Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty

Đề bài: Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 1

Wealthy nations often provide financial support to developing countries, but some people think that it is better to give poor countries a more practical kind of support. I completely agree with this opinion.

One of the problems with financial assistance is that it often does not reach its intended receivers. Instead, it is misused by corrupt government officials, who use this money for their own sake, while those in real need receive little or nothing at all. Another thing that needs to be considered is that giving money to poor countries does not help address the root causes of poverty, one of which lies in a lack of access to basic education.

Therefore, instead of donating money, it is better to invest in the education system of poorer nations. A more practical way to offer help is to deploy teachers, build more educational institutions, and provide more resources like textbooks and school supplies. A lack of education is one of the primary reasons why so many people in underdeveloped countries get stuck in a vicious cycle of extreme poverty. Due to their inability to read and write, many have to work in labour-intensive or dangerous jobs for extremely low wages and they have to keep borrowing money to cover their basic daily expenses. Thus, when people are given the chance to go to school, they will be more likely to get a well-paid job, improve their living standards, and eventually lift themselves out of poverty.

In conclusion, I totally agree with the opinion that financial aid cannot help tackle the problem of poverty in developing countries, and that instead of pouring billions of dollars into the governments of poor countries, that amount should be invested in paying teachers’ salaries, constructing more educational facilities, and offering more resources.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 2

It is commonplace for wealthier countries to provide money to underdeveloped countries, yet the assistance fails to reduce poverty. Others argue that wealthy countries should help developing nations in ways other than monetary aid. Although financial aid is not a complete solution, it may be crucial in assisting developing nations. Moreover, other types of support are also required to battle poverty effectively.

Financial aid is crucial in providing immediate relief during times of crisis, such as natural disasters and pandemics. In these situations, necessities such as food, medicine, and shelter are urgently needed, and financial assistance can provide these resources to those in need. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, has devastated many poorer countries, exacerbating existing challenges such as healthcare and economic inequalities. Financial aid provided by wealthier nations has played a critical role in mitigating the impact of the virus and supporting struggling communities. While financial aid is not a complete solution to poverty, it remains an essential tool in providing immediate relief and support during times of crisis.

To truly combat poverty, however, it is essential to complement financial assistance with other types of aid. Technical expertise and assistance, for example, can play a crucial role in helping poorer nations develop their economies and improve their education systems and infrastructure. More affluent countries can share their knowledge and experience in these areas through partnerships with businesses, educational institutions, and governments. By working together, developed and developing nations can identify and address the specific needs of poorer countries, creating sustainable change beyond short-term relief. Additionally, this can lead to long-term economic benefits for both developed and developing nations, fostering mutual understanding and cooperation.

In conclusion, I believe there is still a significant role that financial assistance may play in assisting low-income nations. In addition, expertise and help from the technological realm are also required in the fight against poverty.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 3

It is widely observed that wealthier countries often provide financial aid to underdeveloped nations. However, it has been argued that this approach alone does not effectively alleviate poverty. Instead, developed countries should offer alternative forms of assistance to address the needs of poor nations. While financial aid may not be a comprehensive solution, it remains essential, and other types of support should be implemented in conjunction to combat poverty more effectively.

In terms of immediate relief during crises like natural disasters or pandemics, financial aid plays a crucial role. It allows for the provision of urgent necessities such as food, medicine, and shelter for those in need. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted many impoverished countries, exacerbating existing healthcare and economic inequalities. Financial aid from wealthier nations has played a vital role in mitigating the pandemic's impact and supporting vulnerable communities. While financial aid alone may not solve poverty, it serves as a crucial tool in providing immediate relief and support during critical times.

However, to achieve long-term poverty reduction, financial assistance must be complemented by other forms of aid. Technical expertise and assistance, for example, can play a pivotal role in helping poorer nations develop their economies, improve education systems, and build infrastructure. Collaborative partnerships between developed and developing nations can facilitate knowledge sharing and experience exchange in these areas. By addressing the specific needs of poorer countries through sustained cooperation, we can foster sustainable change beyond short-term relief. Moreover, this collaborative effort can yield long-term economic benefits for both developed and developing nations, fostering mutual understanding and cooperation.

In conclusion, while financial assistance is crucial in assisting low-income nations, it is imperative to supplement it with other forms of aid. Technical expertise and assistance should be provided to address long-term poverty reduction effectively. By combining financial aid with other types of support, we can strive to create a more sustainable and inclusive environment for developing nations.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 4

Developed nations are frequently seen providing economic assistance to third-world countries. However, it does not always help reduce poverty; therefore, it is argued that less affluent nations must be provided with an alternative form of aid which will help them in the long run. This essay discusses why developing countries can be better off from such assistance and the types of help offered.

Firstly, when developed countries give money to undeveloped countries, it will help citizens in these countries solve short-term problems, and it will not last long. When inhabitants in emerging countries receive money from donations, they use it to pay the temporary cost or issues. For instance, in 2005, the United States donated about 20 billion to some undeveloped countries, but still, it only helped people solve the problem f for two months. After two months, they continued poorly.

