It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.)

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.)

Đề bài: It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.). There is no reason why people should stop this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 1

The natural course of evolution has seen numerous species come and go, including the iconic dinosaurs. Some argue that it is a futile endeavor for humans to interfere with this natural process and prevent the extinction of animal species. Despite acknowledging the logic behind this suggestion, I firmly disagree with it for several reasons.

Proponents of non-intervention argue that extinction is an inherent part of the evolutionary cycle. They contend that species, including dinosaurs, faced natural selection pressures that led to their demise, making it a fundamental aspect of the Earth's ecological processes. Attempting to prevent such extinctions, according to this view, interferes with the natural order of the planet, meaning that it can cause more disadvantages rather than offering any practical benefit. They further argue that all efforts spent on conserving endangered species may not guarantee desired outcomes while demanding exorbitant expenses that can be allocated to more pressing issues.

Nevertheless, I strongly believe that we should take immediate action to address the issue for reasons related to human impacts and the values that endangered species can offer. Regarding the former, the impact of human activities, such as deforestation, pollution, and climate change, has accelerated the rate of species extinction, affecting biodiversity and potentially causing a domino effect on other interconnected species. Humans, as conscious stewards of the planet, have a moral obligation to mitigate the impacts of their actions and preserve the diversity of life. Another significant aspect is that endangered species often possess unique genetic traits which should be studied thoroughly in order to pave the way for breakthroughs in medicine, biotechnology, and other scientific domains. For instance, a species might have developed resistance to certain diseases, which could inform medical research and contribute to the development of new treatments.

In conclusion, while the natural process of extinction has been a recurring phenomenon throughout Earth's history, I would take the view that we should intervene with it to save threatened species. Preventing the extinction of animal species is not only an ethical imperative but also crucial for groundbreaking discoveries that can greatly benefit humanity.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 2

Some people believe that there are no compelling reasons for us to protect animal species from extinction as it occurs naturally. I personally disagree with this conviction and will support my argument in the essay below.

It is true that millions of years ago, many ancient species of animals, such as dinosaurs, were wiped out due to a gradual shift in climate and changing sea levels, according to some hypotheses. However, these environmental factors are not the primary contributor to the disappearance of certain species nowadays. Industrial activities have been devastating the natural habitats of wildlife and disturbing the food chain, causing the mass extinction of countless species. The increased demand for goods made from animals’ products, such as skins and horns, also leads to the rampant poaching of wild, endangered animals, rhinos for instance. In this regard, humans are held accountable and should do what is needed to rectify the situation.

Other justifications for saving wild animals involve the significant roles that they play in not only the balance of the ecosystem but also our lives. Everything in nature is connected, and if one species becomes extinct, many other animals and even plants will suffer as the food chain is disrupted. Wild animals also have great aesthetic and socio-cultural values. They contribute to our rich biodiversity that makes this planet a beautiful place. In numerous places around the world, many types of animals play an important role in different cultures. For example, in some religions, cows are revered and worshiped as gods.

The disappearance of many animal species does not always occur as a natural process but as a consequence of our doings. It is our obligation to help preserve wild animals because their extinction will have a severe influence on many important aspects of our lives.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 3

It is a disturbing undeniable fact that an increasing number of rare animal species are on the verge of extinction. Many people argue that humans can do nothing to stop animal extermination as it occurs naturally. From a personal perspective, however, I completely disapprove of this viewpoint for the two following reasons.

To begin with, it is no longer natural selection but human interference that is driving extinction rates to unprecedented levels. Although such animals as dinosaurs died out because of worldwide environmental change, this phenomenon transpired millions of years ago. These days, human activities are the primary factor conducive to the disappearance of animal species. The growing need for cultivation and habitation of humans has resulted in large-scale deforestation, engendering great loss of natural habitat. As a consequence, not only wildlife but also the natural food chain is severely disrupted, leading to the mass extinction of several rare species.

Secondly, it is of urgent importance to conserve animals since their existence plays an integral part in maintaining a well-balanced ecosystem and enriching biodiversity. Since all species in nature are interdependent, the extinction of only one will trigger a lack of food source for another. Subsequently, this food chain disruption detrimentally affects not only the whole natural system, but humans will also be the one to suffer. Furthermore, animals can be a valuable source of cures for countless of deadly diseases. Indeed, certain products of animals have been found to provide medicines that can effectively treat serious ailments. The loss of a species may therefore reduce the potential for new drugs we have yet to discover, potentially hampering human health in the long run.

