Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 1

In this day and age, cultural globalization has led to similarities in various aspects of daily life, including fashion, advertising products, brands, diets and TV channels. From my point of view, while this phenomenon offers certain advantages of promoting an interconnected world, I believe the drawbacks outweigh benefits and warrant careful consideration.

There are various advantages of the world having close connections. First, it promotes cultural understanding and connection. Sharing the same media platform contributes to a better awareness of global events, which supports international cooperation and increases shared efforts to tackle timely issues such as wars or climate change. Moreover, the availability of brands allows for easier purchase of goods and services. For example, now we can get a fresh, tasty frappuccino from Starbucks right in Vietnam, instead of traveling to any other countries. This not only potentially improves the quality of life by stimulating competition between brands, but also facilitates economic growth worldwide. However, these benefits are overshadowed by the drawbacks. Despite promoting international dialogues and cooperation, the globalization of cultural patterns from all over the world can also lead to cultural homogenization. This poses a threat to unique traditions and local practices. The prevalence of international brands restricts space for local brands to expand their market size and gain public attention; even though their products might be of the same quality but at a much cheaper price. Moreover, many nations will face the risk of losing their identity if national citizens keep gravitating towards foreign products and neglect supporting local ones.

One might argue that cultural homogenization or the increased similarities between different countries are an important factor contributing to peace and cultural understanding. Nevertheless, engaging and appreciating differences between cultures must also be regarded as more important, for this also constitutes cultural sensitivity and peace between different nations. Fostering international cooperation and world peace, therefore, also involves exchanging and appreciating differences, rather than erasing them.

In conclusion, while the trend brings undeniable benefits, it poses risks to cultural diversity, local economies, and national identity. Therefore, it is crucial to strike a balance between welcoming international influence and optimizing unique, cultural privileges.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 2

In this day and age, contemporary attention has increasingly been placed on the opinion that the boundaries between countries are becoming blurred as people around the world consume the same media. Despite some drawbacks of this development, I believe the benefits still outweigh the downsides.

On the one hand, I must admit that there are some disadvantages to this trend. Firstly, limiting one’s media consumption to outlets that feature news from around the world can mean being ignorant about local news. For example, a small piece of local information, such as a recent robbery, can get lost among the various news coming from around the world. As a result, many people can become insensitive to changes in their local community. Secondly, one might lose one’s cultural identity if following global media outlets carelessly. With the rising trend of the Korean entertainment industry, many people in Vietnam are adapting to the Korean lifestyle. This trend, while generally harmless, has, in extreme cases, led some young adults to degrade their own cultural identities and chase after foreign cultures.

On the other hand, I believe the benefits still outweigh the downsides. Firstly, by following global news, we can learn about social issues happening in other countries and apply solutions to our own. For example, many Vietnamese, especially teenagers and young adults, were interested in the recent US presidential election. Many reported becoming more engaged in political issues in general. As a result, this year’s election in Vietnam saw a peak in engagement among young adults, with many discussions in online forums. Secondly, as more people watch the same media, like YouTube, it provides an opportunity to promote our own culture. For example, more international food bloggers and reviewers are visiting Vietnam because they saw videos and TV series about Vietnamese food on these global media outlets. As a result, the number of tourists to Vietnam has significantly increased.

In conclusion, I understand that there are some disadvantages to this globalization trend in media consumption. However, I think that the advantages brought by this development far outweigh the disadvantages.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 3

Many aspects of culture and people's lifestyles are becoming increasingly similar throughout the world. Although this trend has some benefits, I would agree that the disadvantages are more noteworthy.

