Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree? hay nhất giúp bạn có thêm tài liệu tham khảo để viết bài luận bằng Tiếng Anh hay hơn.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same

Đề bài: Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 1

In many societies, there is a growing concern about the increasing number of juvenile offenders committing serious crimes. Some individuals argue that these young offenders should be punished as adults due to the severity of their crimes. However, I firmly disagree with this opinion.

Firstly, it is essential to recognize that young offenders often lack the same level of maturity and judgment as adults. Adolescents are still developing mentally, emotionally, and socially, which may contribute to impulsive decision-making and a heightened vulnerability to peer pressure. For instance, a teenage shoplifter who stole under peer pressure may not fully comprehend the consequences of their actions due to their immature judgment. Therefore, it is crucial to consider these factors when determining the appropriate punishment for young criminals. Punishing them in the same way as adults may not only be unfair but also counterproductive, as it fails to address the root causes of their behavior.

Secondly, rehabilitation should be the primary focus when dealing with young offenders, rather than punitive measures. By providing these individuals with access to education, counseling, and skill-building programs, society can help them to overcome the challenges they face and ultimately reduce the likelihood of reoffending. For example, a young offender who has committed a serious crime could be placed in a juvenile detention center that offers educational programs, counseling services, and vocational training, which helps them address the underlying issues that led to their criminal behavior. As a result, upon reentering society, they are better equipped to make positive choices, reducing recidivism rates and promoting a safer community for all.

In conclusion, punishing young offenders who commit serious crimes in the same manner as adults disregards the unique developmental needs and circumstances of adolescents. Instead, society should focus on rehabilitation and support for these individuals, ensuring they have the opportunity to grow and learn from their mistakes.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 2

Whether adolescents should be punished for their crimes in the way adults are has gained traction. From my point of view, imposing similar punishments for both young and mature offenders will have a negative impact.

On the one hand, advocates of equal treatment for underaged and adult lawbreakers have grounds to believe that this notion can have positive results. First, more young criminals would emerge if they are pardoned for their wrongdoings due to their age. Some retributions are too light for the seriousness of the felonies committed, hence, cannot deter youngsters from breaking the law. Moreover, giving young offenders lighter sentences is unjust for the victims and their families, as some felonies are too vile for punishments such as being sent to prison. One case in point is in Vietnam, 2017, a robber killed a family of 4, including the parents and their young children. Usually, this man would have been sentenced to death, yet he only got sentenced to 18 years in prison. The fact that he escaped just punishment because he was a few months underaged angered the public for an extended period of time.

On the other hand, I strongly believe that juvenile delinquents should not receive retributions similar to that for adults. To start with, children do not have the moral capacity and thorough understanding of the world as grown-ups. Therefore, they cannot fully comprehend the weight of their wrongdoings or even the sentences. Some young offenders commit crimes without knowing that it is an offense. Thus, giving these criminals leeway and an opportunity to rehabilitate and contributing to society is more humane. Furthermore, adolescents are easily affected by different factors, as compared to adults. Grown-ups have the ability to stop themselves but younger ones, once instigated, may act on impulse and cause regrets.

To conclude, while it is undeniable that inflicting fitting penalties for criminals is important to upholding society’s stability and values, I am of the opinion that young lawbreakers should be tried differently in court from adult offenders.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 3

There is an opinion that young offenders should be held accountable for their actions just as adults. While I find this view of some people justifiable to some extent, I also argue that treating both young and mature lawbreakers equally may have adverse effects.

On the one hand, I can understand why a young age should be no deterrent to dealing with criminals. If these juvenile delinquents were easily pardoned in place of receiving strict punishments as adults, they would not become fully aware of the serious consequences of their crimes. Therefore, imposing appropriate punishments could prevent them from conducting illegal actions in the future. Besides, young perpetrators usually receive lighter sentences than they deserve, which is an injustice to the victims. In Vietnam, there was a well-known case in which a teenager murdered almost every member of a family deliberately, escaping the death sentence due to being a few months under the responsible age.

On the other hand, I am convinced that juvenile criminals should be tried in a different court from that for adults. Firstly, children are proven not to have sufficient intellectual or moral capacity to understand the outcomes of their misdeeds, so they lack the necessary conditions to be trial defendants as grown-up people. Secondly, when given a second chance, these underage convicts can have an opportunity to successfully rehabilitate and learn a valuable lesson. Thirdly, children can be negatively influenced by some bad role models, which should also be considered to give them a fair trial.

In conclusion, breakers of laws should not be spared of punishments, but I believe young offenders should be dealt with differently from adults.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 4

In the wake of perpetrations and solemn offences which have only been exacerbated in the past few years, the contention of young people being prosecuted at par with adult criminals has been prevalent. Some opine in the support of equal punishment for all while some hold the viewpoint of tackling the two segments distinctively. I find myself agreeing with the latter standpoint and in the forthcoming sections of this essay, I shall be elucidating the same.

