Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes

Đề bài: Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 1

In recent years, some countries have gained international recognition by constructing specialized training facilities exclusively for top athletes rather than providing sports facilities accessible to everyone. This essay will argue that this trend is ultimately harmful, as it prioritizes elite achievement over broader societal benefits.

Investing resources in specialized sports facilities may come at the cost of neglecting the development of sports infrastructure that benefits the general population. While these facilities may produce elite athletes, they may not promote sports participation for the broader population. Public sports centers, parks, and community programs that encourage physical activity are essential for building a culture of fitness that extends beyond elite competition, benefiting the entire population. The lack of access to such facilities could harm public health, particularly for those from lower socio-economic backgrounds who may not have the means to access private sports facilities. Therefore, governments must invest in a diverse range of sports infrastructure that is accessible to everyone and promotes physical activity and healthy living.

Furthermore, investing heavily in elite sports facilities can widen the gap between the rich and poor, as only those with access to these specialized facilities can benefit from them. This creates an uneven playing field, where wealthier individuals have greater opportunities for success and prosperity than those from lower socio-economic backgrounds. This perpetuates existing societal inequalities, where the opportunities for success are skewed towards a privileged few. As a result, society may become more divided, with only a tiny elite able to benefit from the resources invested in specialized sports facilities. To prevent this, governments should prioritize community-based programs that promote sports participation and physical activity for all. This can help to bridge the gap between the rich and poor and foster a more inclusive and equitable society.

In conclusion, by neglecting the development of sports infrastructure accessible to everyone, fostering an environment of extreme competition, and contributing to societal inequalities, the focus on elite sports could ultimately do more harm than good.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 2

It is observed that global prestige is achieved by constructing specific premises to upskill elite athletes in lieu of offering sports facilities for public use in some parts of the world. I believe that this has detrimental impacts on citizens, despite the fact that it can create favourite conditions for athletes to prosper.

On the one hand, the erection of specialized facilities for training talented athletes can facilitate their capacities. This is because outstanding sportspeople can be given better chances to further improve themselves, enabling them to maximise their potential. Therefore, they can give optimal performances in global competitions and are more likely to achieve rewards and success in sports, making great contributions to national achievements in this field. For instance, the Vietnamese government provided funds to establish football institutions such as Hoang Anh Gia Lai to train and support children who have an innate ability. As a result, numerous young talented football players such as Xuan Truong and Tuan Anh were trained intensively and excelled in football matches, enhancing the position of Vietnam in international sports.

On the other hand, this propensity can induce two noticeable drawbacks. Chief of these is that it adversely affects public health. More specifically, as the state budget is spent on building facilities for training top athletes in lieu of providing community sports facilities, there would be a shortage of open areas such as parks, gardens and squares which offer an abundance of resources for free exercise. Consequently, fewer places are offered for residents to exercise, potentially encouraging a sedentary lifestyle in the community and weakening citizens’ well-being. Another drawback is that it can trigger great dissatisfaction among citizens. As they pay taxes to enrich the government budget, they may argue they deserve to receive free fitness equipment and spaces and may feel discontent if the state funding is allocated to serve a small number of recipients only.

In conclusion, although investing in specialized facilities for professional sports people only can enhance their performances and improve a nation’s standing, I maintain that its consequences including deteriorating public health and generating dissatisfaction among individuals in society are more significant.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 3

In many countries around the world, specialised sporting facilities for top-level athletes are prioritised over those that cater to the general public. Although providing such facilities for everyone to use is extremely important, I believe that providing specialised facilities for high-level athletes is still a positive development.

On one hand, providing sport and exercise facilities for general public use allows people to enjoy the benefits that playing sport and doing exercise brings, which ultimately benefits a country as a whole in the long term. When given adequate facilities and equipment, citizens are able to improve their health and wellbeing by doing exercise and playing sport. By improving the overall health of the general population, a country will have less healthcare costs and a higher level of happiness and wellbeing amongst its citizens. Furthermore, by giving children better access to sports facilities, a higher number of young people are likely to excel in sport, giving the country a better chance at producing high-level athletes. Specialized facilities can further enhance their performance to a world-class level.

In conclusion, although sporting facilities for the general public are highly important, for those countries wishing to produce top-level athletes, specialised training facilities are of much higher importance.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 4

With the ever-developing enthusiasm for sporting events worldwide, professional sportsmanship has gained much investment nowadays in terms of new infrastructure. While some may see this development as beneficial since it provides more chances for success, I think that the specialized systems of sports facilities could gain even more positive outcomes if they extend access to potential amateurs or lease out some space to maximize profit.