On the one hand, the global reach of fashion brands, similar eating habits and similar traditions of people have some major benefits. For instance, Starbucks, the renowned coffee chain, has grown from a single outlet in Seattle to as many as 30,000 shops in around sixty countries. Nearly identical stores serve cups of coffee to hundreds and thousands of customers, no matter whether you are sipping it in New York, London, New Delhi, Melbourne or Istanbul. Thus, the global business opportunity enables many brands to sell products all around the world. As a result, people can enjoy fashion, food and other aspects of diverse nationalities staying in their home country. A stronger bond could be observed among people no matter where they live as a consequence of their similar lifestyle. Thus, the differences among nations are reducing and this is quite helpful in maintaining world peace.

On the other hand, this trend has some striking disadvantages that we should be cautious about. Firstly, the spread of cross-cultural materialistic lifestyles and attitudes makes us less human and more selfish. For example, the role of TV advertisements by global brands, in most cases, is related to the concept of materialism. We are affected by terminal materialism that forces us to buy things for the sake of buying, instead of buying for basic needs. Secondly, with the aggressive spread of market economies and communication technology, local cultures and values are in peril. The true identity and culture are in jeopardy with the influence of alien cultures and the new generation cares less about their history and tradition.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the drawbacks of globalisation and the similar lifestyle of people due to the similar culture in the world far outweigh the few advantages it has.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 4

The discrimination among nations in terms of people's lifestyle, access to information, eating habits and cultural aspects are diminishing with the effect of globalisation and widespread acceptance of technology. Some people see it as a threat to cultural identity, but I take it as a positive sign in terms of improved lifestyle and a better relationship among nations. Without a doubt, the merits of this exceed the disadvantages.

To begin with, globalisation and free trade concepts, that led to the similarities among nations, were not imposed by a rich nation on the rest of the world. Rather, it was a demand of the time that has reduced the gap among countries over time. For example, someone from a developing nation, these days, can avail themselves of the same branded clothes, food, technological devices and so on a citizen in an industrialised country can have. This not only enhances the freedom of choice for people but also opens the windows of opportunity to local brands on the international stage. If countries look more similar around the globe, it means just one thing - the wealth and life standard gaps among people are declining.

Moreover, the trend reduces the cultural gap among nations and help maintain world peace. Also, a growing number of people nowadays go to rich nations for study and work, and similar culture makes them adapt to a foreign country more easily. Freedom of the press and easy access to global information has accelerated this trend and there is no stopping to it.

Finally, the culture and tradition of a nation change over time even without the interference of any alien influence. Hence restricting the overwhelming facilities this trend brings is not a good idea at all, especially when the world still has a huge wealth gap and animosity among nations.

To conclude, the wealth and power gaps among nations may lead to conflicts, and this is why people should be treated as global citizens rather than citizens of a specific country. To make this dream come true, international brands, TV channels and other global facilities should be present in every corner of the world.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 5

Differences among nations are becoming less perceptible these days as people all over the world are sharing the same lifestyle, technology, fashion, foods, advertisements, and entertainment programmes. As a result, cultural identity and traditions are in peril. The following essay advocates that the disadvantages outweigh the benefits of this trend.

The first benefit of this trend is that international brands can produce goods on a mass scale, and the manufacturing cost becomes cheaper. As a result, consumers enjoy the advantage of buying products from global brands at an affordable price. Secondly, people all over the world share the same culinary experience, and that is why they have more food options than ever before. For example, people around the globe can now purchase food based on their preference, whether it is Chinese, Indian or Western food or brands. Furthermore, this trend reduces the cultural barrier and brings people under a common platform where people will have more knowledge and respect about other nations and their customs.

On the contrary, the globalisation of the fashion, entertainment and culinary industries have some severe negative sides. First, many people abandon their cultural values due to this, which hurts the identity of a country. Besides, foreign television shows have negative influences on young people. Many global TV channels, for example, show programmes that are sensitive to other cultures. However, as these shows are easily accessible nowadays, many young people follow them, and as a consequence, adopt a non-acceptable lifestyle and life choices.