To sum up, due to human interference and the importance of animal species in both nature and humanity, it is imperative that individuals and governments prevent them from the brink of extinction as soon as possible to ensure the long-term health and sustainability of our planet. I completely disapprove of letting animals die out since humans are the main cause of fast animal extinction speed.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 4

People have different views about whether or not extinction of animal species is a natural phenomenon, and preventing this process is pointless. From my perspective, I am completely against this notion for a number of reasons.

First of all, humans are partly responsible for various disappearances of animal species. While many wild beasts went extinct from natural causes, a greater proportion of species are on the verge of extinction or no longer extant as a result of human activities. Mass deforestation to build infrastructure or for timber harvesting has cost wild animals their living habitats, leading to food sources depletion and eventually, death. To illustrate, Australia's recent wildfires have pushed around 100 species closer to extinction. Hunting is another notorious cause for the dwindling of animals’ population as many species such as rhinos or elephants are hunted for their body parts. For example, the African Black Rhinos are no longer in existence for being hunted for their horns.

Another point is that preventing animals from becoming extinct is critical to our ecosystem. The loss of animal species could disrupt our ecosystem’s balance. Since all living organisms’ lives in a habitat are interrelated, once a species succumbs to extinction, other animals that depend on it will be affected and eventually disappear. This will lead to the lack of diversity and can also cause potential damage to our economy. For example, in 2013, the sunflower starfish in Northern California declined in number due to a disease, thus causing its prey - the purple sea urchins to flourish. This sudden proliferation has damaged the red urchins’ population and also exhausted a great source of sushi, which resulted in a slump in the area’s economy.

To summarize, the process of animal extinction has been escalated by human activities such as hunting and deforestation. This will have grave consequences on both our ecosystem and our economics; thus, it is urgent that we take action to protect all animal species.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 5

It is sometimes argued that animal extinction is a natural process which should not be intervened in by humans. I largely agree with this argument given the importance of the process and the urge to address more urgent issues even though the disappearance of species might lead to serious harm to the ecosystem.

The foremost rationale for my disapproval of human intervention lies in the crucial role of extinction in natural selection. Specially, the selection process, one of the fundamental laws of nature, ensures that species incapable of acclimatizing to environmental changes are eliminated to allow for more suitable species to survive. If humans interfered with the elimination of some species, this fundamental principle as well as the normal development of the natural world would be seriously disrupted.

Another reason as for why I oppose the endeavour of halting animal extinction is the presence of more pressing challenges. Notably, there exist a number of perennial problems, including environmental pollution, international conflicts and overpopulation, which might not only downgrade people’s living standards but also threaten the existence of mankind. Consequently, allocating resources to tackle these urgent problems takes precedence over preserving certain animal species.

Nevertheless, I acknowledge the potential degradation of the ecosystem associated with the extinction of animal species. If one or more animal species are lost forever, this would disrupt the food chain as other animals would lose important sources of food. This could lead to a chain reaction of other animals and by extension the breakdown of the wider ecosystem, threatening both global food security and human habitats.

In conclusion, I mostly endorse the opposition to human protection of animal species from extinction considering its importance in natural selection and the significance of solving more immediate problems despite the possible loss in biodiversity. That is why governments should halt all related projects and redirect their resources to more important ones.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 6

It is commonly known that many species have gone extinct throughout history, including the dinosaurs. Some argue that preventing extinction is not necessary, as it is a natural process. However, I believe that humans have a moral obligation to protect endangered species and prevent their extinction.

Firstly, human activities such as deforestation, overfishing, and pollution have caused a rapid decline in animal populations, leading many species to be at risk of extinction. As a result, humans have a responsibility to conserve the environment and prevent further harm to wildlife. It is unfair for humans to cause the extinction of a species due to their actions, particularly when they have the ability to prevent it.

Another reason is that many species play a crucial role in maintaining the balance of the ecosystem. For example, bees are essential pollinators that are responsible for pollinating 80% of flowering plants, and thus if bees were to become extinct, it would have a devastating impact on our food supply and ecosystem. Similarly, the loss of predators can cause a ripple effect, leading to overpopulation of other species and causing imbalances in the food chain.