It is irrefutable that sports centers are vital for the development of professional athleticism. In order to achieve the best results in international competition, athletes must not only engage in the strictest training but also utilize state-of-the-art equipment that may not be available in common sporting facilities. For instance, swimmers nowadays need specialized motion and heart rate monitors to calculate the exact breaststroke to optimize for the fastest result in a race. Hence, technological advancement is as important as hard work in modern sports. In addition, all Olympics-winning countries such as the US, China, or Japan have already had well-established stadiums and facilities for pro players to practice. This is to enable athletes to produce a stable performance since the training environment should be comparable with stadiums in real-life tournaments.

Though undeniably beneficial to top-tier achievement, the current trend in building professional infrastructure could produce more positive outcomes if there are more parties involved. First of all, youth development should be another target for investment in terms of providing modern facilities. All athletic career paths begin from young amateurs, and thus, teenagers should have the same training opportunities as their professional counterparts since they are a nation’s sporting future. Barcelona’s Barca Academy for football is an excellent example for effective utilization of existing estates for training both pros and youth. During every national tournament’s off-season, the Spanish team prioritizes its home field for talent training. This results in better usage of the stadium and enables the team to prepare for their future human resources. Furthermore, winning competitions and prizes alone cannot guarantee financial stability for any sports team. Therefore, Barcelona usually rents out its free spaces for the public to use and in return, continues to reinvest in talented athletes by raising their pay or purchasing even more training equipment.

In conclusion, establishing new sports buildings is beneficial for international success in competitions as technology these days increasingly plays an essential role in training and improving performance. However, sporting bodies should not only consider current achievement but should also cater to potential amateurs and financial sustainability for future development.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 5

Nowadays, international sports games have become a playing field for national sports industry to showcase their best talents and bring home positive publicity and admiration. Thus, some countries are willing to invest heavily in building specialized training complex to up skill their athletes, instead of fitness facilities for the public use. While I personally think this is a positive development, it also has some drawbacks that are worth discussing.

As mentioned above, the main reason for this trend is almost every country wants to be recognized for their sports industry. The only way to do that is to offer elite sports players high-class training areas including modern equipment monitoring athletes’ physical states. Another advantage of having domestic facilities is that the government can reduce the cost of sending the athletes team for abroad coaching. For example, Australia has long been well known for its gold medal swimming team due to their internally developed method of training and sufficient investment in infrastructures. Moreover, this trend of development may have a positive impact on younger generations who, in turn, will be more likely to choose sports professions, contributing to the booming of national sports industry in many years to come.

However, having said that, these training stadiums usually take up enormous cost of capital and limited spaces that would have otherwise been used to build public sports areas. As a result, people will have fewer places to go for exercises and play their favourite common sport such as badminton or swimming. Even when local gyms and fitness centres are built in some suburbs, it is not always accessible to people who are not from a well-off background. This may unfortunately increase chances of people leading a sedentary lifestyle which is totally against the active lifestyle that sports is trying to promote.

In conclusion, I believe that the benefits of building specialized training centres for top athletes clearly outweigh the minor drawbacks on the general well-being of the public. It is suggested that a balancing act is required from the authorities to minimize the potential drawbacks of the issue.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 6

In several nations, the construction of exclusive infrastructure to train professional athletes for international reputation is prioritized over offering sports amenities for the general public. From a personal perspective, I would contend that this policy manifests itself as a detrimental development due to several downsides. 

To begin with, placing more emphasis on providing top athletes with specialized facilities may exert adverse effects on the populace’s well-being. Indeed, allocating extra financial resources to enhancing sports stars’ careers equates to the deficiency of spaces and opportunities for ordinary citizens to exercise. This, in turn, can widen the existing social divide between elite sports and grassroots participation, engendering challenges for numerous individuals to improve their health, particularly among financially disadvantaged ones with limited means to access private sports amenities as opposed to the elite minority. As a consequence, communal engagement in sports and physical activities would be greatly discouraged, thus resulting in diminished overall public well-being.

Another unfavorable impact of focusing on elite athletes’ achievement rather than the broad population lies in dwindling prospects for national sports development. Admittedly, building world-class sports premises can bring honor and recognition for professional sports players as well as foster a positive image for their home country. Nevertheless, such a propensity overlooks the fact that the general citizenry also includes young individuals with unfulfilled potential for sports who require adequate infrastructure to maximize their capability. Consequently, this failure to discover and nurture would-be athletes from diverse socio-economic backgrounds could gradually undermine the talent pool for future sports advancement of a nation.