In conclusion, the globalisation of fashion, advertising, culinary and entertainment products have both advantages and disadvantages. But, carefully considering both, I strongly feel that it has more negative effects than positive aspects.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 6

These days, it is increasingly common to see people around the world adopting similar fashion trends, favoring the same brands, and even sharing identical eating habits and media consumption. Consequently, the distinct differences between countries are gradually diminishing. This essay will argue that the potential drawbacks of this trend significantly outweigh the benefits.

Granted, the global spread of positive trends, particularly those related to health and well-being, can have a beneficial impact on people's lives worldwide. For instance, the rise of social media platforms like TikTok and Instagram has made it easier for healthy eating habits to gain traction globally. As these lifestyles become popular, people across different regions are more likely to adopt these beneficial dietary practices, leading to improvements in public health.

However, the widespread adoption of global trends at the expense of local customs can lead to a gradual erosion of cultural identity. In Vietnam, for example, many young people have been influenced by Western cultures, adopting clothing styles that emphasize individual freedom. This influence has led to situations where traditional norms are disregarded, such as wearing inappropriate attire in sacred places like temples and pagodas. This lack of respect for local customs has sparked significant debate and even conflict within the community.

Beyond cultural erosion, the dominance of global brands poses a serious threat to local businesses. Large multinational corporations, with their vast resources, can easily outcompete smaller local enterprises through extensive marketing campaigns that shape consumer behavior. By way of illustration, global sports brands like Nike and Adidas have almost monopolized the sportswear market in many countries, leveraging their enormous budgets for advertising, sponsorships, and store placements. This leaves little room for local brands to thrive, ultimately stifling competition and diversity in the market.

In conclusion, while the increasing similarity between countries may offer some minor advantages, such as the dissemination of positive lifestyle trends, I believe that the negative consequences, particularly the loss of cultural identity and the challenges faced by local businesses, are far more significant. This trend threatens to homogenize global cultures and economies, ultimately leading to a less diverse and vibrant world.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 7

In recent times, the cultural differences between countries have diminished as people consume the same TV shows, advertisements, fashion, and brands. While this trend could have positive and negative consequences in equal measures, it is crucial to examine both aspects.

On the one hand, exposure to diverse media from different countries promotes cultural exchange and understanding. People are now more likely to appreciate and learn about various customs, traditions, and perspectives, fostering a more interconnected global community. For instance, the global popularity of K-pop, driven by music streaming platforms, social media, and online video sharing platforms, has allowed people from diverse cultures to engage with South Korean culture. Additionally, access to the same TV shows, advertisements, and media content allows individuals to stay informed about global events, trends, and ideas, which can broaden their knowledge and encourage a more global outlook. International news networks like CNN and BBC exemplify this by delivering extensive coverage of global issues to audiences worldwide.

On the other hand, the convergence of media and brands can lead to cultural homogenization, where local traditions and identities may be overshadowed by a globalized culture. This homogenization could result in the loss of unique cultural characteristics and the erosion of diversity. For example, McDonald's has established a global presence with franchises in numerous countries, often overshadowing local culinary traditions. Furthermore, global media and brands are frequently controlled by powerful multinational corporations, which can perpetuate socioeconomic inequalities and concentrate influence in the hands of a few dominant players. Companies like Google and Facebook exemplify this by dominating the global digital advertising industry, thereby limiting cultural representation and undermining local industries.

In conclusion, while the globalization of media and brands fosters cultural exchange and global awareness, it also poses significant risks to cultural diversity and local economies, making the advantages and disadvantages of this trend equally significant.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 8

We are now living in a global village where geographical barriers have become insignificant. People wear the same kind of clothes all over the world, eat the same foods and watch the same films. In my opinion, this trend has made life easier for us all.