Lastly, preventing extinction is not only a matter of responsibility but also a matter of morality. Species have intrinsic value, and it is not our place to determine which species should exist and which should not. Humans must respect the inherent value of all life forms and do what they can to protect them.

In conclusion, while extinction may be a natural process, it is not a justification for humans to sit idly by and watch as countless species go extinct. By taking action to conserve the environment, humans can ensure that future generations can enjoy the same diversity of life that we have today.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 7

Extinction of animal species is indeed a natural phenomenon that has occurred throughout Earth’s history. However, I strongly disagree with the notion that there is no reason for people to prevent animal extinctions. In fact, I believe that humans have a moral responsibility to take action to prevent or mitigate the extinction of animal species. In this essay, I will elaborate on the reasons supporting my viewpoint.

To begin with, human activities are the leading cause of the current alarming rate of animal extinction. Deforestation, pollution, habitat destruction, overfishing, and illegal wildlife trade are among the key human-driven factors that have resulted in the loss of numerous animal species. For example, the illegal poaching of African elephants for their ivory tusks has caused a drastic decline in their population, putting them at risk of extinction. This clearly indicates that human beings have a direct impact on animal extinctions and should take measures to prevent them.

Furthermore, animal species play a crucial role in maintaining the delicate balance of ecosystems. Each species occupies a unique ecological niche, and their disappearance can have severe consequences for the entire ecosystem. For instance, the decline of bee populations due to pollution and habitat loss has raised concerns about the pollination of crops, which could result in a decline in agricultural productivity and food security. Additionally, many animals, such as predators, help regulate prey populations, which in turn affect the distribution and abundance of other species in the ecosystem. Therefore, preventing animal extinctions is vital to preserving the delicate balance of ecosystems and ensuring their proper functioning.

In conclusion, although it is true that animal extinctions have occurred naturally throughout history, the current high rate of extinction is largely driven by human activities. Therefore, I strongly disagree with the notion that there is no reason for people to prevent animal extinctions, and I believe that concerted efforts should be made to conserve and protect endangered species for the present and future generations.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 8

It is argued that there is no convincing reason for people to try to prevent animal species from becoming extinct. I completely disagree with this idea, and this essay will argue why people need to protect endangered species from becoming extinct.

Firstly, environmental factors play an essential role in natural habitats for animal species. Several rare animals were wiped out by climate, such as dinosaurs, and dodos. For instance, in 2019 prolonged droughts devastated forests in Australia. This forest fire caused heavy damage, and more than half a million animals died, such as koalas, and kangaroos. In addition, people also are one of the major reasons for harm to animals. Illegal animal hunting leads to animal species that are on the verge of extinction; therefore, the government should impose new laws against using animal products.

Second, wild animal species have great aesthetic and sociocultural values, and they contribute to our rich ecosystem. For example, in many countries, animal species play a vital role in showing the cultures of that country. Furthermore, in natural the environment, animal species are connected; thus, if one species becomes extinct, several other species also suffer as the food chain is disrupted. If people protect animals, we will help maintain a balanced ecosystem.

In conclusion, mass animal extinction does not completely fall upon natural process, on the contrary as a consequence of our doing. People need to be aware of protecting animal species, and everyone should have the responsibility to maintain animal species.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 9

The extinction of animal species, as seen in prehistoric creatures like dinosaurs, is often perceived as a natural and inevitable process. However, I firmly disagree with the notion that there is no justification for human intervention to prevent such occurrences.

The critical role of biodiversity in sustaining ecological health forms the cornerstone of this argument. Each species is a vital cog in the ecological machine, contributing to essential processes such as pollination and nutrient cycling. The loss of even one species can trigger a ripple effect, leading to significant disruptions in the ecosystem. For instance, the decline of a particular bee species can result in the reduced pollination of certain plants, which can adversely affect the animals that feed on those plants. This interconnectedness underscores the necessity of preserving each species to maintain ecological balance and stability.

