Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled

Đề bài: Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 1

It is argued that the authority should be the one which conducts and manages scientific studies. While certain benefits can be derived from governmental control of scientific research, I would believe that private organizations are a better candidate for such essential research.

Admittedly, there are some good reasons why the government should be in charge of carrying out and controlling scientific research. Firstly, the government has the budget from national taxes that can support scientists and researchers. Thus, the company in charge would receive money to complete their work without worrying about the depletion of resources. Secondly, some independent companies only look for profits, which makes it extremely dangerous. For example, a company may discover a chemical that can make biological weapons, and they may sell it to an antisocial party in Pakistan; this is certainly harmful to almost all human beings. 

However, despite some arguments above, I am of the opinion that private firms would do the research mentioned above much better. Firstly, non-governmental companies usually pay a huge amount of money for their staff; this helps them attract more talented and skillful scientists to work for them. As a result, scientific studies and papers conducted by these organizations are likely to be more accurate. Secondly, unlike the authority that has many aspects to take care of, independent firms often concentrate on only one to two fields, which helps to yield auspicious results. For example, MCG, which is a medical company in Binh Duong, only concentrates on two particular fields that are researching and manufacturing new medicines, which makes it better than other governmental companies in Vietnam. 

In conclusion, it seems to me that private institutions are much better in conducting and directing important research.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 2

There has been significant discourse surrounding the proposal for scientific research to be conducted by governments rather than private entities. While some would argue the opposite on the grounds that it engenders greater innovation, I contend that governments can conduct better research as they are less susceptible to corporate influence.

Admittedly, there have been cases where privately funded scientific research has stimulated innovation. Individuals who conduct research on the behalf of commercial interests are typically encouraged to think creatively in developing new solutions to pervasive problems. For instance, SpaceX is a for-profit corporation that is leading its competitors in terms of innovating space travel. Founded and managed by tech magnate Elon Musk, it has introduced new solutions to existing problems in space transportation such as reducing production costs on their rockets by using 3D printing technology and mass production methods. Furthermore, SpaceX has pioneered the utilization of reusable rockets as half of them have flown more than once with little to no refurbishment. From this case, it can be understood why some argue commercial entities should be in charge of conducting scientific research.

However, the case for governments conducting scientific research is stronger. With private companies conducting such research, they are more predisposed to financial incentives since they are primarily driven to boost profits. In contrast, governments conduct scientific research often with the altruistic aim of finding solutions to various societal problems in their respective nations. To cite an example, a private medical firm in Ghana was tasked with conducting research and producing 600,000 doses of their own COVID-19 vaccine. However, these doses did not meet WHO standards after testing as a result of the research process being rushed to maximize profits. It was only when the Ghanian government intervened to replace the previously made doses with their own newly certified products that the public finally felt at ease.

In conclusion, although privately sponsored scientific research has an important place thanks to the competition that drives innovation, I believe that government sponsored research exerts a more positive impact on society and the public good. In the near future, it can be predicted that the scientific community will be able to welcome more scientific breakthroughs thanks to the funding of the state.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 3

Nowadays, it is often argued that the authorities should play the predominant role in conducting and managing scientific research rather than private enterprises. Personally, I totally agree with this belief and will provide my opinion in the essay below.

Firstly, the financial capacity of any private business can hardly equal that of governmental institutions. Consequently, if the enormous state funding is properly expended on costly scientific projects, a larger quantity of equipment and facilities can be provided for government researchers, which would considerably facilitate their scientific research.

Secondly, there is often an element of openness and transparency within governmental scientific projects. Specifically, these research pieces are usually funded by public resources and expected to be made publicly available for independent verification and replication of results. Therefore, the state research outcomes tend to be significantly accurate and objective.

Finally, not only do governments focus on the research outcomes but they also have to be highly aware of any potential risks and dangers caused to the environment or even the researchers’ health, such as the disposal of noxious chemical samples or use of toxic radioactive substances in laboratories. By contrast, for economic benefits, private companies tend to put substantial emphasis on the final results in the absence of numerous safety measures to protect the ecological and human factors.

To recapitulate briefly, I am totally in favor of the idea that scientific research should be put in the hands of governmental corporations instead of private ones for their better financial capacity, transparency and awareness of possible damage.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 4

Some say that the government should have complete control over scientific research. While governments must play an important role in technological advancement, I feel that collaboration between government and private funding would be more beneficial. 

