Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students - mẫu 1

Many students are made to attend certain classes when they are 15 years of age, while others are required to learn various subjects before leaving school. Although an education system with a broad range of subjects can provide diverse knowledge, with a narrower range is better as learners have more time for other activities desired.

Those supporting the former education system may claim that students can access a wider range of knowledge that they may need in their later life. Having a chance to attend many classes, students are taught numerous lessons related to various fields, many of which can be of great help when they grow up. For instance, in Vietnam, students aiming at engineering courses in university are only required to have good grades in Maths and Physics. However, the knowledge they have acquired in non-major classes like English or Computer Science can offer them a competitive edge when they apply for a job in a multinational company, compared to those who are not familiar with foreign languages or computers.

On the other hand, students who study only a few subjects have more time for other purposes than those studying so many. With fewer subjects to learn, they have extra time either for stress relievers such as playing some sport or taking a rest or for further research related to their chosen subjects. The former activity helps students relieve pressure at school and recharge their energy, whereas the latter is a good way of reviewing the lesson taught in class. Scientifically, these activities increase their study efficiency and academic performance, so such an education system is much better than that forcing students to learn various subjects.

In conclusion, although the knowledge learnt in various classes is potentially helpful, I believe that a study program with not so many classes is more beneficial to students who can have more time for deeper study or relaxation.

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others - mẫu 2

The educational focuses for students from the age of 15 vary across educational systems, with some prioritizing an in-depth coverage of a limited number of subjects, and others spreading the focus on many subjects across the board. Compared to the former methodology, I believe that the holistic approach would prove more beneficial.

On the one hand, there are two main reasons why a number of educational systems narrow the scope of study to merely several core subjects for mid-teens. Firstly, the early concentration provides students with practical preparation for the university major and the career they aspire to pursue after leaving school. Without such a focus, students would have to divide their attention for a wide range of subjects, many of which do not seem to have any direct relevance to their prospective career. Secondly, it can help bridge the knowledge and skill gaps that an economy may have. For example, computer science, architecture and engineering are the disciplines which have yet to attract enough of a talent pool in Vietnam, and the focus on these areas for Vietnamese high schoolers is doing its job to gradually fill the gap.

On the other hand, I believe that it is more advisable for 15-year-old-and-above students to follow a more holistic curriculum. Firstly, these students should be given the opportunity to explore a broad range of subjects instead of following a standardized one-size-fits-all group of subjects at school. At the age of 15, most students are too young to decide the major they want to pursue, not to mention that their desire can swing halfway. Therefore, broad coverage in this sense could give them more time to explore themselves and identify which discipline would suit them best. Moreover, on an economy-wide scale, given the rapidly changing economic landscape, it is hard to predict with accuracy which kinds of knowledge would be of the essence in the future. Accordingly, students with a well-rounded preparation at school could gain a competitive advantage over those who do not. Lastly, hardly any profession nowadays exists in isolation, so a wider repertoire of acquired knowledge during school means they can deal with their future job more flexibly and resourcefully.

In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that the adoption of a comprehensive educational program for learners after 15 years old could bring more significant benefits compared to a restricted curriculum.

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others - mẫu 3

In certain parts of the world, high school students are required to study a wide array of subjects whereas in some other regions, a narrower teaching scope is preferred. Either educational paradigm offers its own distinct benefits, yet I consider the latter to be the better system.

An education system comprised of a huge number of subjects is often believed to provide students with solid foundations of different natural and societal concepts. For example, a 6th grader in Vietnam is supposed to study around 12-13 subjects, which cover a very wide range of thematic areas, in the hope that at the end of the academic year, they are able to be decent at doing maths, carrying out some basic scientific experiments, and understanding key notions of history and literature. In a sense, this can be beneficial if all of the aspects are well taught, and students’ knowledge is well retained up until they graduate from high school at the age of 15.

However, I would argue that an emphasis on a certain number of subjects is a better educational approach, as it relieves students’ study pressure and allows for greater learning focus. School examinations designed for such an education system are often unnecessarily stressful, and it is not rare to encounter cases of students contemplating suicide for failure to do well in tests.

Moreover, more time spent on some particular subjects results in better knowledge retention and skill mastery. Teenagers who have a gift for music, for example, may end up becoming much better musicians in their future career if they can allocate more time doing rehearsals than being forced to memorise large amounts of information for examinations.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that students can reap greater benefits from an education system which includes a certain number of academic disciplines. In the 21st century when professionalism and personal development are highlighted, such a paradigm will be embraced by more and more educational reformers.

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others - mẫu 4

Many educational reformers today incline towards a narrower curriculum for students 15 and older. In my opinion, while this is part of a decidedly modern movement for early specialisation, a wide range of knowledge serves as a basis for more well-adjusted adults.