Moreover, developed countries should invest in healthcare and education rather than loan money to other countries. When the younger generation receives a quality education and everyone has access to proper medical treatment and hospitality, it will help eliminate unemployment and prevent people from resorting to unlawful activities. So developed countries must avail themselves in building good schools, universities, and hospitals. Moreover, they can help stabilize the government in these countries and monitor whether the political environment is conducive to growth. Although money helps feed the hungry lot, it is only a temporary solution.

However, before providing help with other aid to developing countries, developed countries should give financial assistance to developing countries because people say that money does solve most problems.

To summarize, I favour the opinion that rich countries should provide practical help to improve the economic status of developing countries. However, financial assistance can only help to a certain extent and is not the definite way to eliminate poverty.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 5

In order to solve poverty in poor countries, some wealthy nations tend to donate money to them. However, due to the ineffectiveness of financial aid, some people believe that other measures should be implemented. I firmly agree with this view, as corruption never allows such resources to be spent wisely.

Some might argue that financial aid gives local governments more power to resolve issues like poverty. Since they know their country and people better, they might be more suitable to decide where the money should be spent. Indeed, a true government will always prioritize its people’s welfare, but unfortunately, it usually is not the case in many third-world countries. For instance, the USA supported the local government of Afghanistan for decades by providing billions of dollars. However, the latter did not prosper as it should have because of its systematic corruption at the government level. As a result, it collapsed once again with its people still being one of the poorest in the world.

Therefore, powerful countries need to identify the needs of disadvantaged nations and send experts to train locals to be able to become economically independent. For instance, Afghanistan is known for its rich sources of minerals and raw materials. If the US had sent industry experts and built factories to help locals increase their domestic production levels and earn money through exports, the country would have become industrialized within a decade and stopped needing foreign aid. Additionally, building schools and training local teachers to take charge of a standard education system would have had far-reaching benefits, as each well-trained student could bring fresh ideas and start a business, creating jobs for others. Eventually, all these measures would have improved the economic health of the country and eradicated poverty by eliminating nationwide unemployment.

In conclusion, providing financial resources to local authorities might seem an easy way of fighting poverty in the world, but not every government is trustworthy enough to spend money wisely. Therefore, investing that aid in the nation’s infrastructure, instead, is a more sensible solution, as it targets education and unemployment to resolve the problem.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 6

Financial aid is frequently provided by wealthy nations to impoverished nations, yet this type of aid alone fails to resolve the issue of poverty. Hence, it is recommended that wealthy nations offer alternative forms of aid. In my opinion, I believe that while financial aid is still an important form of assistance, rich countries should also explore other forms of aid.

On the one hand, financial aid can certainly help provide immediate relief. Firstly, financial aid can be helpful in addressing immediate needs such as food, shelter, and medical care. For example, after a natural disaster, financial aid can help provide emergency relief to affected communities, which is crucial in helping to contain the epidemic and save lives. Secondly, providing financial aid to poor countries can contribute to global stability by promoting political and economic stability in those countries. For instance, this can help reduce the risk of conflict and prevent the spread of extremism and terrorism.

On the other hand, financial aid alone does not solve poverty in the long term. Financial aid can sometimes lead to dependency, as poor countries become reliant on aid rather than building their own economies. One example of financial aid leading to dependency is the case of Haiti’s earthquake. After the earthquake, Haiti received a significant amount of aid from foreign governments and international organizations. However, the aid created a culture of dependency, as the Haitian government became reliant on aid rather than developing its own economy. Additionally, there are other available forms of assistance that can help poor countries break the cycle of poverty. As proof, education is a crucial form of aid, as it can help poor countries develop a skilled workforce that is capable of driving economic growth and development.

In conclusion, financial aid is still an important form of assistance, but it is not a solution to poverty in poor countries. Rich countries should explore other forms of aid such as technical expertise, education, and training to help build sustainable economies and address the root causes of poverty.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 7

Although poorer countries usually receive financial aid from more developed nations, such assistance does not help eradicate poverty. Thus, it is believed that developed countries should provide other types of help to their underdeveloped and developing counterparts, with which I completely agree.

Despite its impact on poorer countries’ economies, monetary support is only a short-term solution and cannot help these countries escape poverty. In some developing and underdeveloped countries, corruption is among the serious problems which have been existing for years. Even if rich nations provide financial assistance to their poorer counterparts, the money may not reach the right recipients, who are unfortunate people living on the breadline. Furthermore, there are still some problems which stem from poor management of government or administrative systems in poor countries. Those problems could not be tackled by financial aid since a country has no right to interfere with another country’s internal affairs.

Since financial assistance could not contribute much to the alleviation of poverty, developed countries should offer other forms of support to their poorer counterparts. One way is for richer countries to provide occupational courses to increase the level of education in poorer countries. One of the root causes of poverty in underdeveloped countries is the lack of education, which could be solved by developed countries offering basic training courses for employment in poor countries. Furthermore, providing proper technical training could be another type of effective help for poor countries. Thanks to the advanced technical understanding provided by developed countries, poor countries can upgrade their industries, enhance their global competitiveness, and therefore eliminate poverty.