People feel that governments should oversee scientific research for a variety of reasons. To begin, scientific study, by definition, necessitates enormous effort, time, and money. It is thought that only the government, with the well-being of the entire population in mind, can continually invest in these initiatives and will not sacrifice the long-term purpose for a short-term financial benefit. Second, some scientific endeavors, if allowed unchecked, are likely to produce social or ethical difficulties, undermining society's value. For instance, genetic engineering technology has sparked several debates and is presently subject to government oversight. Finally, most science funding comes from tax income; as a result, individuals want their tax dollars to be used under the supervision of government officials. 

Nevertheless, as long as these technological programs are driven by the government, I believe private sector engagement will undoubtedly contribute to the end aim. The fundamental reason is that government personnel are not professionals in either the scientific or business sectors, but private funds are more specialized in the implementation of scientific achievements since they are profit-driven. With genuine economic rewards achieved by those studies, relevant employees may be more encouraged to do more research. Furthermore, government personnel are occasionally understaffed and inefficient. Without such teamwork, people risk becoming overwhelmed by the volume of work and communication. 

Finally, I believe that academic studies may be carried out and marketed more effectively with the partnership of the government and private firms, given that officials rigorously regulate it.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 5

Scientific research plays an important role in the development of humanity. Some people think that the responsibility for conducting and managing it should be taken by governments, and not by private companies. Personally, I believe that both governments and private businesses should have the right and duty to carry out research.

I believe that governments should play the leading role in performing research due to a number of reasons. Firstly, scientific research is the key to finding solutions to the pressing concerns of society. Thorough medical research, for example, needs to be conducted by governments to develop vaccines against potential epidemics. Research into renewable energies is also crucial to deal with global warming. These kinds of research require a great deal of spending, which can only be afforded by the government. In addition, scientific studies controlled by governments will ensure that reliable and ethical methods are used and minimize the risk of these studies being used for criminal activity. For instance, studies related to nuclear power or weapons must be carried out or supervised by governmental organizations to protect a country from terrorism or other warfare.

However, private companies can do research which is not carried out by governments. In fact, many useful scientific discoveries have been made by private institutions. To illustrate, the invention of the iPhone by Apple, a corporation in the US began the era of smartphones and facilitated modern forms of interaction between people all over the world. Furthermore, encouraging profit-driven companies to conduct scientific investigations will help them develop their own products and create competition in the marketplace. Society will therefore benefit from new inventions and better products.

In conclusion, although governments should control and carry out major scientific studies, private companies should not be deprived of the right to do research.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 6

Many argue that only the government should regulate and carry out research projects. In my opinion, although the state should be the sole governor of these studies, it should collaborate with private firms in pursuit of science exploration.

Both the authority and commercial businesses should conduct scientific studies. On the one hand, the state undeniably occupies the central role in basic research, which lays the foundations for future discoveries. It also covers a broader spectrum, including social, health and education welfare, and creates knowledge as a medium for social betterment. On the other hand, non- public enterprises can capture the fruit of such public intellectual capital, utilize it in their targeted research and translate it into viable commercial products which benefit the community at large.

However, research studies which are undertaken by independent corporations are result-oriented. Consequently, these organizations might only establish the particular outcomes that reap monetary benefits; some even go a step further, shifting the results for commercial purposes. For example, a food company funding for a study of a new variety of pomegranate may influence the study's methodology and interpretation to its advantage. Due to such commercial bias, it is imperative that the government step in to scrutinize and ensure the credibility of independent research studies. Furthermore, the state should have the upper hand in controlling scientific studies so that it can supervise high-risk research in certain fields, such as national defense and nuclear power, and abandon inhumane studies, namely animal testing and human experimentation.

In conclusion, when it comes to carrying out research activities, a partnership of both parties is necessary: the authority supports fundamental research to produce knowledge, and commercial enterprises transform it to market-based products. However, only the government should possess the power to control these activities to guarantee the research's credibility and ethics.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 7

In this concurrent world, governments and commercial companies both fund and direct scientific research around the globe. While I can see why some would argue in favour of private enterprises funding and overseeing scientific research, I contend that this is better addressed by the state.

The business world claims it is enthusiastic to do scientific studies, yet doing so entails two significant risks. To begin with, organisations doing this kind of study may be inclined to distort results in order to increase revenues, which could compromise the quality and neutrality of the research itself. Several controversies have emerged as a consequence of the rush to debut a new product without proper testing. To exemplify, the medicine thalidomide was created by a German pharmaceutical company, although it caused thousands of deformed babies to be born. Ethically speaking, leaving genetic engineering research to businesses could have severe societal repercussions, such as the introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops with as-yet-unknown effects that could lead to the collapse of entire ecosystems.

