Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree - mẫu 1

Nuclear energy is the all-powerful alternative to fossil fuels, and it is the finest choice to satisfy the rapidly increasing demand across the world. In my opinion, I completely agree with the fact that nuclear energy is a pretty appropriate choice and a good replacement for fossil fuels. I will explain my views on why nuclear energy is a superior option in the subsequent paragraphs.

One of the best substitutes for fossil fuels is nuclear energy. It generates a lot of energy from a very small amount of fuel and emits very little CO2 and other harmful pollutants. It also has a very good safety record as hundreds of nuclear power plants worldwide have been operating for more than fifty years without any serious accidents. Moreover, several nations are using nuclear energy as an alternative source to generate electricity as they don’t emit harmful gases that lead to acid rain or global warming. In fact, nuclear energy has saved many lives in the past, which may have been lost if we had built fossil-fuel plants instead of nuclear reactors.

One of the major threats of using nuclear power is the creation of radioactive waste that might be an environmental issue. The radioactive materials might also be fatal. However, these nuclear power plants are built very carefully to prevent such releases. As a result, even the two worst nuclear accidents in history (Chernobyl and Fukushima) have harmed very few people in number compared to fossil fuel pollution.

Although nuclear fuel is not renewable like fossil fuels, they have high productivity with no geographical limitations. The sustainability of nuclear power is a very big concern as it will be an environmental tragedy if a dangerous crash occurs.

To reiterate, nuclear energy is a reliable and powerful source of electricity with zero emissions. Besides, nuclear energy is still more viable than fossil fuels and is relatively safe.

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree - mẫu 2

There is no denying the fact that nuclear power comes with massive potential that can be used positively to improve mankind. Nuclear technology has become one of the potent resources and fulfills the demands of people accordingly. In my opinion, nuclear power has demonstrated more benefits for constructive purposes for varying factors of life. I shall illustrate my perspective in the below paragraphs.

To begin with, there are plenty of advantages that can be gained by developing more nuclear stations. First and foremost, nuclear technology is extensively used in the fields of science and medicine, such as X-rays, to diagnose significant internal fractures and injuries. Another noteworthy example is radiotherapy that is universally used to cure patients suffering from deadly diseases, such as malignant cancerous tumours, and more.

In addition to this, the green power stations, being eco-friendly, do not have any contribution to air pollution. Moreover, it can be used to produce electricity without wasting any restricted natural resources, be it gas or coal. To represent it better, everybody knows that nuclear gas is a renewable resource and that it cannot go extinct; hence, it can be effortlessly used in diverse major sectors. With this gas, there will be no issues of carbon emission. Furthermore, this way, there will be no issues of climate change, or the air quality will not further deteriorate. Consequently, a lot of countries are comprehending to integrate nuclear power as the solution to high demands of gas, oil, electricity and decrease the issues with climate changes as well as pollution.

While it is true nuclear power is being used for negative factors too, such as nuclear bombs, the benefits it offers evidently surpass the drawbacks.

Conclusively, nuclear technology definitely has a lot of positive uses and provides a promising future. From my point of view, it would be better if this power is used for its true benefits and the betterment of the world.

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree - mẫu 3

The word ‘global warming’ has had a huge effect on people’s minds with respect to the energy resources they use. Most nations are heavily dependent on fossil fuels for power production, even though they are very dangerous to our climate. As a result of climate change, many nations consider nuclear energy to be an effective solution to this issue and a good way to satisfy ever-increasing energy needs. To some point, I agree with this feeling.

On the one side, nuclear technology has many benefits over conventional energy sources. First of all, it’s a green energy source, so we don’t need to think about scarcity and reserve considerations. For example, once fossil fuels are non-renewable, the more easily we use them to die.

Secondly, nuclear energy is environmentally sustainable and releases no carbon dioxide material into the environment. It is cleaner energy than conventional energy sources.

Lastly, atomic energy’s mass to energy generation is very high, which implies with a limited volume of atomic material we can generate enough electricity to lighten the whole region.

To the opposite hand of the coin. It still has drawbacks, though. The substance of nuclear energy is a significant danger to any form of life on earth. Radioactive waves or radiation trigger dangerous illnesses, such as cancer, if not contained. Japan, for instance, was met with a tragedy after the waves hit one of the nuclear power plants in Fukushima.

As a consequence, there was a leakage in the facility, the region deemed to be a radioactive zone, culminating in a mass evacuation of natives from the region. But the region is still maintained as a quarantine area, meaning that no living things survive there. In comparison, the safety of nuclear power stations is very dangerous. Today, these kinds of installations are attacked by militants as nuclear weapons.

In summary, nuclear fusion is the only alternative to the energy deficiency that the earth is currently facing. It is also the ideal solution to the environmental issues that we are facing right now. While there are still certain drawbacks, proper service and creation of these types of facilities should be assured.

Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree - mẫu 4

In today’s world, people are searching for an effective way to raise electricity consumption. Some people think that nuclear energy is a better option than fossil fuel. In my view, I am in favour of this claim.

Nuclear electricity has some advantages that other sources of energy do not have. Firstly, it is a renewable energy source, which ensures that it can be used to generate electricity without consuming scarce natural resources such as coal, oil or gas. As we all know, fossil fuels are being used at an unprecedented pace.

Second, it is safer than fossil fuel, in other terms, it will help us minimise the carbon content that induces global warming. Ultimately, the development of nuclear power will create more job possibilities and even make those technologies more effective for the industry.

There are, on the other hand, certain aspects against these claims. The sustainability of nuclear power is a big concern. It will be a tragedy once a dangerous crash occurs. Millions of people are going to be harmed or injured. In comparison, a nuclear power plant will occupy a large area, get rid of its own square, and nobody wants to live near it. Furthermore, the expense of constructing a nuclear power plant is high, and expensive investment would put a heavy economic strain on the country.

In addition, I agree with the assertion that nuclear technology can be used somewhat in some nations, such as some developing countries. Nevertheless, the country’s growth has been driven by technical and scientific developments, and the officials are required to boost the country’s global influence and increase the quality of living of people.

To write a perfect essay you must keep some points in mind. In agreeing or disagreeing essays, you must pick a side that is easy for you. You must support your answers with suitable examples which will impress the examiner while checking your essay. Do not bring your personal opinion or examples in your essay, as it is not appreciated at all.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it a positive development while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both points and give your own opinion

• The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people feel that the private lives of celebrities should not be openly shared by the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree

• Some people feel that the cost of space exploration is far too high for the benefits it brings while others argue that space programmes should continue no matter what the cost. Discuss both sides and give your opinion

• The tendency of human beings to copy one another is shown in the popularity of areas such as fashion and consumer goods. To what extent do you agree?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---