In conclusion, prioritizing investments in developing amenities for top athletes can detrimentally affect public health and sustainable sports development. Hence, I am convinced that more resources should be distributed to attending to ordinary citizens’ demands for the sake of societal growth as a whole.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 7

Sports facilities are essential for promoting human well-being. However, each country has different investing strategies with regards to these infrastructures. Some nations focus on building specialized facilities for elite athletes who can compete internationally, while others prioritize building generalized facilities for the public. This essay will explore the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches.

There are several benefits of focusing on training elite athletes and providing necessary equipment for their success on the global stage, mainly involving increased promotion of national pride and elevated spirit among the youth. Firstly, the investment in the best performing sportspeople may prove worthwhile when the athletes win medals and trophies in international competitions. For example, Vietnam has built numerous specialized centers with regards to training facilities and academies to nurture its talents to become champions. This has served to boost the country’s global influence and attract global interest in the country. Moreover, young people may follow these success stories and view the hardworking athletes as their role models, which may motivate them to overcome challenges and contribute to the country. For instance, Usain Bolt, the Jamaican sprinter who trained in a world-class facility, has inspired millions of black children around the world to take up athletics and become respected community members.

However, opponents of this suggestion also highlight other drawbacks of neglecting the needs of the general public when considering sports; public discouragement to exercise and social discontentment. Regarding the first argument, if there are not enough sports facilities that are accessible and affordable for the majority of people, many citizens may not exercise regularly and develop lifestyle diseases such as obesity and diabetes. This is instrumental to extra medical costs to recover the health of citizens. Furthermore, it can create a sense of inequality and resentment among the people who are subjected to a feeling of being excluded from sports opportunities. Hence, they may perceive the government, the rich, and the gifted as unfair and elitist, and lose trust and confidence in other governmental policies. If these basic needs were to be ignored for too long, the disadvantaged would engage in detrimental activities, such as protests and riots, further widening the gap between the state and the people.

In conclusion, there are pros and cons to each approach presented in this essay. The idea of supporting sports facilities, whether they are specialized or generalized, is beneficial for society regardless. Therefore, both proposals are not mutually exclusive but rather compatible, and state governors should balance the implementation of both for the well-being and prosperity of top athletes, the community, and the country.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 8

Sports are vital for human culture, as they offer various benefits for individuals and communities. However, not everyone has equal access and opportunities to participate in sports. Some nations prioritize building specialized facilities for their best athletes over providing sports establishments for the public. This essay will argue that this trend is negative, as it promotes inequality in sports and diverts resources from more urgent issues.

The main positive effect of establishing elite sports centers is to nurture talented athletes and enhance their performance in international competitions. Talented individuals are rare and need polishing. By allocating resources and funds to cater to top athletes, the government can give them an edge on the global stage. For example, China has built state-of-the-art training centers for its Olympic athletes, resulting in remarkable individuals. This logic expects that winning medals and breaking records will display the home country’s excellence, pride, and reputation, inspiring young people to follow suit. However, such scenarios are based on false narratives, and real data suggests that the returns on investing in performing athletes are limited. International competitions are dominated by the most prosperous nations, which have spare resources to invest in this area. If a developing country does the same, other pressing issues would be neglected.

The proposal of building specialized facilities for top athletes is also negative as it increases social inequality, promotes discontentment. Firstly, the introduction of venues that are restricted to only the best sportspeople may widen the disparity between the privileged and the normal, as only those who are gifted may afford expensive training and equipment, while most people are left with inadequate or no facilities. This can create resentment and frustration among the less gifted groups, who may feel discriminated against. Additionally, when little equipment is available for the public, some may feel less engaged in maintaining a healthy lifestyle, as they may perceive sports as exclusive to the elite only. This psychological misconception can have irreversible effects, such as increased health problems and costs for society.

In conclusion, prioritizing the construction of dedicated venues for top athletes is a negative development because it fosters social inequality and depletes the national budget. Therefore, it is sensible to suggest that the government focus on generalized facilities for the people to enhance their health and social harmony.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 9

In several countries worldwide, the trend of building specialized facilities to train athletes for international events has generated divergent perspectives. This essay will discuss both the advantages and drawbacks of this practice.

The establishment of specialized facilities brings certain benefits. Firstly, this can elevate underdeveloped nations onto an international pedestal, providing them with a platform to shine globally. For instance, an athlete in the spotlight can raise awareness for political instability in their homeland. Additionally, such facilities can cater to entertainment needs, allowing spectators to bond over supporting their national team.

However, there are several downfalls to this approach worth considering. Foremost among these is the concerning issue of exploiting young athletic talent. With many elite athletes starting grueling training regimes at remarkably young ages, the risk of physical and emotional distress is high. Moreover, by focusing resources only on top athletes, the average citizen’s access to sports facilities becomes limited. This could lead to health disparities, with fitness becoming a privilege for the affluent.

