Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted

Đề bài: Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 1

Laws and rules are said to be the building blocks of our society and have brought stability by acting as a solid framework for all citizens to abide by. For this reason, I agree that it is vital that individuals follow these social guidelines.

Throughout the course of history, it has been well-proven that laws have bound humans as a community. Laws could be understood as a set of social guidelines that set each person’s responsibility. One case in point is regulations about food safety. At the state and local level, restaurants must follow rules on sanitary food storage and preparation to ensure diner’s safety. At a national level, production plants should be examined by governmental agencies to guarantee that food in markets will be of top quality. Thanks to food safety regulations, the relationship between consumers and service providers will be balanced and indisputable.

Moreover, rules and regulations ensure equality for people of all social status. When there are no laws, humans can freely do as they please, thus resulting in discrimination between different classes. That the rich would be favored while the poor would be opposed, and the gap between the well-off and the less fortunate would widen is likely to happen. For example, a famous case of laxed law and order, leading to double standards, is the scandal of the Red Bull heir, who was charged with a hit and run but has managed to escape retribution for years. If the criminal was an everyday citizen, he would now be serving his sentence. Thailand’s public was angered and have been demanding for the law to be enforced.

In conclusion, when there are no laws and rules, the society would fall into chaos and some of its fundamentals, such as equality, could not be achieved. Therefore, humans should put these founding pillars as our top priorities instead of acting on our own will.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 2

Rules and laws are the basis of most modern-day societies. Some people believe that society could not function if people were free to do as they please. I partly agree with this idea and will discuss the issue in the following essay.

Many people fear that society would deteriorate into chaos if there were no rules or laws in place to control people’s behaviour. They believe that rules and laws exist in order to set boundaries so that people behave in a way that is conducive to a peaceful and functioning society. I believe this is true to a certain extent. For example, if there were no laws or rules, and therefore no police to enforce those rules, then a certain number of people may try to take advantage of such a situation and some upheaval may result as a consequence. However, this would only be temporary, as I believe that the majority of human beings are good people and would ultimately unite against those who were causing distress to the rest of society, once again resulting in a peaceful state.

However, I do believe that the number of laws and rules that people are subjected to in most modern-day societies causes more harm than good. Most laws and rules these days benefit a minority of people, while the majority are still being affected by the very rules and laws that are there to protect them. For example, in many countries it is illegal to own a gun. However, when a criminal breaks into their home and attempts to murder them with a dangerous weapon, they are unable to defend themselves effectively. Furthermore, many rules and laws these days favour the rich and oppose the poor. That is why in most countries the gap between the rich and poor is getting bigger and bigger.

In conclusion, I believe there only needs to be one universal law, “Do no harm to others”. The innate goodwill and intelligence of human beings will naturally create the most peaceful and productive human societies possible, without the endless amounts of unnecessary rules and laws of today.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 3

In defining society, many insist that it consists of rules and laws, and would not be able to function if individuals were to operate without restrictions. I agree with this view and believe that although society should allow individuals a level of autonomy, an effective legal system is necessary for a well-functioning society, and ensure the safety of the general population. 

On the one hand, I believe that a level of autonomy is necessary for a society to flourish. Individual freedom allows the whole of society to move forward - by each person doing what he or she wants to a certain extent (so long as it does not harm others), society can benefit from greater creativity and flexibility. Furthermore, this would also improve the state of civil society, since individuals would be able to debate one another on issues that concern their common governance, and as such make place for a healthier democracy. This is for example, the case in Western Europe, where a more individualist societal set up has created the longest surviving democracies and richest countries in the world. 

On the other hand, one could also rightly point that no man exists as an island, and that individuals are connected within a society through a set of laws. These rules not only ensure that individuals do not exploit one another, it also sets the expectations for societal interactions - this standardization of behaviour allows people to treat each other with a degree of similarity and upholds societal stability, which could be said to be sorely lacking from an archaic society. For instance, in areas of war, where societal trust has broken down, we can see that individuals are much more skeptical of one another. 