In conclusion, rather than giving direct financial support, I think developed countries should share other resources, such as their knowledge and understanding, with poorer countries and thus help them curb poverty.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 8

Currently, the gap between affluent and poor nations is expanding. Even today, millions of people in developing countries lack access to health care and education. Since their governments lack the financial resources to enhance their citizens' standard of living, some believe that wealthy nations should provide financial assistance. I agree with this recommendation. In my opinion, rich nations should support poor nations.

Firstly, wealthy nations have excess finances. By providing financial assistance to underdeveloped nations, the global quality of life can be raised. Poverty is the underlying cause of numerous societal evils. It is a well-known fact that numerous antisocial elements thrive in disadvantaged countries. In general, the impoverished are unhappy with their own life. They are also furious with the wealthy. Obviously, many of them exhibit criminal tendencies. They cannot be reformed without an improvement in their living conditions. By offering financial aid to needy nations, wealthy nations can alleviate poverty in those nations and contribute to a more peaceful world.

In addition to financial support, wealthier nations should employ other means to aid the needy. The strategies will focus on enhancing the motivation, survival abilities, and knowledge of the recipients. Therefore, they will be able to govern their country effectively and enhance their living conditions. As a result, living conditions in less developed countries will improve and they will be able to rely on their own resources.

In conclusion, I believe that high levels of corruption and weak governance are the primary causes of poverty in underdeveloped nations. However, this can be resolved by instituting the appropriate rules and regulations.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 9

It has been suggested that wealthier nations should always provide adequate financial aid to developing nations in order to relieve poverty. In addition to providing monetary assistance, prosperous nations should prioritise providing humanitarian aid to developing nations. In my opinion, suitable services for teaching and training the citizens of these impoverished nations should be made available.

To commence with, financial assistance to a country in need may initially appear to be a solution because it temporarily alleviates a country's economic problems. However, merely financial aid will not work in the long run for various reasons. First, financial aid does not always reach those in need. Some of the poorest nations have corrupt administrations that misappropriate foreign help for their own gain. Consequently, the poor will remain impoverished even after receiving foreign aid. Therefore, if these financial aids are implemented effectively, they can be substantial or even more effective in providing actual support.

Secondly, prosperous nations should establish their firms in these less developed nations. Therefore, a rise in investment will allow the country's citizens to have access to employment opportunities. On the other hand, the process of giving economic aid should not be halted, as the above-mentioned processes require time to produce the best results. A congruous combination of these variables would produce a more favourable outcome in the future.

In conclusion, I support the view that rich countries should provide practical assistance to enhance the economic situation of poor countries but, providing just economic assistance to poor countries will temporarily mitigate the gravity of the issue.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 10

Nowadays, rich nations are becoming richer while poor nations are becoming poorer. Some people believe that developed nations should send financial aid to developing nations, while others argue that financial aid cannot fix this issue. However, wealthy nations provide needy nations with assistance other than financial aid. This idea has both benefits and drawbacks. I concur with the former view.

On the one hand, many people feel wealthy nations should provide financial aid to developing nations. In accordance with this criterion, rich nations provide this assistance, which is beneficial to underdeveloped nations as a result of wars and natural calamities. While some state authorities aid this country financially and provide food and essentials to its citizens, others provide shelter to those who have lost their houses as a result of the war.

On the contrary, a number of individuals believe wealthy nations should provide assistance in other ways besides financial aid. While financial aid is necessary, developed nations also provide other sorts of assistance, such as excellent education, water supply, electrical infrastructure, etc., since if only money aid were provided, the issues of poverty could not be resolved. For instance, in the majority of nations, pupils learn with the fewest available resources since these nations lack good schools and quality education. Therefore, prosperous nations should provide educational and medical aid.

In conclusion, I believe that wealthy nations should provide financial aid and great education to young people so that they can advance their careers and the nation as a whole. Moreover, they should also provide employment opportunities so that the standard of living could be improved.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 11

The global dialogue on financial aid reveals a critical consensus: merely transferring funds from affluent nations to impoverished ones falls short of eradicating poverty. I contend that alternative forms of assistance can prove more effective, focusing on sustainable development and capacity building. This essay will explore the significance of investing in education and infrastructure, alongside fostering local economies, as transformative strategies that surpass the temporary relief offered by financial aid.

Financial aid, though crucial for immediate crisis alleviation, often bypasses the fundamental factors perpetuating poverty. Conversely, strategic investments in education serve as a powerful lever for empowerment, equipping individuals with essential skills and knowledge for self-improvement and community upliftment. For instance, literacy and vocational training are instrumental, enabling people to acquire better employment opportunities and effectively break the relentless cycle of poverty. Additionally, a well-educated populace is pivotal in fostering a society adept at making informed choices, thereby significantly enhancing governance and curbing corruption, ultimately leading to more transparent and accountable societal structures.