There are several benefits to following global fashion trends. It makes traveling easier. For example, now, Indians and Americans or Europeans have more or less the same tastes in fashion, food, and music. As a result, young Indian professionals can travel to the US or Europe and still feel at home there. The biggest advantage of following a global lifestyle is that it eliminates culture shock when you travel to other countries. It also protects you from discrimination. When you wear the same kind of clothes or eat the same kind of food as everyone else, you will not stand out. This will actually protect you from various forms of discrimination that you might experience when you are in a foreign country. An Indian woman living in the US will be at a disadvantage if she insists on wearing only traditional Indian clothes and eating only vegetarian foods. This will limit her choices, but if she is willing to follow the culture of the country she lives in, life will be easier for her.

The only disadvantage of this trend is the loss of ethnicity. Every nation has its traditional styles of fashion and clothing. When everyone wears the same kind of clothes, this cultural legacy gets lost.

To conclude, the benefits of following global trends in lifestyle and fashion are many. It makes life easier for globetrotting youngsters. There are, nonetheless, a few disadvantages, but there is an easy way to get around them. People who are proud of their ethnic fashion and lifestyle can follow it when they are in their own country.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 9

Globalisation has allowed people to adopt a homogeneous culture in terms of entertainment, fashion and other areas as such. However, there are some people who believe such uniformity isn’t very beneficial. This essay shall discuss further both the sides of this phenomenon.

Having the same kind of preferences helps people get around the world very easily. If we watch TV shows or adverts of a certain country, we get familiar with a summary of its culture, thereby making it easier for us to blend in there. The more we get to know about each other, the more can the differences between countries be eliminated, making the world a huge harmonious community. We are no longer restricted to brands of our own country but are exposed to international products and services. Following a global fashion trend shall make you feel and act more naturally with the people anywhere in the world without being too obvious.

The people who do not support such a development are the ones who feel a country’s own ethnicity will be lost if the people try to adopt the prevailing global culture a little more than required. Watching TV shows or movies from a foreign country may influence and alter the mannerisms of the people of the home country. Some cultures are very rigid when it comes to clothing and the acceptance of universal fashion trends therefore will not be received well. Although, I feel these are minor issues in comparison to the host of advantages that we have regarding this. One’s own ethnicity can be followed regardless of the TV shows we watch or the clothes we wear.

To conclude, I agree that the advantages of the phenomenon of having a uniform culture worldwide outweigh the disadvantages. Every subject has pros and cons, and the cons here can be ignored easily, especially when such an acceptance makes life easier.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 10

The globalization of culture is a phenomenon that has sparked much debate, with some arguing that the increasing homogenization of societies across the globe is a positive trend, while others lament the loss of unique cultural identities. While it is undeniable that globalization has led to a convergence of cultural elements, such as advertising, brands, food, and entertainment, the question of whether the advantages outweigh the disadvantages remains open to interpretation.

On the one hand, the spread of global brands and cultural products can foster a sense of interconnectedness and shared experience. Access to international entertainment, fashion, and cuisine can broaden people’s horizons and promote understanding between different cultures. For example, the widespread popularity of K-pop music and Korean dramas has fostered a sense of global community among fans, breaking down cultural barriers and encouraging cultural exchange. Moreover, the adoption of international brands and products can drive economic growth and create job opportunities in developing countries.

However, the homogenization of cultures can also have negative consequences. The erosion of unique cultural traditions and identities can lead to a loss of diversity and a sense of cultural displacement. The dominance of Western cultural products can stifle the development of local creativity and expression, leading to a decline in cultural distinctiveness. For instance, the proliferation of fast-food chains and multinational supermarkets has often resulted in the displacement of traditional cuisines and local food markets, contributing to a loss of cultural heritage and culinary diversity.

In conclusion, while the globalization of culture has brought about increased interconnectedness and a sense of shared experience, its potential for cultural homogenization and the erosion of unique traditions raises concerns. While the advantages of global cultural exchange are undeniable, it is crucial to strike a balance between embracing global influences and preserving local identities. The preservation of cultural diversity is paramount in ensuring a rich and vibrant tapestry of human expression and a world that celebrates the unique heritage of each nation.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 11

The striking similarity between countries as a result of globalization and modernization has been a heated social issue in debate, leading to many showing concern about elimination of national identity. However, I strongly believe this trend’s advantages outweigh its shortcomings.

