In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should be required to work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views and give your opinion hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think - mẫu 1

Education and health facilities are crucial to the development of society in the modern period. Educative and specialised hospitals are unquestionably positioned in urban regions. To equalise these amenities in urban and rural areas, some individuals propose that the government enact regulations requiring doctors and teachers to begin their careers in rural areas. Others, however, reject this proposal by emphasising the freedom to select one's location of employment. In the forthcoming essay, both perspectives will be explored.

To begin with the former argument, the fundamental rationale is that if the new teachers and medics work in rural regions for a little while, it would be a proactive effort to improve the health and educational level of the people in such areas, which are now substandard. Moreover, in rural locations there would be a less stressful work environment, making this a great platform for these experts to extend their careers. Additionally, they would be able to gain unique and significant experience that would be extremely beneficial to their future job development.

On the other hand, some individuals argue that this idea restricts the personal freedom of these experts to choose where and how they operate. To be accurate, any new professional, whether a doctor or a teacher, would want to begin their career in a challenging position, which is difficult to find in rural areas. In a rural environment, these experts must also sacrifice a substantial salary scale.

In conclusion, I believe that the rural populace requires the skills of professionals rather than untrained individuals. This may be accomplished by offering such specialists nice compensation, and it is not a significant barrier for any government because their needs are relatively less than in urban areas.

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think - mẫu 2

In contemporary decades, living conditions, such as medical and educational facilities, have improved. Due to the shortage of specialised hospitals and educational institutions in rural areas, it is proposed that recent graduates in these sectors should be moved there for a few years. Others disagree with this view and believe that individuals should be free to choose their own occupations. Both perspectives are discussed here, although I stand with the former view.

To commence with, there are numerous advantages for professionals working in rural locations. First, there are fewer medical and educational facilities in rural areas, and with the support of well-trained physicians and teachers, the quality of these services would increase significantly. This would eventually improve these individuals' standard of living. Second, this development would probably prevent rural inhabitants from migrating to urban areas. Due to this, urban cities can prevent overpopulation. In addition, it would be a great opportunity for teachers and medics to expand their practical expertise, so boosting their self-confidence when interacting with people, as there would be a huge workforce in rural areas.

On the other hand, some people believe that recent graduates have the right to pick a comfortable workplace. Initially, such a mandatory regulation may have negative impacts. Some teachers and doctors, for instance, may not want to be assigned to these remote areas because they cannot be separated from their families or because they consider the living possibilities there unpleasant.

In conclusion, deploying the top physicians and educators to rural areas would undoubtedly contribute to the nation's growth. However, I believe that the government should offer financial and non-financial incentives to these people in order to increase their motivation to live in these locations and contribute to improving their quality.

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think - mẫu 3

In every nation, there are always certain regions that remain relatively poor, while others are advancing at an excellent rate. This difference between the wealthy and the poor is one of the most prevalent global challenges. To improve the quality of life for its citizens, governments implement specific policies. Therefore, it is suggested that newly graduated medics and teachers relocate to rural areas in order to improve the level of living. Others oppose this viewpoint. In my opinion, the former should be implemented. Hence, both sides are discussed in the next section.

Evidently, the presence of these new specialists in many professions would have a significant impact on the state of rural societies. Without teachers and doctors, the situation in these regions could worsen as there would be no access to medical care and the next generations would stay illiterate owing to a lack of educational resources. Furthermore, there would be no luxury comforts available to new individuals in any area, making it difficult to survive under such circumstances. Therefore, no one would want to live in an impoverished area for years. Consequently, some measures or restrictions are required to encourage them.

However, there are some cons to this policy. Specifically, if a person is forced to work against their will, this would have a negative consequence. In addition, as an independent individual, no one could be forced to work in any location they like. For instance, if doctors and teachers are forced to relocate from large cities to impoverished towns, some of them will likely be resistant. And this condition might easily change a teacher into their pupils' worst fear and a doctor into a murderer.

In conclusion, I concur with the idea that in order to better the situation in rural areas, new doctors and educators should voluntarily accept the challenge of working in rural areas, as it is mutually beneficial. However, some steps must be taken to secure its continuation by the government.

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think - mẫu 4

Due to a lack of good educational institutions and health care facilities in the countryside, it is suggested that newly graduated teachers and doctors should be sent to these areas for several years. While some people disagree with this idea, I believe it is reasonable to require fresh graduates to spend a period of time working in rural areas.

On the one hand, some people say that new teachers and doctors should be able to decide where they work. The first reason is that everyone has the right to choose a workplace that they feel comfortable in. For example, many graduates want to live and work in a place that is close to their family. Therefore, we cannot force new teachers and doctors to move to the countryside against their will. Another reason is that if all new teachers and doctors are forced to work in rural areas, these occupations would become less attractive. As a result, fewer students would choose to become teachers and doctors in the future.

On the other hand, I believe it is a great idea to send these new graduates to the countryside for a few years. Firstly, as rural areas are having a serious lack of facilities, the arrival of well-trained teachers and doctors would provide better education and health care services. This would significantly enhance local people’s living standard. Secondly, this policy is also likely to play an important role in preventing rural inhabitants from moving to big cities in search of schools and medical facilities. As a result, we can avoid overpopulation in large urban areas. Finally, since there is a lack of workforce in the countryside, it is also a great opportunity for newly graduated teachers and doctors to practise and gain more practical experience.

In conclusion, while many people believe new teachers and doctors should be given the right to choose their workplace, I would argue that they should be required to work in the countryside for a period of time.

