Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentally friendly at the same time. Others disagree with this view. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion. hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye

Đề bài: Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentally friendly at the same time. Others disagree with this view. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 1

The strength of any nation does not come without costs, one of which is upon the surroundings whose resources fuel each and every sector of the economy. And yet many believe a strong economy and a clean environment can co-exist. I do not entirely deny this belief; however, I find myself more convinced of the fact that we cannot have them both.

Scientists for years have developed ways to replace traditional sources of exploitation in many fields, like electricity and fuel. Alternatives of using renewable energy from sunlight, wind and geothermal heat have been applied in many places, which keeps the environment away from harm. Besides, many environmental activists say that it is certainly within our reach to minimize the damage caused by industrial activities and protect Mother Earth. Some even succeeded in broaching the subject with the authorities and convincing them to take actions in such regard.

Nevertheless, we should not forget that there are things that make it impossible to remove our dependency on natural resources. For example, the automobile, mining and steel industry, are without doubt taking a heavy toll on the environment on account of CO2 emissions and chemical waste. But those prove to be indispensable and irreplaceable to the progress of an economy. In addition, tremendous damage has already been done, and many people fear that the environment’s state of cleanliness cannot be restored. Take Beijing as an example. Air quality there is the worst in the world, with thick layers of smog covering the atmosphere.

In conclusion, my firm conviction is that no matter how hard we try to preserve the environment while our exploitation of natural resources for the sake of the economy is ongoing, we can never have them both at the same time.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 2

The intricate balance between economic prosperity and environmental sustainability continues to spark global debate. Critics argue that industrial expansion often leads to environmental harm, exemplified by increased pollution and reliance on fossil fuels. In contrast, examples from countries like Germany and Sweden show that strategic policies can align economic growth with environmental preservation. This essay will explore these viewpoints, asserting that with thoughtful governance, economic progress can indeed complement environmental health.

Critics of economic growth frequently point out the environmental degradation that can accompany unchecked industrialization. For instance, heavy reliance on fossil fuels for energy has escalated carbon emissions, contributing to global warming and climate change. Moreover, the rapid expansion of industrial activities often leads to significant waste and pollution. This is particularly evident in regions where industrial growth outpaces the establishment of environmental regulations, emphasizing the challenges that arise when economic priorities overshadow environmental concerns. Such examples clearly demonstrate the potential environmental costs associated with economic development when it is not managed with environmental considerations in mind.

Conversely, examples from nations like Germany and Sweden illustrate that economic growth can coexist with environmental sustainability. Germany’s Energiewende, or "energy transition," showcases how government-led initiatives can steer economic activities towards sustainable practices. By heavily investing in renewable energy, Germany has not only diminished its carbon footprint but also strengthened its economy by becoming a leader in green technology. Similarly, Sweden’s robust carbon tax policy has effectively reduced carbon emissions while preserving economic stability. These examples suggest that with thoughtful legislation and a strong commitment to sustainability, economic advancement can indeed support and enhance environmental health, demonstrating a harmonious balance between economic and environmental objectives.

In conclusion, while economic expansion can lead to environmental issues such as increased emissions and waste, nations like Germany and Sweden demonstrate that strategic environmental policies can harmonize economic growth with ecological sustainability. Therefore, economic prosperity and environmental health are not mutually exclusive when governed wisely.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 3

The debate on whether a country can simultaneously achieve economic success and maintain a clean environment is polarized. Proponents of sustainable development argue for harmonious coexistence, while skeptics cite historical conflicts between economic growth and environmental health. This essay will explore both perspectives, ultimately advocating that a balanced approach can enable both economic prosperity and environmental preservation.

Those who believe in the feasibility of a country being both economically successful and environmentally sound often cite the concept of sustainable development. They argue that through innovative technologies and renewable energy sources, economic growth does not have to be synonymous with environmental degradation. For instance, countries like Denmark have made significant strides in wind energy, which contributes to their economy while reducing carbon emissions. This approach advocates for a balance where economic activities are conducted with a long-term vision for environmental health, suggesting that the two are not mutually exclusive but rather complementary.