Even though authorities have many demands on their budgets, it is crucial that they monitor scientific research. Funding university departments to conduct high-quality studies for the public good rather than to enter new markets or acquire a competitive edge is the initial step in setting the bar as high as feasible. This newfound information can be disseminated internationally among scholars. Additionally, the greatest way to focus spending on specific fields of research is through administration making, which can account for the present and future requirements of society. Expanding the use of renewable energy sources is one example.

In recapitulation, I absolutely support the position that governments should be solely accountable for scientific inquiry.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 8

There is a widespread belief that governments should take responsibility for overseeing and funding crucial scientific research rather than leaving it in the hands of private enterprises. In my opinion, private entities should be given more freedom to conduct their own research, subject to appropriate oversight from the state.

It's true that the government shouldn't be the only entity financing scientific inquiry. The primary reason is that the breadth and depth of scientific reports means that private corporations may be able to hide research that isn't conducted by authorities. The lessons of history allow us to recognise the value of many discoveries made by individual entities or individuals. Singular inventors like Thomas Alva Edison, who created groundbreaking technologies like the light bulb, motion picture camera, phonograph, and many others, have made significant contributions to human civilization. We now have electric light because of Edison, but it's crucial to remember that the administration wasn't particularly invested in the field at the time.

While it is important to allow private industries to conduct scientific studies, policymakers must exercise close oversight to ensure ethical practices are followed. Some of them may be doing it for financial gain or to make destructive weapons, so keeping them under check is essential. One example is the potential threat to international stability posed by corporations' pursuit of biological weapons. Countries should prohibit and obstruct this type of study.

In conclusion, I disagree with the position that only nations should fund and perform research. It's a well-known fact that the realm of scientific inquiry is vast. Thus, it is important to allow private businesses to participate in research. In any case, I believe that governments should oversee and regulate the research conducted by commercial businesses to prevent any inappropriate use of the outcomes.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 9

Research in the sciences is undeniably important for a country's progress in the modern world. On the other hand, it's crucial to regulate who can do such studies. As government agencies are typically more concerned with serving the public interest, I tend to believe that they should be given priority when it comes to funding scientific research.

Having treasury research initiatives is crucial for a variety of reasons. To begin, there is never any financial motivation behind state research; rather, it serves the general good. Due to this, the process has become more open, and there is immense pressure to sponsor high-calibre studies with broad societal benefits. When it comes to spending taxpayer money on scientific inquiry, a government is inherently more accountable and responsible.

When it pertains to investment, private companies typically prioritise returns on investment over the welfare of their employees. There is an added risk of outcome bias when sponsorship originates from the same institution, as this would favour the supporting institution. Companies that create pharmaceuticals, for instance, are obligated by law to conduct extensive trials, the completion of which can take years. Businesses are unable to wait for the results of such analyses over a longer period of time considering the substantial capital outlay they must make. As a consequence, there is a greater possibility that quality may be sacrificed in order to ensure the study's success.

In a nutshell, transparency and openness are critical to high-quality research, making the conduct and regulation of scientific research a difficult issue. There's no doubt that a non-profit entity, such as the government, is required to carry out such a task.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 10

There is no doubt that scientific breakthroughs have revolutionized our lives in various ways; nonetheless, the question of who should pay for and evaluate scientific research remains a controversial topic. It is believed by some that the governments should be the ones that need to fund and control scientific studies rather than the private sector. While I agree that the states should scrutinize the research process, I believe that industry could join hands with authorities to foot the bill for science.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why I believe that research into science should be funded in partnership with or by the private sector. First, if private investment is allowed, it will help to ease the pressure on the state's budget that is already tight, which, in turn will allow the government to have more money to finance other significant domains such as education and healthcare. Second, as the aim of most companies is to maximize their profits, the studies financially supported by these firms tend to be more efficient and quicker compared to the lengthy process of publicly funded research. As a result, more inventions and new products with advanced and improved features and lower prices could be released into the market, benefiting consumers in general. Tesla is a prime example whose research has successfully led to the creation of modern electric cars that are affordable and environmentally friendly.

On the other hand, I believe that governments should be the watchdog of the research process to ensure the reliability and validity of scientific research. This measure can deter private organizations from conducting poor research and generating biased results in favour of their marketing strategies. For example, pharmaceutical companies often sponsor clinical trials that support their products. Moreover, the private partners hardly ever release information that might compromise its profits, and therefore, the involvement of the government in the research process can help to alleviate such a problem. Clearly, research should be evaluated largely on its scientific merits rather than the affiliations of those involved and thus, state control could increase the transparency and the quality of research, thus helping to alleviate bias concerns in the public.