Moreover, the accelerated rate of species extinction in recent times is largely attributable to human activities, distinguishing it from natural historical occurrences. Activities such as deforestation, pollution, and contributing to climate change have precipitated a crisis for various species. A case in point is the Sumatran elephant, whose dwindling numbers are largely a consequence of habitat loss due to human encroachment. This scenario exemplifies the urgent need for human responsibility and intervention to reverse the damage caused by our actions and to safeguard the remaining biodiversity.

In conclusion, my firm disagreement with the viewpoint that animal extinctions should be left unaddressed stems from the vital importance of biodiversity and the undeniable impact of human activities on the natural world. It is our responsibility to counteract these effects and actively engage in conservation efforts.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 10

Some individuals hold the belief that there are no compelling reasons to intervene in the extinction of many animal species because it is the natural process of them going extinct. I, however, strongly disagree with this perspective and will elaborate on my stance in the following essay.

While it is accurate that millions of years ago, various ancient animal species faced extinction due to environmental shifts, contemporary extinctions are primarily driven by human activities. Industrial practices have wreaked havoc on natural habitats, disrupting the food chain and leading to the mass extinction of numerous species. The escalating demand for products derived from animals, such as skins and horns, has fueled rampant poaching, particularly endangering species like rhinos. Consequently, humans bear responsibility for these threats rather than nature and therefore should take corrective actions.

Additional justifications for the conservation of wild animals extend beyond environmental concerns to encompass their vital roles in ecosystem balance and our daily lives. The interconnectedness of nature means that the extinction of one species disrupts the entire food chain, impacting many other animals and even plant life. Moreover, wild animals contribute to the aesthetic and socio-cultural richness of our planet. They are integral to our diverse biodiversity and even hold significant roles in various cultures. For example, in certain religions, cows are revered and worshiped as deities; therefore, they should be protected from extinction.

In conclusion, the extinction of numerous animal species is not solely a natural occurrence but a consequence of human actions, so we should contribute to the preservation of wild animals, as their extinction will profoundly affect crucial aspects of our lives.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 11

Some people argue that the extinction of certain animals is inevitable, and that it is senseless to prevent nature from taking its course. Personally, I disagree with this belief as I believe that humans are now primarily to blame, and human actions can and will prevent many species from dying out.

To begin with, humans should be held accountable for the extinction of a significant number of animals. Granted, some animals have indeed gone extinct without human interference, as in the case of dinosaurs were once hypothesized to have been wiped out due to a meteor crashing the Earth. However, ever since humans became the dominant species on Earth, the rate at which animal species become no longer in existence has multiplied. Rapid industrialization, along with increasing deforestation and pollution, has caused a significant loss of natural habitat. At the same time, animals such as rhinos and tigers, among others, are often illegally hunted down for their horns and skin to be used in luxurious commodities. Such industrial development and ruthless poaching have, consequently, put many animal species on the brink of extinction or, in the worst-case scenario, wiped them out altogether. With ample evidence presented, it would be insensible to refute humans’ role in driving many animals to extinction.

I believe that human attempts to save animals from extinction can make a huge difference. First of all, more transparent and stricter regulations have a paramount role to play in animal protection. In the case of industrial activities for instance, factories must strictly conform to environmentally-friendly and non-disruptive code of business conduct. Illegal hunting is another area where changes could be made in terms of enforcing regulations, in such a way that the self-serving malpractice is closely monitored and punishable by a fitting sentence. In addition, in a time of impressive technological advancement, humans can wield their technological prowess to better protect animals. There may even come a day when the human race is capable of climate conditioning and manipulating the natural world in ways that preserve the Earth’s biodiversity. As the ecosystem is a dynamic and delicate one, in which all species are reliant on the services provided by one another, it is our job to treat animal preservation as a top priority, or else the entire biodiversity could collapse.

To conclude, I am convinced that animal extinction is not always driven as much by natural forces as it is by our wrongdoings, and humans are capable of making significant contributions to better the prospects of endangered species.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 12

In the contemporary world, the issue of whether humans should actively intervene to prevent the extinction of animal species is a topic of considerable debate. While some argue that extinction is a natural process and human interference may be unwarranted, I firmly disagree as biodiversity is crucial for the well-being of our planet and concerted efforts must be made to preserve it.