Conversely, others argue that economic growth inherently leads to environmental damage. This view is grounded in historical precedents where industrialization and economic development have often led to air and water pollution, deforestation, and loss of biodiversity. Critics point to countries where rapid economic growth has been achieved at the expense of environmental health, such as China, where industrial expansion has led to significant pollution challenges. They contend that economic activities, especially those reliant on fossil fuels and non-renewable resources, are naturally at odds with environmental conservation.

In my opinion, while the challenges are significant, it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and maintain a clean environment. The key lies in embracing sustainable development and green technologies. This approach requires a paradigm shift in how we perceive economic growth, prioritizing long-term environmental health alongside short-term economic gains. By investing in renewable energy, enforcing strict environmental regulations, and encouraging sustainable practices, a balance can be achieved.

In conclusion, the prospect of a country being both economically prosperous and environmentally sustainable is not a utopian dream but a viable reality. It demands a commitment to innovative solutions and a redefinition of what constitutes true economic success.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 4

There have been debates about whether countries can achieve economic success while maintaining a clean environment. Since the industrial revolution, numerous countries have sacrificed the environment to pursue rapid economic growth; however, nowadays, more countries are successfully strengthening their economy and keeping the environment unpolluted. Hence, this essay believes that countries can have both economic success and environmental protection at tandem.

Overly obsession with economic growth could lead to environmental degradation. This is because modern manufacturing technology involves massive machinery and a huge volume of production that releases toxic wastes. To be more specific, national economic booming engines, such as giant cars and chemical industries, need a large volume of energy to keep the machines running. They burn a massive amount of fossil fuel, such as coals and oil, which could release a huge amount of harmful gas into the air. For example, over the last 30 years, even though Beijing has been incredibly successful in terms of economic growth, its industry releases have been bombarding the waste managing drainage system, and the pollutant gas is creating a smog layer in its skyline.

However, multiple developed countries are actively adopting ecological modes to develop their economies. New and clean resources such as wind, solar and nuclear energy have been employed in factories to reduce pollution. Scientists have been exploring how to use these types of technologies to promote energy efficiency, and to ensure the environment is not harmed. For instance, many West European countries such as France and the UK are developing nuclear energy to generate electricity for factories and households. As a result, these countries are not only enjoying an economic boom, but also maintaining a sustainable development.

In conclusion, economic growth could lead to pollution and damage to the environment, but modern technology has been constantly seeking new energy to promote efficiency and decrease pollution. Therefore, it is viable for countries to develop their economy and protect the environment simultaneously.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 5

The relationship between economic growth and the environment has become a long- lasting debate. Although some believe that they cannot exist together, I would argue that they are indeed positively related.

On the one hand, opponents of the question co-existence of a developed economy and a healthy biosphere point to the fact of global warming that we have been experiencing today. They say, in order to achieve an economic progression, we need to rely heavily on transportation systems. While more vehicles carry goods to transfer nationwide boosting its economy, they also produce higher level of carbon emissions – an essential element for raising the global temperature. Moreover, industrial waste is also believed by some to act as a pollutant. They contend that larger factories are hailed as an indicator of powerful economy, meaning that excessive waste produced by them is continuously damaging our Earth. However, this could easily be mitigated by thoughtful disposal and better enforcement of laws by the authorities.

Conversely, I side with those who believe that a country can not only be economically successful but also environmentally friendly. First off, economically advanced countries tend to budget more to protect the environment. This is to say if national reserve is higher enough to provide essentials such as health or education, government is more likely to spend further on cleaner air or other environmental issues. This evidence can be clearly seen in Canada. Additionally, the more countries become economically stable, the more they can spend on mass education, leading them to have a better environmental awareness. If we consider India, we can see people are indiscriminately disposing litters in the streets which is a rare incident in a developed country like Australia.

To sum up, while some criticize widespread traffic and waste materials of an advanced nation can damage the environment, it could possibly be overcome by stricter regulations. Therefore, I believe that having extra funds and educated citizens of developed countries can protect our surroundings.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 6

It is undeniable that humans have an inextricable relationship with the environment. While many believe that it is impossible to protect the environment if countries want to develop their economies, others argue that keeping the environment clean in tandem with having a wealthy country is not too difficult. This essay is going to examine the reasons behind these views before revealing my personal opinion.