The root cause of such resemblance between nations is the accelerating trend of multiculturalism. People who are against this trend have grounds to claim that the high-level similarity means the eradication of culture gap between countries, thus leading to all traditional values of a nation being completely abolished. When English, international clothing stores and American pop music, for example, are overwhelmingly prevalent in the streets of a country, its native language, local brands and folk music would face the imminent threat of total disappearance.

On the other hand, this interconnectedness among countries has benefits that cover many different areas. It reciprocally developed economies all over the world and increased cultural exchanges. Specifically, in an age of thriving international business and travelling, all countries are required to reorganize their infrastructures for the purpose of reaching global standards. To illustrate, the construction of railway stations and airports always follow the international norms, while information printed on packages, billboards and food menus are translated into English, the universal language. Pop culture also immensely contributes to this trend of similarity. With exposure to advertisements of multinational companies, young people around the world now have a similar taste in fashion, technological devices and eating habits. Such a globally common preference also makes people in different regions look the same.

In conclusion, with geographical barriers becoming less significant, some individuals may express concerns about cultural identity loss. Nevertheless, the beneficial impacts of globalization on cultural and economic aspects remain paramount.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 12

The world today is more aptly said to be a global market where almost every country witnesses the same kind of brand market in every field. The globalization of the world has opened the doors for the intermingling of the different cultures, lifestyles, traditions of the different countries. Often it is found that the global brands have started launching their products keeping in mind the wide global audience with different tastes, suiting their lifestyle. There is a clear sign that the differences between the countries have started to become less evident than before and this brings with them certain advantages as well.

Speaking about globalization, people now have become more open to broad ideas, and world views. The sphere of vision has increased from a small area of land to a vast world. This can be seen in the fact that now we have global channels with global reach with the vast diverse audiences sitting in different countries but loving the same character, unlike before where our reach was only confined to local regional channels. For example, an American sitcom, FRIENDS, became more popular in India, China, Middle East countries, and other European countries and brought the culture of Coffee Cafes’ in the global market. Now, people of all the countries are accustomed to the same type of global fashion trends, food cuisines, and lifestyles, etc. This has helped in reducing the communication gap amongst people, increased the values of tolerance, acceptance, and sharing. Now it can aptly be said that the world has become a global home for its people where the cultural, educational, and traditional boundaries have outcast the physical boundaries. One of the biggest advantages counted here is it has brought more peace and unity to the world, unlike the old times that have witnessed some of the major wars like a world war, cold war, etc.

Though the advantages of globalization have been manifolded and the difference between different countries is reducing rapidly, but there are some spheres where such differences are quite visible like the economic inequality, literacy inequality, compliance with the sustainable development goals have been incompetent among different countries. To make the world a global home to live in, these inequalities need to be worked upon.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 13

In these modern times, it has become quite evident that the world portrays the image of a friendly global market, with globalized consumers from remote corners of the world. Nowadays, a fashion idea launched in the USA has become a fashion trend in India, or an Indian cinema becoming a Blockbuster movie in Canada. The modern world has opened the wide market of acceptance of each other’s culture, ideas, cuisines, fashion, art, lifestyle and so on. This has made the fact crystal clear that the differences between the countries of the world are vanishing at a rapid pace. But these vanishing differences are bringing a lot of disadvantages along with advantages. Some of these disadvantages are included in the paragraph below.

We have often seen that people are more attracted towards international junk foods items than their traditional food. The attraction for these international junk food items has overpowered the nutritional value of traditional food. The changing food habits of the people have deteriorated their health and impacted the lifestyle of the people to a great extent. The vanishing of the differences has made it evident that people are so influenced by international ideas and cultures and started following their lifestyles that they have forgotten the indigenous cultures and values. For example, a culture-rich and diverse country like India has become more westernized in its culture and lifestyle that they have started to lose their indigenous values and culture. This has brought a drastic change to the value-added system of the country. With globalization, international relations have undoubtedly become better in terms of trade and economy but the living conditions of the rural or the poor people in the indigenous countries have become worse.

