People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should not pay tax to the state. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 1

The concept of keeping all the money one earns without contributing to the state through taxation is appealing to some individuals. However, this essay disagrees and will argue that paying taxes is essential for maintaining a well-functioning society and providing critical services to citizens.

One of the primary purposes of taxation is to generate revenue for the state to fund essential public services, such as education, healthcare, and infrastructure. These services not only improve the quality of life for citizens but also contribute to a more equitable society by ensuring that everyone has access to basic necessities, regardless of their income level. For example, taxes finance public schools, which provide education for all children, including those from low-income families who might not be able to afford private education. Similarly, taxation supports public healthcare systems, enabling access to medical care for all citizens. In the absence of taxation, these services would likely be underfunded or non-existent, leading to a more significant divide between the rich and the poor and exacerbating social inequality.

Another critical function of taxation is to maintain and improve public infrastructure, such as roads, bridges, and public transportation systems. These infrastructure projects not only facilitate the movement of goods and people, promoting economic growth, but also ensure that citizens can access essential services and employment opportunities. Without taxation, the responsibility of maintaining and improving infrastructure would fall on private entities, which may prioritize profit over public welfare. This could lead to the neglect of essential infrastructure projects or the imposition of user fees that would disproportionately affect low-income individuals who rely on public transportation or cannot afford tolls.

In conclusion, while the idea of keeping all the money one earns may be tempting, I completely disagree with this view as it is essential to recognize the crucial role of taxation. Taxes are a necessary part of a functioning society, and their contribution to the state helps to ensure a higher quality of life for all citizens.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 2

In contemporary society, the notion that individuals should be able to retain all the money they earn and not pay taxes to the state is a subject of considerable debate. While it is understandable that people want to keep their hard-earned income, I would argue that taxes are a necessity in both the smooth functioning of a country and presents significant benefits to the individual citizens.

Firstly, it is important to acknowledge the rationale behind the belief that people should keep their income. Many individuals work tirelessly to earn their wages and naturally feel a sense of entitlement to their earnings. This is the reason why many people are unwilling to contribute a sizable proportion of their monthly income to the government. For instance, a person might prefer to invest in education or property rather than seeing a significant portion of their salary deducted as tax. This perspective is rooted in a desire for financial autonomy and the freedom to make personal financial decisions.

However, despite these valid concerns, paying taxes presents substantial benefits. Primarily, taxes fund essential public infrastructure and services that individuals rely on daily. Public transportation systems, the electrical grid, healthcare, and education are all financed through tax revenues. Without these contributions, maintaining such facilities and ensuring their continuous improvement would be impossible. For example, the salaries of government staff who maintain public infrastructure are paid through taxes, ensuring the smooth functioning of these essential services.

Furthermore, the economy of a country significantly depends on tax revenues. Taxes are the backbone of a stable and functioning economy, providing the government with the necessary funds to manage economic policies, support public welfare programs, and invest in development projects. This economic stability, in turn, benefits all citizens by fostering an environment where businesses can thrive, job opportunities can expand, and public services can improve. When taxpayers contribute, they are not just aiding the government but also ensuring the long-term prosperity and stability of their own country.

In conclusion, while the argument for retaining personal income and avoiding taxes is understandable, the broader benefits of tax contributions cannot be overlooked. Taxes are crucial for funding public infrastructure and services and maintaining a stable economy. Therefore, I would reiterate that taxing a proportion of people's income would introduce more benefits in the long run.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 3

Many are of the opinion that they should keep all their earnings and not have any obligation to pay taxes to the government. I am in disagreement with this notion.

Opponents of paying taxes point out that they do not have trust in local authorities. Undoubtedly, the funds collected from common citizens should be used for public services. In a large number of countries today where corruption and bribery are rampant, however, the federal budget is misappropriated for the personal gains of those in power. Another reason why people are hesitant to part with their money is the high tax rates combined with an unfair tax structure. For instance, the British public is now furious that while they are working hard and paying their fair share, big corporations are cheating the system to avoid paying theirs. These burdensome factors are likely to propel people toward tax avoidance and non-compliance.

Nonetheless, I am convinced that citizens should make a fair contribution to the common good in order to fund the public goods and services on which they all rely. There is no doubt that taxes are crucial because governments collect this money and use it to finance social projects such as health and education. Some of the money is also channeled to fund projects such as pensions, unemployment benefits, and childcare. Without taxes, it would be impossible for governments to raise money to fund these types of projects and meet the demands of their societies. It is the taxpayers who reap the benefits of this money and thus, citizens should endeavor to make a financial contribution and understand that it is meant to be more than just a "money grab" from the government.