On the one hand, it is understandable why some subscribe to the view that governments could not focus on both economic development and the environment at the same time. As more and more industrial parks and factory plants are helping boost countries’ economies, toxic fumes are almost unavoidable, as they are released from these places into the air. Beijing is a case in point. The city with a large number of factories has been reported to have a hazardous level of air pollution in many years that could not be solved by the government.

On the other hand, I believe that the aforementioned drawbacks are not intractable, and governments can still protect the environment when they pay attention to develop the economy. To begin with, severe punishments must be administered to individuals or organizations that deliberately harm the environment. For instance, governments must fine factories that emit excessive toxic fumes, thereby keeping the environment clean. In addition to this, focusing on the environmental protection, nations should channel into rewarding programs for businesses. This would encourage businesses and other stakeholders to keep the environment clean.

In conclusion, while it is difficult to keep a clean environment along with a substantial economic development, I would contend that it would be unwise to overlook the importance of the environment to human lives. Therefore, governments should take actions to ensure that the environment is protected while they develop their economy.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 7

Several students believe that, in this period of increasing industry and urbanization, a country may accomplish economic growth while also maintaining a clean environment. Another segment of the public, on the other hand, is dissatisfied with this viewpoint since they believe both aims are negatively connected. This article will examine all sides of the debate, as well as my personal viewpoint on the subject, before coming to a logical conclusion.

On the one hand, many people feel that greater industrialization and urbanization would have a negative impact on the environment because economic prosperity is a result of increased industrialization and urbanization. Furthermore, supporting the economy necessitates a significant quantity of industrial output, which poses environmental risks. For example, air pollution is produced by the emission of industrial waste into the atmosphere, while the majority of water pollution is generated by the flow of factory waste into rivers. As a result, compatibility between these two elements is seen to be exceedingly challenging.

Several people, on the other hand, think that achieving environmental purity during the process of economic growth is not difficult if the element of eco-safety is inculcated from the start of any industrial or manufacturing activity. To give an example, any industrial production should be required to use environmentally friendly raw materials. Another option is to make environmental safety requirements a top priority in each commercial decision and to impose sanctions for those who break them. As a consequence, prioritizing environmental health in one's everyday work may naturally result in a safe environment as well as success.

To sum up, I believe it is feasible for a country to have a thriving economy while still being ecologically conscious. Nonetheless, we can only get there if we put a lot of effort into caring for the environment.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 8

Human existence is becoming more demanding than it was previously. All countries strive to improve their national economies while also considering the environment as a whole. That remark might lead to two distinct interpretations. First, a group of individuals is convinced that those two things can be accomplished at the same time, while the second believer does not. As a result, in this article, I will explore both points of view and offer a reasonable conclusion.

To begin with, many youthful generations may believe that everything is possible. It discusses their perspectives on life. That's how they came up with some novel ideas. In this case, they would employ what is known as a sustainable system, which is a prevalent trend in many areas in our period, and which is made possible by the use of technology. As a result, numerous more environmentally friendly solutions have emerged. One of the outstanding ideas of this decade, for example, is the development of ethanol from green algae. This might assist to minimise CO2 emissions as a source of energy.

Traditionalists and skeptics, on the other hand, may hold a different viewpoint. It's no surprise that they're opposed to this idea after witnessing how commercial activity has exploited natural resources for years. So, why do people think that way? It is due to the fact that wealthy countries, such as Australia, which has a greater GDP than Indonesia, are ranked as the third-largest CO2 emitters. As a result, some people formed opinions on those two features. In other words, they feel that a desire to raise GDP is not required to improve the environment.

In summary, while the data from Australia may sway some people's opinions, young people's creativity is more enticing and exciting. As a result, in my honest opinion, I agree with the first choice, that the aim to increase the nation's wealth while preserving the environment is achievable.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 9

Some individuals think that in this age of modernity and technological advancement, society can both preserve a clean environment and achieve successful economic development. Others think that these two ideals have an inverted function in the current society. Nature does not appear to suffer as a result of progress, in my opinion.

On the one hand, the sector is a critical economic driver for the country. In reality, the by-products of profit-driven companies frequently pollute the environment. As a result, pollutants like exhaust gases and carbon are discharged into the environment, damaging air and water resources. China is an excellent example of this, where the permanent manufacturing line determines the world's highest air pollution index. Eventually, both preserving a clean environment and manufacturing hazardous products appear to be delusory at the same time.