In conclusion, while the creation of specialized facilities can put nations on the global map and provide entertainment, it simultaneously poses a risk to young athletes and restricts access to fitness resources for common people. The potential negative repercussions, in my opinion, outweigh the benefits.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 10

There is no doubt that these days countries are spending more money on providing proper facilities for professional athletes rather than for the public. The question is, does it benefit the nation’s development? In this essay I am going to discuss both sides and draw my own conclusion.

In terms of the advantages of providing an infrastructure for athletes, these athletes are like ambassadors for their countries, and such deserve top training facilities. In other words, if they train very well, they will win and achieve a good performance on the globe stage. Thus, the reputation of the nation will be enhanced. Moreover, the countries with largest number of professional players are often those with the best sport facilities. For example, the South American counties spend more of their budgets on training their top athletes, and they bring prestige and worldwide attention to their countries.

However, there are several important reasons why the government should provide more public sports facilities than specialized facilities for professionals. First, the health of the nation is worth a lot more than the golden medals won by start athlete. Secondly, the declining number of people engaging in sport is in great part to be blamed on the lack of facilities. Third, some of the children of today will be the top athletes of the future, so they need to be provided with facilities to get involved in sport. Thus, authorities should provide more public sport spaces to improve the health and sport skills for their citizens.

In conclusion, although spending more money on training top athletes is beneficial for counties' development, it is more vital if the governments spend that money on providing public sports facilities. Therefore, I believe that the advantages of providing public sports facilities outweigh building specialised facilities.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 11

When it comes to a phenomenon that some countries prefer to allocate more money to facilities designed for athletes rather than spend money on public facilities, some people argue that such a phenomenon may be a negative development, but I cannot agree with this opinion.

Admittedly, the public may lack facilities for exercise without devices provided by governments. It is acknowledged that governments’ budget is limited but what governments need to improve is countless. Providing that governments use money to purchase more professional devices for athletes, comparatively, the amount of funds for public facilities will be reduced. Then, some communities may even lack sports facilities for their residents. Nevertheless, it is still a positive development for countries to focus on training professional players.

To begin with, constructing more devices specialized for athletes could serve to maintain their performances. In order to defeat others in international games, such as the Olympic Games, countries, even after gaining a lot of golden medals, need to guarantee that their athletes could perform better in the future. It is natural and reasonable for those governments to fund their players and offer them better equipment and devices. Then, their players could maintain their performances and countries could gain honor and reputation from those matches as well.

In addition, sports facilities could be better used by athletes. Even in some communities where there are a lot of sports facilities accessible, occupied by work, citizens may neglect those facilities to some degree. Compared with building facilities for the public, allocating budgets to professional facilities seems more effective since most athletes will make use of those devices quite frequently. Thus, funding athletes could lead to a better utilization of sports facilities.

In sum, it is still positive for countries to concentrate on training athletes and provide them with more facilities, considering that players are potent to perform better in competitions and they could also make better use of those devices.

Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes - mẫu 12

Allocating resources for specialized sports facilities exclusively for professional athletes is a common practice among countries striving for global recognition. While this strategy undoubtedly enhances national pride, it is ultimately detrimental as it diverts funds that could be utilized for the welfare of the broader population.

Supporters of this tactic argue that it enhances national cohesion, a phenomenon particularly evident during global events such as the Olympics. Nations like China and the United States have invested substantial amounts in developing sports infrastructures for potential Olympians, and the resulting medal tallies validate these investments. The impact on national solidarity is evident when citizens unite to support their athletes, temporarily setting aside domestic conflicts. This level of unity would be unattainable without specialized facilities for top-level athletes.

Conversely, these infrastructures primarily benefit a narrow segment of society rather than the majority. The funds dedicated to these facilities consume a significant portion of a government's budget, which is also required to address critical areas like healthcare, education, and defense. Therefore, directing funds towards preparing elite athletes for international events inadvertently deprives the majority of enhanced facilities. For instance, many urban youths in economically disadvantaged neighborhoods lack access to recreational areas, perpetuating a cycle of generational poverty. Repurposing funds designated for elite athlete facilities could enable the construction of amenities accessible to a broader, underprivileged demographic.

In conclusion, although the indirect benefits to national solidarity are significant, this practice ultimately has a negative impact as it caters to a privileged minority. A more equitable distribution of resources towards facilities accessible to a larger demographic is essential.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In many parts of the world, children and teenagers are committing more crimes. Why is this happening? How should they be punished?

• Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

• As transport and accommodation problems are increasing in many cities, some governments encourage businesses to move to rural areas. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that introducing new technology can improve people’s quality of life in developing countries. However, others believe that free education should be offered. Discuss both views and give your opinion

• Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---