In a similar vein, the construction and enhancement of infrastructure, including roads, healthcare facilities, and systems for clean water, create a solid foundation for sustained economic advancement. Improved access to comprehensive healthcare services markedly reduces disease spread and boosts population longevity. Simultaneously, upgraded transportation networks crucially support trade and access to broader markets. Encouraging the development and expansion of small and medium-sized enterprises, wealthy countries can vitalize local economies, generate substantial employment opportunities, and stimulate innovation. This multifaceted approach not only underpins self-reliance but also plays a significant role in fostering a global economy characterized by greater equity and inclusivity.

In conclusion, financial aid offers a short-term fix to poverty's symptoms, whereas investments in education, infrastructure, and economic empowerment tackle its root causes. Shifting focus to these areas enables affluent countries to foster sustainable development and self-reliance in poorer nations, creating a deeper and more enduring impact. This strategic shift in aid approach aims for poverty's eradication, not merely its alleviation.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 12

The provision of financial aid by affluent nations to their poorer counterparts has long been a staple of international assistance. However, this approach is increasingly scrutinized for its inability to resolve the underlying issues of poverty. I argue that a more effective strategy lies in non-monetary aid forms, specifically targeting education, infrastructure, and economic empowerment, to enact lasting change.

Direct financial assistance, while crucial for alleviating immediate short-term needs, often overlooks the deeper systemic barriers to sustainable development. In stark contrast, education serves as a powerful catalyst for empowering individuals with the essential knowledge and skills necessary for achieving economic self-sufficiency. Targeted initiatives, such as comprehensive vocational training and extensive literacy programs, equip individuals with valuable tools to significantly improve their employability and enhance their entrepreneurial capacities. This form of empowerment transcends mere individual benefits, fostering broader socio-economic development within communities and instigating a positive ripple effect that benefits society at large.

Furthermore, the pivotal role of infrastructure development in promoting sustained economic growth is undeniably profound. Strategic investments in critical sectors like healthcare, transportation, and sanitation create a solid foundation for a healthier, more mobile, and highly productive population. For example, innovative rural electrification projects have the transformative power to revolutionize communities by providing widespread access to information, facilitating digital education initiatives, and unlocking new markets for local products. Such endeavors not only stimulate vibrant economic activity but also contribute to the creation of a more interconnected and resilient economy, showcasing the far-reaching impacts of well-thought-out infrastructural advancements.

In conclusion, prioritizing education, infrastructure, and economic empowerment over financial aid offers a more sustainable poverty solution. These measures tackle poverty's root causes, encouraging development, self-sufficiency, and resilience. Such a holistic approach enables richer nations to contribute more meaningfully to eradicating global poverty, providing not just immediate relief but a roadmap to enduring prosperity.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 13

The provision of financial aid to poor countries by their more affluent counterparts has been a widely debated topic. It is often argued that such monetary assistance does not effectively solve poverty and that wealthy nations should consider alternative forms of support. This essay will contend that while financial aid may not be an all-encompassing solution to poverty, it remains a critical component in alleviating the plight of impoverished nations. Consequently, it is essential that rich countries continue to provide financial assistance while concurrently exploring other means of support.

Financial aid to poor countries plays a crucial role in addressing various development challenges. For instance, it enables the implementation of vital infrastructure projects, such as the construction of schools and hospitals, which significantly improve the quality of life for citizens. Additionally, financial assistance can be employed in emergency situations like natural disasters, where quick and substantial monetary support is indispensable. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that relying solely on financial aid may not solve the poverty issues in the long run.

Alternative forms of help, such as capacity building and technological transfer, can be more effective in promoting self-sufficiency and sustainable development in poorer nations. Capacity building entails equipping individuals with the necessary skills and knowledge to create a robust and resilient economy. This can be achieved through vocational training, educational exchanges, and mentorship programs, which empower locals to become agents of change in their communities. Furthermore, technological transfer facilitates access to advanced tools and systems, enabling developing nations to leapfrog stages of development, thereby stimulating economic growth and reducing poverty.

In conclusion, it is evident that financial aid to poor countries, though not an absolute solution, remains a vital component in the global fight against poverty. However, it is important for wealthy nations to also engage in capacity building and technological transfer to support sustainable development and self-reliance in impoverished nations. Only through a multifaceted approach can the issue of poverty be effectively addressed, leading to a more equitable and prosperous world.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 14

Nowadays, developed countries are frequently giving monetary assistance to the low-income countries, whereas direct financial support is already a proven ineffective approach which has been leading us to look for an efficient alternative mechanism. I strongly agree with this statement, and I believe that rich countries’ generous investment in poor nation’s public transportation and technical education would be a sustainable support to the least developed ones.