To blow off the differences between the countries in the true sense, the need of the hour is to bring everyone to the same page, to improve the living and working conditions of the people globally, to improve the environment unitedly, to work upon achieving the sustainable development goals together. This will help in bringing the people together on the same platform and will make the world a global home in the true sense, outcasting all the boundaries.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 14

The globalized world has evolved so rapidly in modern times that the ethnic and global differences between the countries have started to vanish. People across the globe have become more accepting and tolerant of other countries, cultures, and ideas. This has made the world stand on a platform of inclusiveness globally. The diminishing of the differences between the countries of the world has brought with it several advantages and disadvantages.

Talking about the advantages first, with the increasing communication facilities, the world has involved itself in each other’s emotional area. Now with the wide prevalence of global media, we are aware of everything happening across the world, and they have started to become involved in the struggles of other countries' people. This has increased the value of humanity for each other. The killing of a black man in America has witnessed a global protest on ‘Black Lives Matter. The victory of Barcelona in Football is celebrated among football fans in India. Indian movies do blockbuster business in Canada. This social acceptance has made the world a global home, where many foreigners visit our countries and many students and working professionals of our country settle abroad for education and work. Social and cultural acceptance has made the festival of one country celebrated globally by all. Besides, the vanishing differences have brought world peace among different countries and friendly relations with all. Also, the world economy has been booming like anything due to the extinction of these differences among countries.

Coming to disadvantages we see that with rapid globalization, the indigenous culture and morals have lost their values. People are so influenced by westernized ideas that they tend to have forgotten their roots. Another disadvantage is that the eating habits of people have changed drastically, and this change has a negative impact on their health. People are more influenced by junk food ideas that they find their traditional food tasteless. People have started to lose their original identities in the pursuit of modern ideas.

In conclusion, though the vanishing differences have been quite evident, and they have created a huge impact on the lifestyle of the people for good as well as for bad. It is good to change with time, but one must never forget their roots and must stick to their culture and traditions rationally and logically.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 15

It is an undeniable fact that nations are becoming less different from year to year. These days, different societies living around the globe tend to have the same tastes in relation to fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. I believe that the benefits of such globalizing processes far outweigh their drawbacks because they imply that an increasing number of people are enhancing the quality of their living. This essay will first discuss improving the standards of living as the main benefit of cultural globalization, followed by an analysis of the major drawback which is the assumed loss of cultural identity by some communities.

One of the principal advantages of sharing the same cultural values is a positive change in the quality of living people have. The reason for this is that societies can normally adopt only those new values, which are more beneficial than existing ones. As a result, sharing the same fashions, advertising, eating preferences, brands and TV content is accompanied by enhancing the standards of living. For example, having carried out research, the scientists from The International Monetary Fund have revealed that the quality of living in developing countries has increased three times compared to that in 2000.

The main disadvantage associated with such cultural unification is thought to be the possible loss of cultural identity by countries affected by this trend. Often people presume that new values are rapidly replacing the old ones, which means that the original set of cultural features may be totally lost in time. However, it is clear that existing cultural uniqueness is only becoming less popular, despite this it continues to be shared by smaller societies. This is confirmed by a European university's new study that has revealed the preservation of the root culture in all the nations since 1985.

In conclusion, in my opinion, the benefits of cultural unification outweigh the disadvantages in the long run because enhancing standards of living is far more important than the irrational fear of losing cultural identity. If it were not for globalization, the quality of living in less developed nations would be much lower.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 16

It is undoubtedly the case that the world today has become a global village. One of the effects of this is that increasingly people in all corners of the world are exposed to similar services and products and adopt similar habits. My view is that this is largely a beneficial process and in this essay I will explain why.