In conclusion, I am of the belief that it is the national duty of every resident to pay a small portion of their income to the government for their own advantage.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 4

It is sometimes asserted that working people should not be required to pay tax and instead be allowed to use their income as they wish. I largely disagree with this assertion given its impact on social spirit and necessary investment even though the misuse of tax money might be a concern.

The foremost rationale for my disapproval of people being exempted from paying taxes is the rise of selfishness. As this policy allows everyone to keep all of their salaries for themselves without contributing to the national shared budget, it might encourage a selfish attitude which prioritises personal richness over shared responsibilities. If this attitude proliferates, society might suffer from a decreased sense of belonging and connection among its citizens.

Another reason why I am against allowing paid employees to bring home their entire income lies in the necessity of governmental investment. In reality, income tax is one of the most significant financial sources for the national budget, which funds various projects addressing infrastructure, literacy, employment and healthcare. Provided that this source is completely eradicated, these crucial projects might all come to a halt, causing possibly far-reaching repercussions on not only the immediate operation of a country but also its future prosperity.

However, I acknowledge the possibility of taxpayers’ contributions being misused. Those who are in charge of managing national funds might abuse their power for their own benefit. To illustrate, several ministers of the Vietnamese government have been convicted of corruption in recent years with millions of dollars being invested illegally in companies secretly connected to their families. This has undermined the trust of ordinary Vietnamese who regularly contribute to the national budget through the income tax system.

In conclusion, I am mostly against the idea of freeing people from tax responsibilities as it negatively influences social cohesion as well as hinders the execution of social initiatives, despite the risk of corruption. That is why countries should run nation-wide campaigns to educate people on the significance of income tax and implement policies that enhance the transparency and effectiveness of national fund management.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 5

A group of people think that residents should keep all their earnings and should not have an obligation to pay taxes to the government. I personally disagree with the statement as taxes are useful for the residents and the nation themselves, and the following essay will discuss it in detail.

To begin with, it is a fact that taxes are used by the government for developing its nations. Taxes are allocated for various kinds of essential matters. Firstly, they are used for expanding and maintaining public transportation facilities, such expanding roads and highways, and replacing old public transportation units. Secondly, taxes are utilised for providing decent medical services and basic education for their residents. And last but not least, taxes are also used for funding military services, which is important for maintaining the political stability of a nation.

And then, people should also notice that taxes that they have paid will also be beneficial for themselves sooner or later. Some of the funds that have been collected by tax authorities are used for retirement funds. It means that in the end people will enjoy and benefit some personal facilities from the government, which are funded from taxes. Therefore, people should not keep their earnings to themselves, and they should comply in paying their tax duties and obligations.

In conclusion, I do not agree if we should keep all our income and not pay any taxes to the government, as taxes are beneficial for the development of the people and the nation itself.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 6

Whether people should pay tax to the government or not is an argument of great debate. Some people think that it is government's responsibility to raise money from other sectors and should not take the portion of a person's hard earning cash while others stand just opposite of this opinion. I believe if the government spend the money for the benefit of the citizen, as it meant to be for every country, and value the mass people's opinions and suggestions how to best use the money, then there is nothing wrong with the tax paying method and rather had many positive reasons to do so.

Those who are against the tax paying system often opine that the government should never take their hard earning money for the sake of country's development scheme. This is especially true for those who earn an amount that barely supports his/her family and who are not satisfied with the public service provided by the government. In many countries, people have to pay a tax of more than a quarter of the total earning of a year and yet do not get basic facilities like treatment, education and they have to spend their own pocket money for those purposes. This is very natural that they become angry about the tax paying.

But tax collected from the people of a country can be a great fund to use for their betterment by the government. There are lots of poor people who can benefit from the tax paid by the others. The government can build more roads, offer public services, and can introduce other useful schemes using the money. Almost in most of the countries, people who earn more than a predefined amount have to pay tax and not for those who earn less than that amount. So, the government is not forcing poor people to pay tax but those who are able to pay tax.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 7

The idea that individuals should be allowed to keep all the money they earn and not be required to pay taxes to the state has gained traction among some people. While this perspective might seem appealing at first glance, I believe that taxes are essential for the functioning of society and the overall well-being of its citizens. In this essay, I will discuss the reasons why taxes are necessary and why the idea of not paying taxes could be detrimental to both individuals and society as a whole.