People who argue that everyone should be charged with equal punishment, principally state that for equal crime, the prosecution has to be equivalent. However, for the young and undernourished mindsets that would be too extreme to execute. Juveniles who commit misdemeanors are not mature enough to distinguish between right and wrong. They majorly culminate in committing a serious offence influenced by what they perceive from their surroundings and hence discernment and prudence of judging often don’t get contoured to their maximum capacity in their case. Hence, prosecuting them equally as adult criminals and misdoers shall not be apposite.

The fragile and gullible adolescents, if treated commensurately as adults, shall curb their development and ravaging all the scope of them treading in the right direction. Subjecting juveniles to a strict trial will not only deprive them of their chance and possibility to ameliorate but it may imperil them into adapting a personality that could be immensely diabolical in the later stages of their lives. Bestowing a mild laxity in the case of juvenile delinquency could treat them for their offences and hence letting them know the dire consequences of such peccadillos without being harsh on them that might defeat the whole process of their refinement.

Although people of a younger age could use it as a loop to evade the repercussions of the misdeeds, the threat of possibility couldn’t nullify the factual facet of their deterioration otherwise.

In conclusion, it could thus be argued that punishing everyone with an equal intensity under a similar set of charges could denude the frangible personalities of young people.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 5

As the remarkable increase in juvenile delinquency has been a serious cause for concern nowadays, it is generally believed that youngsters who are involved in serious crimes such as murder or robbery should be subject to the same sort of punishment as adults. However, from my point of view, while legal deterrence is essential, it is advisable that the degree of detention for juveniles be lower than that for mature people.

Although young people are inexperienced and to a certain extent unconscious of their behaviors, it is wrong to say that they are virtually innocent when attempting a murder or fraud. Recent reports of adolescents below the age of maturity committing murder or swindling people out of their money on the Net are a case in point. Those young criminals seemed to abuse their rights in order to lower or even get away with their sentence. Although titled as “minors” in legal papers, juveniles have nearly the same intelligence and physical strength as adults, who are just several years older than them, so detention as compensation for their crime is vital.

However, I believe that the degree of punishment should not be taken to the extreme. Teenagers have insufficient life experience and are to some extent ignorant of what awaits them after committing a crime, so they should not be applied the highest sort of punishment. Programmes that assist in the progress of re-education of juveniles are wiser and more pragmatic replacements of severe punishment such as lifetime imprisonment or capital punishment.

In conclusion, whereas young criminals are mandated to be subject to detention, it is vital and ethical to put them on a lower scale of punishment than that for adults.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 6

In modern times, the rate of youths being convicted for serious offenses has increased drastically. There are certain people who believe that young people deserve to be sentenced as adults, others however do not share these views. I completely disagree with youths receiving the same exact punishment as adults even for the same crimes committed.

Though there is a rise in the involvement of teenagers in more crimes lately, I believe that every child needs to have hope and a chance at a good future and hence should not be judged so harshly as an adult for their actions. According to my opinion, every human makes mistakes, but it would be wrong of us to cost the teens their future because of one mistake. First and foremost, governments should not enact the same punishments to resemble crimes regardless of age as though in the short term it may decrease the crime rate but in the long term it will be detrimental to the social cohesion of the society as the youths could not be easily included within the social fabric of any community even after their prison sentence is over. This in general affects negatively the future of a country.

For such instances juvenile detention systems remain the best for younger folks as exposing children to the degraded environment of an adult person can affect their mental health severely and scar them for the rest of their life. In some proven cases it was observed that adult prisons left a bad impact on the young prisoners' minds which led them to turn to more violent crimes in the future. It is usually more beneficial to engage children in some constructive training instead of just sending them away to live in an isolated cell. On the other hand, it has never been proven that extensive jail time corrects the behavior of the convicts. In addition to these, the environment of the child in which they are growing up is also an important factor to be considered as in many cases it has a direct relationship with the crimes being committed by the youths. Young people are easily influenced by adults and as such can also copy their aggressive behavior ultimately leading to something far dangerous.

Altogether, though more and more demands for equal punishment for youths are being raised every day due to the steady increase in the number and nature of violent crimes being committed. I however vehemently disagree and believe the better way to punish them is to detain them in specialized centers where the government will provide professional help for dealing with the minor offenders.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 7

Crimes can be detestable, while minor offenders and their crimes are from time to time treated with leniency. Thus, some argue that laws should not discriminate, and equally punish minor criminals—an opinion that this essay is against.