First and foremost, biodiversity plays a pivotal role in maintaining the stability of ecosystems. Each species, no matter how small, contributes to the intricate web of life, and the loss of any species can have cascading effects. For example, the extinction of pollinators such as bees can disrupt the pollination process, leading to a decline in the production of fruits and vegetables as well as affecting other species that depend on these plants for sustenance. Consequently, the collapse of one species can set off a chain reaction that ultimately impacts the entire ecosystem.

Furthermore, many species have intrinsic value and contribute to the cultural and aesthetic diversity of our planet. From majestic elephants to vibrant butterflies, each species has unique characteristics that capture the imagination of people around the world. Losing these species not only diminishes our cultural heritage but also deprives future generations of the opportunity to marvel at the wonders of the natural world.

Additionally, human activities, such as habitat destruction, pollution, and climate change, are major contributors to the accelerated rate of species extinction. Therefore, I contend that it is our moral responsibility to address these human factors and strive to mitigate their impact on the environment via conservation efforts, habitat restoration, and sustainable practices.

In conclusion, I firmly believe that the prevention of species extinction is not only desirable but imperative for the well-being of our planet. By embracing a responsible approach towards our environment, we can ensure a harmonious coexistence between humans and the diverse array of species that share our planet.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 13

Extinction has been a natural part of evolution since the beginning of time. For this reason, many people hold the belief that human intervention in preventing species extinction is futile. While this perspective underscores the inevitability of extinction, it overlooks other factors and benefits of animal conservation, which will be addressed in this essay.

The main reason why people vote against animal conservation is the natural cycle of extinction. It is strongly believed that all species are susceptible to eventual extinction due to external factors beyond human control, such as adverse weather or predation of other species. However, this does not inherently mean conservation efforts are meaningless. Many species have been rescued from the brink of extinction like pandas or rhinos. Through strategic intervention, these species are shielded from natural threats within controlled environments conducive to reproduction, thus increasing their survival prospects.

Furthermore, the continued existence of rare breeds also brings practical benefits for society. Since animals on the brink of extinction usually intrigue people's interest, they can act as a tourist attraction, generating profits for the local economies. A prime example of this is China, well- known for panda conservation efforts, which amass many tourists, both domestic and international. With the massive number of visitors, the local tourism industry flourishes and environmental consciousness is spread widely.

In conclusion, it is clear that helping endangered animals survive is important and effective. The protection of animals also offers economic benefits from tourism. Therefore, it is a situation advantageous for both the animals and our communities.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 14

There are some people who have the opinion regarding the extinction of the animal species citing it as a natural process. Considering it a natural process, they argue that there is no reason for people to prevent the extinction of the species. However, I believe that despite extinction being a natural process, in the modern world human activities also have a role to play in it. Accordingly, I disagree that people should not try to prevent the extinction of animal species. Human beings should make all possible efforts to keep the animals alive as long as possible. The argument that favours this topic focuses on the fact that extinction of animals is a natural process, and no interference is required in them. However, the presence of humankind on Earth can be considered a boon and a curse. While modern developments in society have been possible because of humans' expertise, it is the same human that has induced trajectory effects on the environment. Nature works in a balance of animals and plants and water bodies coexisting on the planet. However, with rapid growth of industrialisation and urbanisation, the ecological balance has been disrupted on a massive scale. It is true that all animals would become extinct at one point or another being a natural process. The same has been validated with the extinction of dinosaurs, dodos, etc. But their extinction happened naturally, dinosaurs became extinct even before human species came into existence. On the other hand, many animal species in recent years have become extinct mainly due to human activities. These include deforestation, use of natural resources on a massive scale, extensive dumping of garbage and wastes, etc. which has increased carbon footprint. This has resulted in an increase of greenhouse gases. Hence, it can be concluded that while no interference in the natural life cycle of animals is expected, human activities need to be under control. This is to ensure that human activities indirectly do not become a reason for early extinction of the animal species.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 15