A nation’s overall economy vastly depends on its public transportation system which is directly connected to the productivity of the masses of the country. We know that general people predominantly use public transport, such as bus, train etc. If these means are efficient enough, the commuters will need less travel time and save a significant number of productive hours, which will eventually benefit the overall national economy. Some of the mega cities in poor nations are also the worst in terms of traffic congestion with unplanned routes and outdated vehicles. In peak period of a day, commuters spend hours in traffic jam. If they could spend this amount of time at work, it would have been an incredible addition to the national economy.

In addition, rather than giving direct fund, proving proper technological training could be another effective help to the poor countries, because they need the advanced technical understandings to upgrade their industries and enhance their global competitiveness. In fact, only when a country can keep pace with global competitiveness, it can get rid of the poverty trap. However, this assistance should be well studied. For instance, if a country has cheap labours, it should be provided with the labour-intensive industrial resources and trained with the relevant knowhows. As a result, the poor country would generate employment and rise with overall economic growth.

In conclusion, direct monetary grant might help an underdeveloped country only for a short term. When it is about a sustainable economic progress, along with proper investment in poor countries’ transportation system, developed nations should help them also with technical assistance aiming their industrial improvement.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 15

It is believed by a majority of people that wealthy nations’ financial aid to third world countries is ineffective and other efforts should have been made instead. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with this opinion due to two main reasons.

One point supporting my view is related to the ineffectiveness of providing financial assistance to developing countries. The main problem of the authorities in many developing countries is related to their lack of strong financial management, money disbursement transparence, and capable human resources to carry out projects. Therefore, a large proportion of the provided aid amounts tends to be embezzled by governmental officers, meaning insignificant amounts left to reach the needy groups. As the intended purposes of support would not be realized, problems such as poor infrastructure, a lack of medical supplies, or low-tech farming would continue lingering and trap developing countries like Nepal and Cambodia in the inescapable cycle of poverty.

Another reason for my agreement lies in the ensured sustainable development of developing countries once provided with practical technologies in replacement for meaningless financial assistance. Specifically, technical aids including sharing expertise, knowledge, and skills would transfer valuable know-how and technical capabilities to locals in order to build their capabilities and skills for future development. Once high-tech and value-added industries are developed, this internal force would eventually be the driving factor to trigger local business, job opportunities as well as economic growth, therefore promoting self-sufficiency and long-term economic growth in poor nations. In contrast, such problems could not be thoroughly addressed by providing monetary aid since funds might be quickly depleted or misused by inexperienced locals.

In conclusion, I am convinced by the idea of wealthy nations converting their current impractical financial aid into other types of assistance to underdeveloped countries. This is due to the fact that positive promotion of self-reliance within the locality would trigger local entrepreneurship as well as avoid the possible misuse of funds by inexperienced recipients.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 16

Developed nations have more money than they need, so they give financial assistance to undeveloped and developing nations. I certainly agree with the view that this financial aid hasn’t solved all the problems plaguing poor countries. However, it has definitely improved the situation in those countries to a certain extent.

Corruption is one of the biggest problems that poor nations face. Even if rich nations give financial aid, the money does not reach the people who need it. Millions of people living in poor countries lack education. They are not even aware of their rights and accept poverty as if it was their birthright. If a nation is to progress, it needs empowered people who are aware of their rights and who have the capability to fight for it.

An honest and efficient administrative system is required for the development of any nation. Corrupt officials and ignorant people who are not aware of their rights have never helped any nation. Unfortunately, developed nations that give financial assistance cannot do much to improve the government or administrative system present in poor nations. No nation can interfere in another nation’s internal affairs beyond a certain level. So, other than giving financial assistance there is not much that rich nations can do to help poor nations.

To conclude, I certainly agree with the view that foreign aid hasn’t solved the problems of poor countries. However, this does not mean that developed nations should stop giving financial assistance. They should continue to give money but the purpose of giving financial assistance should be the empowerment of people. Eradication of poverty is equally important but as they say teaching a man how to fish is much better than giving him a fish.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 17

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid.

It is observed quite frequently that the underdeveloped nations only receive financial assistance from the developed nations, which does not completely help improve the nation’s economic situation. Other fundamental amenities and help provided by developed countries can also have a significant contribution to eradicating poverty. I completely agree and believe that financial aid can help improve the country’s economy and various factors like improving social-political conditions, education, employment, etc., play an important role in it.

First and foremost, Monetary support is considered one of the major factors in improving the financial status. Still, it is only a short-term solution and does not have a solid impact on stabilizing the economy of the country. In other words, it cannot solve the root cause of impoverishment. For example, the United States has donated about some billion to some under-developed nations. Still, it got utilized within 2-3 months to solve some immediate issues, but the underlying problems were unattended.

To improve the country’s economic status permanently, one should offer, for example, a wide range of educational courses for youth in the IT sectors, consulting, etc., which can help secure a better education and bring them massive opportunities for finding well-paid jobs. Additionally, employment can be initiated by developed nations like the US, Canada and UK, opening their national companies in developing or under-developed countries which offer jobs to the local citizens. This can decrease the unemployment rate effectively.