In conclusion, I believe that governments should utilize the financial resource of the private sector to conduct scientific research that can benefit the public, but they should monitor the research process closely and carefully to ensure the validity of the findings.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 11

Some individuals claim that scientific studies should be conducted by governments instead of companies. While it is true that the authorities need to be responsible for carrying out research, I would argue that these activities should also be done by private companies.

To begin with, there are some benefits of governments taking care of scientific research. Firstly, as governments of different countries can co-operate with each other, they may be able to conduct studies on a larger scale which require larger investment. For instance, they can carry out research into ways of dealing with global warming. Secondly, unlike private companies, governments tend to pay more attention to research areas that can benefit society as a whole. Studies related to environmental issues or crime rates are great examples. By contrast, companies usually only focus on maximising profits rather than helping all citizens.

However, I believe that private companies should also share the responsibility to conduct scientific research. The first reason is that this could help to ease the pressure on the government’s budget. As a result, citizens would have to pay lower taxes, and the authorities would also have more cash to spend on other important areas such as education or the military. Another reason is that since the top priority of companies is to earn money, they would have more motivation to conduct research more quickly and more efficiently. For example, a company called Tesla has been carrying out extensive research in order to produce electric cars and bring them to the market.

In conclusion, I believe that both governments and private companies should be involved in research activities.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 12

Scientific research across the world plays a significant role in national development. Some people think that governments should conduct crucial scientific research rather than private companies. I believe that scientific projects should be carried out and supervised by the state.

There are many benefits of governments taking care of scientific research. Firstly, successful scientific experiments which require years of commitment and sufficient capital can only be guaranteed by the government. If the project fails to achieve its objective, the government has executive power and resources to deal with the losses incurred. Moreover, the government should implement research such as nuclear technology or military intelligence because those activities are in the national interest and involve high levels of secrecy. By contrast, private businesses may compromise principles and leak research findings, posing a severe threat to national security.

On the other hand, private companies can participate in scientific research since they can attract talented scientists and make advances in various fields. Over the past few decades, many private organizations have presided over valuable research on multiple areas such as space exploration or renewable energy sources. However, corporations undertaking scientific research may manipulate results to maximize profits. For example, legislation in medical companies usually requires rigorous trials and decades for new drugs to complete. This process might be too long for profit-driven agencies to go through. Thus, new products tend to be introduced hurriedly just after preliminary trials.

To conclude, I would argue that governments should primarily monitor and control scientific research. With well-regulated and credible methods, the government can minimize the risk of these studies being abused. Private companies should not be deprived of scientific exploitation provided that they are kept within precise limits.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 13

Instead of being conducted by private companies, important scientific research must be managed and administered by the governments, according to the opinions of many. I personally believe that private companies should be given their own freedom in doing research, but with sufficient and proper monitoring from the government.

On one hand, it is true that scientific research should not be only conducted by the government. The main reason is that the scope of scientific research is diverse and wide, and private companies could cover up some research which is not carried out by the governments. Many private institutions or individuals' discoveries are useful for the humanity, as we can learn from the past. For example, Thomas Alva Edison was an individual inventor who has greatly contributed to the world with his inventions such as the bulb light, motion pictures, phonograph and so on. We should notice that the invention was not the main focus of the government’s research during that time, and thanks to Edison we have electric light today.

On the other hand, although private companies are given the right to do scientific research, they must be strictly monitored by the governments. They must be controlled, as some of them might be doing it for their monetary gain or for destructive weapons. For example, some companies might focus on developing biochemical weapons, and it could threaten the world peace. It is the governments’ job to prevent and block these kinds of research. 

In conclusion, I do not agree that scientific research should only be conducted by the government. It is a fact that the scope of scientific research is huge. Therefore, private companies should be allowed to do research. However, I do agree the research that is done by private companies must be reviewed and monitored by the governments in order to avoid any misappropriation.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 14

It is undeniable that scientific research is imperative for a country’s development in this modern world. However, it is equally important to have control in place as to who can carry out such research. To a larger extent, I agree that the government should have the upper hand when it comes to undertaking scientific research as they tend to be more people driven.

There are various reasons why it is pivotal to have government-run research projects. To begin with, when research is carried out by the government, the motive behind is always people-driven and not money oriented. As a result, there is more transparency in the process and the need to invest in a quality research that benefits the general public also increases.

Furthermore, a government is borne to be more responsible and has complete accountability when it comes to investing public money in such research.