Therefore, I overall argue that while people should be given a certain amount of autonomy in order for society to flourish both economically and creatively, this should nonetheless be confined to a pre agreed set of rules and laws. 

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 4

Law and order have been embedded into all societies and communities since the dawn of civilization. Some argue that the world will be thrown into chaos in the absence of the law. I completely agree with this thinking, for the reasons provided below.

First of all, without the law to suppress mankind's baser nature, society will be in ruins. Humans are inherently selfish and greedy, and these traits could incite jealousy and spark violent conflicts. They could also prompt us to pursue economic growth with reckless abandon, causing irreparable damage to the planet like we have done in the past century. In other words, without a set of rules to ensure wholesome behaviors, human society will head toward a path of self-destruction - a scenario that has thus far been averted by the criminal justice system and the environmental accords that we have in place.

Second, a society without the strictures imposed by legislation will allow huge disparities and injustices to exist. Power would ultimately rest with the individuals and corporations who possess the most resources, leaving ordinary citizens vulnerable and powerless. Imagine the world's oil reserve being owned by a handful of major oil tycoons who are free to dictate how much a barrel costs - this commodity would simply become extortionate for the masses. This would perpetuate the wealthy's prosperity and the poor's austerity, and such a society is hardly desirable.

In conclusion, I agree with the view that that a society devoid of laws and regulations is a dysfunctional one as it would invariably result in destruction and inequality.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 5

Societies across the world have established rules and laws to maintain order and ensure the smooth functioning of communities and their members. Without these regulations, it is argued that society would descend into chaos and face numerous challenges. This essay agrees with the notion.

One of the primary reasons why societies must have rules and laws is to establish order and ensure the safety of its members. Laws provide a framework that governs human behaviour and sets clear boundaries for what is acceptable and what is not. For example, traffic laws regulate how people drive on roads, ensuring the safety of both drivers and pedestrians. Without these laws, the roads would be chaotic, and accidents would increase, jeopardizing public safety. Therefore, rules and laws play a crucial role in maintaining order and protecting the well-being of individuals.

While individual freedom is important, it must not create social nuisances and harm others. Laws provide a framework that allows individuals to coexist harmoniously and resolve conflicts in a fair and just manner. For instance, property laws protect individuals' rights to own and use their possessions, ensuring a sense of security and preventing conflicts over property. Similarly, laws against theft and violence establish boundaries that safeguard personal safety and maintain social order. By having rules and laws in place, societies promote a sense of accountability and discourage behaviours that could harm others or disrupt the functioning of the community.

In conclusion, rules and laws are essential for the functioning of societies. They establish order, ensure safety, and strike a balance between individual freedom and social responsibility. Without rules and laws, society would face numerous challenges, including increased chaos, conflicts, and threats to public safety.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 6

Laws and regulations play a vital role in preventing individuals from acting on their primal impulses, thus helping to maintain order and stability in society. This essay argues that without the law and rules, society would devolve into chaos and become dangerous.

Firstly, laws and regulations serve as a protective measure for individuals and help resolve conflicts. They establish clear guidelines for acceptable and unacceptable behaviors, acting as a deterrent for potential offenders. By implementing a set of universal principles and consequences, the law promotes equality and fairness, ensuring that everyone is treated equitably under the legal system. For instance, laws prohibiting murder and theft have existed since ancient times and continue to restrain these heinous acts from causing harm. Furthermore, laws and regulations also serve to mitigate conflicts that may arise between individuals or groups, providing a means of resolution.

Secondly, laws are crucial for promoting social progress and justice. As the world evolves, the legal system must adapt to changing conditions, allowing for positive social development. Over the course of history, new laws and legislations have been introduced to address issues such as slavery, apartheid, segregation, and voting rights for women and minorities. In addition, the law guarantees basic rights for individuals, including the right to an abortion, the right to same-sex marriage, and the right to freedom from discrimination. These rights serve as a foundation for individuals to live their lives with dignity and security.