Thus, to conclude, I am in favour of the opinion that the rich countries should help in practical ways like providing education courses, employment, better health care facilities, transportation facilities, etc. to gradually improve the economic condition.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 18

It’s often noted that developed nations give financial help to poor countries to curb poverty, but some people think that developed countries should give other resources instead of financial aid. The developed government should use financial and other resources to overcome poverty in poor countries.

On the one hand, it’s often noticed that poor countries’ governments utilize financial aid to fulfil the needs of the country’s people. But in poor countries, often corrupted people have not allocated the given funds to their citizens, but leaders used to buy their things for their comfort. For example, one Asian country, Sri Lanka, often get millions of dollars from the USA and the world bank for development, but it doesn’t reach their citizens. As a result, unbreakable inflation was noted in 2022 and had to declare a financial emergency in the country.

In addition, if developed countries provide basic training skills for employment in poor countries, it will improve the economy, and people will learn some skills they can utilize to get jobs. Also, developed countries should invest in building hospitals and schools to overcome literacy and enhance the chances of job opportunities. Moreover, lack of education is a deep root of poverty in poor countries. If developed nations share their agricultural practices with poor countries, it will help the poor nations grow needy things for their own country’s people. This helps to enhance the yield and also enhance the income of citizens.

In conclusion, I think developed countries should share other resources like infrastructure and knowledge with poor countries, so it helps to curb poverty, while financial aid is not very helpful in overcoming poverty in countries.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 19

Poor countries are often given financial aid from richer nations in an attempt to provide the citizens of those disadvantaged countries with a better standard of living and quality of life. However, this kind of aid rarely solves the issue of poverty, and therefore I completely agree that richer nations should provide other forms of help.

Firstly, in order to truly help people from poorer nations in the long term, governments and citizens should be provided with good quality education. For example, only in recent times have people from richer countries spread awareness and education to those from poorer nations about the simple, yet life-saving practices of hand washing and personal hygiene. This has resulted in significant improvements in the general health and well-being of people in poorer countries and reduced the rate of preventable disease and infection. Furthermore, by providing education on the latest techniques in farming and agriculture, people from poorer nations will be able to farm more efficiently, giving them more access to food, which will essentially provide them with adequate nutrition to ward off hunger and disease.

Secondly, rather than simply providing money, richer nations should provide governments from poorer countries with access to new technology and equipment. By providing such countries with specialised farming machinery, or life-saving medicines and medical equipment, the lives of poorer people will be significantly enhanced. Furthermore, while many poorer countries may have access to significant amounts of natural resources, such as fossil fuels, minerals, and precious metals, they often do not have the technology or equipment to mine and refine such resources. As a result, many wealthier countries often take advantage of this situation and mine the resources of those poorer countries while paying them a fraction of their worth.

In conclusion, while giving financial aid to poor nations can be beneficial in the short term, providing education and technology will benefit them more in the long run.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 20

Developed nations are often seen providing economic assistance to the third world nations. However, it does not always help in reducing poverty and therefore it is argued that less affluent nations must be provided with an alternatives form of aid. This essay discusses why poor countries can be better off from such assistance and types of help that can be offered.

One of the main reasons why developing nations should be assisted in other ways is because money can solve problems only for the temporary period. It is not a long-lasting approach to tackling poverty. To illustrate, a developed nation can build schools for poor nations but the expenses that incur later in regard to student's fees and teacher's wages may force to close the institution. This is because foreign aid may not be able to support for longer periods. Thus, it is highly essential that developed countries should find alternatives when helping the poorer nations.

There are different kinds of aid that affluent nations can provide to address this problem. First and foremost, young people could be given necessary training in various fields such as technology, modern agriculture, teaching, technical skills, communication etc. This helps them to find employment in their own countries or they can apply for jobs in other rich nations. Another important option is investing in prosperous and promising sectors in poor nations. If first world nations such as the USA opens its companies in third world countries like India, Pakistan, Nepal etc. many people can be highly benefited as such industries can create many local jobs.

In conclusion, there are many advantages if rich nations can provide alternative forms of aid instead of capital because financial support is only the short-term approach to tackling the issue. In future, it is suggested that such new approaches need to be continued.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 21

Wealthy nations often contribute financially to their less prosperous counterparts, but this has shown to be inadequate in eradicating poverty. I therefore concur that rich countries should opt for other methods of assistance, as opposed to monetary aid, for countries that are economically challenged.

The frequent transfer of funds from wealthy to impoverished nations may provide a short-term solution, but it falls short of liberating these nations from the harsh cycle of poverty. It is notable that corruption is rampant in many underprivileged nations. Thus, the funds dispatched may not reach the hands of those struggling in dire poverty. Additionally, challenges rooted in flawed governance or bureaucracy cannot be resolved with financial aid alone, as it is not the place for one country to interfere in another’s domestic concerns.