The first point to make is that there are some downsides to this process of cultural globalisation, but these are relatively minor. The most significant of these disadvantages is that it can weaken national culture and traditions. For example, if people watch films and television programmes produced in the United States, sometimes they adopt aspects of the lifestyle of the American characters they see on television. Typically, however, this only affects minor details such as clothing and does not seriously threaten national identity.

When we turn to the other side of the argument, there are two major points to make in favour of this process. The first of these is that the more we share habits, products and services, the better we understand each other, and this reduces prejudice against other nations. The other point relates to modernity. It is a sign of progress in a society where people no longer are restricted to brands and advertisements from their own society but are able to access more international goods. If, for example, they were unable to drink Coca Cola or wear Nike, then that would mean their society was not part of the international community.

In conclusion, I understand the point of view of people who worry about cultural globalisation because it is a threat to national traditions. However, this is outweighed by its positive impact on international understanding and the fact that it represents progress within a society.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 17

As the proverb goes, "Every coin has its two sides". Globalization is no exception. Many countries throughout the world are sharing similar patterns in their own culture. Despite having some benefits, I still consider this trend more negative.

On the one hand, shortened global distance has created many advantages. In the fashion industry, the traditional cultures of several states provide a variety of ideas and materials for making clothes. People tend to share their styles, which diversifies the fashion around the world. Additionally, business is becoming increasingly international. It creates opportunities for employment and makes huge profits. Besides, people over the world become closer. They would communicate with each other more easily despite having different languages, be no more challenging to travel and gain chances to approach to knowledge from other countries.

On the contrary, I advocate that drawbacks of globalization become more serious. The public is likely to wear clothes that are trendy and from the luxurious brands. This habit makes them lose the connection to traditional costumes. Additionally, many people do not really have knowledge about the real products, which cheats them pay a lot of money for fake stock. Besides, the development of ways to communicate over the world leads to the shortage of direct spoken. People seem to be talking face to face unnecessary due to misusing technological gadgets. Lastly, the biggest problem is unemployment and exploitation. Because companies tend to move to developing countries where labor is cheap. This creates redundancies and job losses, which are major issues these days.

In conclusion, it seems to me that the drawbacks of shortening the global gap do outweigh the benefits.

Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share - mẫu 18

The contemporary times have been witnessing the blurring of dissimilarities, in terms of choice of food, clothing and entertainment, across the world. This phenomenon is believed to be having a domino effect, which has appeared in favourable and unfavourable manifestations.

To start with, this trend has come in as a boon for mankind: people all over the world are abandoning their heterogeneous aspirations and tastes and are embracing homogeneity. This evolution has been hailed as extremely beneficial, it is helping people develop a broader and liberal perspective and understanding about other cultures, aiding in bridging the gaps based on culture, ethnicity, geography and nationality, and establishing enduring harmonious relationships among the citizens of the global village. This raises the possibility of resolution of conflicts without firing a bullet, and peace descending on the planet.

Moreover, it is undeniable that this shift towards global preferences has ushered in an era of unprecedented convenience. Now, people travelling to different parts of the globe to fulfill their objectives of gaining education, finding suitable employment, receiving appropriate medical assistance and intervention and exploring for leisure and enjoyment, rarely need to worry about easily adapting to the alien surroundings, they feel at home anywhere on the planet now.

However, this dilution of distinct aspects of diverse global cultures has a major flaw, it is causing the demise of unique traditions and ways of life, especially of the weaker cultures. Many fear this will lead to an irreversible loss of invaluable knowledge that has been accumulated over several ages, for mankind.

Overall, I feel even though this swing towards the global preferences has exposed many customs and beliefs to the possibility of extinction, the advantages derived from this tendency eclipse even the direst of the failings.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness?

• Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?

• Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the Internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music, dance and arts lessons for children. Others think that they should be funded by private businesses or by children’s families. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---