On the one hand, some people argue that they should be able to keep all the money they earn because they believe that their hard work should be rewarded without interference from the government. They claim that taxes reduce the incentive to work hard and that individuals should have the freedom to decide how to spend their money. For example, if people were not required to pay taxes, they might be more motivated to work harder, knowing that they could enjoy the full benefits of their labor. Moreover, some people argue that they can manage their finances better than the government and that they would prefer to invest their money in ways that directly benefit themselves and their families rather than contributing to public funds.

However, the idea of abolishing taxes is impractical and could lead to significant problems for society. Taxes are the primary source of revenue for governments, enabling them to provide essential public services such as education, healthcare, infrastructure, and national defense. Without taxes, these services would be severely underfunded, leading to a decline in the quality of life for all citizens. For instance, roads, public schools, and hospitals would not be adequately maintained, and this would negatively impact everyone, including those who argue against paying taxes. Additionally, taxes help to reduce income inequality by redistributing wealth and providing social safety nets for the less fortunate. Without taxes, the gap between the rich and the poor would widen, leading to social unrest and instability.

In conclusion, while the idea of keeping all the money one earns may seem appealing, it is not a viable option for a functioning society. Taxes are essential for funding public services, maintaining infrastructure, and ensuring social stability. Therefore, I believe that paying taxes is a necessary responsibility for all citizens, and the benefits of taxation far outweigh the drawbacks.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 8

There is an ongoing debate about whether individuals should be allowed to keep all their earnings without paying taxes to the government. While it is understandable why some people may feel entitled to retain their full income, I strongly believe that taxation is crucial for the functioning of a well-balanced society. In this essay, I will explain why paying taxes is not only a civic duty but also essential for societal development.

Those who support the idea of not paying taxes argue that individuals have earned their money through hard work and should have full control over their income. They believe that taxation is an unjust practice that punishes success and discourages productivity. For instance, without taxes, people might be more inclined to pursue entrepreneurship or invest in personal development, knowing they would fully reap the benefits of their labor. This perspective suggests that eliminating taxes could lead to a more dynamic and prosperous economy.

A society without taxes would have negative and far-reaching effects, nevertheless. Taxes fund essential public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure, which are the backbone of any civilized society. Without taxes, the government would be unable to maintain these services, leading to a decline in the quality of life for all citizens. For example, without tax revenue, public schools would be underfunded, resulting in lower educational standards and reduced opportunities for the next generation. Furthermore, taxes help to ensure social equity by redistributing wealth and providing safety nets for the vulnerable, which are necessary to prevent social unrest and maintain stability.

In conclusion, while the notion of keeping all earned income may seem appealing, it is impractical and would ultimately harm society. Taxes are indispensable for funding public services, ensuring social equity, and maintaining a stable economy. Therefore, I strongly disagree with the idea that individuals should not pay taxes, as the benefits of a well-functioning tax system far outweigh any perceived disadvantages.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 9

The debate over whether individuals should retain all their earnings without being taxed has long been a controversial topic. While some argue that taxes infringe upon personal freedoms, I believe that taxation is vital for maintaining societal harmony and supporting the collective good. This essay will explore the reasons why taxes are necessary and why abolishing them would be detrimental to society as a whole.

Proponents of a tax-free society often argue that taxes are a form of government overreach, limiting individual freedom and discouraging personal success. They claim that by keeping all their income, individuals could have greater financial freedom to invest in their own lives, businesses, and communities. For example, with no taxes, people could potentially invest more in their children’s education, their healthcare, or even local charities, leading to a more prosperous and self-sufficient society. This view holds that without the burden of taxes, economic growth and personal well-being could flourish.

Nevertheless, the idea of a society without taxes is both unrealistic and unsustainable. Taxes are essential for funding public goods and services that benefit everyone, including those who might prefer not to pay for them. For instance, taxes are used to build and maintain infrastructure such as roads, bridges, and public transportation, which are crucial for economic activity and daily life. Additionally, taxes support essential services like emergency response, law enforcement, and social welfare programs, which protect and enhance the lives of all citizens. The absence of taxes would lead to the collapse of these critical systems, resulting in a lower quality of life and increased inequality.