In contrast, private organizations are not people oriented and they tend to invest in research projects that are more profitable. In addition, when the funding comes from the same organization, the results could also be biased to ensure there is a favourable outcome to the funding institution. For example, companies that produce medicinal drugs are legally obliged to go through rigorous trials, which may take several years to complete. As private companies invest a lump sum of money in such studies, it is impractical for them to wait for a longer tenure to attain the expected results. Hence, there is a higher probability of the quality being compromised to make the research successful.

In conclusion, carrying out and controlling scientific research is a contentious issue as transparency and openness are pivotal for a quality research. Undoubtedly, this is only possible if done by a non-profit organization like the government.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 15

While some advocate for government control over scientific research, I strongly disagree with this viewpoint, as privately funded research initiatives have proven to be crucial drivers of innovation and societal progress.

Firstly, privately funded scientific research has played a pivotal role in fostering innovation and technological advancements. Researchers working on behalf of commercial interests are often incentivized to think creatively and develop groundbreaking solutions to prevalent challenges. For instance, companies like SpaceX, under the leadership of tech visionary Elon Musk, have revolutionized space transportation by leveraging innovative technologies like 3D printing and mass production methods to reduce production costs and enhance efficiency.

Secondly, encouraging profit-driven companies to spearhead scientific investigations fosters competition and drives product development, benefiting society at large. By investing in research and development, companies can create new products and services, introducing healthy competition in the marketplace. For example, pharmaceutical companies conducting research on new drugs not only contribute to medical advancements but also stimulate innovation and offer consumers a wider range of treatment options, ultimately improving public health outcomes.

In conclusion, entrusting scientific research solely to governments overlooks the invaluable contributions of privately funded initiatives in driving innovation and societal progress for these above-mentioned reasons.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 16

It is suggested that science research projects should be done and under supervision by the government. From my perspective, I partially agree with the statement and will explain it in this following essay.

Firstly, there are many institutions or individuals conducting scientific projects in many different fields. Those people try to make new inventions and breakthroughs in order to make human life easier. For example, with the development of technology such as the internet, people now can easily run their business, communicate with other people long-distance, and do many other useful things. Furthermore, more developments as the result of scientific experiments have been done without direct intervention from the government, the reason is every individual has a right to do experiments or research projects as long as it is in accordance with the applicable rules and standards operational. However, due to many illegal experiments, the government also has to tighten the rules about it, to ensure the safety of everyone.

On the other hand, there are some cases where governments should get involved directly in scientific projects. For instance, with the process of making vaccines for the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Of course, in an emergency situation like this, the authority must collaborate with institutions and other parties related to achieve the goal of the experiment.

In conclusion, everyone can do scientific research and must follow the regulations and ethical codes or the guidelines. In addition, on several occasions the authority should be part of it, especially in a situation in which threats to the life of many people.

Many people believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled - mẫu 17

Alongside the rapid development of science, there have been concerns regarding which to take the responsibility of conducting and mastering the experiments between governments and private companies.

Personally, I am convinced that it should be the state officials to monitor the research, but at the same time some private organizations can take part in these to push the progress.

On the one hand, I subscribe to the opinion that the governments are responsible for implementing and controlling scientific research. It is no denying that some experiments can be immensely dangerous and harmful to the scientists, therefore it requires the assistance and the supervision from the state to ensure the well-being of those who conduct them. To illustrate, experiments in radioactive substances are perilous and a serious threat to the experts that carry them out. Without the stringent management from the officials, it is likely that traumatic incidents would happen. In fact, history has witnessed the deaths of radioactivity from many scientists in this particular field, namely Marie Curie.

On the other hand, private companies should be allowed to run scientific research on their own. This is because various types of experiments from these organizations have benefited us greatly. A typical example of this is pharmaceutical companies, whose sole purpose is to produce medicines to cure people's diseases. With continuous control in their own laboratories, scientists may feel disturbed and uncomfortable doing their job. As a result, the scientific progress would slow down and potentially affect the patients, whose health would get worse without proper treatment.

To conclude, I believe that scientific research should be carried out and controlled by both the governments and private companies because there are advantages from each of them. The state would help to ensure the safety of these experiments and the companies would be able to contribute their parts to the well-being of the society.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In the future, we will have more and more leisure time as machines will replace many of the tasks we do at home and work now. Discuss the benefits this will bring and also the problems it will cause

• Video records are better to learn about the way other people in the world live than written documents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts and that this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view?

• People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that technological development has made life complex. The only possible solution is not to use technology to live a simple life. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Săn shopee giá ưu đãi :

• Sổ lò xo Art of Nature Thiên Long màu xinh xỉu
• Biti's ra mẫu mới xinh lắm
• Tsubaki 199k/3 chai
• L'Oreal mua 1 tặng 3

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---