Given the lack of effectiveness of financial aid in eliminating poverty, well-off countries should consider alternate forms of aid for poorer countries. One such method could be offering skill-based education to improve the educational standards in the struggling countries. Education, or the lack thereof, is often a major cause of poverty in disadvantaged countries and this could be rectified by more prosperous countries offering basic job training. Moreover, technical training could be another viable form of aid. By disseminating advanced technical knowledge, countries in need could modernize their industries, elevate their global competitiveness, and thereby, take strides towards alleviating poverty.

In conclusion, I advocate for affluent countries to provide more resourceful forms of aid, such as knowledge and technical expertise, rather than direct monetary contributions. This strategy, I believe, will enable struggling nations to combat poverty more effectively.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 22

Assisting underprivileged nations has long been a priority for wealthier countries, often through financial aid. However, critics argue that providing mere monetary support does not effectively eliminate poverty. Instead, developed nations should offer alternative forms of help to less affluent countries. I firmly support this perspective.

A critical issue with financial aid is its susceptibility to corruption and mismanagement. In several developing countries, funds intended for crucial sectors like healthcare or education often fall into the wrong hands, sidestepping the intended beneficiaries. Moreover, while developed nations provide substantial financial assistance to underdeveloped countries, it usually offers short-term relief without a sustainable impact. For instance, despite the United States allocating around $20 billion to several underdeveloped nations in 2005, it failed to address long-term solutions and after two months, they continued poorly.

Redirecting focus from monetary contributions to investing in the educational framework of impoverished nations seems more viable. This strategy involves deploying teachers, constructing educational facilities, and improving resources like textbooks. The lack of education plays a pivotal role in perpetuating severe poverty in underdeveloped areas. Access to education acts as a catalyst, empowering individuals by opening doors to better employment opportunities and ultimately breaking the cycle of poverty.

In conclusion, I think by emphasizing educational infrastructure rather than solely providing financial aid, developed nations can play a more impactful role in lifting underprivileged communities out of poverty. This approach offers sustainable solutions by nurturing the foundation of knowledge and skills needed for lasting socio-economic progress.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 23

It is common to see industrial countries offering economic help to developing ones. Yet, it does not always assist in eliminating poverty; hence, it is believed that less wealthy countries must be supplied with an alternative kind of long-term aid. This essay examines why developing nations may benefit from such aid and the forms of assistance provided.

First, when rich nations provide money to underdeveloped countries, it will assist the residents of these countries in resolving short-term issues, but it will not be long-lasting. When residents in developing nations get money via contributions, they utilize it to pay for temporary expenses or problems. In 2005, for instance, the United States provided over $20 billion to underdeveloped nations; nevertheless, this assistance only lasted two months and was not beneficial in sustainable development.

In addition, affluent nations should invest in healthcare and education instead of lending money to other nations. When the younger generation has a decent education and everyone has access to adequate medical care and hospitality, it will help eradicate unemployment and discourage individuals from engaging in illegal acts. Thus, wealthy nations must invest in constructing quality schools, colleges, and hospitals. In addition, they may assist in stabilizing the governments of these nations and assess if the political climate is favourable to development. It is true that money helps in feeding the hungry, but this is only a temporary solution.

Nevertheless, before offering other forms of aid to poor nations, rich nations should provide financial support, since money is said to alleviate the majority of issues.

In conclusion, I am in favor of the notion that wealthy nations should aid in improving the economic situation of developing nations. Financial aid can only alleviate poverty to a limited amount and is not the definitive solution.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 24

It is said that support funds that are given to Third World countries will not solve the poverty issue and therefore developed countries should think of other kinds of help, which are more effective. To a certain point, I would agree that there should be an alternative kind of help for the poor countries, but financial support would also be needed for a short time period.

Many experts believe that financial support that is given to poor countries is not effective and efficient; therefore, there should be other kinds of help which could be considered. Firstly, it is a fact that illiteracy has become one of the major issues in poor countries, and developed countries could send some of their teachers to improve the education system there. It is hoped should the literacy rate increase, the number of unemployment will gradually reduce. Secondly, people of the poor countries are suffering due to the low quality of the health system there. Building more qualified hospitals and improving the quality of the medical staff would be an effective way to help them. And lastly, many third world countries have a bad infrastructure and public transportation facilities. By building more roads and improving the public transports there, it is hoped that people of these poor countries would be more productive as they will have easier access to their workplaces.

It can be seen that all of the alternative ideas are long term projects, and people would only see the improvement after ten or fifteen years minimum. For a short period of time, financial aid is still needed by the Third World countries; as governments could not provide decent health and education system, and many people are starving and sick. However, since corruption is also a serious problem in poor countries, strict monitoring of the financial support should be a priority, to ensure that the fund is appropriately utilised.

In conclusion, to a certain extent, I would agree that financial aid given by advanced countries to poor nations would not be the best solution in solving the poverty issue. However, since resolving poverty problem would be a long-term project, financial help should also be given for a short period of time, but it should be strictly controlled.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 25

I fully agree with the given statement as monetary help often failed to improve the condition of poor nations. So other forms of improvement schemes and help could be a better solution to help the poor countries.

