks and sports centers predominantly lies with the government. Governments have access to greater resources and thus are better equipped to ensure the availability of essential facilities for all communities.

In conclusion, although the idea of companies offering sports and social facilities for local communities is appealing, its practicality may be limited. Smaller businesses may lack the financial means to engage in such initiatives, while the primary responsibility for providing these amenities rests with the government. Therefore, while companies contributing to community well-being is beneficial, expecting them to solely shoulder this responsibility may not be feasible in all cases.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 21

Nowadays, companies are exploring various strategies to promote their brand and products, with one compelling measure being the provision of facilities for local communities. I totally agree with this practice because it not only benefits the residents but also serves the interests of the companies themselves.

Firstly, organizing sports and social events allows community members to engage in enjoyable activities, thereby improving their quality of life. For example, at Google's campus in Mountain View, California, the company hosts diverse sports and social events like the annual Google Soccer Tournament and community fitness classes. These events not only provide fun and engaging activities but also foster a sense of community well-being. As a result, the residents' lives are enhanced, and Google's image as a socially responsible and community-oriented company is strengthened.

Secondly, providing such facilities helps companies reach a broader audience and promote their products. In many countries, companies sponsor public areas such as beaches or parks and, in return, are allowed to advertise in these spaces. For instance, when a sports company organizes a football match and uses its own products, the participants and spectators get to experience these products firsthand. This exposure often leads to increased brand recognition and sales, as players and onlookers are more likely to purchase the products they have tried and enjoyed during the events.

In conclusion, companies should indeed provide sports and social facilities for local communities, as it enhances residents' quality of life and offers significant promotional opportunities for the companies.

All large companies should provide sports and social facilities in the local community. To what extent - mẫu 22

Some individuals argue that large corporations should invest in providing sports and social facilities for the local community. Although there are potential benefits to this approach, I firmly believe that it is not the responsibility of big companies.

There are several positive effects if large corporations provide sports and social amenities. Many local areas suffer from a shortage of such facilities, which can be costly to establish. As a result, if large corporations invest in these areas, local residents can benefit significantly, promoting their mental and physical well-being. Moreover, local governments may experience less financial pressure, which can be directed to other essential services. Additionally, corporations can gain benefits from such investments, including brand advertising, contributing positively to the community, and enhancing their corporate image.

However, I disagree that it is the duty of large corporations to fund sports and social facilities. Primarily, these companies have other core responsibilities such as product development and employee training. Diverting funds to community facilities could impose a significant financial burden and impede their primary operational goals. Furthermore, there are numerous other ways for corporations to contribute to the local community, such as creating employment opportunities for local residents or offering work experience programs.

In conclusion, while there are arguments in favor of large corporations investing in social and sports facilities, I personally believe that this should not be considered their responsibility. Instead, their focus should remain on their primary business activities, and there are alternative ways to support the local community.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

• The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels like gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others believe that the main interest is in world business. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---