To begin with, minors are yet to approach their maturity, and their crimes, albeit serious, should be punished with the consideration of their young age. Internationally speaking, countries might define the start of adulthood differently—18 being the most common—but they commonly believe that there is a distinction between minor crimes and adult crimes. Minors are likely to be given a better chance for rehabilitation when they commit crimes because of their inexperience of life and possibly better life prospects. In that case, milder punishments are inflicted on juvenile delinquents: lesser sentencing and relatively less harsh correction facilities are introduced in their cases.

Moreover, considering the correction process, minor offenders should not be punished equally as adult criminals. Despite the above-mentioned arguments that are in young offenders’ defense, crimes, especially felonies by minors, deserve heavy punishment to deter crimes and reduce the harm of those crimes to the society. However, sending minors to adult prison might entail unexpectedly negative results. First, minors are naturally closer to more sophisticated criminals and crimes, which aggravate juvenile delinquency. Second, when in adult correctional facilities, young criminals might be threatened by assaults by adult prisoners, mostly sexually, which is nowhere closer to the purpose of rehabilitation.

In sum, law breakers, be they minors or not, should be punished for their wrongdoings, but lesser sentences and special correctional facilities might be more reasonable and helpful.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 8

There are reformers today who argue that adults and young people should be treated equally under the law. In my opinion, despite the ostensible fairness of this proposal, it disregards crucial psychological differences.

Those who believe all ages should receive equal treatment point out that this will engender a greater deterring effect. The main reason that all individuals in society are punished is not for justice alone, but as a means to ensure others will not commit similar crimes. Young people learn in school and the world generally that their actions will have consequences and that crimes are punishable with prison time and other penalties. If these censures are weakened, then the chances a young person will attempt to commit a crime will logically increase, even if the total number of young people engaging in criminal behavior today is lower than at any point in human history.

However, age is a just mitigating factor. Adults who commit crimes have had more time to develop socially and intellectually while young people might not fully grasp the consequences of their choices for themselves and others. For instance, there have been recent cases where young people were influenced by extremist elements now pervasive in social media. Young people are more impressionable in these situations and often lack the confidence and maturity to think for themselves. This vulnerability extends to their emotional and intellectual development and justifies laws that protect young people from receiving overly harsh sentences.

In conclusion, though there are practical reasons to support equal punishments for all ages, this alteration would be unfair to young people. Courts should consider a range of factors before selecting an appropriate punishment.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 9

The punishment to adolescents for committing crimes is undeniably a contentious matter that has been debated by various people of our society. I believe they should be punished in the same manner. This is a viewpoint with which I strongly concur. I recognise that young individuals over the age of 16 face major penalties for their activities, in my opinion.

To begin with, crime is so awful that punishment was implemented to keep the people safe and improve their lives. This gives people who perpetrated atrocities the opportunity to reconsider their actions and possibly choose the right side. Teenagers are encouraged to commit crimes in these settings because they will face fewer consequences. In a country where drugs are banned, for example, a young man sold something similar, and it wasn't his fault. As a result, regardless of age, adults and children should be penalised equally.

Second, they will discover that their misbehaviour was cruel after punishment. That, in my opinion, is the fundamental reason why not only adults but even young people must go to prison after committing crimes. The greater the penalty, the better for the children. I support the opinions of countless others who have committed similar offences. It would also be beneficial to have the same laws all around the world in order to limit the number of cheaters.

In conclusion, because young individuals already understand how a person should behave in society, they must be held accountable for their crimes as adults. However, measures to assist teenagers in leading honest lives when they are released must be put in place.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 10

Nowadays many people are observing that the number of minors committing major crimes is increasing. Some people think that teenagers who commit crimes should be punished like adults. I completely agree with this viewpoint. When juvenile offenders are considered adults and are sentenced to the same punishment, it will have a major impact on other juvenile offenders too.

In many countries, youth are subject to less severe punishment when compared to adults. This gives young people the green flag to do what they want without being held accountable for their actions. In India sometimes, teenagers go unpunished even for the most serious crimes. So, if countries implement consequences for youth, they will think twice before breaking the law. Second, some adolescents with particularly aggressive behaviour need to be excluded from society and receive specialized psychological care this will indeed help to prevent such disastrous crimes in the future.

Increasing the severity of punishments will deter other teenagers from committing crimes. In other words, potential young offenders will fear committing a crime because they will be aware of and fearful of the severity of the consequences. This can benefit society and youth in the long run. Regardless of age, a crime is a crime; if minors are given leniency, they will not be aware of the harm they are causing to society. For example, if a college student stabs someone and walks away, he will not understand the seriousness and consequences of his actions.