In conclusion, I believe that laws and regulations play a critical role in maintaining a functional and just society. They protect individuals, resolve conflicts, promote social progress, and ensure the essential rights of all of humanity.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 7

It is argued that our society’s functionality hinges upon rules and laws, preventing people from acting without constraint. This essay firmly concurs with this standpoint, emphasizing how laws safeguard individuals’ rights and uphold societal equality.

The primary rationale supporting my agreement with the significance of regulations and laws is their role in protecting people’s rights. Absent the shield of the legal system, it would be uncertain whether individuals’ fundamental needs and rights could be met in various scenarios. For instance, labor laws ensure that employees can assert their rights regarding fair compensation corresponding to their productivity, entitlement to annual leaves, and provision of insurance during work. Should employers fail to meet these requirements, affected individuals retain the right to file a complaint or pursue legal action against them.

Another crucial aspect reinforcing my alignment with the stated perspective is the intrinsic equality maintained by the legal system. Laws dictate that every citizen is accountable for the consequences of their actions, irrespective of social status, wealth, or job position. For instance, consider the recent legal proceedings involving Donald Trump in Colorado. Despite his status as the former President of the United States, he faces repercussions for inciting the protest at Capitol Hill in 2021 and potentially might be barred from running for the presidential position in 2024. In the absence of laws, owing to his wealth and status, Trump could evade responsibility for his actions, potentially leading to more severe consequences in the future.

In conclusion, this essay strongly agrees that a society without legal constraints on individual actions would be non-functional. This is because laws not only safeguard the basic rights and needs of citizens but also ensure the maintenance of societal equality.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 8

It is generally understood that society is held up by the rules and laws made by people. Nevertheless, some people think that society could still properly function even if its members could do anything they desired without fearing the legal consequences. I wholeheartedly disagree as I support the idea that a civilized society would descend into anarchy when individuals are entirely free to do whatever they want.

There are several immediate adverse effects of this kind of situation. First, people will be less concerned about others, and their decisions would be more motivated by self-interest. Furthermore, knowing that they cannot be punished by the law for their actions, many people will only become more brazen over time, eventually attempting to satisfy their primal instincts no matter what. Greed, rage, and lust are three clear examples that can result in morally reprehensible behaviour should people’s decisions ever become unchecked in society. For instance, a company can sell faulty yet cheaply produced merchandise to customers in order to increase their profit margin when consumer protection laws are not in place, or a maniac can murder someone on the road for making him angry and still get away afterwards.

To make matters worse, such a situation will encourage malicious people to claim power and coerce others for their gains. Self-styled and local “lords” will arise, recruiting followers using both promises of order and threats of violence. As a result, the current society would stop existing and instead regress into brutal conflicts among powers fighting for control. Ultimately, these conflicts may spread, and humanity’s fate will hang in the balance.  In their quest for power, such self-proclaimed leaders would sacrifice their supporters, pushing humankind to extinction with the abundance of murderous tools. Hence, the absence of the rule of law should never occur so that we will not face our eradication as a species.

In conclusion, the consequences of a situation where people in society are unrestricted in their actions are bleak. That is why every reasonable individual should understand the necessity of having rules and try their best to maintain the laws of society.       

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 9

Any country has its own rules and laws that all citizens must comply (obey/adhere to). Some people argue that regulations may be against individual freedom, yet I opine (think) that legislation is crucial to ensure social safety.

To begin with, rules and laws are built based on agreements that people in a society mostly agree on. For example, people are not allowed to cross a red light, otherwise, car crashes and traffic congestion could be foreseen (anticipated/expected). This typical rule creates a community standard that helps to maintain the stability of the whole society. They by no means contradict (go against) human rights. Rules and laws help to ensure that people freely act and behave within a common standard.

On the other hand, if there were no limits to human freedom and everyone just acted in the way they wanted, society would be chaotic or malfunctioned. People would have different judgments about legal actions and misdeeds (wrongdoing behavior). There would be no way to resolve conflicts as there was not either a social standard to be based on or deterrent measures for misdoings. For example, if someone killed some else, it would be unjust if the murder is not at least incarcerated (imprisoned/sent to prison).