On the other hand, despite the negative impact on the sector, it is still feasible to conserve a considerable number of natural resources without negatively impacting the country's economic growth rate. Modern technology may enable manufacturers to use environmentally friendly materials and recycling techniques. Similarly, reusing water, plastic, and paper may help the environment by reducing waste. Germany, for example, has begun to utilize an innovative approach to reusing and recycling trash by investing in the formation of special firms. As a result, if each country implements eco-friendly policies, global pollution will decrease.

Finally, focusing on society's riches cannot coexist with environmental preservation since hazardous compounds are released into the sky. Nonetheless, putting current involvements into practice will assure the ability to reduce the variety of pollutants.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 10

Sustainable development has gradually become a growing concern on a global scale. While some people believe that balancing economic growth and environment protection is nearly impractical, I am more convinced of the opposite views for the following reasons.

First, it is common for the society to be induced to think that economic progress is associated with pollutant emission growth and depletable resource consumption. For instance, accelerating urbanization, despite being an important instrument for economic development, is one of the driving forces behind the loss of agricultural land. As a result, not only natural habitats that are home to wildlife are endangered but also arable land is shrinking due to urban expansion. In addition, exhaust emissions from manufacturing factories, consisting of harmful particles suspended in the air as well as heavier materials that remain on the surface are contaminating the environment at an alarming rate. The pursuit of high growth at all costs, for example of China - world’s second-largest economy could lead to severe pollution.

On the other hand, I still hold a strong belief that the combination of economic and environmental sustainability is within our reach. In this era of high technology, scientists have developed multiple alternatives to replace traditional sources of exploitation in many fields. The rise of renewable energy from wind, sunlight or ocean waves would be the answer for escalating demand. What’s even more encouraging is the fact that many countries are joining hands and pooling their resources to cut down industrial pollution. Commitment to protect the environment and prioritize sustainable development over resource extraction would allow the economy to thrive in the long run.

In short, even though achieving economic goals is of utmost importance, each nation should incorporate environmental issues in the policy making process. Only then can the human race exist in perfect harmony with nature.

Some feel that it is impossible for a country to be economically progressive and environmentallye - mẫu 11

The debate surrounding whether a country can be economically progressive and environmentally friendly simultaneously is a topic of great significance in today's world. While some argue that these two goals are mutually exclusive, others contend that they can coexist harmoniously. This essay will discuss both viewpoints and present my opinion that a country can achieve both objectives simultaneously.

Those who believe that economic progress and environmental friendliness are incompatible argue that economic growth often comes at the expense of the environment. Industrialization and rapid economic development can result in increased pollution, deforestation, and depletion of natural resources. For instance, the rapid growth of manufacturing industries in some countries has led to high levels of air and water pollution, negatively impacting ecosystems and human health.

On the other hand, proponents of the opposing view argue that economic progress and environmental sustainability can go hand in hand through the adoption of sustainable development practices and green technologies. They emphasize that investing in renewable energy sources, improving resource efficiency, and promoting eco-friendly industries can drive economic growth while minimizing harm to the environment. For example, countries like Denmark and Costa Rica have successfully integrated wind and solar energy into their energy grids, reducing carbon emissions while experiencing economic growth.

In my opinion, the relationship between economic progress and environmental friendliness could be complex, but it is possible for a country to pursue sustainable development models that prioritize both economic and environmental aspects. Long-term economic prosperity depends on the preservation of natural resources and the mitigation of climate change. This is why it is very much possible for a country to achieve economic prosperity while also being eco-friendly.

In conclusion, while some argue that economic progress and environmental friendliness are mutually exclusive, I believe that it is possible for a country to achieve both objectives simultaneously. While there may be challenges and trade-offs along the way, the integration of sustainable practices, green technologies, and a shift in societal values can create a synergy between economic growth and environmental preservation.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Water pollution has become an increasing problem over the past few decades. What causes water pollution? How can we prevent this problem?

• Some believe governments should spend more money on improving roads and highways, while some think money should be spent improving public transportation, such as buses, trains, and subways. Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.

• Nowadays, some parents put a lot of pressure on their children. What is the reason for this? Is this a positive or negative development for the children?

• Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people, who would normally never have the chance to meet, to communicate. What are the advantages of international communication online? Are there any disadvantages to this?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---