In conclusion, the problem of increasing juvenile crime can only be solved by providing appropriate punishments regardless of their age.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 11

In some regions of the world, youth-related crime is increasing. Therefore, some say that children who commit severe crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. This perspective is wrong in my opinion because it exposes adolescents to the corrupt influences of the world.

Firstly, the adolescent years are significant turning points in everyone's lives. They are influenced by violent films and lose the ability to discriminate between truth and fiction as a result. Due to the fact that heroes are admired even after committing a crime, they have a tendency to associate with the wrong people and engage in activities that they must subsequently undergo. They lack advice from their parents and elders as a result. For instance, according to a survey conducted by The Times of India, more than 50% of the criminal activities done by adolescents mirrored the actions shown in movies and video games.

Criminals must be punished because they convey the incorrect message to society, but these adolescents should be given a second chance and compensated by society. They should be sent to rehabilitation clinics where they will be taught life-improving skills and techniques. They must be taught the law and how to be responsible citizens. The government should organise all of this at a facility that can alter a child's outlook.

In conclusion, teenagers who violate significant laws should not be punished as severely as adults and in my opinion, this viewpoint should be promoted as punishing them can have adverse effects on youth.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 12

It is irrefutable that the rise of crimes has brought see changes in the lifestyle of individuals and rapidly spread across the world. Youngsters should be treated in the same way as adults when they are engaged in an offence. I endorse the statement wholeheartedly. I have some solid ground to explicate at length in the paragraph to come.

The first and foremost reason is that it does not require any harsh punishment for youngsters; when they are involved in a certain type of crime, according to them, they are already in their learning stage, and their minds are not to competently expand, which they are able to neglect that bad habits and evaluate their right decision. for instance, a regular survey conducted by the United States about the increasing the ratio of crimes among the young people and got shocking results and found in most cases were of youngsters who got distracted from their parts and involved in a better society and addressed with the appropriate lessons which were based on the reality of life without giving strict punishment as an adult. Furthermore, violence in the media can attract young people’s attitudes and behaviour. Lack of parental guidance can lead a teenager to delinquency which eventually leads to becoming stubborn and easily committing crimes. Add it, and domestic violence can force young people onto the streets and into bad company.

It is implicit that the age factor of youngsters must be considered while giving any strict punishment, thus leading to there would be become means for the nation and spoil their whole life of the juvenile. For instance, bad behaviour is easier to change when a person is grown-up rather than provide hard punishment. Moreover, a youngster might be negatively influenced by time in adult prison, which is totally acceptable at a minor age. In addition, teenagers need re-education and re-socialization rather than penalization because adult sentences are too serve for youngsters. Such as, in the middle east, the Australian government organized several rules and conducted an abundance of seminars for taking care of minors, which they found any crime before the age of 18.

To put it in and nutshell, I pen down saying that juveniles need to know that law is serious, and punishment is a good way to teach them this and also get familiar with their mistakes. Therefore, the government must develop a committee, especially for teenagers, which brings them accurate morals and crucial aspects of the lifestyle of the youngsters.

Some people believe that young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same - mẫu 13

It is argued that the same punishments should be applied to both young criminals and adults who commit offenses. In my opinion, I agree with this point of view only if the crime is serious.

There are several reasons why it is wrong to impose the same punishments on both adolescent and adult criminals. Firstly, perhaps young people could only commit minor crimes, and this causes very little damage to society. It is better to send them back to family or school for rehabilitation. Secondly, they are not mature enough to understand that their misbehaviors could have negative impacts on the society, and these behaviors often come from peer pressures. For example, those who suffer from school discipline problems, such as bullying, are forced by their bulliers to pursue illegalities such as robbing or stealing which can exert serious effects on others.

However, I would argue that strict punishments like prison sentences should be imposed on young offenders who commit dangerous crimes. This is because only such punishments could demonstrate to the adolescents that heinous actions will have consequences, and this can help to dispel any ideas of committing crimes of young people in communities. In some countries, Vietnam for example, young offenders aged below eighteen will be put on probation, even if they commit a serious crime such as murder. As a result, the number of young people who break the law in Vietnam has been increasing rapidly. Therefore, it is necessary for governments to implement a policy of zero tolerance to dangerous crimes regardless of age.

In conclusion, it seems to me that juvenile offenders who commit dangerous crimes should deserve the same treatments as adults.

Xem thêm các bài luận Tiếng Anh hay khác:

• In many countries today, if people want to find work, they have to move away from their friends and their families. Do you think the advantages of this problem outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some young people look forward to a year of travelling, a “gap year”; before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons. For others, this is an expensive waste of time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

• One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

• Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others consider they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

• People these days watch TV, films and other programmes alone rather than with other people. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

• Hơn 20.000 câu trắc nghiệm Toán,Văn, Anh lớp 9 có đáp án

---