It could be sometimes argued that some rules are no longer necessary or effective. However, rules are created by humans, and they are frequently reviewed and revised to match what is happening legally. Citizens have the right to raise their voice whenever they find any regulation that needs modifications (corrections). Legislations not only ensure citizens’ legal rights, but they act as a means of human rights promotion.

In short, to live safely and function well in society, rules and laws are a must. They are created for social security, not to go against individual liberty. People can freely act as they want but within the existing legal frameworks.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 10

Many believe that the rule of law is the only reason society does not descend into anarchy. I am in agreement as idealistic; revisionist views of human nature do not take into account the full pre-history of humanity.

Those who have a more hopeful view of mankind argue the modern progression towards compassion and tolerance. Humans are not necessarily violent and prone to criminal activity. The last hundred years have seen tremendous advances in areas ranging from civil rights to voting to more inclusive social policies. There is therefore a chance that even if society removed or reduced laws governing behaviour, individuals would continue to behave responsibly out of a renewed understanding of what it can mean to be human. These claims are bolstered by the existence of certain small communities in isolation where there is relatively little or no crime.

However, modern values are the product of a refinement of humanity over centuries that still requires reinforcement. The laws against violent crimes, for example, were enforced with brutal penalties for thousands of years in countries around the world. Only in the last two hundred years, have most nations reformed punishments to be either imprisonment or fines. The harsher penalties of the distant past might be outdated, but the current ones still deter potential criminals. The best evidence of this is that people today still attempt to commit crimes despite advances in forensic science and nearly ubiquitous surveillance cameras. It takes little imagination to see realise many more would lean towards breaking the rules in the absence of punishments altogether.

In conclusion, laws and regulations are crucial barriers to the excesses of human nature and cannot be wished away with a good conscience. This does not, however, imply they must be unnecessarily strict.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 11

It is true that throughout human history, people living in social groups have always made rules and laws to govern their conduct. While a few people argue in favour of a free and lawless society, I completely agree that the results would be disastrous if individuals were able to do whatever they liked.

Firstly, It is hard to envision a society without rules and laws, as crime rates would likely increase significantly in their absence. In fact, legal systems establish boundaries and set expectations for people’s actions, enabling individuals to align their behaviors with society’s principles. They may fear the repercussions stipulated by the legal system, resulting in a decrease in crimes that harm society, such as theft, murder, and drug trafficking. For example, multiple studies have shown that drug trafficking rates have decreased in many countries around the world due to more stringent laws on this type of crime. Thus, rules and laws play a crucial role in reducing crime rates and offering safer living environments for human beings.

Beyond just maintaining order and safety, laws and rules play a crucial role in ensuring fairness and justice. They create an equitable environment where every individual, irrespective of their background or status, is subject to the same legal framework. This is especially vital in complex; diverse societies where differing interests and perspectives must be balanced. For example, in countries with robust legal systems, many people in developed nations have their basic rights safeguarded. Without laws, the weaker sections of society could be exploited by the more powerful, leading to social unrest and inequality.

In conclusion, the fabric of society is intricately woven by its rules and laws. These not only define socially acceptable behaviors and prevent societal descent into chaos but also ensure fairness and justice.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 12

Many argue that laws and regulations are the sole reason why civilization does not descend into chaos. In my opinion, a code of law remains a justified necessity, although economic and educational reforms may slightly reduce the need for a hierarchical coercive structure.

Anarchists often question the absolute efficacy of the justice system in addressing the underlying systemic sources of criminality. The best example of this is in the United States, where crimes remain pervasive even in the presence of strict sentencing guidelines, sophisticated surveillance networks, and advanced forensic technologies. In Sweden, a less structured legislative approach and higher emphasis on providing proper education and vocational training have seen the country’s crime rates falling to historic lows. This, coupled with recent progressive movements towards compassion and tolerance between genders and races, such as the Black Lives Matter and Gay Pride movements, has given hope to the feasibility of a society without stringent regulations.