The theoretical statement about animal extinction being a natural phenomenon is in fact a reality. Considering that in some way or the other, they would be extinct like the dinosaurs. However, I do not agree with the fact that we as humans should not do anything to preserve and prevent them from extinction. It may be identified that human activities are a way through which challenges are endured by animals in living in the natural environment. Extinction of the dinosaurs for example took place long before the existence of humans. However, the existing animals surviving in their habitat are faced with challenges caused by human activities which cannot be ignored. These activities of humans include the rapid industrial developments that cause immense air, water and land pollution, large scale deforestation, etc. All of these are causing the ecological disbalance due to which the natural environment is degrading. Moreover, the depletion of the natural resources in the environment can be considered to be a huge issue that has led the animals to get displaced from their homes. Not being able to survive in the natural habitat has led to animals dying. While hunting and poaching has become illegal in many parts of the world, it still exists in the environment resulting in their extinction of the species. Forest fires are a natural phenomenon caused mainly due to human activities resulting in depletion of the forests which are natural homes of many animals. The impact is significantly felt on the environment resulting in climate change making it difficult for the animals to survive. Certainly, lack of awareness and education on how to protect the environment and the animals living with them is a cause for the same. Young students and people need to be made aware of the issue thereby making their activities limited in harming the ecosystem. Animal species’ extinction cannot be controlled because of its natural life cycle. However, the impact of human activities causing their extinction can be limited and reduced for their survival for longer years.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 16

The extinction of the animal species is opined by some people as a natural process whereby generations survive before they are completely extinct. Being a natural process, people have argued that prevention of animal species’ extinction is not required. However, I believe that in the modern world human activities also have a role to play in the extinction of animals, despite extinction being a natural process. Therefore, I disagree that people should not try to prevent the extinction of animal species. However, the presence of humankind on Earth can be considered to be quite challenging for both the natural environment, animals and even for humans. Modern developments like industrialisation, urbanisation has led to the expansion of the habitats for humans to live. Further, the natural environment has been suffering on a massive scale. The natural balance of the ecosystem is disrupted with unwanted and unlimited human activities. These activities utilise the natural resources but contribution towards its protection is largely limited. Extinction of animals has been taking place since before humans appeared on earth. Accordingly, it is true that all animals would become extinct at one point or another as it is the natural cycle for animals to die. Although the process is quite lengthy considering the presence of numerous generations of animals on earth. The same has been validated with the extinction of dinosaurs, dodos, etc. which have survived millions of years before they were extinct billions of years along. Many animal species in recent years have become extinct mainly due to human activities including western black Rhino, Splendid Poison Frog etc. in the last ten years. The reasons for their extinction are related to deforestation, forest fires, urban developments, etc. Hence, it can be concluded that there is indeed no need for intervention for preventing extinction because of the natural process. However, intervention is required in human activities that do not steer the extinction of animal species before time.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 17

The extinction of animal species has been considered a part of the evolutionary cycle. Some argue that there is no need for human intervention to prevent such extinctions. However, I disagree with the notion that the conservation of these species is unnecessary.

Granted, in the natural world, extinction is an integral part of the evolutionary process. This natural cycle contributes to biodiversity and allows for the emergence of new life forms. For example, the extinction of dinosaurs paved the way for the evolution and diversification of mammals. However, this viewpoint overlooks the fact that human activities have accelerated the extinction of species in recent times. Human-induced factors such as habitat destruction, overexploitation, and pollution have caused a swift decline in biodiversity, resulting in the decline and disappearance of countless species. This can be exemplified by the extinction crisis faced by the Northern White Rhino today, where rampant poaching for their horns is the main threat to their survival.

In addition to this, given the inextricable relationship between the human race and animal species, it is absurd to downplay the significance of protecting them. In other words, if one animal is missing from the ecosystem, others will suffer due to the disruption in the whole food chain. For instance, vital pollinators in ecosystems such as bumblebees, contribute significantly to the reproduction of various plants, including those crucial for agriculture. Therefore, the decline in those pollinating insects, often attributed to factors including habitat loss and pesticide use, could disturb pollination cycles, potentially leading to reduced crop yields. 

In conclusion, while natural extinction is an inherent aspect of the evolutionary cycle, human activities have undeniably exacerbated the loss of numerous species. It is crucial to acknowledge our role in preserving biodiversity, as it is not only an ethical responsibility but also crucial for maintaining the balance of ecosystems and securing a sustainable future for living beings on Earth.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 18

Some today argue that humanity should not interfere with the extinction of other species. In my opinion, this was a more legitimate argument in the past, when mankind was not the primary driving force behind this phenomenon.