Limiting subjects from the age of 15 onwards can allow for greater focus. It is not uncommon for many children to choose one musical instrument or participate in a single sport from the beginning of grade school. The rationale is that more time spent in one domain inevitably leads to mastery and this is supported by research into the importance of practice for elite performers. There are many famous examples of individuals who focused from their teenage years onwards and found success such as The Beatles’ band members with music and Steve Jobs with computer technology. Fewer subjects after age 15 is therefore one way to safeguard a child’s future.

However, the famous examples above are belied by the bulk of research that shows, for the majority of individuals, a wide range of skills and interests is a better predictor of future success. Studies have overwhelmingly shown that varied skills allow for increased creativity and a more even temperament. The average high school student must study obviously useful subjects such as math and various disciplines of science but also take music, art, home economics, and choose their own electives. They may never become professional musicians but opening up that side of their brain can help them be more creative in another field and feel their education is well-rounded. Without dabbling in these allegedly useless subjects, they might feel harnessed to a single career and purpose, unable to exercise autonomy over their own life.

In conclusion, studying a range of subjects after the age of 15 leads to better results in general. A complete syllabus furnishes happier individual citizens and contributes to a richer overall society.

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others - mẫu 5

Currently, numerous education systems have operated specialized learning programs for students at the age of 15. However, some people argue that students need to study a variety of subjects until leaving school. From my viewpoint, albeit offering certain benefits, an extensive curriculum is still inferior to a specialized one for high-school students.

On the one hand, studying a wide range of subjects can be advantageous for older schoolchildren in some aspects. First and foremost, students can acquire extensive knowledge for comprehensive personal development. As they learn multiple subjects at school from mathematics and physics to literature and geography, their background knowledge will be broadened considerably. This will enable them to have a multi-dimensional outlook on life and solve problems in numerous fields. In addition, learning various subjects until high-school graduation allows students more time to choose their specialization more meticulously. Since choosing one’s own specialized field for future jobs is a complicated matter, having more time means that students can experience more subjects and ultimately make the most. appropriate decision for their future specialization.

However, I concur that concentrating on a smaller range of subjects can bring more benefits to students from the age of 15. To begin with, studying only a subset of subjects at school provides students with greater motivation. Should students be allowed to choose the subjects they yearn for, they will put more dedication to studying, thus heightening their overall learning productivity in lieu of having to focus on other subjects they are not interested in. Furthermore, specializing in certain subjects from the age of 15 assists pupils to have higher likelihood of success in their future jobs. Studying early correlates with more time to develop technical understanding and relevant skills for the chosen domains. With such firm groundwork for future employment, these students will reap the competitive edge in both specialist knowledge and hands-on experience, allowing them to land a job and move up the career ladder more easily.

In conclusion, although studying wide-ranging subjects can be favorable to students to some extent, students will derive more benefits from a specialized curriculum from the age of 15. Nevertheless, this educational approach should be implemented in accordance with a tactful orientation program for students below this age so that the policy can bring the optimal outcome for all.

Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others - mẫu 6

In many parts of the world, students are made to attend classes of various academic subjects, while in some other regions, school curricula only comprise a limited number of subjects. Either educational paradigm offers its own merits, yet I believe a narrower teaching scope is much more beneficial for students’ sake.

On the one hand, advocates of teaching children a wide spectrum of subjects may claim that students will be provided with concrete foundations of different natural and societal concepts. For example, as 8th graders in Vietnam are required to attend 12 subjects which cover a wide spectrum of theory and application, they are capable of justifying physical phenomena, carrying out scientific experiments, and performing art. In this sense, a school system with a wide array of academic disciplines provides young learners with a broader understanding and perspective, preparing those versatile individuals well for their future life.

On the other hand, students who learn only a few specific subjects can save more time for other pursuits.  Having fewer subjects to study, students are granted the opportunities to either participate in stress-relieving activities, such as swimming or skating, or specialize in their subjects of interest. The former can allow young learners to recharge their energy, while the latter can be of great help for those who want to work in academia in their later life. In fact, such activities have been proven to boost their academic performance, making this education system better than making students learn a variety of subjects.

In conclusion, although broad and holistic curricula can equip students with a greater understanding of their surroundings, I strongly believe that students can reap greater benefits from school systems with an emphasis on certain subjects.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people suggest that a country should try to produce all the food for its population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In the past, people stored knowledge in books. Nowadays, people store knowledge on the Internet. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that the government should fund training courses for performing arts such as music, dance and arts lessons for children. Others think that they should be funded by private businesses or by children’s families. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Everyone should stay at school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that language should be taught in small classes, while other people think the number of students in a language class does not matter. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---