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think - mẫu 5

As a big gap is there between the urban and rural areas, some people opine that teachers and doctors who are fresh out of college should work in villages for a few years. However, others believe that the choice of where to work should be left on the teachers and doctors. In this essay I shall discuss the merits and demerits of both approaches and finally give my opinion.

There are many advantages of having teachers and doctors working in rural areas. Firstly, the people in the villages will have access to medical care and education which they are deprived of normally. Secondly, it would be good for the teachers and doctors who are fresh from university to translate their theoretical knowledge into practice. In urban areas there are already so many experienced teachers and doctors. Therefore, people would naturally not opt for fresh ones. In a rural setting, they would gain a lot of confidence very early on in their career. Finally, a few of these doctors and teachers may choose to live permanently in those villages to serve humanity.

On the other hand, this compulsory policy may have some negative effects. To begin with, we belong to a democratic country, and everyone has a right to work where one pleases. Such enforcement may result in working passively and there will be no motivation. So, the rural residents may not get appropriate treatment and service. Secondly, fewer and fewer students would choose such majors and careers and so in the long run there would be shortage of such professionals.

In my opinion, it would be better to have such a rule. It would be a win-win situation for both rural people and the professionals. It would also help to bridge the gap between the cities and the countryside. The government can, however, make fresh teachers and doctors want to work in the rural areas by offering higher salaries and other incentives.

To put it in a nutshell, I pen down saying that, sending doctors and teachers to rural areas would be an ideal situation but the government should offer some financial and non-financial schemes.

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think - mẫu 6

Undeniably, educational institutions and specialised hospitals are located in urban areas in almost all countries around the globe. To equalise these facilities among the citizens of a country, most of the people have the opinion that the government should make regulations for compulsory rural service after graduation by the professionals. Whereas others believe that it is an unethical interference with someone’s freedom. This essay delves both these views before arriving at a logical conclusion.

On one hand, mandatory service after graduation by health professionals and educational faculty are astonishingly beneficial to the rural people. For instance, compulsory, one-three years rural service for new teachers, doctors, dentists etc. will alleviate the scarcity of trained professionals in the village area. In addition, those who have qualified from government institutions receiving a grant from the government have their responsibility to serve the government and the people. Moreover, because of the brain drain system community is getting very less service from the talented professionals and compulsory work in rural areas by new doctors and teachers will ensure that they concentrate more on serving people rather than planning to migrate to a rich country. Rural people have to move to city areas for better treatment and for their children’s education and this has negative consequences like overpopulation, increased crime rate and pollution in city areas. Adopting this strategy by the government will ensure a better distribution of the population in both rural and city areas. Finally, professionals like doctors and teachers should focus primarily on serving people, not to amass fortunes. Unfortunately, teachers and doctors in many cases are far more concerned about money than helping people and a few years’ compulsory work in rural areas at the beginning of someone’s career would be a great leap toward appositive mind-setup by these professionals.

On the other hand, some others believe that in an independent country everybody should have the freedom to decide where to work and where to live. Any restriction and mandatory rules would violate their rights and would cause them to become frustrated. These professionals would then dislike to work or stay in their homeland and will try to migrate to a foreign country. Furthermore, this should be a spontaneous decision made by a newly became doctor and teacher and should not be a forced decision.  Hence the supporters of this view argue that compulsory work in rural areas is both unfair and harmful.

Put everything into consideration, I personally feel that for a rapid and complete development of a nation both rural and city areas should get focus for facilities and development. The government should ensure the equal distribution of services and place new doctors and teachers in rural areas for a few years would be a great idea to help rural people and also build a service-oriented mentality among these young professionals.

In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think - mẫu 7

Although the living conditions, such as medical and school facilities have been enhanced in the past few decades, rural areas still experience the scarcity of such infrastructures. Therefore, some people are of the opinion that teachers as well as doctors should be assigned to these remote places helping the local communities, while others are opposed to this opinion, arguing that it is against the free will of those teachers and doctors. Personally, I support the latter.

Admittedly, allocating medical and educational professionals can help to alleviate the current situations in remote areas to some extent. To be specific, under the guidance of new doctors, not only can local people receive more advanced medical attention, but also establish community medical centers, which will benefit them even in the long run. Moreover, it is teachers who can foster the next generation. Thus, more and more specialized and knowledgeable youngsters can be cultivated, which in turn will dedicate all their techniques and knowledge to the development of their hometown.

Nevertheless, reaching the conclusion that newly arrived teachers and doctors can help to develop rural places does not necessarily indicate that this is the best solution. In fact, such compulsory policy may trigger negative effects. For instance, some of the teachers and doctors may not want to be allocated to these remote places due to the fact that they cannot be separated from their families, or they consider the living conditions there are very harsh. Under these circumstances, it would be wrong and inhuman to implement this policy. Furthermore, if these professionals were assigned against their will, they would be reluctant to perform their jobs and would even hold resentment towards their jobs.

In addition, instead of sending new teachers and doctors, the government should improve the local infrastructure. This is the fundamental solution to tackle this problem. That is to say, without the construction of local facilities, the allocation of teachers and doctors would be neither productive nor attractive. Only after local hospitals and schools are developed can this problem be effectively addressed.

In conclusion, as far as I am concerned, sending professionals to rural places cannot combat the problem completely. Instead, the government should give priority to the construction of schools and hospitals, which is the essential solution.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public, or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance? Discuss this issue and give your opinion.

• Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organised group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

• Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

• Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labour. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• Improvements in health, education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations. However, the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---