Throughout history, extinction has been part of natural selection and evolution. Creatures such as the dinosaurs disappeared due to a likely cataclysmic event, but in more recent history, less adaptable species have also gone extinct. Humanity, in these cases, played either no role or one commensurate with the rest of nature. This can be seen as necessary to the work of nature. Certain species develop and prosper, while other ones do not and perish. A modern, compassionate public might view this as inhumane, but the indifferent cruelty in nature has served the historic purpose of maintaining a healthy, thriving, and diverse ecosystem.

However, contemporary human dominance must be accompanied by a larger share of responsibility. Mankind is no longer one animal among many, but the dominant species whose actions affect the majority of other animals. The most pertinent examples of this relate to deforestation and climate change. In order to sustain booming populations, production has stripped bare sections of the earth, decimating natural habitats and plunging thousands of species to the brink of extinction. The causal role of human industry necessitates taking responsibility. Moreover, there are simple steps that could be taken to preserve species and curb the effects of human progress. If countries collectively committed to moderate conservation efforts, then the earth could be restored to a more natural equilibrium.

In conclusion, though humanity was not at fault for past extinctions, the current influence of industry means that we should now take responsibility for biological diversity. Once a species disappears, it will never return.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 19

Humans do not control nature; it is uncontrollable, like natural disasters. We cannot control these types of events, but we can also predict them. On Earth, many wild species and other species have become extinct because of human activities, and in past history, dinosaurs, like monster species, died because of nature. Preventing natural disasters is not something humans can do, but we can save species that are dying from human activities. I believe that even if some animals are dying from natural processes, we can try to prevent that.

To begin with, in this world, every species or human being has their own right to live peacefully, and they have their own part in this universe. Moreover, in this tragic world, work is done on the life cycle, and if any species that has a role in this chain becomes extinct, it will unbalance the cycle and become a mess for species living on Earth. For instance, in its life cycle, a lion is a wild animal that only eats meat like deer and buffalo from jungles. If those species become extinct, predators like lions and tigers will have no choice but to kill people in cities and rural areas because of their hunger.

In addition, helping to prevent these species from becoming extinct has not done any harm to humans because it shows how nature has given us beautiful creatures, and some countries are also taking steps to create zoos that are only for extinct creatures. For example, recently, the Indian government bought cheetahs so they could breed this species and expand their numbers.

In conclusion, humans have no control over nature because nature reacts to our bad outcomes. However, the activities we do that harm the natural species are ones we can prevent.

It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. dinosaurs, dodos, etc.) - mẫu 20

It is an irrefutable fact that animal extinction is now increasing significantly. Many people believe that it is a natural phenomenon behind the perishment of animals such as dinosaurs that went extinct in ancient times, and humans are not responsible for this. However, in my opinion, I completely disagree with the statement. This essay will analyze my views by demonstrating points and proving arguments in the impending paragraphs.

To begin with, many individuals believe that rather than humans, there are many reasons for extinction, but the most predominant one is climate change. To elucidate further, natural disasters were not only responsible for life-threatening illnesses but also destroyed their sources of food. For instance, an article published by a national newspaper revealed that 30% of the animals had died in the past only due to the food shortage. Therefore, it is undeniable that environmental factors play an imperative role in destroying some endangered species.

On the other hand, I would assert that humans are responsible for destroying some species because all animals are immensely necessary for maintaining ecosystems. First of all, farmers cut down forests to have more places, planting crops and raising livestock, which later provide to human beings. Besides, Industrial activities have devastated the natural habitats of wildlife. The increased demand for products made from animals’ skins and horns leads to the problems of endangered animals. Furthermore, man-made pollution contributes to the loss of species, too. Discharging sewage and other toxic substances into rivers has killed off fish and other marine animals. Therefore, I believe humans should take responsibility to prevent the extinction of animal species.

In conclusion, although climatic factors and disasters are dominant, humans are also involved in these activities, which could be the major reason for animal extinction.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people say in order to prevent illness and disease, governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In many parts of the world, people do research on their family history. Some people believe that finding out about previous generations is a useful thing to do. However, others believe that it is better to focus on present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

• In some countries, university students live at home, while in other countries university students go to other cities rather than live with their family. Do you think the benefits of living away from home outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that in modern society individuals are becoming more dependent on each other. Others believe people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

• It is a good idea for people to continue working in their old age, if it is possible for them to do so. Do you agree or disagree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---