Nevertheless, I believe that anarchism is inherently unstable, and society could not practically function after the comprehensive removal of laws. While challenging authority is not intrinsically destructive and some reformists, such as Gandhi, have petitioned against all forms of violence, there will always be overly ambitious individuals who attempt to seize more power for themselves because of their innate competitive nature. Battles over dominance in a world without rules or laws could potentially lead to public upheavals and eventually reversions to a state of nature. Hence, a more sensible approach would be establishing statutes, mandates, and ordinances as a declarative written embodiment of shared precepts and moral principles mutually agreed between cultures and religions. Laws can then prescribe appropriate behaviors, deter criminals, and provide sanctions for unjust acts, thus driving society in a progressive direction under a unified set of values.

In conclusion, laws and regulations are still indispensable, especially when considering the instability of a state without a government. In my opinion, the authorities should shift their focus toward the foundational catalysts underpinning crimes.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 13

It has been noted that the rule of law is the foundation of modern civilisation. While some believe that a society without laws can function properly thanks to human characteristics, I contend that it will completely collapse due to bad behaviour.

On the one hand, certain shared beliefs have made countries with no official rules possible throughout the history of mankind. In fact, centuries before the first laws were introduced, the ancient Chinese had been able to gather in millions as a nation to save them from natural disasters and enemies since they all shared an intuitive sense of community. Furthermore, in modern Bhutan, national or organisational rules are essentially redundant as most citizens already live in harmony with each other as the result of Buddhist practices which promote compassion across races or social classes.

On the other hand, I am of the opinion that if people are free to do whatever they desire, social order would be destroyed by misbehaviour. In Vietnam, for example, at a crowded intersection without clear regulations and instructions, many commuters would happily block others for a quick pass. Worse still, if there is an accident, some ill-tempered drivers are quick to throw punches at each other right in the middle of the road, which instantly brings the traffic to a complete standstill. (R)As similar consequences can be predicted in other fields such as commerce and politics, the normal operation at a societal level is likely to collapse entirely.

In conclusion, civilisations without agreed rules could exist if citizens possessed specific qualities. However, I believe societies will stop operating because of poorly behaved individuals. From my perspective, governments should continue to enact strict laws that promote discipline and order for their countries to thrive in the modern era.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 14

It is evident that rules and laws are the basis of many modern societies. It is therefore argued that society could not function properly if individuals were free to do as they wished. I completely agree with this point of view.

Laws play a crucial role in safeguarding the well-being of citizens and the stability of a nation. On the individual level, compensating for a certain amount of freedom seems to be an acceptable trade-off for being protected by laws. As law-abiding citizens are protected from illegal activities, they can feel secure about the safety of themselves and their families. On the societal level, it would be easier for the government to manage society. For example, since the majority of Vietnamese inhabitants conducted social distancing, an order from the government to fight the spread of Covid-19, this country managed to fight this deadly pandemic.

A society would deteriorate in chaos if people’s behavior were not curbed by any regulations. In other words, there would be no safe place for people to reside and develop. Since criminal activities were not regulated by the authorities, the well-being of individuals and society as a whole would be at stake. For instance, owing to the absence of laws, companies would go out of business due to vandalism or robbery, or driving would become dangerous as reckless acts like speeding and driving under the influence were not penalized.

In conclusion, I believe that a society can be safe and functional only when rules and laws exist to set boundaries to people’s freedom.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 15

“Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose,” retorted a great poet. That is a great concept, but does that mean that we can do whatever we like without repercussions? I believe not, as any action will always have some kind of effect on others.

It is always easy to harm others, whether it is intentional or not. That is why society is heavily regulated and becoming more so with every passing year. If we drive too fast, we will obviously hurt someone else before too long. “No man is an island,” all those around us affect us as we affect others in turn; therefore, we have to have limits to our behaviour to ensure that everyone is safe to live their lives the way they choose.

Although our choices are limited by laws and morals, I still believe that we have plenty of freedom to live our lives happily in most countries in the world. Too much restriction forces us to live in certain ways that may not allow us to express ourselves in a way that’s true to ourselves. So whoever makes the rules must do so altruistically.