In summary, while the concept of retaining all earned income may initially seem appealing, it would ultimately lead to a less equitable and functional society. The infrastructure and services necessary to maintain a stable and flourishing society are mostly financed by taxes. Therefore, I firmly believe that paying taxes is not only a civic responsibility but also a necessary contribution to the well-being of society as a whole.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 10

Collecting taxes dates back to ancient civilizations, yet some people claim that the money they have earned should be kept to themselves rather than turned to taxes to the nation. From my perspective, this idea fails to recognize the role of taxation, and I disagree with it.

First, taxation is the key to financing public services and infrastructure that constitute the basic needs of individuals, such as healthcare and transport. For instance, public education is a cornerstone of societal development and economic progress, but without sufficient funding, the quality of education would decline, leading to a less competitive workforce. Therefore, if people refuse to pay taxes and shoulder the collective responsibility, a country cannot function properly and support the overall well-being of the populace.

Secondly, taxation serves the purpose of wealth redistribution. The tax-free system could exacerbate income inequality as the wealthy could accumulate more wealth. The absence of tax revenue means governments cannot establish social safety networks or social welfare programs to support and assist the less fortunate groups of people, leading to further income gaps and social inequality in many aspects. In this situation, social instability and turmoil are likely to occur.

I understand the advocates’ argument that individuals have the freedom to keep their wealth in their hands because this represents the fruit of their labor and efforts, while paying tax infringes on their property rights. This is plausible because it neglects the essence of the relationship between citizens and governments. Individuals’ freedom and well-being are reliant on the functioning of society. Without governments and adequate funding, keeping their wealth is like a castle in the air.

In conclusion, while individuals’ rights matter, the idea of not paying tax is ungrounded and unjustifiable when we consider the role of taxation in individual well-being and society’s stability and development.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 11

Some people argue that they should be entitled to retain all the money they earn without paying taxes to the state. However, I totally disagree with this view.

Firstly, taxes are essential for funding public goods and services that benefit everyone in society. Without taxes, the government would be unable to provide critical services such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, and public safety. For example, public hospitals and schools rely heavily on tax revenue to operate and maintain their services. If individuals kept all their earnings, these vital services would suffer, leading to a decline in the overall quality of life. Therefore, taxes are a necessary contribution to the common good, ensuring that essential services are available to all citizens.

Secondly, taxes play a crucial role in reducing income inequality and promoting social equity. Through a progressive tax system, where higher earners pay a larger percentage of their income, the government can redistribute wealth and provide support to the less fortunate. This helps to create a more balanced and fair society. For instance, social welfare programs and unemployment benefits, funded by taxes, offer a safety net for those in need. By contributing to these programs, individuals help to create a more just and equitable society. Thus, paying taxes is a way to ensure that everyone has access to basic necessities and opportunities for a better life.

In conclusion, I firmly disagree with the notion that people should keep all the money they earn and not pay taxes since taxes are indispensable for funding public services and reducing income inequality. Hence, ensuring a well-functioning society requires that everyone contributes their fair share through taxation.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 12

It is believed that individuals should have the freedom to retain all of their income instead of allocating it to taxation. This essay will challenge this school of thought.

Granted, those who believe that it is justified to keep their hard-earned money rather than contribute to the tax system have their own standpoint. They may argue that the money is what they deserve after long hours of hard work while the state does not directly assist them with their work. However, this line of reasoning overlooks the benefits, amenities, and conveniences they enjoy daily, which largely come from tax revenues. For instance, the public transport system enables many people to commute to work quickly and conveniently with various choices from buses to subways at an economical toll, funded by the state budget.

From my perspective, contributing to the tax system should be viewed as a way to collectively develop a country and enhance living standards. Indeed, tax money serves the public in various fields, including education, transportation, healthcare, and national defense. For example, in Denmark, one of the countries with the highest tax rate per individual, citizens are still pleased to pay taxes annually because they enjoy free education, advanced hospitals, and swift, clean public transport, all of which contribute to their overall satisfaction and well-being. In extreme cases such as wars and conflicts, a country without a national budget, or tax revenue, would find it virtually impossible to protect itself as there would be no allocation for the army or weapons. This is why I believe that individuals should not be selfish and should contribute part of their income to paying taxes.

In conclusion, I totally disagree with those who believe they should keep all of their earnings rather than paying taxes, given all the benefits they enjoy that are funded by the tax budget.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 13

People work hard and earn money which ideally they would like to retain for themselves. However, a significant portion of this usually has to be given to the state. In my view, it is right that people pay their fair share of taxes.