It is true that donation provided by rich countries has not solved the problem of poverty in the developing country like Bhutan, Afghanistan etc. It is important to understand why rich countries provide money. The reasons behind this are to accelerate the development of poor countries by establishing industries, tourism and other pre-requisites. Some of the causes for failure of the donation programme are corruption, poor governance, scarcity of skilled population and lack of proper planning.

Firstly, corruption is mostly prevalent in the developing countries like Nepal, Congo etc.  according to data from Transparency International. Most importantly, corruption is deeply rooted in almost all fields like health sector, civil service etc. and exists involvement of simple clerks to high-level bureaucrats and politicians. The cause of corruption may be rooted in the lack of handsome salary, lack of severe punishments, selfishness and the slack of rules and laws etc. If money allocated for development projects is misused, then the quality of the projects is reduced, or it may not be finished in time. In fact, scenarios like these affect the rate of development in the developing countries.

Secondly, the sustainable and harmonious development cannot be achieved without effective and efficient administration which is lagging in the poor countries. Succeeding in any project is a daunting task for management committees. First, the problems arise at the local levels where local people ask for unfeasible demands such as the job for each household, high compensation for land etc. If these problems are addressed, then, other problems like the strike of employees occur or negligence of contractor occur. Is it possible to complete projects at the specified time? No, it takes decades to complete the projects or strands in the middle forever.

Thirdly, there are problems in formulating plans and policies. Even though they are formulated, the authorities cannot implement them in a scientific way. So, funds freeze for the next financial year. These are only some instances of how money provided by donors is used.

Education, expertise support, training, monitoring the development, conducting research, establishing factories are better alternatives than giving money to the poor nations and these should be embraced by the rich nations to truly help the poor countries.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 26

Developed countries have been providing financial aid to Third World countries for decades, but it has not changed the economic plight of the poor countries. I totally agree that this aid should be replaced by other more effective types of help because of corruption and poor economic management.

The primary reason why the financial aid provided by the first world countries is not being effective in achieving the results they are intended to achieve is because of the level of corruption prevalent in these poor countries. A major portion of the aid is misappropriated by officials before it trickles down to the people. As most of these leaders are not democratically elected and have a strong grip on power, people have little leverage to change this and hence they benefit less, and their situations remain unchanged.

The second reason why this financial aid is not effective is that the governments which are the recipients of this assistance do not have sound economic policies and good governance in place. This means that these governments are not capable of managing the funds properly and the aid will be lost or misused before it reaches the people. Therefore, ensuring governments are capable of managing the funds before they receive them is crucial in achieving positive outcomes from this financial aid.

In conclusion, I reiterate my strong view that other types of support are necessary because financial aid is often misused by recipient countries due to corruption and financial mismanagement. Therefore, I recommend longer term more tenable strategies be put in place to ensure financial aid can be phased out.

Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty - mẫu 27

It is true that an enormous amount of money has been poured into impoverished nations to help them escape from poverty. While this solution is sometimes effective, I personally believe that financial aid does not fully tackle the problem, and other types of aid need to be implemented.

Firstly, money given to destitute nations does not always reach people in need. In developing countries, lack of transparency and an ineffective management system has enabled prevalent corruption in government. It is therefore likely that monetary support from other countries would bring about benefits to only governmental officials instead of the poor. Another problem with giving out money is that in most cases recipient countries do not have necessary resources such as manpower, technology, infrastructure or management system in place to make the best use of financial aid. For instance, in my country, a large amount of money from foreign governments was spent on building health care centers in rural areas, but those centers were soon abandoned or operated at less than one tenth capacity due to lack of health care professionals, lack of electricity and clean water, etc. Another illustration would be in the agricultural field. We received monetary support from international funds to increase productivity of crops, but we had no experience in conducting research before implementing a project, in project management and evaluation. As a consequence, a large amount of money was wasted on ineffective programs proposed by incompetent leaders.

Furthermore, it is undeniable that financial aid can sometimes do more harm than good and worsen the situation in poor countries. Some developed countries gave out monetary support to ruling oligarchy in Africa under the name of economic development, but for hindered political reasons as well. They might want to gain international preference, to win support from their citizens before an election, or to enhance their political influence in recipient countries, etc. In such cases how the money would be spent was not their concern. Leaders in recipient countries therefore used the money to strengthen their position, by enriching themselves or purchasing weapons to suppress opponents. Had it not been for the financial aid, people in these poor countries might have been able to overthrow their incompetent, greedy authority. Financial aid in this case became an obstacle for revolutions against dictatorship, social progress and poverty eradication.

In conclusion, monetary support alone could not eliminate poverty. Other types of help such as technological support, staff training, infrastructure development and management system improvement is required to handle the problem.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful, but they are also likely to suffer from negative social consequences. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand. Do you agree or disagree?

• Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings. Some people find it a positive development while others think it is a negative development. Discuss both points and give your own opinion

• The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous government expenditure. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people feel that the private lives of celebrities should not be openly shared by the media. To what extent do you agree or disagree

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---