In sum, without the necessary limitations that keep us safe, society could never be stable for long. However, over-regulating can be just as restrictive. Balance is therefore needed.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 16

Governments have the responsibility of ensuring the safety of their citizens by imposing certain rules and laws. Although it may restrict their freedom to a certain extent, there would be utter chaos in society in the absence of these laws.

Rules and regulations cause minor inconveniences to people, but they also ensure the safety of individuals and society. It is a reality that hundreds of accidents are caused due to drunken driving. Since there are many rules against driving under the influence of alcohol, many accidents that could cause great damage to human life and property are avoided. Those who believe that such rules interfere with their freedom pay with their own lives and that of others. The conclusion one can draw from these experiences is that people should tolerate certain inconveniences, in order to protect their lives from possible dangers.

Littering and spitting in public places is considered a serious offence in Singapore, which is dealt with serious fines. People in countries like India, that do not have such strict rules on public hygiene may not realise the value of such a regulation, but this has made Singapore one of the most beautiful and cleanest countries in the world. When people learn the benefits of certain restrictions, they would begin to appreciate such constraints on their freedom.

However, in certain cases, we may find that some rules are unnecessary and ineffective. These are only rare instances and citizens have the right to raise objections against them. Any sensible government would revoke such rules and regulations if it finds them unproductive.

In general, the rules that we have are not too many but essential for the smooth functioning of any civil society. The absence of such controls would lead to chaos and confusion in public life.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 17

A society consists of its people and does have its own rules and by-laws which define the ideal conducts for individuals who are living in the society. These guiding principles are necessary to avoid any conflict by clearly demarcating the do’s and don’ts of the society. But these rules should not come into the way of individual preferences and choices which certainly can create a rift between those who are in power and those who are being governed.

To start with, society regulations are a must have for running an ideal society. In the absence of which there will be possible contradictions among people as everyone has his own way of thinking. For instance, in our society, there is a by-law which prohibits any kind of disturbing noise to be produced after 10 o’clock at night. This rule makes sure that even if someone organising a function, he has to stop playing music after the designated time so as to make sure no one else gets disturbed.

On the other hand, these rules and regulations should not interfere in the personal choices of the individual as they are against the individual autonomy of the general public. Just to exemplify, a state of anarchy in the society is being created after the government of India proposed to make it illegal to sell and consume beef in India. By doing this the government is imposing their personal preferences over individual choices.

To sum up, it is quite clear from the above arguments that having a defined set of rules and regulations is a prerequisite for the society to function and avoid any ambiguity but at the same time it is essential to make sure these laws does not come in the way of individual autonomy.

Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted - mẫu 18

Rules and laws are a common feature of almost all societies. It has been argued that without them there cannot be a safe and functional society. In my view, this is completely true.

In the ancient world, one’s compliance with rules was key to survival. Imagine one day, an individual from a gather-hunter group did not particularly like to work, this would probably be unfair for other members. If unluckily, his friend saw him get away with his laziness, he might as well do the same, and the ripple effect would be disastrous as there would not be enough food for the group. This is why even the smallest communities had unwritten rules to prevent the scenario mentioned above.

Modern society is even more complex and, therefore, the importance of law and order has never been clearer. One area to look at is traffic. It is hard to fathom how cars and motorbikes could move without basic traffic regulations. For example, in Hanoi, it takes only a few cars to run a red-light during rush hours for the otherwise seamless flow of traffic to result in chaos. Another case in point is the system of trash collection and disposal. In most neighborhoods in my country, households are required to bring their trash to a designated spot for janitors to collect. However, some city dwellers are reluctant to travel several hundreds of meters, so they dispose of their trash right in front of their house or into a nearby river. Their freedom has affected many other inhabitants and if everyone were like them, most areas would become extremely difficult to live in.

In conclusion, for a society to survive and thrive, it is important that citizens comply with its rules and laws.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• Some people think that being able to communicate with others online is breaking down geographical barriers and enabling people, who would normally never have the chance to meet, to communicate. What are the advantages of international communication online? Are there any disadvantages to this?

• When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

• The best way to solve the world’s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• It is generally acknowledged that families are now not as close as they used to be. Give some reasons why this change has happened and suggest how families could be brought closer together.

• Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---