Money is everything in today’s world. This is because money is used to buy all the necessities such as food, water, and shelter. Money is also used to help a family’s children in the form of school fees and other activities. In addition to this, people do not only need money to cater for their necessities, but also for future investments. The more that people have to invest, the more they believe they can accumulate in the long term. As a result, many are reluctant to lose some of their income through the deduction of tax.

Nevertheless, citizens should be obliged to pay taxes to the government for a number of reasons. They should accept that the taxes they pay help the government offer them public services all over the country. These public services are things such as the construction of roads, bridges, public hospitals, parks and other public services. The same tax money helps the country’s economy to be stable. Through taxes, the government can also pay off its debts. In short, money received through taxes is a way of ensuring that people have comfortable livelihoods.

In conclusion, even though many people think that they should not pay taxes, that money is useful to the stability of any country. Therefore, people should not avoid paying taxes as it may affect the country’s economy and the services that it provides.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 14

Paying taxes is required by law and regarded as a civic duty in most nations. However, there are drawbacks that make some individuals or businesses attempt to evade or deduct the tax they must pay. Some people argue that taxation is unfair and that they should be allowed to keep all of their legitimate income because they fight for it every minute. In this essay, we will discuss both the views with reasons and justification.

In addition to reducing individual workers' motivation, high taxes have the potential to penalize hard work. However, the situation that is more concerning is that with all of the money paid by taxpayers, the government also could misuse or even become corrupt. In this instance, it is preferable for them to keep the money for themselves rather than anyone else. It is a legitimate claim that I am earning money by working hard and it is my right to keep it. Hence, the people who have this view cannot be blamed. They really work hard to make ends meet and support their family. Even 1% of their income is huge for them. In that case, paying 10% taxes is not justified.

On the other hand, people argue that taxes are a crucial source of revenue for the government and the country. They are in charge of building a strong nation and providing essential public services. The services include education, healthcare, the police, and many others that are crucial to the well-being of every citizen. The government also needs money to run the government. If there were no taxpayers, there would be no money to pay government employees. Without this revenue, there would be no organization to run the country, which would probably jeopardize national security. As a result, each and every taxpayer should be responsible for paying their taxes.

I believe that citizens who are able to pay taxes should pay their taxes to the government. They should provide our government with the resources it needs to protect our nation as a whole and improve our personal quality of life. However, these resources must be properly utilized and cannot be abused by incompetent officials.

People believe that they should be able to keep all the money they earn and should - mẫu 15

Some people argue that the government shouldn't tax people because they should use all of their earnings for their own needs. I disagree with this idea because taxation is a means by which the government provides essential services and infrastructures. This ensures equality in many societies.

Equality is one of the primary advantages of taxation. This means that there is a tax bracket for each genre of people and income. To put it another way, people in many nations pay taxes in proportion to their earnings. As a result, people with higher incomes pay more taxes to the government, while seniors and people with lower incomes, with a few exceptions, pay less. Luxury goods, for example, are subject to a high tax in many nations, but individuals who do not have a regular income are exempt from certain taxes. As a result, society has become more equitable. Let us take the example of working professionals. In India, the government has allowed no tax for people earning below 2.5 lakhs. There is a certain amount they need to pay if they earn 2.5 to 5 lakhs. The person earning above 5 lakhs needs to pay 20% of the total income that is more than Rs.5 lakh. Hence, it becomes easier for lower income people to pay less or no taxes.

In addition, infrastructure development and the provision of essential services necessitate taxes. This is because the majority of governments use tax revenue to pay for these public services and infrastructures. For instance, the tax revenue that the government receives is used to pay for social services, health care, and security in many nations. Therefore, the government would not be able to develop public infrastructure or pay for essential services if it did not receive tax revenue.

In conclusion, I disagree with the notion that individuals should pay tax rather than keep their income. Taxation is the primary means by which governments fund public services and infrastructures and ensures equanimity in many nations. The promotion of these qualities should be encouraged.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• The international community must act immediately to ensure all nations reduce their consumption of fossil fuels like gas and oil. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment, while others believe that the main interest is in world business. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• Differences between countries become less evident each year. Nowadays, all over the world people share the same fashions, advertising, brands, eating habits and TV channels. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?

• Happiness is considered very important in life. Why is it difficult to define? What factors are important in achieving happiness?

• Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15, while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school. What are the benefits of each system? Which is better?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---